Category Archives: Miscellaneous

The Top 10 Myths of Workforce Development

Industry week recently ran a great piece on “the top 10 myths of workforce development” that is worth repeating since there is a big difference between effective workforce development that will increase the productivity of your staff and ineffective workforce development that will decrease the motivation of your staff.

  1. If you build it, they will come.
    Tell that to the manager who spent a million dollars on a “smart” toilet paper dispenser that insured no one could take more than the allotted number of tabs per trip to the toilet.
  2. When times are tough, cut training first.
    When times are tough, you should double the training budget as you have to get lean and mean. If you really need to cut, fire the moron in management who is the first to suggest you cut training.
  3. Just build e-learning courses. It’s cheaper.
    You need customized content development by an expert, which is costly, and then customized IT development, which is costly, and then controlled testing to make sure your students took the course and grasped the material, which is costly. If you add it all up, you’ll find that custom e-learning course development is not cheap at all.
  4. All training must be done in an instructor-based classroom setting in order to be valuable and convey important knowledge.
    Uhm, no. Some training can be pre-defined cookie-cutter web-training. Some can be on-line multi-media delivery. Some can be classroom.
  5. Once learners go through training, the manager never needs to find out how they are applying what they learned … that’s why they went through training.
    The first thing the manager needs to do is find out what they aren’t applying that they learned and how he can redesign processes and remove roadblocks to help his employees apply that knowledge.
  6. It is always better to look for your own local vendor.
    You need the experts, regardless of where they are located.
  7. Sending people on a training course will solve all performance problems and development needs.
    Sending people on a course will help them identify all the performance problems that are likely your fault. Until you eliminate those, there will continue to be performance problems.
  8. It will be obvious to a skilled trainer what each class participant needs so there is no need to discuss it in advance.
    As a former Professor and Professional Trainer, I love this one. I’m supposed to know the difference between a student who is staring blankly because he doesn’t know the prerequisite material from one who has trouble with the language of the course from one with an attention deficit disorder from one who finds the material too remedial if he won’t talk and you never discussed the goals and individual learning needs with me? HA!
  9. I’ve done presentations. Professional trainers make out that it is far more difficult than it really is.
    There’s blowing your own horn and actually conveying knowledge to another person. I would contest that many “presenters” don’t know the difference.
  10. We don’t need a university — we have a learning management system.
    If you hear this, be sure to follow it with a “and we don’t need you either” because if that kind of thinking is allowed to fester in your organization, you can forget about ever achieving any innovation whatsoever.

Do Your Contracts Enhance Trust or Destroy Trust?

A recent article in the Harvard Business Review notes that good contracts are designed to reinforce trust and reduce risk but that there can be a fine line between a good contract and a bad contract which destroys trust and, ultimately, increases risk. A contract that is too detailed or rigid, or one that sends mixed signals, can exacerbate the problems it was intended to preclude as it can restrict creativity and even prevent the display of good intentions.

For example, if the contract specifies a rigid resolution process that requires that all issue reports need to be reviewed by a team before being classified as either errors or enhancement requests, at which point they will be placed a queue for resolution, and the bug is actually preventing the client from getting work done, instead of insuring that the client’s requests are addressed in a fair and equitable manner, the contract is preventing development from making what might be a quick fix. Instead of engendering goodwill by attempting to insure every request from a client is considered, you’ve created ire by preventing a developer from getting a client running again quickly.

The reality is that most negotiators want to overestimate the level of certainty and underestimate the likelihood of future divergences from the situation they perceive during negotiations. As a result, fewer contingencies are included and terms are finalized sooner than they should be. A good contract defines a good dispute resolution process and leaves room for renegotiation later if circumstances change. Something to think about before being too hasty to dot every i and cross every t in your next negotiation.

Technology and My Hobby

Over on New Florence, New Renaissance, Vinnie Mirchandani has reach his goal of fifty guest author submissions to his Technology and My Hobby series. For those of you looking for something different, but yet interesting, to read … you might want to check this out. To help you find the guest posts related to your hobby, I’ve indexed them by category.

