Monthly Archives: September 2012

Ten Tips To Top TMS

Inbound Logistics just published a good piece on how to choose the right TMS for your company. Almost makes me want to forget about that double play I recently scored against them.* Almost. 😉

Anyway, most of the tips in this article were dead on, even if some were a little obvious. By now, where Supply Management Systems are concerned, we all know that you definitely want to pick the right size provider, check references, try before you buy, check off all of your-must haves, and consider ongoing upgrades. The good tips were the following:

  • Time It
    Bring a stop-watch to the demos, and keep it by your side when you try it. Does it improve efficiency? If it doesn’t, what are you paying for?
  • Call Support Before You Buy
    If you can’t get through now, do you think you’ll get through later?
  • EDI is Essential
    Whether it’s EDI, XML, API, etc., you need to be transmitting and receiving all your documents electronically. If you have to pay by the bit, watch out! There shouldn’t be transmission fees when internet connectivity costs are fixed. You can be damn sure your provider isn’t paying by the bit, they’re paying a fixed cost for a dedicated 100 MB feed to their data centre. The cost for EDI should be a low, flat rate per month (up to a certain GB limit, because if the provider goes over their dedicated transfer rates, they will pay overage charges and have to pass them on).
  • Count the Cost in Money and Time
    It’s not just the cost of the TMS — it’s the cost of the TMS, the hardware, the connectivity, the integration, the training, the support, etc., etc., etc. as I have outlined repeatedly (and given you a spreadsheet for). But that’s just the hard cost. If the system takes a long time to set up, a lot of manpower to maintain, and decrease efficiency when compared to the current system, then the ownership costs will continue to pile up over time.
  • Can it Be Customized?
    This may not be that important for you, but if it is, and the system can’t be customized effectively and cost efficiently, find a new system – ASAP.

For the rest of the advice, see the article on ten tips to choosing the right TMS for your company.


*We’re not mysterious. We’re Canadians!
The Best Way to Insure Routing Guide Compliance

When (Out)Sourcing Goes Wrong

Today’s post is from Dick Locke, Sourcing Innovation’s resident expert on International Sourcing and Procurement.

Three hundred Pakistani garment workers die in a factory fire. (Source: New York Times) Doors were locked, windows were barred. And the factory had just been inspected by a subcontractor to a certification agency. Lesson here: If you can’t afford to visit the factory you are sourcing from, then no cost savings is sufficient. Do not let other companies do the research for you.


Thanks, Dick, for the valuable lesson here.

Will Factories in a Box Revolutionize Sustainability Initiatives?

Gizmodo just ran a very interesting, and vey insightful article on how The Next Industrial Revolution Starts in this 20-foot Shipping Container about Re-Char and their Shop-in-a-Box that can perform rapid fabrication of steel parts by way of software and a CNC plasma torch. With the Shop-in-a-Box described in the article, Re-Char can produce 600 lids for Climate Kilns. This is a specialized lid-and-chimney integration that adapts a 55-gallon drum to produce the soil amendment biochar. (In Kenya, farmers burn sugarcane debris in an open field and release tons of carbon. A Climate Kiln controls the burn to produce the carbon-rich charcoal biochar that, mixed into soil, reduces the fertilizer requirements for crops by half.) This required the precision cutting of 18-gauge metal, which, in East Africa, leaves you the option of using a guy with an oxy-acetylene torch on the side of the highway or importing a full production run out of China, one full shipping container at a time. But for 30,000, Re-Char was able to produce a Shop-in-a-Box metal cutting and joining setup that could be run by two two people and produce 600 lids as a time, when needed, where needed (as the shop in a box can be moved to a new community when the needs of the current community have been fulfilled).

From a sustainability perspective, this is incredible. It’s lean, green, and completely against the routine. Actually, lean is an understatement. The power requirements are limited to what is needed to produce the lids. The energy required just to light, cool, etc. an average factory typically takes a 600 V feed … or two … or three. It’s green in that it can be powered by sustainable energy, including wind power, water power, or solar power – whatever is available. (Transformers come with the standard kit, along with generators for [natural] gas power for stability. Just add batteries and a UPS and it’s 100% green power most of the time.) And it’s completely against the routine. When the industrial revolution started, you can be that the robber barrons never predicted a moveable factory.

To date, the most (wide-spread) innovative use of containers has been data center modules, with Google a leader in this technology. (But this has been taken to the next level. For example, Green Data Center has designs for completely self-contained data center modules that you can drop anywhere. Just hook-up a power feed and an internet feed, and you’re literally good to go. (And since you can easily put a generator, or two, in a second container, you don’t even need a power feed. Just a natural gas feed, split between a couple of generators if you don’t have a sustainable power feed, for a primary feed.)

