Category Archives: Services

SpendKey: Your Solution-Oriented Key to Spend Insights

Preamble:

As the doctor wrote on Spend Matters back in November of 2021, shortly after SpendKey‘s initial release, SpendKey was formed in 2020 by a senior team of Procurement and Spend Analysis professionals with experience at big consultancies (Deloitte, E&Y, etc.), big companies (Thomas Cook, Marks and Spencer, etc. ), big banks and Finance Institutions (Barclays, London Stock Exchange, etc.), and Managed Service Providers (Cloudaeon, Zensar Technologies, etc.) who identified a market need for faster, more accurate data processing and better analytics across the board as well as better expert advice and guidance to accompany those analytics to help companies make quick and optimal decisions to get on the right track the first time around.

After less than a year and a half of development, their initial service-based offering was already sufficient for turn-key consultant led projects and their roadmap had them on track for a completely stand-alone SaaS offering by 2023, which they delivered to the market last year.

So where are they now and what do they do? That’s what we’ll dive into in this article.

Introduction:

SpendKey has evolved from a dashboard driven spend analysis solution to a comprehensive spend, contract tracking and decision intelligence platform with a mission to provide deep insight for sourcing and procurement.

SpendKey‘s unique selling proposition is its ability to index every part, product, services and vendor with context. The product ontology and interoperability creates relationships with any attribute; providing end-to-end visibility; and a data foundation for autonomous workflows (on the roadmap), which can currently be used to power a client’s existing stack.

The SpendKey platform supports the creation of customized reports tailored to client-specific requirements. With a wide array of out-of-the-box dynamic dashboards, SpendKey offers standard insights into spend across categories and suppliers. These dashboards are augmented with advanced analysis tools like ABC analysis, trend analysis, Pareto analysis, Inside/Outside evaluations, order-to-actual correlations, and what-if scenarios, delivering a full-spectrum view of spending.

In addition to its customizable options, SpendKey provides a variety of standard reports to analyse spend, costs, goods, services, and information flows. The platform includes pre-defined reports that cover essential areas of spend analysis with customization for every client need.

SpendKey’s reporting suite has been expanded to include contract reports, budgeting reports, and dynamic MIS reports, offering a comprehensive toolkit for monitoring and optimising spend.
These tools were designed by procurement experts with decades of experience in spend analysis, ensuring that organizations can identify opportunities to not only reduce costs but also enhance overall efficiency and profitability.

SpendKey has an advanced spend-intake process that maps all of an organisation’s spend to any taxonomy (which can be theirs, yours, or a hybrid) using a multi-stage hybrid mapping process that uses known mappings, AI, human corrections, and overrides that feedback into the next mapping cycle. Once the client has worked with SpendKey to do the initial spend upload and mapping, the client can subscribe to incremental updates (that will be handled fully by SpendKey) or do self-serve via file-based incremental uploads.

So, if you read the initial analysis, what’s new?

  • improved data intake pipeline (which increases auto-mapping completeness and shortens the intake cycle)
  • project tracking
  • budget approvals
  • document analytics (and contract tracking)
  • commitments, budgets, and actuals comparison capability
  • ability to index parts, products, and services
  • line item auditability and more security controls
  • more spend sources
  • new dashboards

And what hasn’t changed (much)?

  • still no DIY (do-it-yourself) report builder
  • limited mapping audit access through the front end

And we’ll talk about each of these in turn.

Data Intake Pipeline

The data-intake pipeline is multi-step and works something like this:

1. Upload a raw data file in CSV or Excel or integrate via API

2. Validate the file against column descriptions, data formats, and language requirements (auto-translating to English if required) and apply any necessary transformations and cleansings to create records for classifications.

3. Run the current corpus of mapping rules.

3a. Push the mapped data into the live spend database.

3b. Package the unmapped transactions for web-processing.

4. Extract the supplier, product, and related information and use web-scraping (including Gen-AI models) to extract supplier and line of business information that can be used for classification.

5. Create suggested mappings where there is sufficient confidence for a human to review.

6. Push the verified mappings into the mapping rules and then retrain the machine learning on the new corpus of mapping rules to map the remaining unmapped spend and push through anything with sufficient confidence to the live system, having a human deal with the rest (or push it to an unclassified bucket).

