Category Archives: Decision Optimization

The Sourcing Innovation Source-to-Pay+ Mega Map!

Please Use The 2026 V2 Mega Map Instead. Thank you!

Now slightly less useless than every other logo map that clogs your feeds!

1. Every vendor verified to still be operating as of 4 days ago!
Compare that to the maps that often have vendors / solutions that haven’t been in business / operating as a standalone entity in months on the day of release! (Or “best-of” lists that sometimes have vendors that haven’t existed in 4 years! the doctor has seen both — this year!)

2. Every vendor logo is clickable!
the doctor doesn’t know about you, but he finds it incredibly useless when all you get is a strange symbol with no explanation or a font so small that you would need an electron microscope to read it. So, to fix that, every logo is clickable so you can go to the site and at least figure out who the vendor is.

3. Every vendor is mapped to the closest standard category/categories!
Furthermore, every category has the standard definitions used by Sourcing Innovation and Spend Matters!
the doctor can’t make sense of random categories like “specialists” or “collaborative” or “innovative“, despises when maps follow this new age analyst/consultancy award trend and give you labels you just can’t use, and gets red in the face when two very distinct categories (like e-Sourcing and Marketplaces or Expenses and AP are merged into one). Now, the doctor will also readily admit that this means that not all vendors in a category are necessarily comparable on an apples-to-apples basis, but that was never the case anyway as most solutions in a category break down into subcategories and, for example, in Supplier Management (SXM) alone, you have a CORNED QUIP mash of solutions that could be focused on just a small subset of the (at least) ten different (primary) capabilities. (See the link on the sidebar that takes you to a post that indexes 90+ Supplier Management vendors across 10 key capabilities.)

Secure Download the PDF!  (or, use HTTP) [HTML]
(5.3M; Note that the Free Adobe Reader might choke on it; Preview on Mac or a Pro PDF application on Windows will work just fine)

Even Forbes is Falling for the the Gen-AI Garbage!

This recent article in Forbes on the Supply Chain Shift to Intelligent Technology is what inspired last week’s and this week’s rant because, while supply chains should be shifting to intelligent technology, the situations in which that is Gen-AI are still extremely rare (to the point that a blue moon is much more common). But what really got the doctor‘s goat is the ridiculous claims as to what Gen-AI can do. Claims with are simultaneously maddening and saddening because, if they just left out Gen-AI, then everything they claimed is not only doable, but doable with fantastic results.

Of the first three claims, Gen-AI can only be used to solve one — and only partially.

Procurement and Regulatory Compliance
This is one example where a Closed Private Gen-AI LLM is half the battle — it can process, summarize, and highlight key areas of hundred page texts faster and better than prior NLP tech. But it can’t tell you if your current contracts, processes, efforts, or plans will meet the requirements. Not even close. In fact, no AI can — the best AI can just indicate the presence or absence of data, processes, or tech that are most likely to be relevant and then an intelligent human needs to make the decision, possibly only after obtaining appropriate expert Legal advice.
Manufacturing Efficiency
streamline production workflows? optimize processes? reduce errors? No, Hell No, and even the Joker wouldn’t make that joke! You want streamlining? You first have to do a deep process cycle time analysis, compare it to whatever benchmarks you can get, identify the inefficiencies, identify potential processes and tech for improvement, and implement them. Optimize processes? Detailed step by step analysis, identification of opportunities, expert process redesign, training, implementation, and monitoring. Reduce errors? No! People and tech do the processes, not Gen-AI — implement better monitoring, rules, and safeguards.
Virtual Supply Collaboration
A super-charged chatbot on steroids is NOT a virtual assistant. Now, properly sandwiched between classical AI and rules-based intelligence it can deal with 80% of routine inquiries, but not on its own, and it’s arguable if it’s even worth it when a well designed app can get the user to the info they need 10 times faster with just a couple of clicks. Supply chain communicating? People HATE getting a “robot” on a support line as much as you do, to the point some of us start screaming profanities at it if we don’t get a real operator within 10 seconds. Based on this, do you really think your supplier wants to talk to a dumb bot that has NO authority to make a decision (or, at least, should NEVER have the authority — though the doctor is sure someone’s going to be dumb enough to give the bot the authority … let’s just hope they can live with the inevitable consequences)?

