Author Archives: thedoctor

The One Sign You Don’t Have a Highly Functional Procurement Department

Recently, on Linked In, Anders Lillevik, who (once) tried to buy and drowned in paperwork (which is why he decided he needed to find a Focal Point), decided to post what he thought were the six signs your procurement efforts aren’t delivering the impact they should. In his view, they were:

  1. No spend visibility
  2. Unhappy customers
  3. Backlogs and delays
  4. Poor supplier relationships
  5. Reliance on manual processes
  6. Department is seen as tactical, not strategic

… which were signs that your Procurement department is not delivering, but not the one sign you have to look for to determine whether or not you have a highly functional Procurement department, since these are all symptoms of a single root cause. In fact, if you wanted to go down this route, instead of identifying the core problem, you could also add the following to Anders’ list:

  1. Spend is spiralling out of control while the
  2. Company is having to fire-sale / toss out expired products and outdated inventory on a quarterly basis and
  3. Your brand is in the toilet thanks to excessive carbon, poor working conditions / human slavery, and excessive waste (and wasteful practices) in the supply chain.
  4. Every department head is screaming “The Sky is Falling!”, “The Sky is Falling!”.

… as these are also signs that your procurement efforts aren’t delivering the efforts. But if you want to know whether or not you have a highly functional Procurement department, all you have to really do is answer this one question:

Do you have a strong CPO providing quarterly metrics charting success improvements over time?

Now we know this is a bit of a cheat, as it’s actually two parts, as just thinking you have a strong CPO is not enough, you need the metric-based reporting to verify, but that’s it. If you have a Strong CPO leading a procurement team charting key metrics across all relevant areas, key categories and initiatives get managed, and, eventually, improved. Moreover, you will find that:

  1. you have great spend visibility across all Spend Under Management (SUM) which will increase over time
  2. you have happier customers as your quality, reliability, and predictability improve in key areas and remain consistent in others
  3. backlogs reduce over time along with unexpected supply chain delays
  4. supplier relationships, at least for key products and services, improve
  5. process automation is employed where appropriate
  6. the department starts to assist other departments with strategy, and begins its journey from tactical to strategic
  7. spend increases are at least contained to inflation
  8. inventory management (and inventory loss) improves
  9. improved supplier vetting and risk analysis weeds out any suppliers known to be exceptionally polluting, use sub-tier suppliers that turn a blind eye to working conditions or slave labour, or be completely indifferent to CSR activities
  10. the department heads stop screaming “The Sky is Falling!” and instead scream “Why Is Everything So Bl00dy Expensive!” (even though Procurement consistently meets or beats market prices)

Not perfect, but all signs that your procurement efforts are delivering the impact they should, or at least getting there.

Source-to-Pay+: An Introduction to Supply Chain Risk

If you missed the risk series, you might want to catch up. Risk doesn’t just stem from your immediate inbound tier 1 suppliers, it stems from your entire inbound supply chain. Your Supplier “Risk” Management solution only gives you a partial picture at best. Find out what you need to get the rest!

1: The Beginning
2: End-to-End
3: Corporate Risk
4a: Third Party Risk, Part 1
4b: Third Party Risk, Part 2
5: Supply Chain Risk, Generic
6: In-Transport Risk
7: Multi-Tier Supply Chain Risk
8: Analytics / Control Center
9: Cyber Risk

Data-Driven Workforce Planning — WTF?

Data is good. And you should make use of it all the time. And while data might help you identify gaps in your work force capability, it can’t help you plan your future workforce. Why? A couple of reasons. First of all, you don’t know what’s coming down the pipe in future Procurement and Supply Chain needs and issues. Secondly, existing skill sets may not be enough to address those future needs and issues (which could require evolved versions of current skill sets or even entirely new skill sets). So while the doctor would agree that the 14% of Procurement Leaders who believe they have adequate talent to meet future needs are idiots that never look at the data, he would also argue that looking at the data alone will not allow one to adequately define their workforce needs.

Planning implies you are building a workforce for the future. Data can only identify gaps in your workforce today. And while you need to fill those gaps to conquer today’s challenges, put out the fires, and get to the point where you can start seriously thinking about the future, analyzing historical data is not going to get you there. You need to look at how new technologies will change production, how new technology will change logistics (not just green vehicles, but better planning technologies, more efficient cross-docking techniques, etc.), how regulations will impact trade, and so on. There’s no data on that yet (other than patent documents, vendor spec sheets, draft legislation, and so on). So how can you analyze data you don’t have?

So, why do we need to talk about this? Well, Info-Tech Research group is flooding the PR and Business News Wires with an article on how “data-driven workforce planning is key to future-proofing organizations”. And while data-driven workforce planning is key to getting your workforce right today, as we just explained above, it can’t future proof your workforce because you don’t know what skills your future workforce will need.

Yes, there are serious talent shortages in IT and Procurement. Yes, it reinforces the reality that a proactive approach to workforce management is something that most organizations should have been doing a decade ago. Yes data-driven insights are often the fastest way to see where you don’t have enough people or enough people with the right skills to tackle the job. And yes tools that can help you are highly valuable. But don’t confuse solving today’s challenges with people you will hire tomorrow with solving the problem of future workforce planning.