By using multiple techniques, they are able to get to a high accuracy very quickly and turn around the client’s spend cube rather quickly compared to most consultancies using traditional methodologies. For even their largest clients, they are typically live with high mapping accuracy within 10 days.

Project Tracking

When an analyst or buyer identifies a potential savings project, they can record their find/proposal in the tool, get approval, track status, and keep stakeholders informed. All they need to do to define a project (for tracking) is to define the item or category, supplier(s), aggregated spend amount, project period, project type, and expected savings. They can add custom organizational tags or note key stakeholders if required, and then send it off for approval. Once approved, they just have to update the status and savings-to-date on a regular basis until the project is complete.

It’s not meant to be a project management tool, since most of the projects will be sourcing, procurement, contract, or other events or processes managed by other tools, just a tracking tool to track usage of the platform as well as approvals on projects before buyers or analysts go off on their own savings goose chases.

Budget and Forecasting Management

Budgeting and forecasting are pivotal components of financial management that empower businesses to plan, manage resources effectively, and navigate toward strategic goals. SpendKey platform offers advanced budgeting and forecasting tools for the financial year ahead. With predefined templates for easy budget setup, bulk data upload and download capabilities, and the option to assign specific budgets to each supplier.

SpendKey’s budget management module has specific processes for classification and mapping of the budget and spend data, aligning budget allocations with actual spend patterns. It empowers users with advanced budgeting and forecasting functionalities. With comprehensive reports, a user-friendly interface, and the ability to create, manage, and analyse budgets, users can make well-informed financial decisions. SpendKey enables users to optimise their budget allocations, monitor variances, and gain valuable insights for successful investment strategies.

Document Analytics

Spend Under Management is one of the ultimate keys to Procurement success, and this often requires a lot of Spend Under Contract to ensure supply and mitigate risk. This requires understanding the spend under contract, which requires that the contract meta data be stored in the system. As well as contract prices (to track agreed upon to invoiced to paid).

But no one wants to enter meta-data, so they built a machine learning and document analytics application that can automatically parse documents, identify key meta data, extract price tables, and present it to a human for final verification before the data is stored in the system.

The analytics can also be used on POs and invoices for verification purposes, and the user can decide whether or not to store that data in the system (or associated it with contracts).

More Spend Sources

Not only do they now support contract meta-data and contracted prices, but they also support the upload of asset-based data (for an organization to analyze the current and future value of organizational assets), payroll data (since that’s a significant amount of organizational spend), contingent workforce management data (to track services / contingent worker spend), and PO data in addition to AP data (which is the typical data source analyzed by simple “analytics” applications). In addition, if available, they will also load ESG Ranking data.

Their goal is to allow a complete understanding of organizational spend from budget to commitment to ordered to received to paid to projection using both standard cash views as well as amortization, accrual, and projected spend views.

New Dashboards

There are a slew of new dashboards, which include, but are not limited to:

  • Incliner/Decliner: highlights suppliers with increased or decreased spend compared to a user defined period
  • Contract Overview: provides analytics on different type of contract documents types, their expiry date, contract length
  • Contract Details: navigate and review the summary of data for each contract and the ability to view the respective contract
  • End-to-End Visibility: connects data from spend, contract, budget and other systems to provide end to end visibility e.g. spend vs budget vs contracted spend
  • ESG Summary: provides insights ESG score by suppliers and their relevant spend, including average ESG rating by industry and analytics on performance on each of the E, S and G areas
  • ESG Supplier Ranking: provides insights into ESG ranking for each individual supplier
  • Budget Overview: provides an overview of budget allocation and spending trends, highlighting key variances between actual spend and budget across different suppliers and categories.
  • Budget by Category: shows Budget by Category breakdown, displaying spend, budget, and variances across different levels of categories and suppliers
  • Budget by Suppliers: highlights spend, budget, and variance for key suppliers, along with an overall budget variance by category
  • Budget Distribution: shows the distribution of spend, budget, and variance across different transaction brackets, along with the corresponding transaction counts
  • Budget Detail: details supplier-specific budget, spend, and variance, including non-PO spend and transaction counts
  • Supplier Reclassification: allows you to reclassify supplier spend into a different taxonomy
  • Supplier Fragmentation: allows you to to track the number of suppliers in any category or subcategory
  • Key Insights: presents key spend insights, highlighting potential savings, category spend, new suppliers, and contract renewal dates

