Category Archives: Miscellaneous

Tried-and-True Strategies on the Road to CPO-dom

e-Side Supply Management recently published an article on “The Road to CPO — and beyond” that chronicled advice from David Nelson (of TRW, Honda of America, and Deere & Company) and Maureen Corcoran (State Street) for up-and-coming procurement professionals who aspire to take on the CPO role.

  • Be Curious, Ambitious, and Open to Change
    A willingness to go anywhere and do any job in order to advance shows initiative and helps you stand out. It also helps you think beyond ‘the way we’ve always done it‘ mentality, which is a trait of successful C-suite executives.
  • Develop Strong Successors
    Always hire a younger, smarter backup person so you are easy to promote. You’re not going to get promoted if there’s no one to assume your present job.
  • Learn the Organization Inside and Out
    There’s immense value in having broad knowledge and a wide skill-set. CPOs know the enterprise and how to execute, negotiate, manage and mitigate risk, and do deals and this adds up to general business effectiveness that can be applied in many other situations.
  • Understand the Efficiency/Risk Dynamic
    CPOs must do more than understand the close relationship between supply chain efficiency and increased supply risk; they must also have the tools to analyze, prioritize and act on these risks.
  • Collaborate with Suppliers for Competitive Advantage
    The ability to collaborate with suppliers for competitive advantage is one of the most critical CPO traits. Although it may seem counterintuitive to expect gains from a ‘softer’ approach to supplier negotiations, there are lessons to be learned from the Japanese experience.
  • Aim Even Higher
    The bottom-line value of an effective CPO can’t be overemphasized. A CPO is a natural fit for the corner office.

Not bad. Not bad at all.

Empirical Proof that Layoffs Kill Profits

As summarized in this Strategy + Business Research Brief on a Harvard Business School Working Paper, laying off store employees is a tactic retailers use to cut costs but it’s likely to have a negative impact on the bottom line. The author spent four years studying a national retail firm with more than 260 stores and found a direct link between staffing levels and profitability.

Specifically, the author found that when a store maintained too few employees, which were overworked, conformance quality — which measures how well employees follow specific processes — suffered and this led to higher levels of customer dissatisfaction and lower profitability. More importantly, it only took a slight increase in conformance quality to generate a 4% increase in margins. Considering that some retailers, especially in grocery, operate on razor thin margins that are less than 10%, an improvement in conformance quality alone can result in a 50% to 100% improvement in margins.

So again, one has to ask, given the risks associated with cutting your talent (productivity, morale, quality, revenue, profits, and lawsuits), the benefits of keeping your talent, and the fact that there’s always better savings opportunities to be had with process transformation and strategic supply chain initiatives, is it really worth it?

Is Constant Change A Supply Chain Risk or a Supply Chain Reward?

A recent article by Noha Tohamy of AMR Research claimed that “constant change” was the buggest supply chain risk of all. (I assume she meant biggest, as otherwise it would just be a flea-sized annoyance and gnat worth discussing.)

Referencing a study that found that volatile fuel, energy, and commodity prices were the top three risks reported by companies last October, Noha noted how global companies faced a dilemma between the cheaper production costs and labor wages in China and other low cost countries and the high costs of transportation that result during periods of high fuel and energy prices and concluded that constant change must be the biggest supply chain risk at all.

I have to disagree. While volatile markets are a supply chain risk, which is sometimes only dwarfed by supplier solvency (which is probably the biggest risk these same companies are facing today as entire factories are closing up shop overnight without a warning in China) they are only one example of constant change.

Other examples of constant change are the constant improvements in supply chain technology, supply chain risk management processes, and supply chain finance. Today’s on-demand SaaS platforms, when adopted by your supply chain partners, can give you real time visibility into your supply chain and let you know where your order is at any time, anywhere. Improvements in scorecarding and supplier management practices can delivery higher quality products at lower costs. And modern supply chain finance methodologies, that include properly managed early payment discounts and buyer financing, can lower costs for all parties. I think these rewards far outweigh the risks of constant change in the supply chain.

