Category Archives: Miscellaneous

Harvard Business Review’s Seven Truths about Information Technology Costs

The Harvard Business Review recently ran a short one-page article on “The Truths About IT Costs” that should be a must-read for every business executive. While they don’t capture everything you need to know about IT, every point they cover is a point you need to be aware of.

  1. Enhancements Don’t Necessarily Deliver Results Commensurate with their Costs
    Consider how much you pay for ERP upgrades, factoring in the upgrade costs and maintenance costs, relative to how much of the new functionality you end up using and compute the resultant impact on productivity and cost savings, especially compared to the acquisition of a new SaaS e-Sourcing or e-Procurement solution that automates a business function that’s currently manual and you’ll quickly realize this.
  2. Projects Are Often Too Big and Take Too Long
    Many projects have pages of “must have” features and functions that are nothing more than requests that came from a single stakeholder who will rarely even use the software. Create a short-list of essential functions that will be required daily and augment it until 90% to 95% of regular daily activity is accounted for. Stop. That’s the initial implementation.
  3. Previously Purchased Applications and Infrastructure Technology are Underutilized
    Invest six figures in your redundant WebsShere environment? Then you certainly don’t need WebLogic! Tell your vendor you want the WebSphere version or you’ll find another solution. Same goes for your hardware. Use what you have. Need a separate environment? No problem – use virtualization.
  4. Project Failure Rates are Too High
    That’s why you have to keep the initial implementation small … and why subsequent phases must also be small as well. The process should also be agile, with regular feedback and testing. That way you don’t spend hundreds of thousands of dollars having a third party build a custom solution that you can’t use because you only find out six months later during implementation that it can’t be integrated with your current platform without another three months and three hundred thousand worth of work.
  5. Technical Teams Often Do Not Have Sufficient Incentive to Deliver High Quality Applications
    Especially at your average chop shop. Just because the third party developer and integrator is charging you $150 an hour for a resource, doesn’t mean the resource is worth anywhere near that amount. It might actually be a junior consultant only two years out of school who gets a flat salary of 60K a year and who doesn’t see a penny of the performance bonus the firm collects if they deliver on-time.
  6. Managers Don’t Know Enough About the Systems that Support Their Areas
    As a result, your tech department is probably overwhelmed with “helpless” help desk costs that needlessly drain costly resources.
  7. IT is Too Risk Averse
    Many old-school IT managers still live by the “No one ever got fired for buying IBM, HP, or Microsoft”, even when those solutions cost three times as much as competitive solutions. There are huge cost savings opportunities just waiting to be found if you go thin client wherever possible (as it costs less and requires fewer costly hardware refresh cycles), discontinue costly (and often unnecessary) maintenance agreements, and embrace open source platforms and applications where it makes sense to do so.

Dispute Resolution: Adjicate, Arbitrate, Mediate, or Litigate?

“That’s the way to do it”, at least according to a recent article by Paul Carter Hemlin on Supply Management . com. In the article, he covered the four (primary) methods of dispute resolution that you can use to resolve disputes with your supply chain partners along with their advantages and disadvantages.

Adjucation

The parties agree on a single adjucator, who will be an expert in a particular sector, who will review evidence and arguments and make a decision without the need for a hearing.

  Advantages

  • Confidential
  • Quick Resolution
  • Cost-Effective
  Disdvantages

  • Immediately Enforceable
  • No Case Law
  • Can Be Used as an “Ambush” by a Party Who Spends Months Preparing a Case in Secret
  • Does Not Permit Counter-Claims

Arbitration

Disputes are heard by a lone arbitrator or a panel from an approved body, such as the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, often using a mini-trial format, and are resolved according to agreed upon law(s) outside the court.

  Advantages

  • Confidential
  • Unlikely to be Overturned by a Court
  • Option for a Panel-decision
  Disdvantages

  • Lengthy and Expensive
  • Arbitrators Do Not Have to Give a Reason for a Decision
  • Limited Grounds for Appeal
  • All Matters Must be Concluded Before a Decision Can be Made

Mediation

A third party mediator can help the parties avoid legal action.

  Advantages

  • Quick, Cheap, and Less Adversarial
  • Confidential Outcome
  • “Without Prejudice” Process
  Disdvantages

  • Not Binding
  • Will Not Work When Parties are Entrenched
    (and Only Add Time and Cost)
  • Settlement is Voluntary

Litigation

The ‘traditional’ process for resolving legal disputes on civil matters where the party starting an action (the plaintiff), seeks a legal or equitable remedy.

  Advantages

  • Tried, Tested, and a Vast Body of Case Law
  • Final Decision that Parties are Obligated to Respect
  • Institutionalized
  Disdvantages

  • Lengthy and Expensive
  • Significant Management Overhead
  • Very Adversarial

Whichever method you choose, you should make sure it is specified up-front in the contract, which should also specify the dispute escalation process and timeframes in which both parties must take action or respond to a claim or counter-claim.

