Category Archives: Technology

There is no ONE platform!

As much as we would like to realize the dream of one platform for Supply Management, it’s not going to happen — at least not within our professional lifetime. The internet, and software development, might be moving in cat years, but let’s face it, it’s been 90 cat years since true first generation strategic sourcing, e-Procurement, and other fledgling Supply Management products hit the scene and we still don’t have a single end-to-end strategic source to pay platform! (Yes, there are source-to-pay platforms, and some are rather good, but there is not one that is not missing some key piece of functionality for strategic sourcing, such as optimization or advanced analytics, or for e-Procurement, such as e-Invoicing and automated m-way match.)

But what can we expect, with the exception of a handful of organizations (that can be counted on your fingers, minus your thumbs), we haven’t even reached the era of one ERP. Larry had a dream, but outside of Oracle, I believe the number of global organizations that successfully migrated their international operations to one global (Oracle) ERP instance is 5 (and that’s why the vision of one platform went away and Oracle acquired so many other leading ERP platforms, leaving only its rival SAP standing at the end of the day once the acquisitions on both side are tallied up.)

We have the situation that no one vendor, and this includes SAP, Oracle, and IBM even after their string of acquisitions over the last 90 cat years, has a platform that fully addresses basic Sourcing, Procurement, and Logistics, and once you start factoring in CLM, SRM, Sustainability, Talent Management, and Innovation Management needs, nothing comes close, or will come close, for at least another 60 cat years at the current development pace. In addition, with the constant pace of innovation in terms of process, and the constant shift both towards globalization and specialization, nothing may ever come close.

Sauron may have forged the one ring, but not even the almighty Google will forge the one platform. So you have to stop focussing on finding the right vendor and shift to finding the right platforms to serve your Supply Management needs. To do this, you have to first ask, what is the workflow?

Even though the organization may have different processes and procedures for T&E, P-Card, indirect, and direct purchases, depending on category, department, amount, and budget owner, there is still one (mega) process that is followed.

There will be a needs identification followed by an identification of whether or not an inventory, contract or preferred vendor exists to fill that needed followed by a determination of whether an event is needed or not, followed by the determination if a requisition is needed, followed by an order (which may or may not require a purchase order) followed by goods delivery and an invoice, followed by acknowledgement and inventory, followed by determination of an approval process, followed by an approval process for the invoice, followed by a payment, followed by data capture and archival in the right systems. There is a mega-flowchart that defines the mega-workflow that is defined by everything the organization needs to directly and indirectly support the process that defines system needs and integration needs.

The answer is to identify one or more minimal set of overlapping platforms that fulfill the workflow needs, integrate with the underlying ERP and / or (Master) Data Management (MDM) systems, and, directly or indirectly (through the underlying systems) integrate with each other. Once these system sets are identified, one works with the vendors that best meet the organization’s overall needs and implement the systems that accomplish the workflow. That’s how progress is made. Nothing is gained by seeking out the one platform. It is a myth, and a myth that destroys organizational progress and productivity.

Freightos: Flippin’ Freight Quotes Faster than a Fleet-Footed Feline on Guarana

A couple of years ago we introduced you to Freightos in our post on how they were helping to bring freight into the modern era. Even today, when we are over half-way through the teens, many Procurement professionals, when they call up a forwarder for a spot quote, still have to wait two or three (or even eight) days for a response. It’s absurd. (See this hilarious video on The Great Freight Experiment.) And when the buyer has to get a shipment from Shanghai to San Francisco, which requires a truck, ocean freight, and another truck or a truck, air freight, and another truck, it’s a nightmare waiting for all the quotes to come in.

Freightos was founded to deal with this problem. In order to address this problem and speed up the freight quote time, on or off contract, in the global market place, Freightos was built as a technology platform that enables an on-line network of global freight forwarders to provide instant spot-rate and on-contract quotes for point-to-point global shipments when a (potential) customer needs them.