Add these to the existing dashboards that include, but are not limited to:

  • Main Dashboard : provides an overview of the spend across all categories of spend
  • Category Breakdown : enables the user to drill deep into any category and sub-category of spend to get deeper insights
  • Contract Kanban View : summarizes contract expiry in a kanban view to help identify contracts and suppliers to prioritise for renegotiations
  • MIS Dashboard: provides the user the ability to create their own pivot style report by connecting different data sets to generate views that were not available before
  • PO vs Non PO Analysis : provides an overview of spend compliant with purchase orders
  • Reseller Insights : provides insights to understand purchase of products from resellers
  • Savings Opportunity : provides ability to get a quick high level business case on potential savings based on certain user defined parameters.
  • Spend Summary : provides a narrative on the spend
  • Spend By Country : provides a summary of spend by different geographies and the ability to drill further by country
  • Spend Distribution : provides insights on spend by different transaction brackets to help identify low value low risk spend and suppliers
  • Spend Detail : provides view of the raw data and the enrichment from SpendKey to this raw data at the individual transaction level
  • Spend by Category : provides insights for each category and the relevant sub-categories based on the defined taxonomy tree
  • Supplier Hierarchy : provides insights at supplier level to help understand the parent and all the relevant child entities under that parent
  • Supplier Performance : provides a summary on the reduction in supplier count post data cleansing and supplier normalization
  • Supplier Segmentation : provides the ability to segment or tag a supplier based on user preferences
  • Tail Spend : provides insights and summary into tail spend (bottom 20% to 40% of the spend)
  • What-If : gives the user the ability to try different permutations and combinations of parts/products/services to understand potential savings opportunities
  • IT OPEX Budget : provides the user with the ability to view budget at supplier level or by category or cost centre, material code, etc.
  • Set Budget : provides ability to a user to set and define budget for a user-defined period
  • Forex Rate : gives the user option to set the FX rates for various currencies for a defined date range / period to enable the platform to convert all transactions into the base currency based on your company’s defined FX rates
  • Key Management : this provides the user with the ability to set distribution keys for spend allocation to business units, departments, functions etc. to help calculate recharge
  • Project Tracker : provides the ability to the user to create projects such as savings initiatives and track them in the tool. Also provides a workflow for approval of project milestones such as delivering on your savings targets.
  • User Management : allows the administrator to add new users and define their access control

And it’s a fairly extensive offering for an organization looking for a services-oriented solution to give them insights out of the box.

No DIY Report Builder

Now, companies looking for a services-oriented spend analysis solution aren’t looking for DIY initially, but as they mature in spend analysis, they will likely want the ability to modify the dashboards and reports on their own, which is baseline DIY. As they continue to mature, a few organizations will eventually want to start building their own reports and views, so it’s important that DIY is on the roadmap for an organization looking to mature in their analytics capability over time.

Limited Mapping Audit Access through the Front End

In the backend, they keep a complete audit trail of how and why every transaction was mapped where it was mapped. In the front end every single edit and amend that is made by a user is logged, along with supported commentary by the user. However, when a user goes to edit and amend a mapping in the front end, she doesn’t know if a transaction was initially mapped by rule, SpendKey‘s home-grown self-trained AI, or Gen-AI, and whether or not there was ever a human in the loop.

It’s critical that this data be pushed through to the front end because, among other things,

  1. there will always be someone who questions a mapping,
  2. when that happens, you need to know how it was mapped, and
  3. you need to know the ratio of human vs AI mapping in a category for confidence.

As of now, users can reclassify transactions within the tool, so if there is an error, they can push that to the admin or a “parking lot” for review, where, if the admin agrees, it can be pushed straight to the back end.

Showing who, or what, (initially) mapped the data, and why, in the front end is on the roadmap, and hopefully it appears sooner than later.

Summary

All-in-all, SpendKey is definitely a solution you should be looking at if you are a mid-market (plus) in the UK/Western Europe looking for a services-oriented spend analysis solution to help you analyze your spending and come up with strategies to get it under control.

