Category Archives: Guest Author

American Bar Association to Fortune 500: Clean Up Your Supply Chain


Today’s guest post is from Dick Locke, President of Global Supply Training Company, author of the classic book on Global Supply Management, and a seasoned expert with international experience in Supply Management (having run global supply chains from around the globe).

The Minneapolis Star Tribune published an article titled “Bar Association Warns Corporations: Clean up supply chains.” The author says that the president of the American Bar Association will be sending a letter to the CEOs of all the Fortune 500 companies. He goes on to say that the letter will ask the CEOs to “commit to ending human-rights abuses in their supply chains.”

Chris Johnson, who heads the American Bar Association’s (ABA) business section’s supply-chain initiative makes some provocative statements in the article:

  • “Regulation is increasing. Litigation is increasing. It’s astounding to me that companies don’t get out ahead of this. It’s a time bomb.”
  • “Companies remain reactive and not pre-emptive in handling possible human-rights abuses in their supply chains.”
  • “Why would you want to wait to have your products found in the rubble along with 1,100 bodies of dead workers?”
That last statement was about the April 2013 collapse of Rana Plaza in Bangladesh. More than 1100 clothing workers died when the multistory factory building collapsed. Investigators found several European and U.S. companies’ products in the wreckage.

This was a tragedy for the workers, their families, and their communities. It is an ongoing embarrassment to the purchasing profession. Some of the companies involved had no idea their product was being produced in a manifestly unsafe building.

 Collapsed Rana Plaza

I believe it’s also a wakeup call. There are signs that the clothing industry is banding together to change their purchasing practices on an industry-wide basis to improve their supplier selection techniques.

The article focuses on human rights violations going on in company supply chains. Those violations can involve coerced labor of adults and children, any kind of labor by children, safety issues, wage and hour violations and a host of other issues. Here are two issues many of you are facing now:

  • Is your company a retailer or manufacturer? Do you sell more than $100 million per year? Do you do business in California? If so, is your company making a public statement on its web site about what it is doing to remove coerced labor from its supply chain? If it isn’t, it’s violating California law.
  • Do you work for a publicly held US company? Do your company report to the SEC about the origin of any tin, tungsten, tantalum or gold in the products you sell? It needs to or it’s in violation of Federal law. If you have any electronics in your products, you have one or more of those metals. That’s the obvious example. Here’s a list of 22 other products that contain the metals.

However, a good Supply Chain Social Responsibility (S)CSR program needs to go beyond just following the law. I was surprised to find that U.S. law allows children as young as 12 to work on farms. Does your company have a cafeteria or food vending machines? If so, you probably have 12 year olds working in your supply chain. And it’s legal. It’s just not ethical.

Social Responsibility goes beyond labor issues. It includes prevention of giving and receiving bribes. It includes treatment of animals. It includes preserving the environment. The last topic applies to every organization that buys paper, for example. That’s just about everyone. Does your paper supplier use sustainable forestry techniques?

Want to learn more about what’s involved and how to develop and execute an (S)CSR program? While I don’t usually plug my own work quite so blatantly, Next Level Purchasing’s “Exemplary Supply Chain Social Responsibility” is the only training course I have found that goes into this topic in great detail. In eight on line training hours, on your own schedule, you will get a thorough and practical understanding of the issues and the solutions. To build on Chris Johnson’s statements (above), it’s much better to be preemptive when there’s a threat of time bombs.

Thanks, Dick!

The Evolution of Purchasing


Today’s guest post is from Lisa Nyce, Senior Project Analyst for Source One Management Services, LLC. Source One is a leading provider of sourcing consultancy and category management services.

Over the years, purchasing has become more strategy-oriented, rather than transactional. Purchasing professionals have evolved from the processing of traditional purchase orders and similar responsibilities to involvement in higher value and higher impact ROI projects. Technological advances enable purchasing professionals to offer so much more to an organization today. So sit back, buckle up, and get ready to navigate through a number of drastic transformations – we’ll show you how to become a more involved player by taking advantage of a shifting technological landscape.