Category Author Company
Archaeology (Armchair) Michael Lamoureux (of Sourcing Innovation)
Baseball (Little League) Mike O’Brien (of Appirio)
Basketball Coaching Dan Dal Degan (of Salesforce)
BBQ Floyd Teter (of Jet Propulsion Labs)
Beagles Peanuts
Blood Donation Tom Foydel (of SightLines)
Brewmastering (Home) Dennis Howlett (of ZDNet)
Bridge David Dobrin (of B2B Analysts)
Cars (Tinkering) Brian Sommer (of TechVentive)
Cartoons (Tech Toons) Alvaro “Blag” Tejada Galindo (of SAP)
Cats Rusty Weston (of Third Set Media)
Chess Rita Mirchandani
Cycling Paul Wiest (of Siemens Enterprise Communications)
Fishing Mike Prosceno (of SAP)
Flying Ameed Taylor (of Applation)
Gardening Erik Keller (of Wapiti LLC)
Gastronomy William Mougayar (of Eqentia)
Golf Jim Rafferty (of Market Shapers)
Green Living Timothy Chou (an Author)
Home Design Josh Snowhorn (of Terremark)
Home Improvement (Global) Helmuth Guembel (of Strategy Partners)
Home Movies Tom Wailgum (of CIO Magazine)
Model Planes Anil Wats (of DP World)
Musical Discoveries Mike Laven (of Traiana)
Jazz (Big Band) Joe Thornton (of Lawson Software)
Organ Playing Gerlinde Gniewosz
Reading Francine McKenna (an Author)
Restoring Antiquarian Books Jason Busch (of Spend Matters)
Rifles (Target) Tom Ryan (of Gartner)
Rock (Guitar) Devan Sabaratnam (of Business on Software fame)
RVs Tom Chimera (of Overpayment Recovery Services)
Running Eric Dirst (of DeVry)
Sailing Curtis Beebe (of PwC)
Side-Tripping Kimberly McDonald Baker (of Project Partners)
Photography Michael Krigsman (of Asuret)
Skiing Sig Rinde (of Thigamy fame)
Snorkeling Louis Columbus (of Cincom)
Soccer Coaching Christian Schuh (of Siemens Enterprise Communications)
Squash Nick Dembla (of Capsilon)
Super Momming Joy Wald (of ADT)
Technology Impact Bob Warfield (of SmoothSpan)
Technology Luddism Josh Greenbaum (an Industry Analyst)
Tennis Karen Beaman (of Jeitosa)
Theatre Marilyn Pratt (of SAP Labs)
Travel (International) Harish Malani
Vinyl DJs Ray Wang (of Forrester)
Wine John Dean (of ex-Steelcase fame)
Working Out Larry Dignan (of ZDNet)
Writing (Adventure) Rein Krevald (an Author)
Youth Science Mentoring Charlie Bess (of EDs)

An Update on the Kiva Micro-Finance Experiment, Part II

Last September, I introduced you to Kiva, the world’s first person-to-person micro-lending initiative in a post where I posed the question Can Micro-Finance Make a Macro-Difference? after being referred to the site by a fellow hoser.

In an attempt to answer that question, I decided to conduct an experiment. Since last July, I have been making two loans a month under the hypothesis that if it works, after a year I will have enough capital in the Kiva system to help a new person every month as previous micro-loans get re-payed. To date, the doctor has made twenty $25 Kiva micro-loans (which get bundled with other micro-loans to fund loans to individuals and groups through Kiva’s micro-finance partners). The loans are:

Individual Institution Total Loan Loan Funded Disbursed Repayment Term Repaid to Date*
Gulchehra Rahimova LLC MLO Humo and Partners 1,175 June 28, 2008 July 12, 2008 12 months 67%
Din Ly CREDIT (World Relief) 250 June 28, 2008 July 12, 2008 18 months 44%
Araba Awotwe Christian Rural Aid Network (CRAN) 350 August 14, 2008 August 28, 2008 7 months 100%
Serigne Cisse UIMCEC (Christian Children’s Fund) 975 August 15, 2008 August 29, 2008 12 months 58%
Mavluda Tosheva LLC MLO Humo and Partners 450 September 1, 2008 September 15, 2008 12 months 50%
Mario Aguilar Fundacion Paraguaya 475 September 1, 2008 September 15, 2008 11 months 55%
Irene Microfinanzas PRISMA 1,200 October 11, 2008 October 25, 2008 6 months 83%
Sokhna Sene UIMCEC (Christian Children’s Fund) 300 November 1, 2008 November 15, 2008 12 months 33%
Essoneya Tchindo WAGES 300 November 1, 2008 November 15, 2008 12 months 33%
Guillermo Microfinanzas PRISMA 325 November 1, 2008 November 15, 2008 10 months 40%
Olinda Microfinanzas PRISMA 325 November 27, 2008 October 31, 2008 6 months 67%
Sron Chea Group AMK 200 November 27, 2008 October 28, 2008 4 months 100%
Kayi Lawson Microfund Togo 1,175 January 2, 2009 November 17, 2008 18 months 11%
Abdulhokim Azimov LLC MLO Humo and Partners 600 January 3, 2009 January 17, 2009 10 months 20%
Feliciana Llano Ramirez Manuela Ramos / CrediMUJER 475 Feb 4, 2009 Jan 15, 2009 5 months 67%
Atta Ofori Sinapi Aba Trust (SAT) 525 Feb 4, 2009 Jan 26, 2009 10 months 14%
Moeun Sileng CREDIT, a partner of World Relief 1200 Mar 1, 2009 Feb 12, 2009 21 months 6%
Mohammad Ameen s.a.l. 1200 Mar 1, 2009 Feb 5, 2009 15 months 8%
Daniel Adu Sinapi Aba Trust (SAT) 725 Apr 5, 2009 Mar 26, 2009 8 months 0%
Adetokunbo Fajuke Lift Above Poverty Organization (LAPO) 500 Apr 6, 2009 Apr 20, 2009 10 months 0%
Averages 636 11 months