And maybe if the article had stopped there the doctor would let it pass, but
first of all, it went on to state the following for “AI”, without clarifying that Gen-AI doesn’t fit in the process, leading us to conclude that, since the first part of the article is about Gen-AI, this part is too, and thus is totally wrong when it claims that:

“AI” understands dirty data
with about 70% accuracy where it counts IF you’re lucky; that’s about how accurate it is at identifying a supplier from your ERP/AP transaction records; an admin assistant will get about 98% accuracy by comparison
it can “confirm” inventories
all it can do is regurgitate what’s in the inventory system — that’s not confirmation!
it can identify duplicate materials
first it has to identify two records that are actually duplicates;
and how likely do you think this is with a supplier mapping accuracy of 70%?
it can identify materials to be shared among facilities
well, okay, it can identify materials that are used across facilities and could be located in a central location — but how useful is that? it’s not because, first of all, YOU ALREADY KNOW THIS, and, second, IT CAN’T DO SUPPLY CHAIN OPTIMIZATION — THAT’S WHAT A SUPPLY CHAIN OPTIMIZATION SOLUTION IS FOR! OPTIMIZATION!!! We’ll break it down syllabically for you so you know what to ask for. OP – TUH – MY – ZAY – SHUN!
it can recommend ideal storage locations
again, NO! This requires solving a very sophisticated optimization model it doesn’t have the data for, doesn’t know how to build, and definitely doesn’t know how to solve.
it can revamp outdated stocking policies
well, only the solution of a proper Inventory OPTIMIZATION Model that identifies the appropriate locations and safety stock levels can identify how these should be revamped
it can recommend order patterns by consumption and lead time
that’s classical curve fitting and tend projection

And, secondly, as the doctor just explained, most of what they were saying AI could do CAN’T be done with AI, and instead can only be done with analytics, optimization, and advanced mathematical models! (You know, the advanced tech (that works) that you’ve been ignoring for over two decades!)

The Gen-AI garbage is getting out of control. It’s time to stop putting up with it and start pushing back against any provider who’s trying to sell you this miracle cure silicon snake oil and show them the door. There are real solutions that work, and have worked, for two decades that will revolutionize your supply chain. You don’t need false promises and tech that isn’t ready for prime time.

Somedays the doctor just wishes he was the Scarecrow. Only someone without a brain can deal with this constant level of Gen-AI bullsh!t and not be stressed about the deluge of misinformation being spread on a daily basis! But then again, without a brain, he might be fooled by the slick salespeople that Gen-AI could give him one, instead of remembering the wise words of the True Scarecrow.

You Don’t Need Gen-AI to Revolutionize Procurement and Supply Chain Management — Classic Analytics, Optimization, and Machine Learning that You Have Been Ignoring for Two Decades Will Do Just Fine!

Open Gen-AI technology may be about as reliable as a career politician managing your Nigerian bank account, but somehow it’s won the PR war (since there is longer any requirement to speak the truth or state actual facts in sales and marketing in most “first” world countries [where they believe Alternative Math is a real thing … and that’s why they can’t balance their budgets, FYI]) as every Big X, Mid-Sized Consultancy, and the majority of software vendors are pushing Open Gen-AI as the greatest revolution in technology since the abacus. the doctor shouldn’t be surprised, given that most of the turkeys on their rafters can’t even do basic math* (but yet profess to deeply understand this technology) and thus believe the hype (and downplay the serious risks, which we summarized in this article, where we didn’t even mention the quality of the results when you unexpectedly get a result that doesn’t exhibit any of the six major issues).

