Category Archives: Decision Optimization

The Sourcing Maniacs 2008 Vendor Tour Part VII: Emptoris

At this point in the story, I ask the Sourcing Maniacs to jump ahead and discuss their expedition to Massachusetts for Empower and what they learned.

This is a long post, since the maniacs love to go on and on and on at times, so I’ve broken it up into Preamble and Discussion. If you’re short on time, you can skip the pre-amble, which doesn’t have a lot of content.

Preamble

 
Guys, if I may interrupt, can we jump ahead a little bit?
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot startled, probably forgetting I was even in the room as I’ve been rather silent to this point during the recounting of their massive summer road tour
Wha …
Dot You’re still here?
the doctor Of course! I’ve been listening intently to your story.
Wakko That’s right! We were telling you the story of our summertime blues …
Yakko I’m gonna raise a fuss, I’m gonna raise a holler
About a workin’ all summer just to try to …
the doctor Yakko!
Yakko Yes?
the doctor Can we jump ahead in the story to where you return to Massachusetts in your quest to sneak into Empower?
Dot I thought you wanted to here about our journey as it happened.
the doctor I do … but I just want you to jump ahead and tell me about your recent trip back to Massachusetts, because I know Emptoris is on everyone’s mind these days … and don’t you want to fit the “E” in at an appropriate place? Besides, as soon as you’re done telling me about your recent side-trip, we can return exactly to where you are now in your story.
Dot Promise?
the doctor Yes Dot, I promise.
Wakko? Wakko!
Wakko just lit four roman candles that he pulled out of his backpack and he is starting to juggle them.
You need to put those out now!
Wakko But juggling candles helps me focus!
the doctor But those are Roman Candles!
Wakko So?
Yakko & Dot They explode!
Yakko and Dot quickly grab the candles from Wakko and snuff them out.
the doctor So, can we jump ahead a little bit? Does it make sense?
Wakko Cents … don’t you need copper to make those?
Yakko Wakko!
Yes, doctor, I think it makes sense.
the doctor Then take it away!
Dot Wow, Vinimaya was awesome!
Yakko I never knew you could integrate more than one catalog in one view before!
Wakko … and simultaneously bring up every vendor of baloney in the world with their current pricing and get the best possible deal for your money today! I’m hungry …
Yakko & Dot You’re always hungry! Didn’t you just eat an entire Boston Cream Pie?
Wakko … and it was yummy! …
Yakko Look … way up ahead … I think that’s Pinky and the Brain!
Wakko I think so too!
Dot Let’s hurry!
the maniacs pick up the pace …
soon after, Pinky and the Brain round a corner
when the maniacs round the corner, they see Pinky and the Brain enter a resort ….
they approach … a guard is guarding the door
Dot Quick! They’re in there!
Guard in a French accent
Halt! No en-tray for yoo!
the maniacs come to an abrupt stop
Dot Do I know you!
Guard Yoo furry little hamzterz again? Yoo are not welcome here either!
Wakko We’re not hamsters!
Guard But yoo still zmell like elderberriez, yoo pointy-eared Ratatouilles!
Yakko What are you doing here?
Guard I go where dey send me!
Yakko What do you mean?
Guard I work for RAG … Rent-A-Guard!
Now go, or I shall taunt yoo again!
Yakko Let’s go … this guy is still crazier than us!
Wakko But …
Yakko We’ll have to find another way to find out what’s going on with Emptoris.
Dot But … Pinky …
Yakko Maybe we can catch them on the way out.
Guard I make fun-nee facez at yoo!
Dot OK … I’m getting weirded out …
Wakko Wakko starts making funny faces back
Pzzzt!
Yakko Wakko! Let’s go.
  The maniacs take their leave.