Affordable RFPs – The Real Reason(s) They Are So Rare, Part 2

Three articles ago, we noted that The Key to Procurement Software Selection Success: Affordable RFPs! was critical to getting the right technology to help manage your complex supply chain. This was because a proper RFP required a LOT of understanding to get it right, which we covered in detail in that article and summarized in Part 1. Then, two articles ago, we noted that we know all too well that most of you are asking Affordable RFPs — What Are Those? because you’ve never seen one. So in Part 1, after reviewing the requirements of a good RFP, and pointing out why you weren’t likely to get an affordable RFP from the majority of consultancies, we told you that they were still the answer because

  1. they could be affordable if Niche Consultancies stopped thinking like consultants
    and started thinking like enhanced product-and-data-based SaaS Management Providers,
  2. they only require knowledge management and expert augmentation to get it right, and
  3. if a consultancy understood this and was willing to make the necessary investment, they could quickly become a market leader.

Today we’ll explain what that means. We’ll start with the 10 types of understanding we outlined in our first article on The Key to Procurement Software Selection Success: Affordable RFPs!.

  • Procurement Maturity: the consultancy needs a maturity matrix, along with key capabilities at each level, key questions that need to be asked, and follow on questions (and contextual knowledge) to elicit the right details
  • Process Maturity: the consultancy needs a process progression flow to pinpoint where an organization is in each process, both from a human viewpoint and a technology enablement viewpoint
  • (Critical) Use Cases: not just from a standard “procurement” (“sourcing”, “supply chain”, etc.) point of view, but from an industry point of view; the consultancy needs a large library of standard (critical) use cases to build on
  • Current Technical Maturity: not just from an organizational point of view, but based on the progression of technology in a typical enterprise organization (which, of course, requires a knowledge of the history of tech to the present day along with progression flows along architecture, standards, models, etc. )
  • Missing Capabilities: based on the process and tech maturity, but also based on industry peers and leading solutions; requires all of the above AND all of the below
  • Key Solution Types to Address the Gap(s): knowledge of the standard modular / best of breed offerings in the space and related spaces, as well as knowledge of the standard must have, should have, and nice to have capabilities of each solution type, as well as the progression of technical maturity in each area; a rather extensive knowledge base will be required
  • Key Existing Solutions to Maintain: knowledge of the core, should have, and nice to have requirements of foundational ERP/MRP solutions and companion solutions in inventory, logistics, etc. (to make sure the S2P+ solutions will be enough to go to market for or if other modules / systems [and RFPs] will be needed); a more extensive database
  • Globalization Requirements: knowledge of what the e-procurement requirements are in each country the organization does business in, what languages will be absolutely necessary, what currencies will need to be supported, what government regulations there are for the products/services being sourced/sold, what industry regulations/standards need to be supported etc; internal databases or appropriate database subscriptions will be required
  • Service Requirements: knowledge of what requirements are needed for implementation, data migration, integrations, and maintenance; and how to judge if a vendor / service provider is up to the task
  • Unique Organizational Requirements: knowledge of industries and what differentiates them from a process requirement and solution requirement standpoint; detailed, but yet curtailed, knowledge in an internal database that matrixes this by industry, process, and technology solution

In other words, it means a LOT of detailed models, knowledge bases, and standard progressions as well as a lot of detailed knowledge on:

  • metrics where most organizations lie on the maturity curve(s)
  • vendors, what modules they offer, and how they stack up
  • once all of the above is racked, stacked, and mapped, what the core questions are
  • etc.

And that, of course, requires the consultancy to step up and

  • make some up-front and ongoing investments to build these knowledge bases that will
  • allow their intermediate associates to do the baseline work and
  • enable their experts to come in and finish it up in a fraction of the time compared to if they had to do most of the work themselves (i.e. 1/5 to 1/4).

This will allow most of the work to be done by the intermediate resources at a lower day rate, who will be more efficient with a knowledge base to build on, and then the expert to come in and review the work, identify the areas of weakness, and take it the last mile.

And a consultancy who saw that and made the investments could scale up their operation by allowing their top resources to be four times as productive and support four times as many customers (as well as supporting their customers through the implementation in the project, change management, data migration, and assurance roles. (We only said that they had to be vendor neutral, and not be an implementation provider for the vendor’s software. Everything else is process or organization centric, and as the experts, that’s the work they should be doing, and the most valuable work to be done.)

Again, Affordable RFPs are the answer and maybe someday we’ll see a herd of those mythical unicorns.