When a forwarder, or freight-forwarder / 3PL, signed up for the Freightos network, and uploaded their standard buy and sell rate tables for ocean, air, and land-based shipping for all of the routes they serviced, customers could access the forwarder’s portal on the Freight OS network and get almost instantaneous quotes for the route(s) of their choice. All the buyer had to do was specify the origin, the destination, some basic load characteristics, the desired pick-up date, the allowable modes, whether or not the load is hazardous, if insurance is required, if a customers brokerage is used, whether or not nearby ports / airports can be used, and click quote. Within seconds, the buyer could get the quickest delivery quote, the cheapest quote, and some alternate options from any forwarder that had a rate table in the system and chose to make it public. They could also request custom quotes from a forwarder as well, which they might want to do if they were willing to commit to a certain volume over a certain period of time.

Since it’s launch, Freightos, which primarily targeted freight forwarders and 3PLs, has been extending its platform and its target audience, now also serving (and targeting) enterprise shippers (in traditional logistics divisions) and e-commerce shippers as well. Since it’s initial launch, Freightos has added two major features:

  • the marketplace
    where all forwarders can list their public rates and any buyer can easily search public quotes (without a forwarder having to share quotes with them), compare, and book quotes
  • contract management
    which permits a buying organization to upload all of their contracts, which are included in search results, if the route is covered, and allow a buyer to see their contracted rate vs. the market rates

As well as a few other valuable features for enterprise shippers that include:

  • tariff management
    that allows freight providers (including 3PLs and forwarders) to define all of the associated tariffs and buyers to include all the tariffs defined by their contracted routes
  • spend visibility
    that allows enterprise shippers to see how much is being spent by lane, forwarder, region
  • business intelligence
    that allows enterprise shippers to slice and dice the spend visibility and contract data
  • real-time multi-currency support
  • powerful filtering
    that allows an enterprise shipper to include or exclude forwarders, forwarders, transport modes (and specify ocean only or air only), select and deselect nearby ports, etc.

Freightos is a very powerful solution that will soon be Procurement’s best friend. How so? Stay tuned, as Freightos will be launching their Procurement portal early next year which will build on the powerful enterprise shipping portal they have now, but with features and functions targeted to make your life as a Procurement professional much easier when you are trying to build those total cost of ownership models during your multi quarter and multi-year sourcing events.

There’s No Return on Customization.

the doctor does not attend many events, but hen he does one thing he regularly hears is Company B saying that there is no platform that meets there needs so they are buying Solution S from Company X and customizing it through the vendor or a third party.

Before one more organization does this, the doctor needs to scream DON’T! In this day of age there is no return on enterprise software customization … no matter what the vendor or 3rd party may tell you.

Why?

1) Time to Delivery

If the functionality is truly valuable, by the time it is delivered, another vendor is sure to have equivalent functionality on the market ready and waiting for your implementation.

2) Up Front Cost

Custom development is a huge cost — which may never be realized given the average IT project failure rate and the average return.

3) Maintenance Cost

Out of the box functionality is covered under standard warranty and standard maintenance agreements — custom modifications usually require high hourly rates to contract scarce development talent for as long as is needed to fix any bugs or do any required upgrades.

4) Delayed Upgrades

While everyone else gets upgrades and new, free, features on the provider’s schedule, you get to wait and wait and wait until the talent has the time to address, and complete, the necessary upgrades to the custom modifications you made to allow the base system to be upgraded — this can be months (or years) and efficiency losses will add up on a daily basis!

When you put it all together, the costs will typically outweigh the benefits. So put the effort in to finding the right vendor with the right system and when it comes to customization, just do NOT do it! The only company that profits off of customizations is the vendor doing the customizations, because they are the company at the bottom of the money pit while their clients keep shovelling the money in.

Technological Damnation 76: Cybersecurity / Cyberattack

Recently we discussed technological damnation 78: e-Privacy, where we hinted at the difficulty of maintaining privacy in an era where keeping the data encrypted and secure is getting harder by the millisecond. We followed that with a discussion of technological damnation 92: data loss that noted that intrusions are hard to trace and like privacy, loss prevention requires secure, encrypted, digital vaults that, with advances in computer technology, often get less secure by the millisecond, starting the millisecond they are implemented.

But the damnation of cybersecurity goes well beyond (e-)privacy, which consumers are very concerned about and data loss, which your C-suite is concerned about, to fraud, sabotage, and fear.