The Power of Real Spend Analysis

If you have a real Spend Analysis tool, like Spendata (The Spend Analysis Power Tool), simple data exploration will find you a 10% or more savings opportunity in just a few days (well, maybe a few weeks, but that’s still just a matter of days). It’s one of only two technologies that has been demonstrated, when properly deployed and used, to identify returns of 10% or more, year after year after year, since the mid 2000s (when the technology wasn’t nearly as good as it is today), and it can be used by any Procurement or Finance Analyst that has a basic understanding of their data.

When you have a tool that will let you analyze data around any dimension of interest — supplier, category, product — restrict it to any subset of interest — timeframe, geographic location, off-contract spend — and roll-up, compare against, and drill down by variance — the opportunities you will find will be considerable. Even in the best sourced top spend categories, you’ll usually find 2% to 3%, in the mid-spend likely 5% or more, in the tail, likely 15% or more … and that’s before you identify unexpected opportunities by division (who aren’t adhering to the new contracts), geography (where a new local supplier can slash transportation costs), product line (where subtle shifts in pricing — and yes, real spend analysis can also handle sales and pricing data — lead to unexpected sales increases and greater savings when you bump your orders to the next discount level), and even in warranty costs (when you identify that a certain supplier location is continually delivering low quality goods compared to its peers).

And that’s just the Procurement spend … it can also handle the supply chain spend, logistics spend, warranty spend, utility and HR spend — and while you can’t control the HR spend, you can get a handle on your average cost by position by location and possibly restructure your hubs during expansion time to where resources are lower cost! Savings, savings, savings … you’ll find them ’round the clock … savings, savings, savings … analytics rocks!

The Power of Strategic Sourcing Decision Optimization

Decision optimization has been around in the Procurement space for almost 25 years, but it still has less than 10% penetration! This is utterly abysmal. It’s not only the only other technology that has been generating returns of 10% or more, in good times and bad, for any leading organization that consistently uses it, but the only technology that the doctor has seen that has consistently generated 20% to 30% savings opportunities on large multi-national complex categories that just can’t be solved with RFQ and a spreadsheet, no matter how hard you try. (But if you want to pay them, an expert consultant will still claim they can with the old college try if you pay their top analyst’s salary for a few months … and at, say, 5K a day, there goes three times any savings they identify.)

Examples where the doctor has repeatedly seen stellar results include:

  • national service provider contract optimization across national, regional, and local providers where rates, expected utilization, and all-in costs for remote resources are considered; With just an RFX solution, the usual solution is to go to all the relevant Big X and Mid-Sized Bodyshops and get their rate cards by role by location by base rate (with expenses picked up by the org) and all-in rate; calc. the expected local overhead rate by location; then, for each Big X / Mid-Size- role – location, determine if the Big X all-in rate or the Big X base rate plus their overhead is cheaper and select that as the final bid for analysis; then mark the lowest bid for each role-location and determine the three top providers; then distribute the award between the three “top” providers in the lowest cost fashion; and, in big companies using a lot of contract labour, leave millions on the table because 1) sometimes the cheapest 3 will actually be the providers with the middle of the road bids across the board and 2) for some areas/roles, regional, and definitely local, providers will often be cheaper — but since the complexity is beyond manageable, this isn’t done, even though the doctor has seen multiple real-world events generate 30% to 40% savings since optimization can handle hundreds of suppliers and tens of thousands of bids and find the perfect mix (even while limiting the number of global providers and the number of providers who can service a location)
  • global mailer / catalog production —
    paper won’t go away, and when you have to balance inks, papers, printing, distribution, and mailing — it’s not always local or one country in a region that minimizes costs, it’s a very complex sourcing AND logistics distribution that optimizes costs … and the real-world model gets dizzying fast unless you use optimization, which will find 10% or more savings beyond your current best efforts
  • build-to-order assembly — don’t just leave that to the contract manufacturer, when you can simultaneously analyze the entire BoM and supply chain, which can easily dwarf the above two models if you have 50 or more items, as savings will just appear when you do so

… but yet, because it’s “math”, it doesn’t get used, even though you don’t have to do the math — the platform does!

