Category Archives: Procurement Innovation

Where do you start on your Supply Management Journey?

In our last post on the subject matter, we noted that there is no one platform, just one workflow, and the only way to make progress is to define the one workflow, identify a set of overlapping/integrating systems to achieve the one workflow, identify vendors that can provide these systems, and then select those vendors that best meet overall organizational needs and move forward.

But where does one start? This is a very tough question, and very organization dependent.

  • What does the organization have now?
  • Where is the organization in its Next Level Supply Management journey?
  • What is the talent profile — what is its average and collective IQ, EQ, and TQ?
  • What are the organization’s biggest pain points?
  • What are the organization’s top pressures?
  • What is the organization’s budget?
  • What resources does the organization have available to support implementation and change management?
  • What resources and programs do its current, and prospective, vendors have to help?
  • And so on.

It’s tough. Typically, an organization makes the jump when it’s desperate to get savings, and typically, when doing a systems buy, the organization will focus on the system that is advertised to identify the biggest return. In Supply Management, that’s a true strategic sourcing system that supports complex sourcing as only decision optimization and spend analysis technologies have been repeatedly found to identify year-over-year savings in excess of 10%, with everything else being single digits.

But identification is not realization. In an average organization without the proper processes and systems to support contract implementation, as per a classic AMR series on reaching sourcing excellence, an average organization will only capture 60 cents to 70 cents of every dollar of negotiated savings at the end of the day.

If the organization is not set up to capture savings, it has to start simple. Processes. e-Procurement. SRM to get suppliers on board with processes and programs that will allow it to capture data and insure the suppliers deliver the value they promise without constant monitoring by the buyer. If the organization is set up to capture savings, but can’t identify any, it has to look at more complex platforms or options. However, regardless of the answers to the above questions, it should start simple and work it’s way up the technology and process complexity ladder. The key to success will be adoption, and that will mean not overwhelming those that will be required to adopt the new systems and processes if success is to be achieved.

Finding Your Procurement Mojo and Gettin’ Sigi Wit’ It – Part Deux

This spring, in Finding Your Procurement Mojo and Gettin’ Sigi Wit’ It (Part One), we began our review of Sigi Osagie’s Procurement Mojo, an important book for many procurement professionals and organizations. Unlike most books which attempt to teach you how to do the job (that you already have a decent grip of), Sigi’s book attempts to teach you how to explain to the organization what Procurement does, which is a critical issue that needs to be addressed since:

  1. Procurement is still the Rodney Dangerfield of the organization (and still don’t get no respect) and
  2. most Procurement Pros don’t know how to sell the organization on the unrealized potential that Procurement can bring.

In our first post we discussed how Sigi noted that a key to success was the Procurement brand, but in order to address the Procurement brand, one needed to:

  • build an effective organization,
  • deploy process enablers,
  • manage the supply base, and
  • apply performance frameworks.

Then we discussed some of the key points Sigi made with respect to each of these preliminary steps to building, and most importantly selling, the Procurement brand, but stopped short of discussing any of the game plan because some of his readers would get to hear the man himself and Get Sigi Wit’ It at Trade Extensions’ London event in October. However, now that the event is over, we’re going to discuss the final part of the book and complete the book review.

Sigi outlines three main areas that need to be addressed to build — and sell — your Procurement Mojo:

1. Procurement Positioning

Make sure Procurement is positioned in the organization in the manner and place that will allow it to be the most effective in both delivering its functional obligations and adding value. This involves addressing both reporting structure and enterprise involvement. Not all organizations require a CPO who reports to a CEO, some can do fine with a VP that reports to a COO (who is the CEO’s right hand). For example, if the organization is a manufacturer and most of the spend is direct materials, this can work fine, as long as Procurement is also involved in other key spend categories by the CMO (for agency management), CFO (for back office spend), CIO (for systems spend), and other executives that also have large spend categories. As long as Procurement understands key company purchases and is able to convey the importance of those key purchases to the right stakeholders in a way that elicits their involvement, the reporting structure is not as important as general Procurement involvement.

2. Stakeholder Communication

Every other key Supply Management activity requires stakeholder engagement and support to be successful, so why should brand management and promotion be any different? The key to building, and selling, the Procurement brand (and making your mojo work for you) is regular, effective, stakeholder communication that provides messages relevant to them. Make sure you understand what your stakeholders value most — and address that. Cost savings? Innovation? The relationship? If you can’t talk to their needs and report on value in their terms, it will be hard to break down the silos and sell the value, and brand, of Procurement. Sigi offers some great advice on how to effectively communicate with your stakeholders that most books don’t, and this is a great section of the last chapter, which includes a discussion of how to create a stakeholder map to keep your communications on track.

3. Procurement PR

Good companies make good products. Great companies create a great brand image that people want and instill desire for products even before the products are released or, in some cases, people even know what the products are. Look at Apple. The brand made people want the iPod and the iWatch even before Apple even announced them.

But good PR isn’t easy, especially for a function focussed on hard value and not soft messaging. However, once you know the right formula, it isn’t that hard either. As long as your messaging consistently addresses activities and issues that are:

  • Important,
  • Sustainable, and
  • Credible

and relevant to the audience being addressed, the PR will improve and the brand will grow. How do you do this? Sigi provides a number of examples of efforts that various organizations have used to achieve this goal. While not all will necessarily work for you, some will, and the book is a great aid here as well.

Again, we highly recommend that you check out Sigi Osagie’s Procurement Mojo and Get Sigi Wit’ It.