 

Discussion

the doctor So, you didn’t get into Empower? Did you lean anything? Is there a point to this story?
Yakko We did overhear a few conversations at the local restaurants …
the doctor So, nothing more than rumors then …
Dot Some we heard a few times …
the doctor Well, with respect to those that you heard more than once, did you overhear anything that is more informative than what I already read on Spend Matters and heard from attendees?
Yakko Spend-What now?
Wakko Cost Matters, dude! It’s all about getting as much as you can for whatever you’re selling! It’s all about the mighty dollar!
Dot After all, it wouldn’t be Prada if it were cheap now, would it?
the doctor OOO-Kay … back to topic … let’s discuss what my readers probably already know and see if you have anything to add to it. Sound good?
Wakko Of course they sound good! They’re Bose speakers!
the doctor learning quickly that interrupting the maniacs does not lead to predictable results
Let’s start with the numbers. Any idea how accurate the headcount numbers reported on Spend Matters are? In other words, does Emptoris have almost 450 people, with 150 staff members in engineering and QA?
Yakko I never heard anyone at the local restaurants talk about headcount numbers.
Wakko They were more concerned with losing their shirts, though I don’t know how you lose something that you wear snugly around your body.
the doctor I think they were using a metaphor to refer to the current economic crisis, Wakko.
Wakko Wakko looks … thoughtful.
the doctor It’s unfortunate that you can’t add anything. I’d like to know more about the current R&D breakdown, and, in particular, QA vs. maintenance and support of existing products vs. development of new products vs. mid-term to long-term research?
Yakko Why?
the doctor 150 is a large R&D organization, esprecially in this space. If I had that many people, and they were the right people, I could do some great things. And the more they have on new development and mid-to-long-term R&D, the more you can expect from them in the future.
Yakko After our road tour this summer, I don’t know what to expect anymore! I used to think the solution our former employer developed was very comprehensive and kicked-ass … but now I know it only solved a small part of the problem and that there’s a lot more to sourcing than I thought, and a lot of new solutions out there to help companies address their problems.
the doctor That’s right, Yakko. It’s a wide world of sourcing, with great tools to help you if you know where to look. Let’s move onto the new developments coming down the pipe that Emptoris released details on at Empower.

I have gathered the following from Spend Matters alone:

  • better attachment handling
  • an enhanced notification & alerting framework
  • an updated preliminary bidding interface as well as optimized auctions
  • incremental awards capability
  • ad-hoc reporting capabilities that plug into Microsoft Excel
  • embedded domain knowledge

and I must say that, with the exception of the third and sixth improvements, they don’t grab my attention. We’ve known how to handle attachments for over a decade now, and open source content management / document management solutions with extensive attachment support have been available since early in the decade; if the architecture properly accounts for events, it’s trivial to send off a notification or trigger an alert on any event that occurs in the system; just about everything plugs into Microsoft Excel these days, and has for years; and incremental awards capability is a pretty logical product extension.

That being said, if the domain knowledge that was embedded was extensive, good, and guided the workflow … that would be incredibly useful to your average buyer and if the optimization was tightly integrated into the auctions, that would seriously rock. However, the later is much easier said than done. So, needless to say, I’m curious as to how far they have progressed down that road.

Can you add anything to this?

Wakko When I was hiding in the foliage …
the doctor You were … never mind … continue …
Wakko I heard a couple of men in suits talk about the new “drillable dashboards” and how cool they were. How they thought they’d be able to drill around their reports in real time and find hidden opportunities and then export the data to Excel and play around some more. They said it’s much better than the reporting they got when they first bought the solution.
the doctor A couple of my sources mentioned that too. I hope they did more than that. First of all, as I’ve said again and again, dashboards are dangerous and dysfunctional as they can give you a false sense of security. Secondly, with a spend analysis solution, which is one of the many solutions Emptoris provides, you can not only build your own “dashboard” reports, but actually drill around the entire data set in real time.

I was hoping that the dashboards were quick access points into their SRM application, since that’s the one place I see them being incredibly useful, and was hoping that you’d be able to provide some clarification.

But c’est la vie. Anything else?

