Category Archives: Technology

Eight Figures for an ERP? Think again. Think Compiere.

ERP – Enterprise Resource Planning – the be-all and end-all of business software – all of your transactional data in one place – everything you need to run your business – only seven figures! That was the promise.

The reality is much different. Seven figures for the software license. Multiples of that for the installation. That much again for the annual maintenance contract. In the end, it was an eight figure system – that if you were lucky recorded the majority of your transactions, in such a way that you couldn’t derive any intelligence out of the system without buying expensive modules for each business domain that sat on top of the ERP to allow you to create your financials, run human resources, create your manufacturing plans, negotiate your contracts, etc.

And that’s if you were lucky – if you weren’t, you couldn’t afford a real ERP and had to settle for a smaller, imitation system that probably only contained some set of transactions for the business unit that maintained it, was only accessible by a few people, and didn’t even meet their needs – leading to home-grown ad-hoc systems created by mavericks in an effort to do their jobs.

Either way – you probably have a solution that does not meet your needs. A system that requires more modules or third party add-ons than you can afford to be truly effective or a system that does not have the core capabilities or third party support. But what can you do? If you haven’t fully depreciated your mainstream ERP, you can’t afford to rip-and-replace, and if you don’t have one, you just can’t afford one.

You can look to open-source! And no, I’m not stark raving mad. Once the exclusive domain of big international multi-billion dollar software vendors, even ERP is now available open source. Compiere is a fully functional open-source ERP with built-in CRM functionality that is being used today by hundreds of companies all over the world. In addition, Compiere has amassed almost 100 partners in countries all over the world – so local support is available. And because it’s open, anyone can build extension modules on top of it, and custom modules for various domains are already being offered by it’s partners. Furthermore, Compiere and some of its partners are already hosting instances on-demand. And no, I do not believe I’m insane.

If you’re not an IT company, why not host your ERP on-demand? If it’s not your core business, why maintain an expensive 24-hour IT operation with redundant power supply, internet connectivity, real-time failover, automated off-site backups, IT security experts, always available on-call tech support, etc? After all, with today’s encryption and security protocols, communication security is probably the least of your security concerns.

For those of you who are already open source converts, you might be a little disappointed that Compiere was built on Oracle, but fear not! Compiere just received a significant amount of funding, relocated to Santa Clara, is in the process of completing a Sybase port, and it’s a safe bet that a MySQL(X) port may occur in the future!  (MySQL(X) may not have the required functionality to support Compiere yet, but MySQL(X) improves every year!)

It’s a procurement professional’s dream come true. No huge up front spending for an ERP system that may or may not deliver. With Compiere on demand, you’re paying for the system and support that you use, when you use it, and you’re not locked in!

Furthermore, you just know that a complete open-source-based on-demand procurement system with Compiere at its base is around the corner. After all, Rearden Commerce is less than 30 miles away in its San Mateo offices and there are a number of e-Procurement companies, like Ketera (which was acquired by Deem in 2010) nearby.  If these three companies adapted their APIs to allow you to merge their solutions, it would not be long before you could manage 100% of your contracted materials and services procurement spend. Rearden excels at services, Ketera is good for indirect procurement, and ERP-based planning and forecasting systems are the foundation of your direct materials spending.

I know it’s just pure speculation, but if these three companies made it easy to integrate their solutions, you’d be able to run your entire procurement effort on-demand! Then you could run your entire sourcing and procurement operation on-demand! After all, with respect to a complete solution, we have only left out sourcing (remember, procurement is the acquisition phase, sourcing the predecessor negotiation phase) and visibility (since, at a high level the cycle is Source-Acquire-Monitor). But wait — companies like Iasta (acquired by Selectica, merged with b-Pack, renamed Determine, acquired by Corcentric) have been offering (complete end-to-end) sourcing suites on-demand for years and now we have companies like Apexon offering on-demand visibility solutions!

As a side note, Compiere is holding it’s annual Partner Conference next month in Santa Clara – October 20-21 at the Embassy Suites at 2885 Lakeside Drive in Santa Clara. Check out Compiere’s Events Calendar for more details.