Affordable RFPs – The Real Reason(s) They Are So Rare, Part 1

Two articles ago, we noted that The Key to Procurement Software Selection Success: Affordable RFPs! was critical to getting the right technology to help manage your complex supply chain. This was because a proper RFP required a LOT of understanding to get it right, including, but not limited to:

  • Procurement Maturity
  • Process Maturity
  • (Critical) Use Cases
  • Current Technical Maturity
  • Missing Capabilities
  • Key Solution Types to Address the Gap(s)
  • Key Existing Solutions to Maintain
  • Globalization Requirements
  • Service Requirements
  • Unique Organizational Requirements (less than you think, but those that exist are situation critical)

And this required a breadth of understanding across

  • the market
  • process evolution
  • use case specification
  • … including what must be technology backed
  • … and what should be technology or data enhanced
  • common module/solution types that mind the gap
  • internal foundations
  • the unique requirements, regulations, and resignations of each country you do business in
  • the services your team, and current partners, can and can’t do — even service specializations you didn’t know exist
  • what other organizations do

And most of this you won’t have in house. So you need Affordable RFPs. But we know all too well that you are all asking Affordable RFPs — What Are Those? because, as far as you know, they don’t seem to exist. And we hear you, because they rarely exist at mid-sized and larger consultancies  (because only a select few from their talent pool can do it efficiently and relatively cost-effectively and those resources with deep experience are going to be dedicated to any F500/G3000 that can afford to pay the A rates to keep them as a dedicated advisor), and unless you are a larger mid-size buying a mini-suite, they don’t even exist at the Niche Consultancies where they should be common.

We also spent a fair amount of time explaining why they don’t exist, even though one would think that they should be readily available at the niche consultancies (as this could not only make those niche consultancies true leaders in Procurement but also help them grow). In this last case, it was because it was typically only their senior resources that could do these projects, and since these projects aren’t currently quick to complete, it doesn’t take long for a senior resource day rate to add up. And, as we noted before, while this won’t be that much when you are larger mid-sized organization looking for a mini-suite or suite, if you’re just looking for one or two modules to fill a gap, this could add up to quite a bit.

So if this is the case, why are we telling you that Affordable RFPs are the answer if they’re almost impossible to find?

Because:

  1. they are the answer,
  2. they would be affordable at Niche Consultancies if those niche consultancies stopped thinking like consultants and started thinking like enhanced product-and-data-based SaaS Management Providers, and
  3. they only require knowledge management and expert augmentation to get it right.

So what would a Niche Consultancy have to do to get it right?

We’ll outline that in our next part. But it starts with investment. (And how many partners at consultancies want to invest their money? They were brought up on the Wall Street Mantra — Other People’s Money.)

 

Affordable RFPs — What Are Those?

A couple of weeks ago we penned an article on The Key to Procurement Software Selection Success: Affordable RFPs!. This resonated with those of you wanting to improve your Procurement operations who were willing to admit that you could use the help, but it also left you with one big question: where to find these affordable RFPs?

And the doctor hears you on this. You can’t just go to any old consulting firm and get an affordable RFP. Most of you have encountered high price tags, whether you went to a Big X, mid-size consulting company, or even a niche specialist. And you’re probably wondering why. Well, first you need to understand the following.

1. The Big X.

There are a number of reasons you’ll RARELY get an affordable RFP from a Big X.

  • their modus operandi is to get their people embedded on your projects and keep them there for as long as possible at 3X to 5X+ their hourly rate, they are service firms with a large number of people to keep employed (and they need to invest in employing those people, and, to be honest, trying to streamline RFP processes across every type of software imaginable is just unreasonable for any company to do, so why should we expect it)
  • they have agreements with a number of big suite vendors where they are a preferred implementation partner (and not only do they get a big referral check in addition to YOUR implementation fees which makes finance happy, if they don’t bring enough clients, they could lose that partnership and the deep insight it gives them into the partner, which is key to them being able to bring value to the implementation — see when should you use a Big X?
  • they’ll put a senior resource / junior partner as lead, but you’ll hardly ever see that person, instead, most of the work will be done by a team of inexperienced recent hires, usually recent graduates, who will, unfortunately, even with a good playbook, rack up the hours just trying to get the basics right as they get the experience needed to be more effective (mainly because this senior resource / junior partner will also be attached to many other projects so that they can close the deals, leaving the team without a lot of senior guidance)

2. The mid-size consultancies.

While it is sometimes possible to get an affordable RFP from a mid-size consultancy, the reality is that it’s a rare occurrence (and your odds are about the same as achieving success with an average technology project which, as per Gartner, is less than 1 in 5, largely because they are never scoped and planned right, starting with the RFP), and most of you never will. As with the Big X, there are a number of reasons you’ll RARELY get an affordable RFP from a mid-size consultancy.