Recent Additions to the #1 Supply Chain Resource Site

The Sourcing Innovation Resource Site, always immediately accessible from the link under the “Free Resources” section of the sidebar, continues to add new content on a weekly, and often daily, basis. Unlike many “resource”, “best of”, or “portal sites” that are abandoned almost as quickly as they are thrown together, the resource site is actively maintained (and dead links are removed on a regular, usually weekly, basis).

In fact, there have been almost 260 resource additions in the past week alone, including:

  • 20 new Conferences,
  • 10 new Webcasts, and
  • 224 new Archived Webcasts.

The total number of unique, active resources is approaching the 2,400 mark, and breaks down as follows:

  •   19 Analyst Firms
  • 156 Blogs
  •   20 Centers of Excellence
  • 626 Companies
  • 216 Conferences
  •   24 Job Sites
  •   28 Journals
  • 316 Linked-In Groups
  •   13 Newsletters
  •   28 On-Demand Classes
  •   37 Press Release Services
  •   64 Podcasts
  •   49 Publications
  •   10 Roundtables
  •   72 Seminars
  •   86 Societies
  •   51 Training Classes
  •   67 Webcasts
  • 497 Archived Webcasts
  •   14 Workshops

And includes the following recent additions, among many others:

Conferences

Dates Conference Sponsor
2009-Apr-4 to

2009-Apr-8

Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society

Chicago, Illinois, USA (North-America)

HIMSS
2009-Apr-5 to

2009-Apr-7

Smart and Sustainable Campuses Conference

College Park, Maryland, USA (North-America)

NACUBO
2009-Apr-28 to

2009-Apr-28

FinovateStartup09

San Francisco, California, USA (North-America)

Financial InSite Inc
2009-May-11 to

2009-May-13

Entrepreneurial Finance & Factoring Conference

Chicago, Illinois, USA (North-America)

CFA
2009-May-12 to

2009-May-14

Electric Power

Chicago, Illinois, USA (North-America)

Zachry
2009-Jun-8 to

2009-Jun-9

Lean & Green Summit

Savanna, Georgia, USA (North-America)

AME

Webcasts

Date & Time Webcast
2009-Mar-27

11:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Spend Analysis Demonstration : The First Three Important Steps to Savings

Sponsor: Enporion

2009-Apr-2

10:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Best Practises in Spend Management for Law Firms

Sponsor: Aderant

2009-Apr-7

14:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Generating Working Capital in Today’s Credit Crisis

Sponsor: Receivables Exchange

which are all readily searchable from the comprehensive Site-Search page. So don’t forget to review the resource site on a weekly basis. You just might find what you didn’t even know what you were looking for!

And continue to keep a sharp eye out for new content and even more new content categories which will be coming on-line in the near future!

Should You Provoke Your Customers?

A recent Harvard Business Review article states that “in a downturn, (you should) provoke your customers”. I have to say that even after reading the article to understand where they are coming from, this scares me a bit. It’s one thing to provoke a sleeping bunny, but what if you provoke a sleeping bear? While the first might spring into action, the latter might take a chunk (of business) out of you (by deciding that you’re too pushy to do business with and simply ban you from future opportunities).

While a smart seller will help their customers see their competitive challenges in a new light, they’ll do it in a manner that illuminates the opportunity and inspires the customer to take cost saving actions, not in a way that provokes the customer into an unpredictable frenzy that could cause the customer to make a quick decision that isn’t necessarily right for them. And while it’s true that this could result in a short term gain, in the form of a sale, for a seller, it could also lead to a long term liability if the customer isn’t willing to follow through in the operational execution required to make the solution a success. If the solution ends up tanking, either because the customer failed to redesign their processes and execute accordingly or because the solution wasn’t right for them, and does nothing but cost the customer time and money, the customer could get irate, go public, and start a fiasco that will lead to long term revenue loss.

Maybe it’s just me, but I’d prefer a level-headed customer who saw the advantages, that were clearly laid out in the new competitive landscape the solution created, the solution had to offer to one that was provoked into buying the solution. I just see too many opportunities where “provoking” a customer could go wrong. What do you think?

Why Some Companies are Being Dumb

A recent article in Strategy + Business attempted to address why some companies are making the wrong moves. Needless to say, after my recent dumb company and dead company series, it caught my attention.

According to the article, some of the reasons companies are making the wrong moves are:

  • Market Optimism
    They think they’re better off than their competitors and that the crisis will serve to elevate them by harming their competitors more.
  • Overestimating their Financial Strength
    They are not accelerating their cash generation and, more importantly, cash preservation efforts.
  • Pulling Back on M&A
    When now is the best time for strong and stable companies to snatch up struggling companies with innovative products.
  • Mistrust of Senior Executive Leadership
    A recent survey by Booz & Company in December of 2008 found that two out of every five respondents were skeptical of senior executive plans, which, of course, affects their ability to carry those plans out.

I don’t think it captures all of the reasons, from what I’ve seen and heard over the past few months, but it’s certainly an important set of mistakes to avoid.