Now, if you hire the right people with the right education and the right skill sets in analytics and the ability to learn on their own, they will be more prepared than those employed by your peers. This may put you in a better place, as they may even have the skills to identify the gaps when the world changes, but there are no guarantees. So find top talent with the education, drive, and ability to learn, continually train them, give them time to look ahead once in a while, and you’ll be better off than those who just hire the cheapest resource they can to put out the latest fire.

Consumer Dynamics are shifting like never before. But how does that affect Procurement?

Beyond the obvious, of course. But let’s backtrack.

A recent article over on Fortune noted that consumer dynamics are shifting like never before while purporting to give us some insights from Executives from Instacart, Atlassian, Nordstrom, and Black & Decker [who] share their strategies. However, the insights it shared related to the challenging technology environment the companies, and teams, face daily and not the consumer market in general, which is a very important topic not covered much by most of the publications and analysts that focus on how great the technology (especially AI-backed technology that may or may not work at all) is, but not how it helps you address the consumers that your organization is in business to serve.

Now, it’s easy to track change in demand if you have a good POS system, a good inventory system, at least weekly (if not daily) synchs, and a good DiY (Do-it-Yourself) Analytics system with baseline trend analysis capabilities that can signal changes in demand, the need for rapid reorders to prevent stock-outs, and increasing changes in demand as a result.

It’s not always as easy to track why. Sometimes there’s a strong correlation between the sales and a particular campaign, between the sales and a sustainability initiative, between the sales and recent price decreases in the product line or price increases in a competitor’s product line, or between the uptick in sales and competitor stock-outs, and in this case it can seem obvious, even if it’s not. For example, the campaign may have had nothing to do with it, it could have been the result of a single influencer promoting the product. The sustainability initiative may have had nothing to do with it, as customers may have known it would only impact the next generation of the product. The price decreases may have had little to do with it because it may have already been one of the lowest priced products available at the time as well as the one with the best brand reputation. The competitor stock outs may not have had anything to do with it because those might have been the higher priced products that were only stocked in low quantities anyway.

Moreover, even if you can determine the why with some statistical confidence, that still does not identify the underlying root cause as to why customers reacted to the campaign, the sustainability initiative, the price decreases, or the stock-outs. Are customers shifting towards your brand, adopting a preference for certain products, responding to certain messaging, or just veering away from certain competitors (or at least certain competitor products).

More importantly, how can you predict these trends early, when they are just starting, so that you can make the appropriate Procurement decisions in time to meet the shift in demand better than your competition. Certainly predictive trend analysis (using traditional machine learning fine-tuned to your problem domain) will help, but only if you can identify the right data sets and indicators, which will also mean being able to detect shifts in early sentiment early. So sentiment analysis (not overblown generalized error-prone Gen-AI) will also help.

But that’s just the beginning. Technology indicates possibilities, maybe even probabilities, but not guarantees. For that, you will need a human based assessment of the situation. And possibly an anthropological one. If you want to get ahead, you will need to think ahead of the crowd.

Why Should Small Businesses Invest in Procurement Software?

Plenty of reasons, but the doctor was surprised to see that one of the best articles for a small business layperson that listed some of these reasons was an article on Intelligent Living on 7 Reasons Why Small Businesses Should Invest in Purchasing Software. While e-Procurement vendors are usually targeting mid-size, or larger, organizations (as they want 6-digit deals, and small businesses can’t afford more than 5-digit deals, and micro businesses not more than 4-digit deals), e-Procurement software, especially turn-key self-serve software, is beneficial for small (and micro) businesses as well because it helps organizations of all sizes.

All organizations spend money, and as a result, all organizations can overspend, get defrauded, spend too much time on tactical (thunking) tasks, etc. Low-end baseline 80% e-Procurement solutions can help them immensely, even those that cost as little 500 to 1500 a month. (Yes, they exist. After all, why did the doctor say that 120K is enough for full Source-to-Pay.)

The article points out the following seven (7) benefits of e-Procurement solutions in everyday layman terms which an average small business person should be able to understand.

Automated Purchase Orders
Quickly generate accurate purchase orders from catalog items or repeat buys and push the orders into your Accounts Payable (AP) and/or inventory systems.
Vendor Management
Unified view, complete order and contract history, and automated alerts.
Budget Control
Set budgets, monitor spending against budgets in real time, and set alerts when budgets are (close to being) exceeded.
Real-time Analytics
Real-time spending reports against up-to date data with simple trend analysis.
Enhanced Security
SaaS providers that have industry standard security certifications need to stay on top of cyber security, something the average small business would really struggle with.
Integration with Other Systems
Most small businesses are not very tech-savvy and a platform that integrates with the other systems they use is very useful to them.
Scalability
Most of this software can scale up to support more users, more catalogs, more POs, more transactions, etc.

In fact, as a small business, the only other things you would care about starting off is:

Invoice Matching
to make sure the invoice matches the PO (or is from a known vendor if it’s for a one-time off-catalog product or service you wouldn’t normally do a PO for)
Contract Tracking
basic governance with document storage with searchable, indexable, metadata for quick location for price and term verification

Again, e-Procurement is great for small businesses (and some of the providers in Part 37 of our Source-to-Pay+ Series are priced right for smaller businesses). It’s even greater to see plain language explanations of the benefits that small business owners can understand.