But we don’t have to stop at data centers and steel-part fabrication shops. Especially when we are talking about the developing world (which still includes much of Africa, South America, and parts of Asia). Do we really need to refine cane sugar 2,200 kgs at a time, for example? Or how about water purification? If we’re talking about a small community of a couple of hundred people, and the primary focus is clean drinking water, we don’t need to purify 100,000 liters a day! Purifying 1,000 liters would do nicely! Both processes would fit nicely in a container system. (After all, the sugar refinement process is not radically different from micro-brewing in terms of what is needed, and you could fit that nicely in a container too — although we can’t necessarily bring the same humanitarian arguments if we did.)

And when we’ve insured that everyone has the absolute necessities of clean air, clean water, and healthy food — we could ship them clothing factories in a box. It doesn’t make sense to sew shirts in sweat-shops on another continent just to ship them to small communities in Africa, or South America, or Asia, where the living wage is $2 a day or less. Considering the shipping costs alone, you couldn’t set the price at a point where you’d make many sales. Just ship a container to the town, train a few locals on the cloth-cutting production lines and find a few budding seamstresses to do the stiching, and produce the clothing where it will be sold. A zero-mile supply chain that emits zero-carbon and has zero shipping costs. And since you don’t have time-sensitive fashion industries in developing economies, you could even rotate it between a few small communities in the beginning while the consumer base and local economy built up. (Hopefully you’d also move the employees too if they were willing, as you could outfit another container as temporary living quarters without much cost or effort.)

I think the physical manifestation of the Solution-in-a-Box approach has the potential to revolutionize manufacturing, distribution, and sustainability. And it’s not like we have a shortage of containers thanks to the outsourcing craze of the last fifteen years. They’re just sitting there waiting for a good use. And with all the super-panamax ships, and super-panamax capable ports, that we have at our disposal, we can get them from any continent to any other continent with ease, in bulk, and pretty close to where we want them. And then we just need a freightliner to haul them, and there’s no shortage of those.

Will Resilinc Resonate With Your Supply Chain?

On Monday, we introduced you to Resilinc, a new player in Supply Management that provides a Decision Support System (DSS) for identifying and evaluating risks in your supply chain if you are in the high-tech, medical device, and automotive space and have vast multi-tier supply chains.

We noted that Resilinc is unique in that it is able to provide an overall risk score, delivered in terms of the relative revenue impact of a disruption, for each location and each product; give you the ability to determine the impact of an external event in a given location with respect to specific supplier locations and sourced products; and identify with locations and products are likely to be impacted by a significant event anywhere in the world as soon as it happens. But we didn’t address another aspect of why Resilinc is unique and why they might shake up the risk management space.

Resilinc was founded, and the technnology was designed, and built, by risk management practitioners in the high-tech / device supply chains, and they have added experts in the medical device and automotive supply chains. One of the difficult, and unique, aspects about risk management is the differences in impact and effect of a supply disruption across industries. In some industries, like automotive, bringing a production line back up is not as simple as getting the missing parts or raw materials; in others, like electronic manufacturing, it’s not as simple as substituting one microchip for another if they have different input/output and voltage specs; and in others still, like medical device, it’s not as simple as switching suppliers when one runs out of production capacity as the industry is heavily regulated and it is often the case that all suppliers must carry certain certifications and insurance policies. Without practitioners who understand the specific requirements, and the differing severities associated with each type of disruption, you never get the right models. And if you don’t have the right models, you have zero chance of producing the right metrics and measurements.

For example, the founder, Bindiya Vakil, has served as the Program Manager for Supply Chain Risk Management at Cisco and the Supply Chain Manager at Solectron. Summit Vakil has worked in product management and leadership roles in Brocade, Cisco, and 3Com.

In addition, they recognize the criticality of solid Supplier Information Management as a foundation, and brought in Jon Bovit, with a long history in SIM at Ariba, Aravo, and CVM, to insure they got their unique functionality-focussed SIM model right for the problem they are tackling, which is different from the problems the standard SIM players are focussed on. (For example, in risk management, it really doesn’t matter where the headquarters are and whether you spend 100K or 100M with the supplier. A hurricane could shut down the headquarters and have no effect on your supply chain but if a supplier is sole source, even if you only buy one part, and only spend 100K, if the absence of that part could shut down the production line, that supplier is still a huge risk if they are located in a high risk zone.)

And their CEO is formally trained in Supply Management. She has a Master of Engineering in Logistics from MIT with a thesis on Design Outsourcing in the High-Tech Industry and its Impact on Supply Chain Strategies. Not many companies these days have a CEO who is technically competent in what the company actually does. It is my belief that having a CEO who knows what the product has to do, and how it should do it, greatly increases the chances that the company will develop the right products. (Because when you don’t, you get devices that light-up when they’re off and drain the battery until they die, and million-dollar toilet paper dispensers that limit you to 5 squares. Don’t laugh. Both have happened.)

So while Resilinc, like all new technology platforms, may carry a technology risk, for those of you in the high-tech, medical device, and automotive industries, I believe that it is more likely that it will resonate with your supply chain.