Since my last update in January, where I presented an interim verdict that Kiva appeared to be great, based on the fact that all loans over 3 months old had partial repayments, I’m happy to say that Kiva beat my expectations. I expected that it would take 13 or 14 months to reach the point where the repayments coming in would be enough to guarantee at least one new (minimum) loan of $25 every month, and preferably two, when, in fact, it only took 10 months! As of this month, the cumulative repayments coming in for the month are enough to make two new $25 loans next month.

Conclusion? While the site continues to disclaim (in the footer of every page) that lending to the working poor through Kiva involves risk of principal loss, Kiva is working great. And in this economy, it’s less risky than investing in the stock market and mortgage funds, especially since an investment in Kiva last year would have resulted in your principal being returned to you, while those of us with market-based investments (stocks, mutual funds, 401Ks, RRSPs, etc.) are finding them (considerably) underwater at this time.

Thus, I would still encourage you, if you’re still lucky enough to have any discretionary funds left, to take part of them and try lending through the Kiva platform. Considering that you can start for $25, or the cost of one good bottle of wine (at the liquor store and not your local 300% mark-up restaurant), it’s an endeavor that the vast majority of us should be able to afford. And if even half of the 1.2B people in the developed world made even one loan a year, think of the sustainable difference it could make. That’s something worth aiming for. And if you do lend, remember to tell them that jeff <at> hosernews <dot> ca sent you (because one should give credit where credit is due). (And if you’re a fellow hoser, you can even consider joining his team.)

And remember, there is a supply chain lesson here for all of us. If a good supplier is in trouble in these hard financial times, key customers can band together to keep it financially solvent until times improve through faster payments, guaranteed orders, and low-interest loans. And, in addition to the good feeling these customers will get from knowing they did right, they can also secure long-term capacity from a strategic supplier. Let’s face it — most business people want to do the right thing when given the choice, and many will be quite happy to sign a long term contract or guarantee if you help to bail them out. This means that if you stick by a good supplier when it’s having a bad day, it’ll stick by you through thick and thin.

*As of April 22, 2009

Top 10 Reasons That Good Employees Quit

A recent article on Material Handling Management on-line which noted that, according to the U.S. Department of Labor and Statistics, turnover can cost an organization 33% of an employee’s total compensation was kind enough to summarize the “top 10 reasons good employees quit”. It’s an important read because they’re all preventable, and keeping good employees not only lowers costs, but it maintains morale … and a happy employee is a productive employee.

  1. The Job Was Not As Expected
    The job changes from the original description to something else. The employee, who believes that his new employer played a bait-and-switch game, wonders what else the company lied about and seeks greener pastures.
  2. Work Life Imbalance
    Forcing your staff to pick up the slack when a project’s behind, when a team-mate departs, or when you just finished a right-sizing might look like a great cost-savings opportunity, until your employees get tired of 60, 70, and 80 plus hour weeks and decide to stick it back to you.
  3. New Hire Mismatch
    Square pegs don’t fit in round holes. ‘Nuff said.
  4. Management Freezes Raises and Promotions
    Generally speaking, money isn’t the top reason someone takes a job or the top reason someone leaves one, but if an employee can earn 15%, 20%, or 25% across the street …
  5. Feeling Undervalued
    No one wants to feel less useful than a door-stop. A little praise for a job well done goes a long way.
  6. Lack of Decision-Making Power
    No one wants to be micro-managed, and there’s no need to micromanage a good employee who was hired because she can do the job better than you in the first place.
  7. Not Enough Coaching/Feedback
    Good employees want a career path … and want help getting to the next level.
  8. Management Lacks People Skills
    Not only do people not want to feel like doorstops, they don’t want to work for them either. Make sure that your managers are properly trained and developed, or they might just cost you your best employees.
  9. Too Few Growth Opportunities
    If there’s no career path within, your employees will look for one without (you).
  10. Lost of Faith and Confidence in Leaders
    Make sure you always do the right thing.