Curve Fitting Trend Analysis

Dozens (and dozens) of “AI” models have been developed over the past few years to provide you with “predictive” forecasts, insights, and analytics, but guess what? Not a SINGLE model has outdone classical curve-fitting trend analysis — and NOT a single model ever will. (This is because all these fancy-smancy black box solutions do is attempt to identify the record/transaction “fingerprint” that contains the most relevant data and then attempt to identify the “curve” or “line” to fit it too all at once, which means the upper bound is a classical model that uses the right data and fits to the right curve from the beginning, without wasting an entire plant’s worth of energy powering entire data centers as the algorithm repeatedly guesses random fingerprints and models until one seems to work well.)

And the reality is that these standard techniques (which have been refined since the 60s and 70s), which now run blindingly fast on large data sets thanks to today’s computing, can achieve 95% to 98% accuracy in some domains, with no misfires. A 95% accurate forecast on inventory, sales, etc. is pretty damn good and minimizes the buffer stock, and lead time, you need. Detailed, fine tuned, correlation analysis can accurately predict the impact of sales and industry events. And so on.

Going one step further, there exists a host of clustering techniques that can identify emergent trends in outlier behaviour as well as pockets of customers or demand. And so on. But chances are you aren’t using any of these techniques.

So given that most of you haven’t adopted any of this technology that has proven to be reliable, effective, and extremely valuable, why on earth would you want to adopt an unproven technology that hallucinates daily, might tell of your sensitive employees with hate speech, and even leak your data? It makes ZERO sense!

While we admit that someday semi-private LLMs will be an appropriate solution for certain areas of your business where large amount of textual analysis is required on a regular basis, even these are still iffy today and can’t always be trusted. And the doctor doesn’t care how slick that chatbot is because if you have to spend days learning how to expertly craft a prompt just to get a single result, you might as well just learn to code and use a classic open source Neural Net library — you’ll get better, more reliable, results faster.

Keep an eye on the tech if you like, but nothing stops you from using the tech that works. Let your peers be the test pilots. You really don’t want to be in the cockpit when it crashes.

* And if you don’t understand why a deep understand of university level mathematics, preferably at the graduate level, is important, then you shouldn’t be touching the turkey who touches the Gen-AI solution with a 10-foot pole!

The Power of Optimization-Backed Sourcing is in the Right Sourcing Mix Across Scales of Size and Service

the doctor has been pushing optimization-backed sourcing since Sourcing Innovation started in 2006. There’s a number of reasons for this:

  • there is only one other technology that has repeatedly demonstrated savings of 10% or more
  • it’s the only technology that can accurately model total cost of ownership with complex cost discounts and structures
  • it’s the only technology that can minimize costs while adhering to carbon, risk, or other requirements
  • it’s one of only two technologies that can analyze cost / risk, cost / carbon, or other cost / x tradeoffs accurately

However, the real power of optimization-backed sourcing is how it can not only give you the right product mix, but the right mix across scales. This is especially prevalent when doing sourcing events for national or international distribution or utilization. Without optimization, most companies can only deal with suppliers who can handle international distribution or utilization. This generally rules out regional suppliers and always rules out local suppliers, some of whom might be the best suppliers of goods or services to the region or locality. While one may be tempted to think local suppliers are irrelevant because they will struggle to deliver the economy of scale of a regional supplier and will definitely never reach the economy of scale of a national (or international) supplier, unit cost is just one component of the total lifecycle cost of a product or service. There’s transportation cost, tariffs, taxes, intermediate storage, and final storage (of which more will be required since you will need to make larger orders to account for longer distribution timelines) among other costs. So, in some instances, local and regional will be the overall lowest cost and keeping them out of the mix increases costs (and sometimes increases carbon and risk as well).