Fraud

A cyberattack might be perpetuated to steal customers’ data, especially if it has value (because it contains credit card numbers, health records that snake oil charlatans can use to target desperate people, or incriminating information or photos); to steal proprietary data (that a competitor would pay a pretty penny for); or to covertly steal company funds by inserting false supplier records into the e-Payment system (that would allow fake invoices to be automatically approved by the e-Payment or e-Procurement system) or accessing a company’s bank account through the bank integration so that the hacker can ACH the funds to another account controlled by the hacker that will allow the hacker to electronically wire all of the available funds to a bank account in a country where the funds cannot be recovered.

Sabotage

A cyberattack might be perpetuated to take down core systems that run production lines, as modern production lines are software controled and the right malware can physically damage equipment by causing it to overheat or operate beyond safe parameters. Damaging a multi-million production line, taking down a power grid, or contaminating multiple batches of product can shut a company down for weeks and do considerable financial damage to the company in the short term, and reputational damage to the company in the long term as it struggles to recover from an inability to meet its customers needs for a prolonged period of time and keep its operations safe.

Fear

A successful cyberattack can install fear in a company and its upstream and downstream supply chains all the way from the company that mines or produces the raw materials that are consumed by the company to the end consumer that buys the products. Sometimes that’s enough to do significant damage.

Defense

Defending against a cyberattack is nigh impossible. You don’t know when it’s coming. You don’t know where. You don’t know what zero-day vulnerability the hacker is going to try and take advantage of. You don’t know what communication lines the hacker is going to use and what machine they are going to try and route through. Can you encrypt everything? Secure every line? Patch every known security hole on every machine? And insure that not a single employee can be socially engineered to accidentally give a hacker any additional information to help the hacker in her quest? Defense is almost impossible.

As hinted at in our previous damnation posts on e-Privacy and data loss, cyberattack and cybersecurity is a damnation that is becoming more damning by the day.

Technological Damnation 90: Open Source

When it comes to software, proprietary madness (Part I and Part II) is one damnation — but open source, the other side of the coin, is another.

This is another damnation that is probably making you huh?, because it seems that open source, which not only give us free software, but some of the best software out there, should be a great thing, and it is, but from a Procurement point of view, it’s a damnation. Why?

How do you cost it?

There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and where open source is concerned, this is a free lunch at the Bawabet Dimashq Restaurant where you have to wash the dishes — for the entire floor (that contains 6,014 seats) all by yourself! Unlike most proprietary software which comes with a warranty, a maintenance plan, and support, open source simply comes with a license that says you have to right to use it if you see fit, but you waive all warranties and liabilities while doing so. If it is broken, you can ask the community for help fixing it, but you might have to fix it. You have to maintain and update it. You have to install it. And in some cases, you have to even compile it! That takes development manpower — and sometimes lots of it. Whereas all you might need for vendor provided software is an admin to create and maintain accounts, you might need a dev team backing up the open source.

How do you protect it?

Chances are you will find something that doesn’t quite do what you need, or that needs to be fixed, and will have to fix, and augment it. Under the terms of most open source agreements, any modifications you make must also be open source and released, so if you want to do any custom upgrades, you better be prepared to give them away for free. At least with proprietary technology, you can always negotiate with a provider for custom developed technology exclusive to you.

How do you defend your investment against it?

Maybe the best choice today is that proprietary enterprise software license that costs you high six or low seven figures for enterprise wide deployment — but which should net you a nice return based upon the value you expect to get from it under the assumption that the vendor’s promises will materialize. However, you will only get the advantage you expect in the market if your competitor cannot get a solution for any less. What if an open source with equivalent, or better, capability hits the market next year and the only cost is the cost of training or a few consultants to implement it plus an ongoing system admin after that? If your competition can get equivalent software for a fraction of the cost in a year, will you net your return? And will you be giving up a greater return by locking into proprietary software now when the open source that could materialize in the near future might even allow your organization to take an accelerated path to savings?

Just like proprietary madness, open source is also a technology damnation. When it comes to technology, it’s damned if you do and damned if you don’t.