Category Archives: Supplier Management

Bravo: Analysis and Supplier Performance Management for Contract Compliance

Last month, I told you how BravoSolution Collaboratively Optimized Its Way onto the doctor‘s Short List. Today, I’m going to discuss their (Spend) Analysis, Supplier Performance Management, and Contract Compliance Solutions to give you a broader view of their solution suite.

To get straight to the point, their spend analysis (console) solution, which takes a standard reporting-based approach, and which includes over 60 standard report templates, is nothing special, but their analysis administration tool, the Transformation Designer, is one of the most powerful administration interfaces I’ve seen in a web-based analysis solution. Most providers tout their “leading auto-cleansing, auto-classification, and auto-enrichment” solutions as if they’re the be-all-and-end-all, but those who truly understand spend analysis realize that you can’t auto-cleanse, auto-classify, and auto-enrich everything, no matter how many rules are in your repository or how many billions of transactions your provider has classified. (And those who fall for that line are lucky if mapping accuracy even approaches 80%.)

Every company is different, every department is different, every employee is different, and every transaction is different. That’s why you have 19 different representations of IBM in your supplier master. Furthermore, you don’t buy the same SKUs from the same suppliers with every order. So even if you had a “perfect” set of automatic mapping rules today, they’d be broken tomorrow. You have to continually manage and maintain your data or your reports will be useless. And Bravo’s Transformation Designer allows your data administrator(s) to do all that.

Bravo’s Transformation Designer allows you to select your data sources, define the raw data tables, capture the raw data fields, profile the data, and define custom mapping and transformation rules on the data before it populates your repository. You can also define a bevy of checks (null, range, date, acceptable values, duplicate, etc) and define your rules based on transformations (that can use substrings, calculations, and lookups). The rules can be layered, with higher priority rules taking precedence and lower priority rules kicking in when there are no higher priority rules. (So you can start with the classic “secret sauce” of map the vendors, map the GL codes, map the vendors + GL codes, and map the exceptions and have the rules applied in reverse order.)

In addition to supporting your standard “knowledge base” of auto-classification rules (which includes mappings, and families, for tens of millions of suppliers and even more standard items), which you can use to start your mapping journey, it also supports automated text classification methods based on advanced statistical algorithms. A proper combination of all three rule types — knowledge base for standard vendor and GL code mappings, statistical rules for automated mapping of unrecognized transactions (that can be mapped with high statistical accuracy), and custom hand-coded direct mapping rules for the exceptions — will get you very high classification accuracy with very little work. Especially since you can use their rules engine to quickly identify exceptions and define direct mapping rules that take care of them. And any time you identify a mis-mapping, you can define a new rule to re-map it. (New rules are immediately added to an asynchronous mapping queue and the queue is processed continuously, which allows for near real-time updates. No waiting for the monthly refresh.)

The Analysis Console also works on their supplier performance data. Bravo Solution is a mature provider of SPM, having been offering a solution since 2001. While it might not be broader or deeper than any of the newer pure SPM solution plays (SupplierSoft, Aravo, Hiperos, etc.), they have a history of successful implementations. (And more importantly, how deep is a SPM solution anyway? As long as it captures data, calculates metrics, allows you to create month-over-month, quarter-over-quarter, year-over-year, and trend reports on the metrics, allows you to share that data with your supplier(s), and allows you to collaborate on action plans in a virtual collaboration environment, what else is critical to your average organization just starting on an SPM journey?) With regards to SPM, Bravo has your bases covered. It’s nothing fancy, but it will more than get the job done.

This brings us to Contract Compliance. Their solution can automatically load cleansed GPO contract data, normalize the data based on supplier families and parent-child company organization relationships, and extract line-items and SKUs. If you integrate with your purchasing system, the solution will automatically match purchases to contracts and flag exceptions. It also supports deep embedding with your e-Procurement system and can be used to identify contracts, price levels, and exceptions before a PO is issued. But the best part is the deep integration that is currently being developed between the Analytics Console, SPM Module and Contract Compliance Modules. You’ll be able to analyze contract compliance against supplier performance at any time, over any time period, and see if you’re getting the value you expected from the contract — and then use this information at contract renewal / resourcing time.

Share This on Linked In

All Outsourcing Contracts Should Include Benchmarking Clauses

A recent article over on SourcingMag.com that addressed “why vendors don’t like benchmarking clauses” got my attention, because I believe that, since you’re outsourcing for better performance, that all contracts should have benchmarking clauses to help insure that you get that performance. So I read it, and then discovered that the “benchmarking clauses” being referred to were not really performance benchmarks, but market-cost benchmarks. All these types of benchmark clauses do is exert constant price pressure on the vendor and, as the author notes, create a lose-lose situation for the vendor. And that’s not good.

It’s one thing to expect a vendor to improve performance year after year, and you should, but another to expect them to lower their price every time their competition lowers prices. After all, the competition might not be as good or might not be as familiar with your business, and, therefore, might not give you the same value. Moreover, you should be content to pay whatever price you agree to on day one provided the vendor continues to deliver value. And as long as the vendor improves year-over-year with shorter responses times, higher throughput per FTE, better processes and technology, etc. that vendor is delivering value.

So go ahead and put a benchmark clause in your contract that not only requires performance reviews on a regular basis but reasonable year-over-year improvements as well, because you should expect that. But don’t try to cheat your vendor out of a fair price for services rendered. Not only do they have bills to pay too, but they won’t be very incentivized to beat expectations and get you to best-in-class as soon as possible if all you do is nickel-and-dime them.

Share This on Linked In

SupplierSoft and its Supplier Process Management Solution

Last year, the Sourcing Maniacs introduced you to SupplierSoft, a provider of Supplier Data and Process Management solutions as part of their vendor tour.