When it comes to services, the right multi-level mix can lead to savings of 30% or more in an initial event. the doctor has seen this many times over his career (consulting for many of of the strategic sourcing decision optimization startups) because while the big international players can get competitive on hourly rates where they have a lot of resources with a skill set, when it comes to services, there are all in-costs to consider, which include travel to the client site and local accommodations. The thing with national and international services providers is that they tend to cluster all of their resources with a certain skill set in a handful of major locations. So their core IT resources (developers, architects, DBAs, etc.) will be in San Francisco and New York, their core Management consultants will be in Chicago and Atlanta, their core Finance Pros in Salt Lake City and Denver, etc. So if you need IT in Jefferson City, Missouri, Management in Winner, South Dakota, or accounting in Des Moines, Iowa, you’re flying someone in, putting them up at the highest star hotel you have, and possibly doubling the cost compared to a standard day rate.

However, simple product mix and services scenarios are not the only scenarios optimization-backed sourcing can handle. As per this article over on IndianRetailer.com, retailers need to back away from global sourcing and embrace regional (and even local) strategies for cost management, supply stability, and resilience. They are only going to be able to figure that out with optimization that can help them identify the right mix to balance cost and supply assurance, and when you need to do that across hundreds, if not thousands, of products, you can’t do that with an RFX solution and Microsoft Excel.

Furthermore, when you need to minimize costs when a price is fixed, like the price of oil or airline fuel, you need to maximize every related decision like where to refuel, what service providers to contract with, how to transport it, etc. When it can cost up to $40,000 to fuel a 737 for a single flight (when prices are high), and you operate almost 7,000 flights per day with planes ranging from a gulf stream that costs about $10,000 to refuel to a Boeing 747 that, in hard times, can cost almost $400,000 to refuel, you can be spending $60 Million a day on fuel as your fleet burns 10 Million gallons. Storing those 10 Million gallons, transporting those 10 Million gallons, and using that fuel to fuel 7,000 planes takes a lot of manpower and equipment, all of which has an associated cost. Hundreds of thousands of associated costs per day (on the low end), and tens of millions per year. Shaving off just 3% would save over a million dollars easy. (Maybe two million.) However, the complexity of this logistics and distribution model is beyond what any sourcing professional can handle with traditional tools, but easy with an optimization backed platform that can model an entire flight schedule, all of the local costs for storage and fueling, all of the distribution costs from the fuel depots, and so on. (This is something that Coupa is currently supporting with its CSO solution, which has saved at least one airline millions of dollars. Reach out to Ian Milligan for more information if this intrigues you or how this model could be generalized to support global fleet management operations of any kind.)

In other words, Optimization-Backed Sourcing is going to become critical in your highly strategic / high spend categories as costs continue to rise, supply continues to be uncertain, carbon needs to be accounted for, and risks need to be managed.

Logility “Starboard”: The Real-Time What-If Supply Chain Network Modeller that Every Sourcing Professional Should Have

Now, it’s true that this blog is focussed on Source-to-Pay and it’s true that, as a result, we usually focus on Strategic Sourcing Decision Optimization and occasionally on Logistics-focussed Models and Optimization Solutions, as that what’s typically needed for a Sourcing Professional to make the optimum buy, but this time we’re going to make an exception.

Why is network modelling an exception (besides the fact that, as we told you yesterday when we said Don’t Overlook the Network, it has the absolute best return on investment across all supply chain applications)? Well, if you think about classic network modelling, it’s not something a sourcing professional would do because it’s typically up to logistics and supply chain to maintain the network infrastructure that gets the product from the suppliers to the ports and warehouses and then to the distribution centres, retail facilities, and end consumers in drop-ship models. It’s up to logistics to re-evaluate the supporting network infrastructure on a bi/tri-annual basis and determine if warehouses should be added, relocated, or deleted (on lease end); if ports should be changed (to reduce overall costs due to port fees or local carrier costs or rail vs truck options); if new carriers should be considered; and so on.