  • like the Big X, they want to get projects that keep their people busy (usually at more reasonable 3X to 4X resource hourly rates) as they want to grow, and this leaves little time for trying to streamline RFP creation methodologies which is possible if they are sticking to a niche with only a few, and maybe a few dozen, different solution modules that would be relevant (and, in their quest to grow, they can totally miss the big picture that it is delivered value that wins repeat business)
  • while they are willing and able to be more impartial than the Big X (who need to keep their partners happy to get the insight and training they need to deliver unparalleled value), they have a few partners they prefer to direct any RFPs (and awards) to as they know the systems well (and can get the implementation work), those resources get it done fast, and it keeps them front and center with the vendors who need to direct implementation work to a third party
  • they can’t afford benchers, so their recent grads are not only the top of their class who have shown aptitude for their domain, but they are balanced by intermediate personnel on the projects who can guide them and there’s usually always at least one senior person, but only the senior people can do the RFPs well enough on their own, so the day rates are almost as high as a Big X as the RFPs tend to be mostly senior and intermediate personnel

3. The niche consultancies.

The niche consultancies are your best bet of getting an affordable RFP, but the reality is that it’s still, unfortunately, hit and miss and it’s likely that less than 1 in 3 of you will see a decent rate when all is said and done (where we measure RFP spend against total system spend over five years and try to maintain the right ratio).

This is despite the facts that:

  • unlike the Big X and mid-size consultancies, they have lower overheads and can keep their bill rates in the 2.5X to 3X range (enough to cover their resources’ hourly rate, overhead, and a fair profit margin)
  • even if they have partnerships with a vendor or three, they tend not to favoured by the vendors who will never direct work to them (and only allow them to implement deals they bring) due to their small size and inability to rapidly scale up (like a Big X or mid-size), which means their bias towards any vendor, if it exists, is quite limited
  • they don’t have junior people, because they can’t afford benchers and resources that don’t deliver with their cost model, and only hire (high-achieving) intermediate and senior personnel, and focus primarily on those who can do small projects entirely on their own or with limited support

When you look at this, you should be able to get a lot of value for a reasonable amount of money. And, make no mistake, you do get value for money.

However, when you look at the total system cost that you can afford as a (smaller) midsize company, and then you look at the cost of getting that good RFP, the problem is that the cost of the RFP is more than you can afford (and should be spending relative to the annual cost of the specialized system you are likely to buy). This means that you end up having to cut corners on the software (and get less from a preferred vendor or go with a more cost effective runner up) or forego more than a modicum of help from the consultancy (where you just get a few advisory days and hope your team to can capture enough of the brain-dump to put together something reasonable).

Even though this shouldn’t be the case.

So why are most niche consultancy RFPs not affordable (unless you are acquiring a mini-suite or significant advanced functionality that comes with a significant price tag and are a larger mid-size with the budget for it) when they could easily pick a focus area and make it so?   And for that matter, why aren’t the razor focused mid-sized consultancies more affordable when they could do the same?  After all, it’s only the Big X where the investment would be unjustified compared to the return, and, to be honest, you are going to them for enterprise systems that cost nine (9), if not ten (10), figures, so you should be expecting to pay high six figures for a good RFP in that situation!   (See when you should use a Big X!)

We’ll get to that in our next installment.

Let the Bloodbath Continue!

Note the Sourcing Innovation Editorial Disclaimers and note this is a very opinionated rant!  Your mileage will vary!  (And not about any firm in particular.)

