Category Archives: Technology

Why You Need a Master Data Strategy to Properly Do Supplier Information Management

Supplier Information Management is more than just buying a Supplier Information Management (SIM) solution and plopping it into your data centre. Much more. But yet, it seems that some people — anxious to deal with the visibility, risk management, and supplier performance issues facing them — believe that merely obtaining a SIM solution will solve their problems. A proper solution properly acquired, properly implemented, and properly used will go a long way to increasing supply chain visibility, enabling risk management and mitigation, and providing a solid foundation for supplier performance management, but the mere presence of such a solution in your supply management application suite is about as useful as a drill in the hands of a carpenter holding a nail.

You see, Supplier Information will never be restricted to the SIM system. Supplier information will always be present in the ERP system used for resource planning and manufacturing, the accounts payable system, the transactional procurement / procure-to-pay system, the sourcing suite, the contract management system, the risk management solution, the performance tracking and scorecard system, the sustainability / CSR solution, and other systems employed in your organizational back-office to manage the different supply management AND business functions. Supplier data is everywhere, and without a strategy, just shoving it into the SIM system won’t help.

In order to get a proper grip on supplier information, the organization needs a master data strategy that dictates the sub-records that define a supplier record and which system holds the master data for each sub-record. What do we mean by this? For example, the ERP may hold the core supplier identifier sub-record that defines the unique supplier number in your system, the supplier name, the supplier’s tax number, and your customer number in the eyes of the supplier and be the system of record for this information. The accounts payable system, referencing the supplier by it’s supplier number, may be the system of record for the headquarters address and payment address. The contract management system may be the system of record for the list of employees authorized to sign contracts on behalf of the supplier. The CSR system may be the system of record for the suppliers’ carbon rating, third party CSR rating, and your internal sustainability rating. And so on.

If this is the case, the SIM system, to truly be a SIM solution for your organization, needs to integrate with all of these systems and encode the proper rules to resolve data conflicts as required. Specifically, three things need to happen. First of all, whenever a system of record updates data, that data must be pulled into the system and overwrite the existing data. Secondly, anytime data is updated in the SIM system for which it is the system of record, that data must be pushed out to all systems that use it. Thirdly, and this part is sometimes overlooked, whenever data is updated in a system of record, the data not only needs to be pulled into the SIM system, but it then needs to be pushed out to any system that also uses that data. The SIM solution is the centre of a hub-and-spoke data architecture — all updates flow in, and all updates flow out.

This can only be properly accomplished with an appropriate Master Data Strategy. Don’t overlook it. Otherwise your SIM solution will turn out to be a Stuck In Muck solution. An SI is not kidding about this.

How Do You Find an Innovative New Vendor? (Repost)

Last summer, Brian Sommer over on ZDNet ran a great post on how to easily identify the up and coming innovative vendors in the space. All you have to do is look at who the big established players are trash talking! After all, if the company isn’t innovative, they have nothing to fear from the competitor, and will say something like “yes they also have a solution suite that could potentially help you, but” … “they are missing these key features that we have found to be instrumental to customer success” or “we have done more implementations in your space” or “we have a more mature professional services organization” or “we fit better with the platforms and processes that you have in place” or “we are more committed to customer success” or “we have won more awards proving the maturity of our solution” and just shrug them off. But if the company is innovative and poses a real threat, they will try to trash-talk it out of your candidate pool. And they will use predictable language like “what they are offering is a cool feature, not an application” or “they’re inconsequential” or “their solution is immature and / or will never catch on“. These phrases are your first clue that this is a vendor you should be looking at. It might not be mature enough to meet all of your needs today, but maybe if you can bolt on the innovative new features they are offing to your existing ERP, you can, with a little elbow grease, extract more value and, as the company grows, be the first to take advantage of their new features and applications as an early adopter preferred customer.

And not only did Brian do a great job of pointing this out, he also created a great table that summarizes all of the common phrases an established, fairly un-innovative, company will use to trash talk an innovative startup in its infancy, a rapidly growing new competitor, and an upstart that’s all grown up now. And then, to complete the picture, he also points out what they say when the decide to acquire the grown up upstart because it has a more innovative solution.