Procurement 2020: We’re Off Track, But Can We Get Back on Track? Part II

In part one, which lamented our recent post that asked if we were on track for Procurement 2020 because the reality is that we are way, way, off track, we discussed business process sourcing, supply performance management (SPM) and supplier relationship management (SRM), and knowledge management, three of the six levers that need to be properly pulled to get Procurement on track for 2020, as identified by Hackett way back in 2008. In this post, we will discuss the other three levers and discuss whether or not there is still time to properly pull them.

Talent Management

While tomes can be written about this subject, of all of the fixes that are required, this is the easiest. All one has to do to get things back on track is to reinstate the training budget, give the team the time to get and take training, give Procurement the resources it needs to attract and retain top talent, and sit back while the talent takes your Procurement up a notch. That’s it. It really is easy-peasy. You don’t even need the big red button!

Next Level Strategic Sourcing

This is also an easy fix. Get a true next generation sourcing platform designed for complex tenders that can support true strategic sourcing decision optimization and next level sourcing, get training on what next level sourcing is, and just do it. For more information on what this is, check out Sourcing Innovation’s paper on Optimization: What Comes Next and its upcoming paper on Complex Sourcing, being released on October 7th.

New Product Development & Introduction

Once processes are under control, knowledge is captured and maintained, talent is where it needs to be, platforms are in place, and next level sourcing processes have been instituted, Procurement is going to get results and respect. When it is able to demonstrate to Engineering how involving it earlier in the process will save money and increase value, it will get invited to the table earlier in the process and will eventually be asked to consult and provide guidance on every NPD/NPI opportunity. It will help lead the organization into new markets, rather than just scrambling to make the best of the poor situation it is placed in. And it will be able to do this because it will already have collected the market knowledge, already have cost model baselines that it can use to create should-cost models, already know where to look for the market intelligence to predict the costs associated with different options, and so on.

In other words, we can get back on track, but only if some major changes happen.

  1. Talent needs to come first.
  2. Knowledge needs to be captured.
  3. Platforms and processes need to be in place to support purchasing and capture spend.
  4. Suppliers need to be engaged, monitored, and developed.
  5. Sourcing needs to be taken up a notch.

This is all feasible with today’s knowledge and today’s platforms, and the vision can be realized, but a serious commitment has to be made by the organization which also has to stop focusing on, and more importantly, measuring Procurement on savings and savings alone. It’s not cost reduction. It’s cost avoidance and management. It’s knowing that going too far to save a penny today will cost a pound tomorrow. It’s making the best overall decision to not lower costs now at the expense of being locked into higher costs for for years to come when the organization should be investing in suppliers and platforms that will generate additional value for the organization down the road.

Will it happen? In a few, forward thinking organizations, yes. In the average organization still dancing to the drum of Wall Street, probably not. And it’s a shame. But as global market situations worsen and short-sighted companies begin to fail, far-sighted companies, where Procurement is encouraged to take a longer term view, will gain market share and those that re-institue long term five and ten year plans will prosper the most. While the state of affairs won’t be what they should when we reach 2020, maybe 2030 will see an improvement (and Procurement optometrists will have to adjust their vision scales).

Procurement 2020: We’re Off Track, But Can We Get Back on Track? Part I

As per our recent post that asked if we were on track for Procurement 2020, we’re off track. Way off track. So far off track that we can’t even see which direction the track was in.

Hackett told us way back in 2008 what we needed to do to get where we needed to be, but most Procurement organizations are still nowhere close to where they should be, even though most of it is easy-peasy.

Business Process Sourcing

This is easy to get under control, it just requires some good planning and process mapping. Specifically, an organization has to map all of its processes, define the knowledge-centric strategic aspects versus the manual-processing tactical aspects, and then figure out the benefit of each part of the process with respect to the cost.

If the benefit is low, the cost is high, and the process is tactical, it is a prime candidate for outsourcing. If the cost is low, the benefit is high, and the process is knowledge-centric, the process is a poor candidate for outsourcing. Organizations need to maintain their knowledge and strategic advantages and outsource that which brings them no benefit when performed internally.

An organization that takes the time to map its processes and understand them can find the right candidates for outsourcing and manage them appropriately.

Supply Performance Management (SPM) & Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)

While this was a major oversight in first generation Sourcing systems, this is a common module in second generation Sourcing systems and over the past few years a number of expert consultancies and solution vendors have come on the scene that can help you get your SPM and SRM processes up to snuff. They have n-step processes that can be used to help you get an understanding of where you are on the SPM and SRM maturity curves, what you can do to get better, and how you can figure out how you compare to the market average and the best-in-class.

In addition, there is a lot more information on SPM and SRM, what it is, how to do it, and the importance of it to your supply chain on the various blogs and publications then there was a decade ago. Those who seek out and make use of this information can progress well ahead of the curve. (And a couple of overviews will be made freely available to SI readers over the next month or so as part of a larger offering … stay tuned.)

Knowledge Management

A decade ago, it was unheard of to have more than half of spend under management, and if you said that one day you’d have integrated spend data, you risked being put in an asylum. However, with modern platforms that provide an organization with the ability to not only push all payments through a common platform, but all purchases through a common platform that supports integrated internal and external catalogues — whether they be cXML punch-out, EDI, flat-file, data-base driven, or custom entries — things have changed. When all requisitions and purchases can go through one platform, all spend gets in one database, and the organization has visibility into all of its spend and can plot a course to get the majority of its spend under management.

In other words, we can return the engine to the tracks, but an effort will have to be made to do so. How much of an effort? Stay tuned for Part II.