Procurement pros have a growing number of tools in their arsenal to help make their lives easier and their projects more successful:

  • Spend Analysis Software – Get a better understanding of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of goods and services. To get the most out of any software, the backing of the supporting department and program is essential. For example, with supplier relationship management software, a thorough strategy containing performance management and risk mitigation plans allows a software solution to serve with a full-circle advantage.
  • Cost Savings Tracking – identify cost savings opportunities and aid in the verification of implementation. Aside from the straight-forward benefit of tracking immediate cost savings, these tools can be used to remain competitive by ensuring that these savings are sustained over time and supplier rates remain locked at negotiated levels.
  • Supplier Report Cards – Ensure that expectations are being understood and met by both suppliers and internal stakeholders. These serve as an asset as new technology is presented and suppliers are scorecarded for future endeavors. As the technological landscape shifts, suppliers who don’t “keep up with the times” can be eliminated.
  • Stronger Legal Controls – minimize the need to involve a legal department or outside counsel when engaging in contractual negotiations. As heavily-regulated industries see a new or adapted regulatory climate, these legal controls assist in preventing penalties or a stigma attached to a brand as a result of internal or third-party noncompliance.

Purchasing has been incorporated into the more inclusive Supply Chain operation – it is no longer just a function of buying what is needed at the right time, at the right price with the right quality. Supply Chain activities encompass Strategic Sourcing, Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), Logistics, Planning and Quality. All of these new factors make purchasing a strategic function and the key to being able to meet or exceed the customer’s expectations.

New options abound for management and procurement professionals alike

Organizations have reduced the number of individuals required to get work done. Thirty years ago a typical Purchasing Department could include a Purchasing Manager, Buyers, expediters and clerks. That amount of manpower is simply not needed today. Electronic efficiencies have virtually eliminated clerical positions, and due to more efficient MRP systems, transactions are completed in less time allowing more time to source strategically, build stronger relationships with suppliers, and engage more with customers and stakeholders. Furthermore, employers today have many more options for staffing.

There are permanent, temporary, contract-to-hire, and various staffing options specific to the procurement industry. Procurement consulting is a viable option for companies wanting to obtain subject matter expertise on a particular spend category.

Likewise, supply chain professionals have access to a wider range of educational options to up their game: Logistics, Planning, Procurement, Supplier relations to name just a few. Not only are degrees available in Supply Chain but certifications from accredited institutions and groups are also available to a much greater extent.

The evolution of the Purchasing function has developed and will continue to do so. The change is necessary for organizations to continue to prosper. To stay ahead of the curve, remember to always monitor developments and consider what areas of improvement are possible – this will pave the way to not only personal gains but also further changes in the industry.

Thanks, Lisa.

Driving Stakeholder Engagement


Today’s guest post is from Diego De La Garza, a Senior Project Manager at Source One Management Services and a regularly sourced pundit for sourcing issues in Latin America. As Senior Project Manager, he leads a team of internal resources in the development of strategies to reduce costs and increase service levels for clients.

When organizations undertake new sourcing initiatives, much is said about setting clear objectives for the parties involved and establishing attainable timelines. However, stakeholder engagement is often neglected. Regardless of their business unit, stakeholders will only participate when they clearly understand the process and appreciate the value that strategic sourcing can deliver. However, unlike a timeline or objective, stakeholder engagement may be volatile and cannot just be monitored. It needs to be driven. How quick and how much all stakeholders engage will be paramount to maximize the success of the initiative.

So how, do we drive stakeholder engagement in general? First of all, the expectations need to be adequately communicated to all stakeholders, and their feedback must be requested upfront. The stakeholders’ needs, concerns, and requirements are unique and must be understood. Empathizing with the stakeholders will allow them to see the engagement as an opportunity to drive results, and a clear chance for them to add value that otherwise would be limited due to resource constraints.