Dot When I was pretending to be a waitress, I heard them talking about something called spend desktop intelligence.
the doctor The Prophet (of Spend Matters) mentioned that too, but I’m fuzzy on the details. Are they packaging up their best practices and market insights that they would have gained from working with their customers across America and Europe, and maybe trying to leverage it the same way Ariba is apparently realizing that it needs to leverage it’s category expertise?
Dot I don’t know. They mentioned how great it was that it worked with Excel and supported more ad-hoc reporting.
the doctor That makes it sound like its just an improved reporting tool, which it may be based on a few things I heard. But I hope I’m not getting the full story and that it’s more than that, especially since it’s been reported that they have a Center of Excellence with over 65 staff that speaks ten languages and works with customers across North America and Europe. With that many staff, they would be developing significant market and category expertise, just like the Ariba Supply Watch team, from working on the large number of customer projects that such a team could support over the course of a year. I want to see them package that knowledge up and build a tool that instantly puts it at their customers fingertips. That would be desktop intelligence!

Anything else?

Yakko I heard a couple of suits talking about something called agile contracting and whether or not the simultaneous amendments and mass amendments would be useful.
the doctor Well, if by simultaneous amendment you mean the ability for multiple parties to simultaneously collaborate in the drafting and rapid approval of a contract amendment, which is what I believe it is, that is very useful. But what do you mean by mass amendments?
Yakko I think it’s the ability to amend multiple contracts at once.
the doctor Well, that scares me a little.
Yakko Why?
the doctor Most amendments to a contract need to be mutual … between both parties. That means you can’t just go modifying a contract, once signed, willy-nilly, and that you definitely can’t go modifying a group of contracts willy-nilly … unless you want to give your legal advisor a heart attack. Now, it’s true that some modifications can be made unilaterally, but they are usually restricted to change of address, etc. Although the feature could prove to be quite useful in larger organizations during contract template maintenance and update, which is a huge task in itself if you have the same terms and conditions across multiple types of contracts, I can see it scaring legal council, who would thus be adverse to using it, especially if they think there’s a chance they could overwrite a live contract. Let’s hope they put out some really good messaging on this capability.

Anything else?

Dot Spend enrichment …
the doctor Yeah … I’ve heard this from multiple sources … but I’m going to cut you off at the starting line with this one. Spend enrichment is child’s play with a good spend analysis system (and if you don’t immediately see why, read the wiki-paper and the spend analysis posts on my blog), and doesn’t need much discussion.

What else?

Yakko Performance visibility within Contract Management …
the doctor Now that would be cool … especially if they tightly integrated their SRM application within their CM tool and, for any supplier, you could see how well they were doing at a glance, where they were weak, and what needed improvement … and could take immediate action. And if you can see their invoice accuracy, and verify that you are not overpaying, and thus realizing your negotiated savings … that’s useful. What were you able to find out about it?
Yakko Nothing.
the doctor Nothing?
Yakko They left the restaurant just as they started that conversation.
the doctor That’s unfortunate … as I don’t have any details on this either, though I’m told by multiple sources it’s coming. Anything else? Anything?
Wakko Something about A T K.
the doctor Do you mean AT Kearney?
Wakko I think so.
the doctor What did you hear?
Wakko Something about AT Kearney using Emptoris Spend Enrichment exclusively for all of it’s opportunity assessments.
the doctor Are you sure?
Wakko I think so. Why? Is it important?
the doctor Are you kidding? If you heard right, that’s huge!
Dot, tell me what you heard about what they are calling “spend enrichment” … their definition must be more extensive than mine if they’ve won over AT Kearney.
Dot Something about building in an item knowledge base and vendor knowledge base …
the doctor And???
Dot I got called to another table. I had to keep the waitress act up, you know.
the doctor That sucks. I’d love to know how they won AT Kearney … and to what extent AT Kearney is deploying them … I’d bet that to be one of the most important revelations to come out of Empower … after all, with the exception of optimization-based auctions, just about everything else sounds like logical, incremental, expected upgrades to their existing suite. But whatever they did to get the undivided attention of AT Kearney is certainly worth investigating! It’s too bad they won’t talk to us …