SupplierSoft is a unique solution not only because they’re one of the few companies that understand the importance of centralizing all of the supplier process management solutions in a common platform (because supplier management is more than just supplier information management and supplier risk assessments, two prominent directions that their competitors are moving in), but because they decided to build their solution on the #1 CRM platform, SalesForce.com. As noted in the previous post, there is a lot of similarity between CRM and SRM, since both require extensive information management and the ability to capture and organize the data against relevant business processes.

Despite its recent market entry, the SupplierSoft platform is one of the most extensive Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) and Supplier Information Management (SIM) platforms on the market with supplier management, audit management, corrective action management, product compliance management (PCM), environmental compliance management (ECM), bill-of-material (BOM) analysis, and end-to-end reporting modules.

Over the past year, they have significantly extended their regulatory compliance capabilities in their PCM and ECM modules with extensive customizable BOM and (PDF & web) forms support. You can collect data at any level of the BOM, which rolls up into higher-level components and reports, which can then be drilled into as required. This allows you to focus only on exceptions and non-compliance, which is a must when you have thousands of parts that collectively use thousands of compounds that you need to track to maintain compliance with RoHS, WEEE, and REACH (which is about to get a lot more involved as it works its way through the SIN List). The solution allows you to define custom forms, with defaults, that allow you to only collect the regulatory data relevant to you, which can then be (automatically) customized (by the system) for each supplier with respect to the products they supply you (and the declared components and/or raw materials). SupplierSoft’s clients have found that by creating easy-to-use custom forms, they get better responses to their regulatory compliance efforts with less work on their part. In one customer’s case, the compliance manager was able to free up half the staff to work on initiatives more important than just ensuring the supplier provides all of the necessary information.

A good compliance management solution, which SupplierSoft provides, is becoming very important because:

  • it significantly reduces data collection, review, and reporting costs
    which are becoming more and more significant as a flurry of global regulations are forcing many companies to keep electronic mountains of data
  • it reduces time to market for new products
    which can get delayed due to regulatory reporting requirements if you can’t fill out all of the forms and provide the necessary supplier documentation on-demand
  • it reduces risk
    as manual processes can allow non-compliant raw materials and parts to “sneak” through, which can result in forced recall and significant revenue losses; it also provides you with a “due diligence” defense should you be accused of recklessness in your regulatory compliance efforts
  • it contributes to a 360° view of suppliers
    which is very important to your SPM program

So if you’re looking for an SRM solution and you’re looking at Aravo, CVM, or another big name SIM/SPM/SRM solutions vendor, you might want to give SupplierSoft a look as well. Like their competition, they’re currently getting a lot of attention from a couple of Fortune 100’s and I expect they’ll be getting more attention as time goes on. You won’t know what option is truly right for you unless you look at all of the relevant ones.

Share This on Linked In

Masco Knows the SCORE

I enjoyed this recent article over on Supply Management . com on how when you “know the score”, like Masco, and use collaborative two-way scorecards (like Canada Post does), you can save a lot of money. Masco saved over $5M with its pilot project with just one supplier, exceeding their initial savings goal by over 40%. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. When they roll the program out to their other strategic and high-volume suppliers, I’m sure they’ll save 10 to 100 times that.

Although it’s hard to measure, and even harder to define, true collaboration — where both parties commit to continuous improvement — works. And it generates significant returns when both parties work together and merge their strengths, knowledge, and experience pools. This is because, as the article points out, good collaborative two-way scorecards will:

  • Put the strengths of your purchasing professionals to use
  • Leverage suppliers with whom you do significant business
  • Transfer technical expertise from suppliers to you and vice versa
  • Focus on win-win opportunities that engage both parties
  • Allow both parties to honestly evaluate operations and identify areas for improvements and realistic targets

For more on Masco’s Score methodology (formally labeled their Supplier Collaborative Cost Reduction Evaluation initiative), see the SupplyManagement.com article. It also has their five steps to success, which, though high level, are pretty good.

Share This on Linked In

What Are The Requirements for Collaborative Innovation?

We all know that collaboration is important, because we know it gets results. What we don’t always know is what is required or how to get there. This recent article in Industry Week on Collaborative Innovation (CPG Leaders Discuss Best Practices for Manufacturers) provided some insight.

The article, which resulted from a survey of 30 global CPG manufacturers and retailers and a panel discussion with Coca-Cola, Aerosoles, and Unilever, highlighted four requirements for successful collaborative innovation in the manufacturing and retail sectors. While they may not form a complete recipe for success, they certainly provide a good starting point:

  • Non-Adversarial Mindset
    I would go one step further and say that you need to be able to trust the the party.
  • The Ability to Learn to Speak “Another Language”
    Every profession, and every group, has their own “language”. You are going to need to learn it or you might as well only speak English while your collaborator only speaks Mandarin as the communication gap will be just as broad until you do.
  • New Metrics
    The metrics that got you to today won’t necessarily be the metrics that get you to tomorrow.
  • Willingness to Share IP
    Everyone has to bring something to the table.

In addition, the article highlighted four key lessons that you should heed:

  • Look for Opportunities that provide Mutual Success.
    All parties have to be engaged. This is more likely to happen if it’s a win for everyone.
  • Conduct Collaborate Business Planning that Meets the Needs of Each Partner
    You need to focus on everyone’s needs, not just yours.
  • Build Trusted Relationships
    As I noted, you have to go beyond the non-adversarial mindset and actually work toward trust between all parties.
  • Get Your House in Order Before Attempting External Collaboration
    If you’re not ready to collaborate, your efforts will be for nought.

Share This on Linked In