The key with communicating with stakeholders is speaking their language. In other words, we cannot engage stakeholders in the finance department by speaking in the terms of the marketing team, and IT will not understand why an initiative is important to Finance. Ongoing communication is the only way a stakeholder will understand his or her requirements are being accounted for.

Stakeholders should also identify the parties involved. In cases where strategic sourcing consulting firms are employed, stakeholders can be offered information, expertise, additional resources, or access to data that will support a successful sourcing engagement. All stakeholders involve must be able to understand what this external party brings to the table, how to collaborate more effectively with that third party, and how to utilize these resources available at their disposal.

Another key ingredient for stakeholder engagement comes from the higher levels of the organization and entails strong sponsorship. Sponsorship drives stakeholder engagement because it acts as the voice within the organization. When senior leadership establishes a deep commitment within a sourcing initiative, it validates efforts and aligns departments. Even when expectations are clear, and roles are well defined, stakeholders who perceive low levels of sponsorship will not engage to their full potential or will lose interest quick.

Stakeholder engagement is essential because it creates collaboration across business units, even in cases where sponsorship is lacking, or other stakeholders seem disinterested. When stakeholders are engaged, they become loyal supporters of the sourcing initiative. Driving shareholder engagement is a dedicated effort. As needs change and evolve, checks and balances should be managed throughout in order to increase the success of the initiative.

Thanks, Diego!

An Analysis of eSourcing’s Fast Growth and Predictions for 2015 & Beyond


Today’s guest post is by Jill Ivancich, COO of MM4, Xchanging’s procurement technology solution. Xchanging is a business process, procurement and technology services provider. To learn more, visit www.mm4.com or www.xchanging.com.

In a recent Market Overview report by Forrester Research, Vice President and Principal Analyst Andrew Bartels reported that the ePurchasing software market will see 10% growth in 2014. Additionally, Forrester and Bartels predict double-digit growth for Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)-based eProcurement solutions, under which eSourcing falls. This is a promising outlook for a market that saw global revenue growth of just 5.9% in 2012, according to research reports.

Big Demand, Right Now

The report compelled me to consider what’s fueling the demand now for eSourcing. Factors like its ability to provide risk reduction, transparency and expedited savings have been big drivers for growth based on my recent experience and customer feedback, along with the intelligence it provides. The continued need to drive savings is causing companies to review their entire sourcing process and bring the best in class tools to help execute. We’ve seen eSourcing become a trusted tool for the everyday buyer — one that combines components like company intelligence, market insights, and user and supplier support. These assets ensure that clients have the intelligence needed to drive real results quickly.

The bigger picture is this: the world of procurement has reached a peak in complexity. Exchange rates have never been more volatile, sourcing destinations are experiencing huge shifts as production and services move away from China and India to new and frontier markets, environmental disasters are massively impacting supply, and trading conditions and regulations are constantly changing. In response, some of the biggest companies in the world are turning to cloud-native, next-gen eSourcing solutions to empower procurement teams to know not just how to source, but also what to source, when to source and from whom to source.

What’s Needed for Increased Adoption

The Hackett Group reports that organizations that leverage the most out of technology see 27% overall better performance within their procurement operations. And that’s exactly where more procurement teams will be investing in the coming years. But right now, we’re seeing interest levels in eSourcing peaking, not necessarily adoption. There’s still progress to be made before we reach critical mass, and that will require addressing the specific pain-points of CPOs and procurement teams, and the ability to transform business as usual with an impactful suite of diverse tools that are intuitive and easy to implement.

For eSourcing adoption to continue on its current growth trajectory, addressing the issue of support and knowledge is imperative. Supplier risk will be critical, especially as new, low-cost markets to source from are being considered more heavily. Integration of third-party information sources, so customer’s workflow and intelligence levels are optimized, will also be key.