In a recent LinkedIn post, THE PROPHET tells us there is a Consulting Bloodbath starting, especially in the Big 5 (and their strategy firms). All the doctor can say to this is Good Riddance! and It would be even better if they battled it out Gladiator style! (After all, it’s been 28 years since American Gladiators ended, time for a rebrand and a relaunch with a little bit of MXC, which ended 17 years ago.) But we’re getting ahead of ourselves here …

Basically, according to THE PROPHET, firms are worried about the economy and growth headwinds ahead (this is also why investors have yanked money from equities and lessor-rated debt in recent weeks), and this includes tech/dev teams within consulting firms. In some cases lucky consultants are put on the bench and told they have six or nine months to find their next gig, and in others (and maybe the doctor is reading a bit between the lines here) they received their pink slips faster than they could say please Jack Robinson.

The bit about tech/dev teams makes the doctor happy because,

  • these are not tech firms, and they are selling modern analytics/automation/AI solutions they often have no business selling (and no real capability to deliver at even an average level unless they recently acquired a firm that does — remember what they initially got big doing, that is what they do better than anyone else)
  • they are not structured for proper SaaS development and deployment and are NOT SaaS enterprises
  • most of the “talent” they are using are not “top” talent, and if if they are “top” of their class when they are hired, they still need mentorship and experience to become “top” talent, mentorship and experience they are NOT going to get a lot of at a Big X until they start climbing the ranks (as there are too many hires each year for one-on-one mentorships to be practical, it’s usually one mentor per team)
  • the Big X cost structures are too high for mass market penetration; only the F500 / G3000 can afford them, but they still shouldn’t be using them automatically because overpaying for anything that can be commoditized by a SaaS or servifes vendor doesn’t deliver the value they need in inflationary times where supply chains are breaking daily (and instead the Big X should be used for where they deliver the best value — see when should you use a Big X)

And before you chastise me from apparently taking pleasure in people getting fired, think it through! If you do you will realize

  • the true “top” talent is going to end up at appropriate SaaS/Tech companies (or SaaS+IP powered niche automated services consultancies where their true talent/drive really is) where they can get the mentorship they need to grow and reach their full potential (and possibly rejoin a Big X later, either by choice or through acquisition0 because
  • Big X being forced to pull out of (chasing) inappropriate custom SaaS/tech deals/engagements will open up the market back up for those companies that are well positioned, who can start growing and pick up this top talent, and, moreover, give Big X a chance to focus on where they offer the greatest value, can easily guarantee a return on a high dollar investment, satisfy the customer on the first project, and get repeat business for life (see when should you use Big X)
  • the “talent” that is not ready for the tech market will either go back to school or find their true calling (before going down a path where they will eventually get overwhelmed, be unhappy, or both; we can’t have the next generation burn-out in first world countries where a very significant portion of the aging population will not be of working age in the very near future)

Plus, shift happens! (How many of us have been restructured, rightsized, or outsized from a job by financiers and lawyers who think they can run a complex enterprise from a balance sheet or understand advanced technology and engineering when they can barely gas up the Jaguars and Mercedes they drive to work everyday?*) Furthermore, given that the average life expectancy at a job these days is 4 years, this talent might as well learn about, and get used to it, now when parts of the economy will be rebounding (and they have opportunity ahead of them), versus getting their @ss3s unceremoniously throw to the curb next time the market drops.

And if, for some reason, a Big X Consultancy (which did not start in tech but in accounting/tax, operations, strategy, etc.) is where they belong, then let them prove it in a battle royale! Forget about sitting on the bench waiting and hoping to get invited to a sales call where they can sell a project to work on, put them in the Arena! When a Fortune 500/Global 3000 needs a consultancy, force them to make their selection in the arena where the consultant leads will battle it out modern gladiator style! Not just a Dragon’s Den pitch, they have to battle it out to even get the opportunity to pitch — prove they’ll do whatever it takes to deliver value at the hourly rates their employer is charging!  (Yes, we’re kind of joking here, but if it is where they belong, they should have no problem proving their worth!)

Thoughts?

 

* If the apocalypse is nigh it is largely because some rich benefactors, not even involved in the day to day running of the company, and likely never involved with the company at all, looked at their spreadsheet models and forced the engineers who actually know how to build things out of the C-suite, allowed Gen-AI to tell them how to do technical jobs, and then elected populist pinheads as Prime Ministers and Presidents to tell them balance-sheet management is okay. And let’s not forget that, as per the OECD PISA data, statistically most of them shouldn’t even be able to do high school math competently!