Anything …

Yakko They’re hoping to have their next release out soon.
the doctor I’ve heard that too. Did you overhear what’s going to be in it?
Yakko Dutch reverse auctions, dashboard intelligence, and better spend analysis.
the doctor Sounds about right. My sources didn’t provide much insight here, which is probably good since future development plans are always subject to change anyway. Did you hear if they are going to take whatever they have for auction-optimization up a notch? That could be so cool!
Yakko I don’t know. I didn’t overhear anyone talk about optimization at all.
the doctor That’s depressing. I know that I’ve said before that I don’t think it’s the best solution on the market, but let’s face it, you don’t need the absolute best optimization solution on the market to save big money the first time you apply it to a category … a good optimization solution, which they appear to have based on the details they released in a Spend Matters Post (Emptoris Optimization: Setting the Record Straight) and other publications I’ve been able to dig up, will save you a small fortune (especially if it is significantly more affordable than the best solution out there, as there is generally not that much of a difference between a good, solid, optimization solution and a great one, which generally only saves you additional dollars on significantly complex or specialized categories), and from what I understand, they’ve made some definite improvements, at least on the usability front, over the last couple of years and I bet there’s still a lot of categories their average customer could save 10% (or more) on. (And, these days, that’s a lot of money!)

But what should I expect from the market? The true leaders get it, and the laggards, which, apparently, constitute the majority of the space, don’t. I guess I’ll just have to keep educating them that optimization is easy, that they can do it, and that they can save money … significant money … and this is doubly true if they are already using a solution (like Emptoris) that has optimization. (Even though I’m starting to feel like Rob Schneider in an Adam Sandler movie.) I hope that, for the sake of so many companies which are in unnecessary financial jeopardy, it doesn’t take me much longer.

Anything else?

Yakko Not really.
the doctor Dot?
Dot No … I was really much too busy having fun playing waitress …
Wakko I got so comfortable in the foliage, I feel asleep.
the doctor So you didn’t hear anything more than I did. Pity. Because what I’ve been told, by attendees, and heard over the last few months doesn’t go much beyond the coverage on Spend Matters, the news sites (Supply and Demand Chain Executive, ITWeb, and their own Emptoris Connect news site), and the Analyst sites (like Forrester, AMR, and IQPC). And my readers want more than that. They want deep insights into problems, solutions, and vendors who can help them. Not marketing fluff or the superficial coverage, which is often no more than parroting press release, that most of the news sites seem to be content with these days.

On a different subject, did you meet up with Pinky and the Brain while you were in the area?

Dot Pinky came to see me …
the doctor And?
Dot He told me some funny stories.
the doctor Any contain any insights as to what’s going on with the vendor world?
Dot Not really. They were just about the Brain’s latest attempts to take over the sourcing world.
the doctor Tell him to share them with me! It’s been a while since I’ve heard from him.

Well, if there’s nothing else, I should let you get back to your story.

Yakko Where were we?
the doctor Reviewing notes.
Oompa Loompa Doom-pa-dee-do

 

The next part of the story continues after where we left off in Part VI.

the doctor’s Seven Grand Challenges for Supply & Spend Management

Seven deadly sins
Seven ways to win
Seven holy paths to hell
And your trip begins

Seven downward slopes
Seven bloodied hopes
Seven are your burning fires
Seven your desires….
  Adrian Smith / Bruce Dickinson

In my last post, which announced the cross-blog series that this post is officially kicking off, I reviewed the seven grand challenges for IT over the next twenty-five years, as laid out by Gartner back in the spring. Although they ranged from the ridiculous to the sublime, and contained a fair amount of overlap when closely analyzed, it’s a worthwhile exercise to undertake every now and again, because in order to develop a useful solution, you need to identify what is needed and the path you should be on.