Click on the image to be taken to the full table, and click this link to read Brian’s full post on the Software Smack Talk Playbook. It’s awesome.

The Complete Software Smack Talk Playbook

Who Is Your Vendor Really Working For?

SI has done a lot of posts on how to identify the right e-Sourcing/e-Procurement/e-Supply Chain vendor, over the years, but one question that is often overlooked, or left unstated, is “who is your vendor really working for“. You might expect, based upon their marketing and their business, that they are working for their customers who are paying them, but is this always the case?

To answer this question, we need to go back to the basics of how businesses are structured and funded.

A business is either public or private. A public business is funded entirely by revenue and has its performance judged by Shareholders and Wall Street. A private business is eventually funded by revenue but initially funded either by founders, third-party angels and/or VCs, or a private equity group. There are other business structures and funding arrangements, but these are the most common in our space. Let’s consider each of these.

Public

A public company will make an effort to work for you, but only so far as it does not hurt their Wall Street rating and does not cause the Shareholders to ask questions. They live and die by the stock price, so if the stock price falls, they will typically have to react by way of layoffs to meet whatever earnings number Wall Street has dictated, and probably layoff your account manager and the developer who was committed to your upgrades in the process. They work for you only so far as it doesn’t hurt them in the eyes of Wall Street which typically does not have the long term view you need as a Supply Manager. And while you’ll never get fired for buying from a big public company, you won’t be important to them, unless you’re a Fortune 100 and bringing them > 10% of their business. (And even then, you’re only important until they land someone bigger.)

Private – Angel & VC

Like a public company, a private company controlled by third party investors will make an effort to work for you, but only so far as it meets the objectives of the Angel and/or Venture Capitalists who are driving the board towards whatever vision for the company they believe will make them the most amount of money in the shortest time possible. And since Angels and Venture Capitalists are ultimately only concerned with the balance of their bank account, that vision will be whatever is sexy and likely to support a quick initial public offering (so they can get their return). If that means getting as many new customers in a year as possible to allow for a quick public exit, then all of the money and efforts will be directed towards sales and marketing and customer support and incremental product development and improvement will be an afterthought, if it is even given a thought at all!

Private – Founder Funded

A private company controlled by a founder, or a small group of founders, will be focussed on the objectives of the founder(s). If the goal of the founder(s) is to make money and grow the business organically, the company will have a razor-sharp focus on meeting each and every customer need that the customer is willing to pay for. If the focus of the founder(s) is to get Angel & VC funding as part of an ultimate goal to get the company to an initial public offering, because the founder(s) are vain and more concerned with public image and sex factor than quiet success, the company will work for you only so far as the founders feel it won’t make the company less attractive to the Angels & VCs that can help to take them public.

Private – Private Equity Group

A private company controlled by a private equity group will be razor-sharp focussed on the needs of the customer. Private Equity Groups exist to make money — and while they may sometimes take a company public, this is not their ultimate goal. They take a company public only when the opportunity is right and they’ve reached the point where they believe they can’t make more money growing the company organically over the long term. Generally speaking, private companies controlled by private equity groups will be boring as hell compared to the sexy companies driven by venture capitalists, but they will be the only companies that make you feel like you are the center of the business world, because, in the end, they need your money to pay the bills and keep the lights on. It’s their model, and the one model where you are always the center of attention.

So don’t forget to ask yourself “who is this vendor really working for” before signing on the dotted line. They won’t tell you (the truth), but if you look at their ownership structure (and the frequency of their press releases), you can figure it out.

As a final note, if you are still seeking spherical supply solutions (Part I, Part II, and Part III), you should take another look at the EU Supply Management software providers. Not only do they have more experience in international implementations, but most of their companies are controlled by private equity groups where as most of the North American companies are either funded by Angels and VCs or part of big public companies.

General Dynamics, Why Aren’t We On Mars Yet?

We’ve already conquered extra-planetary supply management with our ability to supply the International Space Station on a regular basis and keep our astronauts fed, which means the next challenge is for us to supply inter-planetary supply chains between Earth and Mars.