The Unique Solution for Travel Procurement

Earlier today we discussed the unique challenges of travel procurement – a nightmare shared by your employees as well as your finance team. After all, when booking a single trip can take an hour by the time you book your flight, rental car, hotel, airport transportation, off-airport parking, and dinner reservations and when finance has to sort through (tens of) thousands of expense reports literally by hand to determine whether their preferred carrier owes them a discount, how could you call it anything but?

Last week I was fortunate enough to see the answer. It’s called the Rearden Commerce Network (rebranded Deem in 2012) For those of you who read Spend Matters regularly, you’ll probably remember Jason more-or-less gushing about them as well in posts such as “Rearden unShrugged”* where he called Rearden the future of “personal” services Spend Management for employees.

Services are tough. They’re calendar-based, time critical, and dynamically priced. There’s a reason there is no Amazon, Google, or Yahoo for services. Even the brightest software engineers cringe at the thought of trying to build a single platform to handle such a diverse array of services. But as far as I can tell, Rearden has done it. Sure the interface still looks Web 1.0, but the capabilities are Web 2.0 all the way. And when they say you can book a complete trip in 10 minutes – they mean it. I saw it – and it works! I’ll tell you one thing – from an applications perspective, few software packages on the market today impress me. Even today, I equate most software applications with undifferentiated organic fertilizer (which is probably why you hear me mention so few companies in this blog – that, or I really am another one of those arrogant PhDs). But Rearden’s solution impressed me.

If you are a mid-size or larger company with a lot of travel related spend, I can not think of a single reason why you should not be using Rearden now! When your employees who travel regularly are probably wasting up to 20% of their time on travel arrangements (instead of a more palatable 5%, or less), when you have no way of easily tracking who you are spending your travel budget on (and if you qualify for discounts) and, more importantly, no way of enforcing that employees are buying against your preferred contracts when possible and sensible when there is this easy to use system that lets your employees do almost everything they need in a one stop shopping experience, allows your finance team to figure out whom you are spending on and in what amount, and allows your procurement team to enforce flexible spending rules. It’s a great addition to your supply chain suite!

Now, I’m not entirely sure whether it will scale up in the future to support all services in a consistent, coherent manner, even though they claim the platform was built to support any service you can imagine, but it is certainly capable of supporting any T&E service you can throw at it, and this is a very significant feat from both a business and a technological perspective. I can’t wait to get some time with their senior technology guys to do a deep dive into the architecture and technology. (After all, I need to use the PhD sometime!) If it’s as impressive as the business capability, I might just be inquiring as to whether or not that Director of Applications Engineering position that they are advertising can be done remotely.

* All posts prior to 2012 were removed in the Spend Matters site refresh in June, 2023.

Apexon and Performance Visibility

I’ve been blogging a lot about visibility lately and mentioning Apexon (acquired and merged with Infostretch in 2022) rather frequently even though I’m sure most of you haven’t heard about this little company or what they do. Last week I had the opportunity to sit down with Kevin Brooks (an occasional guest blogger here on Sourcing Innovation, in other words, his commentary on The Future of Sourcing is not slated to be his last post) and discuss where Apexon was, where it was going, how Apexon goes beyond spend visibility to performance visibility, and how this will eventually translate into actionable intelligence. (A topic I’ll be diving into in the future.)

Whereas most visibility solution providers (like Zycus, Procuri TrueSource [Procuri was acquired by Ariba, which was acquired by SAP] and biq [which was acquired by Opera Solutions, which rebranded ElectrifAI]) focus on spend visibility, or the determination of how much you spend on each of your suppliers, Apexon focuses on performance visibility, or the determination of how each supplier you are spending on is performing. Spend visibility solutions slice and dice on dollars, performance visibility solutions slice and dice on performance metrics – and the good ones slice and dice on the performance metrics of your choosing .