This inspired me to propose a set of “seven grand challenges” for supply and spend management, in the hopes that it would get you, dear reader, to think about what is important, what problems should be solved, and where we should go. Considering how important supply management is in these troubled times, I hope that all of my fellow bloggers chime in with their ideas on what’s good, what’s bad, and, what’s downright ugly in supply chain today — because the first step in solving a problem is properly identifying it.

So, without further ado, to kick off this cross-blog series, here are the doctor‘s proposals for the seven grand supply and spend management challenges:

  • Optimization
    There are a number of challenges here. The first challenge is getting people to use solutions that are already out there. There are currently a number of offerings that address strategic sourcing decision optimization, distribution network optimization, and freight optimization quite well, and that, when properly applied, can save the average company up to 12% above and beyond the best solution obtained with auctions. The second challenge is integrating the different problems (sourcing optimization, freight optimization, network optimization, etc.) into a common framework that allows the tradeoff effects of each decision to be adequately modeled and understood in the big picture. The third problem is addressing the emerging non-quantitative regulatory and compliance requirements such as RoHS, WEEE, and GHG emission limits in a consistent and value-oriented manner within the optimization model.
  • Supplier Enablement
    This is something we still don’t have a good handle on. Beyond “supplier enablement is the provision of technology based solutions that enable the supplier to be more productive and better serve the buyer”, there isn’t yet a general consensus of what this technology needs to be, as most companies have not yet embraced B2B 3.0. I’ve argued before that, today, it’s a combination of catalogs, networks, e-Document exchange and management, and supplier portal technology, and I still think that is a good start, but enablement should go beyond enabling the exchange of information, it should improve the supplier’s operations overall.
  • Integration of the Physical, Information, & Financial Chains
    For most companies, these are three different chains. Some companies that have embraced RFID, GPS, and e-document management have taken the first steps to integrating the physical and information flows, but the technology is still emerging, the integration isn’t smooth without extensive integration and customization between a number of different solutions (and only Fortune 500 companies can even afford to consider this), and we have only started to look at the financial supply chain and how to best integrate it with the information supply chain. I think it will be a while before solutions that truly support a holistic view will emerge, especially considering that even the gorillas in the space don’t have end-to-end sourcing and procurement.
  • Solution Globalization
    Let’s face it … supply chains today are truly global, but the solutions are not. Most “internationalized” solutions are only available in a smattering of languages, most “internationalized” solutions are not plugged into real-time currency exchange feeds — and few developers have thought about the need to maintain/display multiple conversions (including the rate at the time of purchase, the projected rate, the current rate, etc.), and most “internationalized” solutions don’t help you understand how to do business with the country of interest.
  • GHG Tracking and Reduction
    Most enlightened countries have woken up to the fact that, even though we don’t know precisely how damaging each ton of GHG and / or carbon we emit is, we do know that it’s damaging and that we have to reduce our emissions. The first step is to get a baseline of the emissions produced by your operations, but for many companies, this is a multi-year effort. Better product and service solutions are needed. Also, although there are multiple proposals on the table to reduce emissions, there are few total value management models out there to help us select the right ones.
  • Risk Prevention
    Not only is risk not going away, but it’s getting worse by the year. Supply chains are getting more complex by the year, and the likelihood of something going wrong is steadily increasing. Solutions that can help a company identify risks, in real time, and identify possible mitigations and actions required to implement them, are desperately needed.
  • Opportunity Analysis
    Costs are skyrocketing, but consumer discretionary spending is stagnant at best. They key to a successful supply chain is cost reduction and avoidance, and this requires continual opportunity analysis. I envision this starting with modern spend analysis, but it needs to go beyond true spend analysis to continual innovation, since the greatest cost reductions will come from true revolutions, and not just the shrewd identification of category-based overspending. I envision that this will start with the integration of PLM with Life Cycle Analysis and Next Generation Analytics and then morph into something that none of us can envision today.