Fifty years ago today, Andrew Kalitinsky a spokesman for General Dyanmics told scientists at a two day symposium called “The Exploration of Mars”, hosted by the American Astronautical Society that a manned mission to the planet Mars could be launched in 1975 and would likely consist of a convoy of four multi-ton spaceships. (Fifty years and one day ago, one day before this announcement, NASA announced plans to send two satellites to Mars in November 1964 as the first step toward a mission.)

Since then, we’ve only successfully sent:

  • Mars 2, a Soviet probe that crashed into Mars in 1971
  • Mars 3, a Soviet probe that landed on Mars but stopped transmitting after 14.5 seconds
  • Mars 4, a Soviet orbiter that flew by the planet and sent back images and radio occultation data
  • Mars 5, a Soviet orbiter that transmitted 60 images
  • Mars 6, a Soviet fly-by / lander that failed on impact
  • Mariner 4, an American spacecraft that few past Mars on July 14, 1965
  • Mariner 6 and 7 American fly-by probes that reached Mars in 1969
  • Mariner 9, an American orbiter that was the first probe to successfully enter Martian orbit
  • Viking 1, an American orbiter/lander module that was the first spacecraft to successfully land on Mars
  • Viking 2, an American orbiter/lander module that was the second spacecraft to successfully land on Mars
  • Mars Pathfinder, an American spacecraft that landed a base station with a roving probe on Mars on July 4, 1997
  • Mars Global Surveyor, an American orbiter that entered Martian orbit on Sep 12, 1997
  • 2001 Mars Odyssey, an orbiter that reached Martian orbit in 2001
  • Mars Express, the European Space Agency’s (ESA) orbiter that reached Martian orbit on Dec 25, 2003 (giving the ESA a Merry Christmas 10 years ago)
  • Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, an American spacecraft designed to conduct reconnaissance and exploration of Mars from orbit that attained orbit on Mar 10, 2006
  • Rosetta, an ESA probe that flew within 250 km of Mars on Feb 25, 2007
  • Curiosity, the American rover that landed on Mars on August 6, 2012 (and may have spotted a Martian Lizard)

Not a single manned mission in the lot of them! And not a single planned manned mission in the next 10 years! the doctor wants to optimize those inter-planetary supply chains. GD, you’re 38 years late. Get a move on!

The Cloud is Not a Crystal Ball Either!

Despite the fact that I’ve told you that The Cloud is NOT a Fluffy Magic Box, given you More Reasons the Cloud is Not a Fluffy Magic Box, reminded you Yet Again, the Cloud is NOT a Fluffy Magic Box, told you that The Cloud is Filled with Hail, and pointed out that The Cloud is Not a Magic Mirror Nor is it Omniscient, it seems that there is a new brand of silicon snake oil salesmen who want you to believe that that the cloud is a crystal ball that you can use to talk to people everywhere in the world.

Just yesterday someone informed me that a new company is going around trying to sell a cloud business phone system.* What the heck is that? And how does it work? Do I walk outside and shout up to the sky? What if it’s a clear sunny day and there are no clouds in site? Or the middle of the night and I can’t see the clouds through the fog? And how does it handle inclement weather?

And no, the doctor is not being silly. Given that we don’t know what cloud really is**, and that, with (tele)communications, you HAVE to know the origin point AND the destination point, how the heck do you send a phone signal into the cloud and ensure it reaches the right person. Presumably it is built on dynamic, replicated, peer-to-peer IP routing, which sounds great in theory, but may not even be legal in practice considering your business might be in a locale where your phone system has to be 911 compliant. Since no one would know where the signal is coming from, this type of system would never be 911 compliant!

Basically, as I pointed out in Dogbert Translates Cloud-Consultanese, they’re pulling a Dogbert hoping to find a Pointy Haired Boss who will believe their mumbo-jumbo and buy their silicon snake oil solution at a ridiculous mark-up before anyone else in the company realizes that significant money has been wasted on betaware that’s not even as good as products you can get for free (like Skype and Google Voice, for example).

You’ve been warned!


* They didn’t tell me the name of the company, presumably to protect the guilty and give them a chance to smarten up knowing that this absurdity really grinds the doctor‘s gears and typically results in a rant.
** If Larry Ellison has to ask What the Hell is Cloud Computing, that’s telling!