At this point, you’re probably asking are not all visibility providers equal, since all they do is aggregate, slice, and dice raw data ? Technically, they are very similar, but functionally they are quite distinct. The difference lies in the presentation, reporting, and intelligence they provide. Spend visibility solutions are configured to slice and dice on dollars, the data they extract from your underlying systems is your transactional data, and the drill down reports they provide are all pivoted around spend. Performance visibility solutions are custom configured by you to slice and dice on the metrics you track, the data they extract is the data relevant to your metrics, and the drill down reports they provide are all pivoted around metrics. Could one system do both? Yes. Do any current systems do both well? In my view, not really. (But I’m up for a conversation and a demo if anyone disagrees with me!)

However, to truly be useful to you, a system should also provide actionable intelligence. Dashboards that tell you where you are performing well, where you are performing poorly, and provide you with alternatives to improve these poor situations. Although still a young product, with 2.5 slated for release in the near future, this is where Apexon is starting to break away from the pack. Dashboards let you view your performance relative to your key metrics, and then the system lets you drill down into the root causes of poor performance and the root enablers of good performance. Comparison reports can then be used to determine possible solutions – such as shifting supply to a better performing supplier or shifting certain components to different manufacturing lines.

If supply chain performance is a concern for you, and it should be, I’d say it’s worth checking out the solution, especially if you are a traditional manufacturer, particularly in the automotive, aerospace, defense sectors, since Apexon has a strong client base in these sectors that have helped shape the solution since day one. Furthermore, since the solution is a 100% on-demand solution through your browser, the effort required to test-drive it is minimal. The solution works on a push model – at regular intervals (which can occur as frequently or infrequently as you desire), you push updated data to it, and it slices and dices that data on your metrics to give you the intelligence you need to improve your operations.

Is it all it can be? No, I think it can improve in future versions – but more importantly, since Apexon is intent on building its roadmap from customer feedback, I think it will get there. More importantly, you don’t have a lot of choices, most are new offerings, some companies are not as eager to work with their customers to improve the solution, and visibility is an area you can not ignore. Make sure it’s on your list of candidates, and if you’re nearby, check them out at one of their upcoming executive breakfast series in Milwaukee, Chicago, and Detroit (on October 17, 18, and 19). And keep an eye on Sourcing Innovation and Spend Matters – if he’s not traveling, I’d guess that you can bank on Jason hiding out in the back row of the windy city presentation, pounding out notes on his Dell and posting them to you hot off the wire.

It’s a Green World … Unless You Live in the United States

As you know, at least once a month, I like to talk about green – green suppliers, green strategies, green best practices, and any other green you can think of that benefits your business as well as the environment. And I’m not alone. This also appears to be a favorite topic of David Bush’s over on e-Sourcing Forum [WayBackMachine] (see “Will Kermit Change His Tune”?, for example) and of Tim Minahan’s over on Supply Excellence [WayBackMachine] (see “It Ain’t Easy Being Green: Ethanol Hopes and Woes”, for example).

Today I’m going to talk not about how going green is going to help you, but how not going green is going to hurt you. Whereas the United States has decided not to ratify the Kyoto Treaty, the rest of the world appears to be embracing it not only as a requirement, but as a way of doing business.

For example, the EU is trying to stimulate green public procurement for its own institutions and governments. See a recent article on EurActiv.com aptly entitled Green Procurement. Japan’s DENSO Corporation recently announced “New Green Procurement Guidelines for Suppliers” based on DENSO’s long-term environmental policy. The Recycling Council of Alberta Business Development Committee is preparing to sponsor research on green procurement to help Canadian companies find information on green products, services, and existing green procurement policies in Canada. Even Australia, after a recent Green Procurement Audit has realized the need for a sustainability charter to drive ecologically sustainable practices.

In other words, if you’re not green, you could find yourselves with significantly fewer customers in the near future.

On the green front, I’ve collected quite a few articles of interest over the last month.

Via Technologies, a Taiwanese manufacturer of motherboards and chips, has developed a processor, the VIA C7-D, that consumes a mere 20 watts. Now, it’s true that processors do not produce CO2, but the electricity they run on is often produced by methods that do produce CO2. By decreasing processing power requirements, and by contributing to reforestation efforts to counteract the small amount of carbon dioxide that will be produced in the production of the electricity required to power the chip, as calculated by carbon footprint, Via Technologies has taken another step towards making computing greener.