Now, I realize that these are pretty much the same problems we have been facing for the last five to ten years, but I suspect that it will be quite a while before they are solved due to the overwhelming complexity of today’s supply chains.

When the series is done, I’ll compile the “master list” of challenges and, if any of my fellow bloggers can convince me there are bigger challenges out there, revise my list.

the doctor’s Guest Posts: The Year in Review II

Since last year’s summary of my guest post contributions (in June), I’ve blogged a number of guest posts over on eSourcing Forum [WayBackMachine] as well as authored or co-authored a significant number of wiki-papers over on the eSourcing Wiki. I’ve also contributed articles to the EyeForProcurement monthly newsletter as well as Efficient Purchasing.

e-Sourcing Forum

December 2007 to June 2008

Regulations Unlimited
Strategies for Supply Chain Finance
Customs & Security
The Seven Scruples of a Sourcing Sensei
Discovering Your Leverage Points
Seven Risk Mitigation Strategies You Can Do With Smart Optimization
If it ain’t Multi-Tenant, then it ain’t got SaaS (co-authored with David Bush)
Not All Free Trade is Equal
Best Practice Freight Bidding
CSI: Corporate Social Irresponsibility
Critical Skills of Supply Chain Leaders
Devising an RFP That Works
Core Capabilities of Supplier Enablement
Is it Center of Excellence or MindSet of Excellence
Successful GPOs Are About Value, Not Cost Savings
Don’t Swing the Wrecking Ball Unless You’re Prepared for the Falling Debris
Can you really afford to leave Millions on the table?
Are You Managing Your Talent Chain?

June 2007 to December 2007

Supplier Enablement
Confucious eSourcing Project Management Tips
Brunswick Corporation’s e-Auction Best Practices
Collaborative Negotiation
Seven Tips for SaaS Selection
Incentives Motivate
Optimal E-Tool Selection
Five Ways to Take Your Sourcing to the Next Level
A Global Trade Primer
Applications of Spend Analysis
The Benefits of Purchasing Consortiums
Optimization is the Future And The Future is Now
Some Low Cost Country Sourcing Insights
Twelve Steps to Purchasing Program Predominance
Ten Tips for Talent Retention
A Case for E-Sourcing and E-Procurement Integration
Nine Steps to e-Procurement Success
Key Challenges of Tomorrow, Part II
Key Challenges of Tomorrow, Part III
Ten Common Negotiating Mistakes

Articles

Why aren’t you optimizing?, Efficient Purchasing Issue 5, Fall 2007

Why Aren’t You Optimizing Your Sourcing Decisions? EyeForProcurement August 2007 Newsletter

(Strategic Sourcing Decision) Optimization: Can you afford NOT to do it?

Last week at reSouce 2008, Iasta (acquired by Selectica, merged with b-Pack, acquired by Determine, acquired by Corcentric) provided 5 optimization case studies of recent projects that they did for, or in conjunction with, their e-Sourcing clients (who have free access to basic Decision Optimization in a basic suite license as well as access to enhanced Smart Optimization, with extensive freight support that includes support for LTL and TL at buyer-defined freight brackets, for an additional fee). In one of the projects, they only saved a measly 5.5%! That’s only 55,000 of savings for every 1,000,000. Pocket-change to your CFO, right?