The reason that this is typically only done on a bi/tri-annual basis is because it has traditionally been an arduous endeavour where you have to

  • build a very detailed model of all
    • the supplier production facilities, ports, warehouses, distribution centers, manufacturing/assembly centers, and retail facilities
    • the lanes used
    • the modes used for each lane
    • the carriers used for each mode / lane combination
    • the LTL and FTL rates for each carrier
    • the drop-ship rates for direct-to-consumer
  • identify all of the products being purchased and
    • associate them with the appropriate suppliers
    • associate them with the appropriate lanes, modes, and carriers
    • associate them with the appropriate warehouses
    • associate them with the appropriate retail locations or drop-ship locations
  • collect all of the current rates, for every supplier-carrier-lane-mode option in use
  • then solve a current-state optimization problem to determine baseline costs, times to serve, carbon emissions, etc.
  • identify all of the potential port and warehouse locations you could (also) use
  • identify all of the new lanes that would create
  • identify all of the additional carriers that could be used
  • collect quotes for every lane-carrier-mode combination from the potential new options that might actually be used
  • then build an extended model that includes all options and feed in all of the data
  • then solve a full-state model to determine baseline costs, times to serve, carbon emissions, etc.
  • then determine the ranges for the number of ports, warehouses, distribution centers, carriers, time to serve, carbon emissions, etc. that are acceptable
  • solve a copy of the restricted full-state model to determine a new baseline cost
  • then make and create copies of the model and run analysis against different objectives until the model is acceptable, and the costs (time to serve, emissions, etc.) reduced significantly enough to do a network transformation exercise

and this endeavour would typically take three to six months due to the fact it would take weeks to build the baseline models, months to collect the data, and weeks to build, solve, and analyze the models and come up with a new state that improved all the measures of interest as well as the implementation plan to make it happen.

But the problem with doing this bi/tri-annually is that you never know the impact of adding a new supplier or, more importantly, replacing a supplier of a significant product line or category where that supplier is in a completely different location, and possibly one that the last network design never took into account. Plus, the removal of a big supplier might cause a certain node (warehouse, distribution center, etc.) to be significantly under-utilized, resulting in unexpected overspend in certain parts of the distribution network.

But this knowledge is critically important to know before making a major sourcing decision that might change the supply base for a highly utilized product line or category — because the costs of the award will not be the expected costs. They will not be the unit or expected transportation costs used in the analysis that the award decision is based on, but will instead be those costs plus the fixed and variable losses incurred from underutilizing a sub-set of the network and/or overutilizing another sub-set of the network.

While this has always been the case, as the belief was that nothing could traditionally be done about it, if there was a tool that could

  • actively maintain the current network model
  • allow for copies to be created on the fly
  • allow for those copies to be easily modified, including
    • the addition or deletion of nodes (suppliers, ports, warehouses, distribution centers, retail locations, etc.)
    • the definition of new lanes
    • the the addition of carriers and/or carrier modes
    • updated costs for every lane
  • solve those copies quickly and accurately

then a sourcing professional could have deep insight into whether their cost models and assumptions are correct and logistics could update the network model, or at least the future state (if leases/contracts need to expire and new leases/contracts need to be signed), upon every award, and the overall sourcing, logistics, and supply chain costs.

And this is what you can do with Logility Network Optimization, formerly Starboard Solutions (acquired in 2022) and exactly why we are making an exception and covering them.

With the Logility Network Optimization Solution (which really should be called Logility Starboard, for reasons that will soon become clear), a Sourcing Professional can:

  • instantly see a graphical view of the current global network
  • bring up reports that summarize all of the key data
  • drill in to node / carrier / supplier / port / warehouse / distribution / product / combination costs
  • create a copy of the current network with all relevant data
  • and then create a what-if baseline scenario where they can
    • add whatever they wish (through simple pop-up interfaces they can add nodes and relationships),
    • remove whatever they wish (by simply clicking on a node or searching for the entity or relationship and deleting it), and, most importantly,
    • change whatever they want through in the network design through a simple drag-and-drop mechanism
  • they can then specify any constraints and goals, run an optimization, and see the new costs, and, most importantly, extract lanes / costs / variables of interest to populate into the TCO (total cost of ownership) calculations in their sourcing events

Logility Network Optimization can do this because it integrates with third party platforms and constantly extracts current market quotes and market rates for all major global lanes and can, when you change a design, automatically bring in those market rates and costs as a baseline for any lane / (generic) carrier / mode / volume combination you don’t already have a quote for. This not only provides a baseline rate (which might get better with a volume promise, negotiation, or current quote), but a statistically accurate one (especially if you just go with a generic carrier rate). (And, if there is no quote for a lane, the platform is smart enough to build one up from lane segments or tear one down using existing quotes and statistically significant costs per distance using statistically significant base rates for just securing the transportation mode.)