Cellex Power, General Hydrogen, and Ballard have teamed up to produce The hydrogen powered fork lift that runs on hydrogen rather than lead acid batteries. As the article says, it’s not glamorous … but considering how many forklifts there are out there, it’s significant.

Florida is building a $425 million facility that will use lightning-like plasma arcs to turn trash into gas and rock-like material. The gas will be used to run turbines and produce electricity, of which a third will be used to sustain the plant and the rest will be put back on the grid, and the material that results from the melted organic matter will be hardened into slag and used in road and construction projects.

Carbon Fiber, five times stronger and two times as stiff as steel, despite being lighter than steel, is now being used by a number of major manufacturers, including BMW. This allows for a significant increase in fuel efficiency in vehicles that require conventional fuel.

Germany recently dedicated the Gut Erlasse Solar Park, a 12-megawatt facility located near the Bavarian town of Arnstein that holds the distinction of the World’s Largest Solar Power Plant.

A number of fiber and fabric firms are launching green products, as described in this recent Apparel Magazine article. For example, Unifi has launched a polyester yarn made of 100% recycled materials, DuPont Sorona has undertaken an initiative to insure that at least 25% of its revenues come from products made of non-depletable resources, and Sole Custom Footbeds is using corn-based material in its NatureWorks PLA plastic packaging which will decompose naturally with no negative environmental impact.

Finally, GE and mtvU are sponsoring the Ecomagination Challenge where they are asking individuals and teams of college students from around the country to submit innovative, groundbreaking ideas for projects that would make their schools more environmentally responsible. The school with the best idea gets a 25K grant to bring the plan to life as well as an mtvU concert on campus.

Coupa Charges Ahead!

Yesterday I was fortunate enough to have a long chat with Dave Stephens, fellow blogger (Procurement Central, [WayBackMachine]) and founder of Coupa. We talked about a number of topics (and I’ll post more when I get the chance), including what Coupa is focusing on for their next enterprise release as they slowly grow (and set up shop in their new offices in Foster City, California).

Besides a lot of minor updates (which appear in both the open source and enterprise version), to appease the open source community at large (like better sorting and slicker interfaces), they are making improvements in three key areas – administration (much easier to use), buying templates and (visual) form construction (enterprise-only), and budget-based procurement (enterprise only) – probably the first “killer-app” for Coupa.

One of the problems with most approval-based eProcurement systems is that they don’t take budgets into account – which is very important not just in a budget-based shop where the approver would first have to log into another system to see how approving a large requisition would affect his budget, but in any business as a manager needs to see how an approval affects not only the total budget, but her unit’s spending to date. After all, you don’t want to overspend your (share of the) budget without a good reason, and you want to make sure that non-priority purchases are only made if it makes fiscal sense.

I was fortunate enough to see the work in progress on the enterprise edition, and it’s looking really good. The admin functionality, and functionality in general, has advanced nicely since 0.1 (and to some degree, since 0.2) and the form-based templates, definable and customizable at will by the system administrators, will give Coupa a great boost as it will now be perfectly suited for not only your office supplies, spot buys, and other odds-and-ends MRO spend, but also for your services spend as well. One-time legal services or consulting project spend, special advertising, promotional, or print spend, and other odd purchases (such as visa or passport application fees) will now all be able to be processed through the same system. This is VERY SIGNIFICANT. After all, Aberdeen has found that MRO is 26% of the total spend of a company (on average), and can be as high as 63%! Even if you’re not able to negotiate significant savings into your contracts, the presence alone of an eProcurement system, like Coupa, will save you bundles of cash since you’ll be able to virtually eliminate maverick spending with the built in compliance – one of the most significant costs to your organization!

I’ll post more later when I have the time, including some of the benefits of their forward thinking architectural choices, but for now, I suggest you download it and check it out. It might still be a pre-release, but there’s enough there to start giving it serious consideration – after all, it’s the early supporters and adopters that will get to guide its development over the next year or two, since open source projects build their roadmap based on customer feedback, not what an arbitrary executive or investor thinks is the right solution for the marketplace. Plus, they have documentation now!