Well, in case you haven’t figured it out yet, I’m being sarcastic. Iasta not only proved the twice-discovered Aberdeen result that optimization saves 12%, on average, above and beyond e-Auctions, but that, for categories with untapped opportunities, this doesn’t capture the true savings that can be extracted from categories that can’t be efficiently analyzed without optimization. Although two of the projects were below 12%, at 7.0% and 5.5% in the worst case, three of the projects were not only above average, but two were considerably above average, clocking in at 35% and 40% savings, respectively. The first project was a new national roll-out for Dairy Queen, who would have spent 29% more had they gone with their pre-optimization strategy for award distribution, transportation, and inventory management. Instead, they walked away with approximately 1.8M in savings while reducing analysis time by over 2/3rds. The second project was a national award of temporary labor contracts for a large insurance company who would have spent 25% more had they used their traditional spreadsheet analysis methodology. Instead, they walked away with 20M in savings AND reduced the analysis phase by over 75% – completing a project that normally took over a month in less than a week. Furthermore, the project that only achieved 18.2% savings was also quite significant – as it was on a 110M hardware category for Conoco Phillips – who also walked away with over 20M in savings. I say “over” because the 75.6% cycle time reduction they achieved also allowed them to capture an additional 1.6M in savings because they were able to complete the project in 2 weeks, instead of the usual 6+ weeks.

Thus, I must ask you again – why aren’t 75% of you even considering optimization? Can you really afford to leave millions … if not tens of millions … on the table when prices are skyrocketing across the board, revenue is falling, and your job is on the line? Especially when a savings of even 5% on a 2M-3M category can be the difference between the company being able to afford your salary over the next year? (And, to be honest, the chances of you not racking up a cost avoidance of at least 5% with optimization on any category of even moderate complexity are quite low.)

Is it because you think it’s hard? Although I would have conceded this point to you even three years ago, and would still concede this point to you if you are using the wrong vendor who still believes that everyone can use a mathematical programming language interface, the fact of the matter is that some vendors, like Iasta who has put a lot of R&D into making optimization usable by the average buyer over the last few years, now offer solutions that you can be up and running on with only a day or two of training. Now, it’s true that you won’t master some of the more advanced features that quickly, but when even the basics will shave 5% to 10% off the total cost of the award, that’s one heck of a good start and your mastery will improve with each project you do. Furthermore, now that most vendors with UI-based optimization products, like Iasta, now offer you a multitude of options to get started, which include full service and guided support in addition to self-serve, you are free to start at your level of comfort. And when buyers with only a few months under their belts are creating scenarios beyond what people like myself could envision as model designers, and suggesting enhancements that experts like myself (who have been designing these types of solutions for eight years now) never even thought of, you begin to understand that it’s really pretty easy compared to the state of affairs of a few years back.

Of course, you do have to know what you are doing – and as I pointed out above, you do need a little bit of training. But it’s often a lot less training than you think, especially if you’re a self-starter (which you should be if you’re in sourcing these days) and willing to take steps to self-educate. In addition to readily available buyer-training (most vendors will give free demos, free support, and schedule training on short notice for their customers – and do it on your site if that’s what you want), there are also a number of resources out there that you can use to begin to understand what optimization is, what it can do, and how you can begin to use it. There’s the optimization archives on this blog, the optimization archives on e-Sourcing Forum [WayBackMachine], the optimization wiki-paper on the e-Sourcing wiki [WayBackMachine] (which also forms the basis for the chapter on strategic sourcing decision optimization in the e-Sourcing Handbook [e-Book available on request]), the Next Level Purchasing (now the Certitrek NLPA) podcasts (Parts I and II), and the extended transcript with commentary (as well as the introductory “purchasing tips” article). And your vendor, with extensive experience, will be able to help you identify relevant issues for any project you wish to undertake.

It might take a little bit of effort initially, but when your analysis time is reduced by 50%, 66%, and even 75%, it will be more than worth it … especially since successive projects will be faster still as you’ll already have the data templates ready for future projects as well as the basic scenarios you need to build and compare defined. Plus, you’ll have to do less projects to meet your savings / cost avoidance targets … which means that you’ll hit your bonus faster. And, if nothing else, isn’t that reason enough for you to take the leap?


As I have already fully disclosed, Iasta is a client and I am responsible for much of the model that their product (and Smart Optimization in particular) is based on, but the UI innovations are entirely Iasta’s, as are the results reported.