Furthermore, because it is a true multi-tenant cloud solution that uses a distributed “serverless” model that can decompose tasks into subtasks that can be run in (a massively) parallel (manner), such as data fetching, sub-model building, and even model solving (as all optimization models can be solved by solving sub-models on convex subspaces of the high-dimensional solution space), it can do it fast. And it’s just as accurate as the traditional, prior generation tools, at a speed that is breakneck in comparison, and that’s even if it uses statistically significant calculated data.

Moreover, it’s very easy to define multiple constraints and weighted objectives. You can guarantee maximum times to serve / times to deliver (subject to minimums that cannot be improved upon) while balancing overall cost and carbon footprint (through a weighted objective). (It’s quite easy to define objectives in the platform which have built in pop-ups to solve for different goals — service time, emissions limit, cost, and best X, where X is a single dimension or derived dimension that weights 2 or more other dimensions.) Or you can guarantee maximum times to serve, a fixed / x% carbon reduction, while minimizing overall cost. Or you can keep ports you know are stable and the warehouses with contracts you can’t break while allowing the delivery network architecture to shift to minimize overall costs.

The browser based interface to Logility’s platform offers a graphically represented virtual twin to an organization’s network with high-level summary data (products, facilities, lanes, suppliers, customers, activities, and costs) with easy scenario selection and easy definition and modification of scenarios. It’s very easy to dive into definition screens and see the suppliers, facilities, lanes, etc. and see/edit all of the data for any individual supplier, facility, lane, etc.; add a new instance, delete one, and see the associated costs, times, emissions, etc. and the underlying calculations associated with a node or relationship in the network graph (which is stored in a graph database that allows for massive scalability).

It’s also very easy to dynamically generate comparison reports between scenarios that compare (activity) costs (across cost types, such as leases, handling, transport costs, rail costs, ocean freight, tariffs, etc.), (average) service times (by supplier, product, lane, etc.), carbon (by carrier, lane, product, supplier, etc.), and other metrics of interest. Furthermore, when a user is happy with a scenario, they can one-click generate and output a complete comparison / summary report deck to PowerPoint for executive reporting (across as many scenarios as they like).

To enhance usability — which is quite obvious out-of-the-box to anyone who understands the basics of modelling, optimization, and decision analysis — Logility has an integrated quick-tour to get started, a full multi-media course on the platform and the modelling that can be done, playbooks for particular problems and challenges, and weekly office hours where users can ask Logility pros questions and get answers in real time. Logility Network Optimization was designed from the bottom up for usability and success.

Logility Network Optimization is the perfect complement to optimization-backed sourcing platforms with bill of material support. Buyers can model potential changes that would result from awarding to a new supplier, not awarding to an existing supplier, changing carriers or lanes, get expected transportation and tariff costs, augment the supplier quotes with this updated data in real-time through a Logility API feed (from an identified scenario), run a total cost of optimization scenario on the full set of bids augmented with accurate total cost of ownership data, make an award, push that award back to Logility Network Optimization which will update the network model in real time, create a new what-if, and see if the network model should be altered when the new supplier is brought fully on board. For the first time, an organization could have closed loop sourcing, logistics, and network optimization in real-time — a reality that was once as far away as the stars themselves (and why the platform takes you Starboard). It’s a powerful concept, and worth branching out beyond traditional Source-to-Pay providers and Strategic Sourcing Decision Optimization to achieve.