To address the challenge of market volatility, cost modeling modules will become more important as part of eSourcing solutions. Identifying key metrics that influence the company, such as exchange rates from current or potential trade regions and commodity prices for key inputs, will be increasingly critical. Focusing on trends and forecasts rather than spot data, which often has little or no direct value in eSourcing, can help to address this challenge.

In terms of competition within the market, looking ahead, acquisitions will lead. However, the acquired won’t necessarily be gobbled up. The technology companies with the right infrastructure in place can still thrive, and my business, MM4, is one example.

Closing Remarks

New technology and service innovation has drastically expanded the applicability of eSourcing, and it will continue to do so for several years to come. As leveraging technology effectively remains a goal for procurement teams, eSourcing will arm CPOs with the intelligence needed to drive real cost reduction, make smarter buying decisions and have deeper visibility into realized savings. Solutions that support the entire sourcing lifecycle will continue to grow in demand, become more refined and play an increasingly large role in driving sourcing success for businesses of all sizes.

Thanks, Jill.

Risk Management and Suppliers: How Banks can Comply with the OCC’s Guidelines on Third-Party Relationships

Today’s guest post is from Rebecca Lorden, Business Development and Marketing Manager of Source One Management Services, LLC.

In October of 2013, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released specific guidelines to banks and federal savings associations that outline how their companies should assess and manage risks associated with third-party relationships. The OCC’s reason behind these guidelines was mainly due to the fact that “the quality of risk management over third-party relationships may not be keeping pace with the level of risk and complexity of these relationships“. (OCC Bulletin 2013-29, October 2013).

It is true that third-parties pose a threat if their own security protocols are not up to par with that of a major financial institution. In fact, in March of 2013, Bank of America became quite aware of this when they announced that a hack into TEKsystems, a third-party security firm they contracted, was the reason their internal emails were released to the public. These emails were no ordinary messages, but documented proof that Bank of America was monitoring hacktivist groups. Furthermore, the hacking group, known as Anonymous, later revealed that data was not retrieved from a traditional, time intensive and difficult hack, but “stored on a misconfigured server and basically open for grabs“. (Bank Of America Says Data Breach Occurred At Third Party, February 2013). The scandal was not only damaging to Bank of America’s reputation, but also an obvious indication that banks needed to manage supplier risk more effectively.

The OCC’s guidelines outline eight key phases that should be considered when developing risk management processes. These phases include planning, third-party selection, contract negotiations, monitoring, termination, accountability, reporting and reviews. As clear as that might be, banks are still struggling on how to properly implement controls around these factors. That is where supplier relationship management can play a significant role.

Supplier relationship management, otherwise known as SRM, is the actual practice of strategic planning and managing all interactions with third-parties to maximize their value. Many think of SRM as a way to reduce spend. SRM processes can reduce quality issues and delays with suppliers that, in turn, can translate into cost savings. More importantly, however, SRM can function as a main component in reducing a bank’s risk with suppliers. Supply chain experts feel as though SRM offers a “solid framework” that can provide companies with a “formal risk and control process to follow“. (Building The Case For Supplier Relationship Management, May 2014).

For those that already have an SRM program in place, or believe SRM is just a sales tactic for supply chain consultants, now may be the time to reevaluate. First, suppliers can be neglected over the course of their contract. Even if the relationship started off on a good foot, the value from a supplier can diminish pretty quickly, especially if the supplier or the bank is faced with turnover or a redirection in initiatives. SRM dictates a process that continually communicates and supports the relationship, helping build supplier engagement no matter what changes are on the horizon. Secondly, for those non-believers, consider this: if managing suppliers is now a major priority set by the OCC, what better way to adhere to these guidelines than to build a solid foundation on which to base all third-party relationships on?

It certainly seems that these OCC guidelines are a daunting task for banks to tackle. Managing supplier risks and enforcing compliance is not something that can be done overnight. Banks, however, have a secure solution in supplier relationship management. SRM can be the catalyst to successful third-party relationship management, ensuring that the risks are minimized to the best of a bank’s ability.

Thanks, Rebecca.