Daily Archives: May 14, 2026

In two weeks — ALL YOUR DATA BELONGS TO MUSK, ZUCKERBERG, NADELLA, and ALTMAN!

Not being facetious here! It could be step 1 in Musk’s plan to own all your data!

A ruling in two weeks could ultimately result in ALL YOUR DATA BELONGING TO MUSK, ZUCKERBERG, NADELLA, and ALTMAN!

In only two weeks, Texas Third Court of Appeals has a hearing on an emergency motion by Alex Jones’ lawyers that temporarily blocked the transfer of any Infowars assets. (Which were supposed to be transferred and sold to pay off the more than US$1 billion in defamation lawsuit judgments for the relatives of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.)

Now, whether or not you agree with that judgement or not or the sale or not, that’s not important. What’s important is that on October 14, 2024, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, on behalf of X Corp., filed a “Notice of Appearance and Demand for Service of Papers” relating to the case and then, on November 25, 2024, filed a statement on “X CORP.’S LIMITED OBJECTION TO TRUSTEE’S PROPOSED SALE MOTIONS”.

Now if you think this has anything to do with Musk trying to protect Jones, Infowars, or its assets, you’re wrong.

Let’s take paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 25, 26, and 36.

1: Objects to the sale of any account on the “X” platform.

2: Specifically, Infowars, Banned.Video, WarRoomShow, RealAlexJones, and any other account on X belonging to FSS or Jones

3: because accounts on X are X. Corp’s exclusive property

4: and X-Corp is the sole owner

25: and has ultimate control over the accounts.

26: While section 3 of the X Terms of Service (TOS) makes clear the account holder owns the content, section 4 gives X Corp broad rights to “access, read, preserve, and disclose any information”.

36: In addition to being a personal license, the license X Corp. grants to account holders
is an intellectual property license.

Getting the picture? Probably not. Let me spell it out.

An account belongs to the person or an authorized person from a legal entity that creates the account (and, in the latter case, can only be transferred to another person from that legal entity) and cannot be transferred to anyone else under those terms of services.

As a person, you can only access the account as long as you personally are mentally and physically capable of doing so and do not violate the terms of service. As a legal entity, as long as you remain a valid legal entity and have a valid designate to do so.

When these conditions cease to be met, your access is denied, and your account eventually shut down, but X Corp. retains the right to preserve, access, and read that data for eternity, while your (or anyone else’s) rights to such data effectively expire (unless you preserved a copy of such data off of the platform, and transferred your copyright to another entity before you died) as you no longer have a copy or the ability to prove copyright. That data then effectively becomes property of X Corp.

And this is Musk’s effort to have a Judge state that this is legally correct. Because, like its peers, xAI used every available bit of data on the internet to train its models, including every copyrighted book, song and movie/tv show in digital format they could access. And, like his peers, Musk doesn’t want his company sued. (And that’s the real reason there is a 10-year moratorium on AI regulation. It’s not to catch up to China. It’s not to ensure the government has the ability to experiment without recourse in civilian monitoring, military, and electioneering efforts. It’s so the politicians don’t lose access to the biggest money pots out there.)

This is the first step. Have a judge say that social media platforms (where internet users spend most of their time and post most of their data) legally own the service, which is defined as non-transferable in the TOS which also allows the platform to retain all data posted indefinitely. Have the the only copy of the data when the service is abandoned or terminated and assume the rights by default. Then you can’t be sued because you now own the data (because you will by the time the no AI regulations moratorium expires and laws actually get passed).

Sources:

1) CP24.com

2) KUT.org

3) Demand for Service of Papers

4) LIMITED OBJECTION TO TRUSTEE’S PROPOSED SALE MOTIONS

Operationalizing the Pocket Cube for Exact Purchasing Part IV

A few weeks ago, we not only told you that Exact Purchasing is a Pocket Cube, but we broke it down and defined each octant for you, as well as indicating which categories of goods and services were most likely to fall in each octant (with the disclaimer that there is variation between industry and sometimes even companies in the same industry based on size and focus).

This was a great start, but once you understand the breakdown, the next step is understanding how you go about sourcing and procuring the categories in each octant. Today we conclude our deep dive into the core technologies you will use with the Governance focussed-octants.

High Complexity, Low Risk, Low Impact: Spend Governance

Low risk and low impact means it’s almost a prime category for automation, except that high-complexity requires a fair amount of human oversight as not just any product from a catalog (or any service from a random service provider) will do. However, as long as humans are in the loop to approve the providers and the products, this is another category where a lot of automation can be employed, especially if the right technology is available.

This is another category where decision optimization needs to be employed as part of the strategic sourcing process, where continual compliance (as well as risk) monitoring needs to be employed as well as manual verifications of all suppliers and products before they enter the autonomous sourcing process and of all specs and obligation requirements before the contract is inked.

  • (Strategic) Sourcing: Autonomous Strategic Sourcing with Decision Optimization that balances cost and compliance
  • Supplier Management: APLs and Compliance Monitoring
  • Catalog Management: AVLs
  • Contract Management: Auto-Creation, Human Review of Specs and Obligations, Auto-Sign
  • Procurement (Channel)*: Goods PO (Catalog), Framework PO, Consignment PO, Service PO
  • Monitoring: ACK, ASN, Receipt in the Procurement System; Lead Time, Delivery, Quality Trends in the Inventory Management and Production Systems;

High Complexity, Low Risk, High Impact: Relationship Governance

High complexity and high impact is tough. Not as tough as when risk is also high, and you need full supply chain architecture that you’re manually sweating through every step of the way, but tough enough because while shipments will mostly be assured, if they aren’t up to spec, that’s just as bad as a missed shipment.

This is another category where sourcing can only be semi-autonomous as you need to verify the model, employ multi objective decision optimization and award review, review the specification, obligation, and risk management aspects of the contract in detail, and monitor the compliance, quality, and timeliness of the delivery. And monitor the compliance continuously.

  • (Strategic) Sourcing: Semi-Autonomous Strategic Sourcing with Decision Optimization that balances cost and compliance with Award Analysis and Review
  • Supplier Management: APLs, Compliance and Performance Monitoring
  • Catalog Management: AVLs and regular review and approval of new product options and regular automatic identification of potential products for review
  • Contract Management: Auto-Creation, Human Review of Specs and Obligations, Auto-Sign
  • Procurement (Channel)*: Goods PO (Catalog), Framework PO, Consignment PO, Service PO
  • Monitoring: ACK, ASN, Receipt in the Procurement System; Lead Time, Delivery, Quality Trends in the Inventory Management and Production Systems; Financial Status, Litigation Monitoring, Sanction Monitoring, News, Event, and Sentiment Monitoring;

This concludes our initial series on operationalizing the pocket cube of Exact Purchasing!

* Unless the Channel-Master Joël Collin-Demers says otherwise.