Category Archives: Supplier Management

Getting Started with Supplier Relationship Management: A Checklist

In our last post, I alerted you to a recent SIG article and some posts on Robert Rudzki’s Transformation Leadership blog that had some tips on how to get started with an SRM program and recognize suppliers. In today’s post, I’m going to alert all of you checklist cherishers to an article that appeared in the Supply Chain Management Review last quarter that should also help you down the supplier relationship road.

In a “10-point Action Agenda for Strategic Supplier Relationship Management”, Marc Day, Greg Magnan, and Jon Hughes put forward, as expected, a 10-point agenda for action. In brief, their action agenda is:

  1. Assess the Current Situation
  2. Build the Business Case and Compute Your ROI
  3. Establish a Budget and Commit Resources
  4. Establish Key Metrics
  5. Establish Your Processes
  6. Educate all Involved Parties
  7. Manage the Relationship
  8. Work Towards the Benefits
  9. Share the Rewards
  10. Keep on Top of Your Performance Metrics

This is a good starting point. The only big things to add are:

  • Put True Leaders in Charge
  • Enable Your Suppliers

It could take some serious leadership skills to pull a new program off successfully without alienating your current supply base and your suppliers are more likely to buy in if they see clear benefits to them from day one.

Getting Started with Supplier Relationship Management

We all know supplier management is important, especially the relationship aspect. We all know that if we don’t manage the relationship, then it could be hard to manage the performance and even harder to manage the risk. But what we don’t often know is where to start.

To that end, an article recently appeared on SIG‘s site that complemented an earlier series of posts on Robert Rudzki’s SCRM “Transformation Leadership” blog which, when taken together, give you a pretty good start.

In “Supplier Relationship Management – How to Get Started with the Program”, Pamela Schott noted that communicating and dealing with a large and diverse supplier community on a daily basis can be a challenge for any organization, and that, when implementing an SRM program, it is necessary to establish and gain executive buy-in on clear, concise objectives that align with the organization’s primary business goals.

She also noted that suppliers should be segmented according to risk and business impact, with the implication that high-risk and high business impact suppliers need to be carefully managed. A segmentation allows you to look at your supply base more pro-actively and identify opportunities to realign the management behaviors for suppliers based on the outcome.

In addition, you should scorecard your suppliers on a regular basis on key internal metrics, such as cost, delivery & support, administration & ease of doing business, quality & partnership, and technology. This will provide you with an understanding of high performing versus low performing suppliers and help you identify where additional effort needs to be extended.

In addition to managing your suppliers, you should also recognize them. As Robert Rudzki points out in “The Role of Supplier Recognition”, recognizing a supplier that does well often yields:

  • further performance improvements
  • improvements from suppliers who want to be recognized

… and this results in increased ROI across the board.

How should you recognize your suppliers? Robert Rudzki recommends an annual event where your “best of the best” suppliers are publicly acknowledged. Just be sure to note that, to pull this event off right, it will require leadership, effective program management, commitment from top management, a budget, and a long lead time. But considering the ROI potential, it could be worth it.

the doctor’s Guest Posts: The Year in Review II

Since last year’s summary of my guest post contributions (in June), I’ve blogged a number of guest posts over on eSourcing Forum [WayBackMachine] as well as authored or co-authored a significant number of wiki-papers over on the eSourcing Wiki. I’ve also contributed articles to the EyeForProcurement monthly newsletter as well as Efficient Purchasing.

e-Sourcing Forum

December 2007 to June 2008

Regulations Unlimited
Strategies for Supply Chain Finance
Customs & Security
The Seven Scruples of a Sourcing Sensei
Discovering Your Leverage Points
Seven Risk Mitigation Strategies You Can Do With Smart Optimization
If it ain’t Multi-Tenant, then it ain’t got SaaS (co-authored with David Bush)
Not All Free Trade is Equal
Best Practice Freight Bidding
CSI: Corporate Social Irresponsibility
Critical Skills of Supply Chain Leaders
Devising an RFP That Works
Core Capabilities of Supplier Enablement
Is it Center of Excellence or MindSet of Excellence
Successful GPOs Are About Value, Not Cost Savings
Don’t Swing the Wrecking Ball Unless You’re Prepared for the Falling Debris
Can you really afford to leave Millions on the table?
Are You Managing Your Talent Chain?

June 2007 to December 2007

Supplier Enablement
Confucious eSourcing Project Management Tips
Brunswick Corporation’s e-Auction Best Practices
Collaborative Negotiation
Seven Tips for SaaS Selection
Incentives Motivate
Optimal E-Tool Selection
Five Ways to Take Your Sourcing to the Next Level
A Global Trade Primer
Applications of Spend Analysis
The Benefits of Purchasing Consortiums
Optimization is the Future And The Future is Now
Some Low Cost Country Sourcing Insights
Twelve Steps to Purchasing Program Predominance
Ten Tips for Talent Retention
A Case for E-Sourcing and E-Procurement Integration
Nine Steps to e-Procurement Success
Key Challenges of Tomorrow, Part II
Key Challenges of Tomorrow, Part III
Ten Common Negotiating Mistakes

Articles

Why aren’t you optimizing?, Efficient Purchasing Issue 5, Fall 2007

Why Aren’t You Optimizing Your Sourcing Decisions? EyeForProcurement August 2007 Newsletter

Vinimaya : The B2B Search Engine

Last November, I introduced you to Vinimaya (rebranded Aquiire, acquired by Coupa) in my post on The Next Wave in Product Catalogue Management. With their agent technology, Vinimaya is a leader in supplier enablement for those companies that need an integrated catalog solution for their e-Procurement platform as their Product Catalog Management Solution (PCM) supports whatever mechanism the supplier already has – be it a punch-out, catalog, market-place, or plain-old web-site.