The e-Sourcing Handbook (Free e-Book)

The e-book edition of the e-Sourcing Handbook, co-authored and edited by yours truly, and sponsored by Iasta [acquired by Selectica, merged with b-Pack, rebranded Determine, acquired by Corcentric] (an e-Sourcing solution provider), is now available on request (through e-mail).

The e-Sourcing Handbook is your modern guide to Supply and Spend Management Success which utilizes and enhances strategic sourcing technology and best practices. Covering the full spectrum of the e-Sourcing cycle, the handbook helps you understand not only what spend analysis, e-RFx, e-Auction, decision optimization, and contract management are, but where and when to apply these technologies for maximum benefit.

Building on the resounding success of the e-Sourcing Wiki [WayBackMachine] and the e-Sourcing Forum [WayBackMachine] and Sourcing Innovation blogs, the handbook takes the concept of open access to knowledge and best practices one step further by compiling the best information on e-Sourcing to appear on all three public information sources into one definitive source. Furthermore, by mixing content from factual and informative wiki articles with blog postings that are both controversial and opinionated in an innovative manner, the juxtaposition of the two in the handbook allows the reader to see where the boundary lies between information and advocacy. It is the goal of the authors that, through this ground-breaking effort, the reader will gain a better understanding of e-Sourcing and how to take their supply and spend management efforts to the next level.

And, most importantly, unlike some of the recent e-books to pop-up, this is a real book – not a glorified marketing white paper doubled (or tripled) in size with a fancy (spaced-out) layout that contains dozens of colorful, yet useless, images. An exact mirror of the forthcoming print-book, it’s 220 pages of solid content backed up by a 4 page resource section, 8 page glossary, and 22 page bibliography for those who thirst for knowledge. The full table of contents and index are also included to help the reader quickly find what she is looking for.

But perhaps the foreward by co-author Eric Strovink of BIQ (acquired by Opera Solutions, rebranded ElectrifAI) says it best.

The e-Sourcing space has undergone a major transformation since 2000. Vendors who were once dominant or cutting-edge have failed. Many have undergone asset fire sales, become part of the walking-dead, or been absorbed into larger companies; and still others have been forced by their investors into mergers that make little sense to the outside observer.

 

These consolidations have brought about a dangerous commoditization of ideas, along with a slowdown of innovation. Even worse has been the obscuring – by over-enthusiastic and under-educated vendor marketing departments – of deeply important issues that sourcing practitioners must consider and understand in order to be successful.

In response to this, my co-author, Dr. Michael Lamoureux, launched the Sourcing Innovation blog with the specific purpose of educating practitioners and cutting through the marketing babble that had begun to dominate the discussion. Another co-author, David Bush, started the e-Sourcing Wiki (from which the bulk of this Handbook is taken) in a similar attempt to put fundamental e-Sourcing ideas and concepts into a publicly accessible forum. Over the years, David has also built Iasta’s e-Sourcing Forum blog into a credible and useful resource.

These efforts are laudable, but blogs and wikis are sometimes hard to navigate, and effort is often required to extract related information in a useful way. This Handbook is an effort to draw together the knowledge base of the Wiki, along with relevant blog postings, into a coherent and readable framework. Of course, one might argue that none of the authors are readable or coherent – and that may be a fair criticism – but we’ve made a best effort.

Because Michael is a strong and independent voice in the space, it’s appropriate that he is the editor of this Handbook. He has taken an interesting and unorthodox approach, choosing to mix factual and informative wiki articles with blog postings that are both controversial and opinionated. The juxtaposition of the two allows the reader to see where the boundary lies between information and advocacy. This is perhaps the first effort of its kind where two very different resources are interlinked in a constructive, and hopefully interesting, way.

 

I trust that this edition of the Handbook will be the first of many similar efforts, and that together we can collectively energize our space with accurate information and useful insights. Remember, the e-Sourcing Wiki is a public resource – anyone can contribute – so everyone should consider “sharing the wealth” and do so.