Daily Archives: June 29, 2010

Only One More Week. Give Dave Your Support!

On July 6, 2009, Dave Carroll shared his story with the world about how United Airlines carelessly smashed his guitar on March 31, 2008, when he was on the way to a week-long tour of Nebraska, and how United refused to accept any responsibility or fix it. (Full story.) As you may recall, his story, first expressed in a music video on YouTube, was an overnight sensation that quickly received over Three Million views in the first week. It was such a sensation that it even inspired the Harvard Business Review to do a case study on how viral videos spread and what firms can do about them.

 

To date, the trilogy has garnered over 9,942,000 views!

United Breaks Guitars Views (June 29, 2010)
Song 1  8,733,989
Song 2  1,036,185
Song 3  172,070
TOTAL  9,942,244

 

Since the first video was released on July 6, 2009, this means that we’re only one week away from the one year anniversary! It’s time to step up and thank Dave by ensuring that his fantastic efforts receive the Ten Million Hits they deserve before the anniversary is reached … because the airlines, as a whole, still haven’t gotten the message. United Breaks Guitars, Northwest Breaks Dulcimers, and now Delta Smashes Bicycles, proving that they just don’t care whether or not you TriAndGiveaDam or whether or not the children in Africa have water.

Share the links and spread the word! Surely 58,000 views in a week isn’t much of a challenge!

Share This on Linked In

The Impact of Poor Quality on Cost

Every since the Toyota Production System (TPS) made Toyota famous for efficiency, there’s been a lot of talk about six sigma, lean, and TPS for a reason — because efficiency is good, and quality (which can be obtained when the systems are implemented properly, like they are in Asia, and not like Toyota chose to implement them in the US and Europe) is even better. But do you know how much better quality is?

More specifically, when you buy an inferior product, do you know how much this costs your organization? Chances are, poor quality products cost your organization three times as much as you think they do. In other words, for every dollar you spend on a poor quality product, your organization is losing three. An AMR study demonstrated that two thirds of poor supplier quality costs are non-material. For example, if there aren’t enough quality parts to keep the production line moving at 100%, this will incur additional overhead costs and labor costs in addition to return (processing) costs.

So what can you do to increase quality? According to this recent article in Industry Week on how “managing hidden supplier quality challenges can save millions of dollars”, which contained a case study on Graham Packaging, you start with BI. When you can find the quality-related problems with each supplier, determine which ones are a significant cost to the organization, and quickly get to the root of the issues, you can generate quick savings which, in Grahams case, amounted to millions of dollars a year.

And if you already have a modern, powerful, spend analysis system that allows you to build cubes (and reports) on any data set you please, you can crunch all of the performance related data in the corporate ERP system, create roll-up scorecard reports that capture all of the performance metrics, create comparison reports that indicate which performance metrics are below average and unacceptable, drill down to find the reasons, calculate the projected savings by improving the performance metric and, if the savings outweigh the costs associated with implementing any required improvements, take the reports to the supplier and start working on a fix to stop the leaks. It’s that easy.

Share This on Linked In

Finance Needs Spend Analysis and e-Procurement, Part II

In our last post, we noted that Basware recently released its annual “Cost of Control” study for 2010 and pointed out that Finance’s top 10 challenges could be easily solved with good, modern, spend analysis and e-Procurement solutions. The study also outlined the top 10 strategic finance priorities for 2010 … which can also be addressed by the adoption of good spend analysis and e-Procurement systems. For example:

Spend Analysis would address:

  • Increasing Profits and Top Line PerformanceProfit = Cash In - Cash Out

    Spend analysis reduced cash out.

    Therefore, spend analysis improves profit margins.

  • Maintaining or Improving Profit MarginsSpend analysis allows you to consolidate spend among fewer suppliers and fewer SKUs. This reduces overhead and increases profit margin.
  • Planning, Budgeting, and Revenue ForecastingOnce you know your actual year-over-year spend, volume trends, and market trends, your forecasts and budgets improve greatly.
  • Risk AnalysisAugment the data with (financial) risk information and quality/performance metrics, and you can quickly see which suppliers likely pose the greatest risk to your operations.
  • Regulatory ComplianceYou know what suppliers you’re spending on and how much is going to socially responsible suppliers and how much isn’t. Augment the product data with carbon emissions spending and you know if you’re within limits or not. Etc.

E-Procurement would address:

  • Reduce Overall PurchasingA modern e-Procurement system with approvals, checks, and balances would insure nothing is bought that isn’t approved, on-contract, and within-budget without managerial exception.
  • Cash Flow and Working Capital ManagementYou can see how many purchase orders are outstanding, how many invoices are upaid, what discounts are available to you if you pay early, how much cash is actually free, and even take advantage of receivables financing.
  • Improving Short and Long Term Operational EfficiencyYou can cut DPO and DSO in half, eliminate paper processing, and make your team 80% more efficient. Over the long term, you can reduce the headcount devoted to tactical “paper pushing” and increase the headcount dedicated to strategic spend analysis and sourcing, which increases organizational savings per employee.
  • Environmental PracticesNo paper. Spending to environmentally irresponsible suppliers can be denied. Etc.
  • Accessing CreditIf you know what you have, and you can demonstrate the reliable payment history, even if the banks turn you down, you can get receivables financing.

Share This on Linked In