However, Vinimaya, which is a very stable and profitable company (despite some competitor’s claims to the contrary), is not content to just have the best PCM solution. They’ve spent the past six months improving their core technology and working on additional offerings to benefit the supply management space. In addition to their streamlined agent technology-enabled SmartSearch Buyer, which they are able to implement for an average large customer, who needs hundreds of suppliers enabled, in four to five weeks, they now offer a SmartSearch Supplier service for suppliers, B2B transaction services, and they are working on a new Discovery service that is likely to be launched before the end of the year.

Their SmartSearch Supplier service allows suppliers that require specialized punchouts or catalog formats to support their buyers to offer these formats without having to build these punchouts or specialized (XML, CIF, etc.) formats on their own. The SmartSearch Supplier offering, which uses the same underlying agent technology as SmartSearch Buyer, translates the supplier’s current catalog format (web-site, database, XML, etc.) into whatever format the buyer requires (because they use Ariba Supplier Network, SciQuest, Ketera, etc.) on the fly. In addition, it supports the same price override capability as SmartSearch Buyer, so the supplier can customize its prices to each buyer using a set of pricing rules.

Their B2B transaction services supports internet EDI with seven standard document formats, p-card payments, XML-EDI punchouts, and interchange and is delivered by their partners, including VITG USA and ESIS. In other words, Vinimaya is all about the internet as the network and providing you with the ability to connect with anyone, anywhere, anytime.

However, it is the SmartSearch Discovery offering that they are currently working on now that really got my attention when I caught up with them last week. Right now, they allow you to search multiple sites seamlessly through their SmartSearch Buyer, which is more than any other catalog solution allows you to do. However, in the near future, it sounds like they will also allow you to search third-party marketplaces at the same time, in the same view, and seamlessly integrate the best of B2C with the best of B2B. Right now, you can search by product, category, part, and supplier location – everything you can do with your standard catalog. But with this new service, you’ll also be able to search by component, manufacturer, third party rating, and any other piece of information that is out there on third party marketplaces. And there’ll be better integration into your current e-Procurement and e-Sourcing platforms. What will it look like? That’s a topic for a later post. So stay tuned!

Supplier Metrics that Matter

With skyrocketing costs and stagnant growth, performance is becoming ever more important to your supply chain. But how do you insure you get it? You start with measurements – against good metrics. Today we’re going to tackle supplier metrics.

Back in the fall of 2005, CPO Agenda ran an article titled “Supplier Metrics that Matter” that contained some good advice for developing good supplier metrics – including the following checklist that needs to be highlighted and expanded upon.

  1. Measure
    Specifically, measure what is important – not just what’s easy. For example, prompt invoice delivery is easy to measure, but what’s important is invoice accuracy.
  2. Develop and Utilize
    Metrics and outcome measurement. Utilization is the key. If you see a performance metric dropping, dig in, find out why, engage with the supplier, jointly develop a corrective action plan, and make sure it’s followed through. Otherwise, the metric will likely continue to drop.
  3. Accept approximation
    Some critical dimensions, such as the quality of the working relationship and strategic value, will involve subjective measurements by experts. They won’t be perfect, but without any assessments, you’ll have no foundation for improvement.
  4. Embed the Metrics in your Supplier Management Processes
    This process should include a discussion of how a supplier is to interpret the metrics, how they could go about improving their performance (and becoming or staying a strategic supplier), and about how they can improve the quality of the relationship. Furthermore, this conversation should be two way and the supplier should be able to highlight processes, requirements, or directives that are prohibiting them from doing as well as they could. For an extreme example of how arbitrary directives can greatly increase cost or decrease performance, let’s take Alan Buxton’s example of why project design matters. The UK Ministry of Defence was mandating waterproof matches in boxes of 17. However, most suppliers produced these in boxes of 25 by default. In order to supply boxes of 17, the supplier had to unwrap and repackage boxes of 25 into boxes of 17 which increased costs by 300%!
  5. Jointly Define the metrics.
    This will insure that both parties understand the metrics, what the goals are, and what needs to be done to meet them. It also makes sure that the metrics match the intentions. For example, if you want to insure rapid replenishment, you shouldn’t be measuring just average delivery time, because replenishment will also require the supplier to produce the goods as well. You need to be measuring average turn-around time from the time the order is placed.
  6. Share Competitive Data
    If you want a supplier to understand how well, or poor, it is performing, you need to let it know how well it is doing with respect to its peers, in aggregate and individually. (Just be sure to cleanse the competitive data of identifying information.) If you’re telling your supplier that 93% on-time-delivery is bad, then it needs to understand that average performance is 97%, for example.
  7. Focus on Value
    Don’t define metrics for the sake of defining metrics – make sure there is an associated value to be gained by their definition. You can define a metric on everything – delivery, cycle time, invoice processing time, etc. – but if you define too many metrics, or too many metrics that don’t allow you to improve the overall value of the relationship, then you’ll get lost in the sea of data and not make much progress. Start by defining the major operational areas of importance and identifying the three to five most relevant metrics. If you get them right, you’ll likely find that they’re all you need.