What do you think?

How to Build a Bat House

Once upon a time, there was a beautiful old wooden hotel in the North Country. The owner had coaxed an award-winning chef with a new family away from the hurry-scurry of the big city, so the food was fabulous. The staff were locals imbued with the history of the region and an encyclopedic knowledge of hiking trails, scenic vistas, off-the-beaten-track cross-country trails, and so on. The cleaning staff took pride in ensuring that floors and woodwork were polished, the rooms were well-equipped, and bathrooms were spotless. The fixtures and furniture were old but functional, and the atmosphere was charming, down to the homemade quilts on the beds, each one individually selected.

Eventually the owner, beset with health problems, sold the business to a bright young entrepreneur. Several years later, there was an economic downturn, and revenues fell off. The new owner seized the opportunity to cut costs. He replaced the chef with the sous-chef, at a much lower salary. He revised the menu to remove the most costly items. He instituted a retirement buy-out for the original staff, replacing them with rent-a-clerks and teenagers. He replaced the maids with a commercial cleaning service, and traded the difficult-to-clean quilts for store-bought linens and coverlets. He was able to decrease the room rates by 25%.

To the new owner’s dismay, revenues continued to fall. Former customers were turning up at the local Best Western and Holiday Inn franchises, whose newer buildings and minimalist rooms consistently undercut his prices, no matter how much he lowered them. He was forced to close one wing of the old hotel, then another, and more of the staff were let go. Finally, he had to shut the business entirely. After a while, windows blew out and bats moved in, hence the title of this story.

About six months later, the young man met the old owner for dinner. “I’m sorry about what happened to the old place,” he said. “The economy tanked, and no matter what I did to cut costs and lower prices, we just couldn’t recover.” The former owner stared into his wine glass for a while. Then he shrugged, looked up, and asked, “What reason did people have to stay in your hotel? The food was mediocre; the rooms had lost their charm; you fired everyone who cared about the guests, or who could help them enjoy their visit; and poorly-paid commercial cleaners will do the bare minimum, if that.” The young man asked, “What should I have done?” The old man shook his head. “Who knows,” he said. “But people always need vacations, and when times are tough they want an extra-special place to stay. I’d have made it more special, not less special; and I might even have increased my rates and my advertising. Heck, if someone is paying $200 a night for a room, $220 isn’t much of a sacrifice.”

The young man smiled tolerantly. “Yes, but this downturn is different. Everyone’s in trouble. Businesses are failing left and right.” The old man refilled his glass. “I’m sure you’re right,” he said. “Who can say whether my strategy would have worked?” The two men began applying themselves to their meals. Between forkfuls, the young man asked, “So, what are you doing with yourself these days?” “Oh, ” said the old man, “nothing special. The doctors eventually figured out what was wrong with me and fixed it, so I got restless and bought an old ski lodge about a year ago. We renovated the rooms, brought in a French chef, put in an outdoor 4-season pool, and recruited a bunch of savvy locals to run the place.”
   “How are you doing?”
   “We’re booked solid.”

I’d like to thank the Anonymous contributor who provided this story. It really makes the point that Marketing is NOT optional!

Good Advice for CEOs, Good Advice for CPOs

Chief Executive recently posted a good article on why you should “simplify and clarify your business”. According to the article, knowing where to concentrate the effort is critical. A business should focus on where it earns money now and, even more importantly (in the doctor‘s view), where it will earn money in the future (as business, and demand, is constantly changing). To help you do just that, the article presented an approach to Keep it Short and Simple (KiSS) that it believes will help a CEO do just that:

  1. Clarify and communicate what the business is, does, and delegate down the line.
  2. As CEO, aim to remove yourself as much as you can from the dayt-to-day operational business and concentrate on strategic areas.
  3. Aim to reduce meetings and have a clear (and simple) outcome for those that do take place.
  4. Reduce the number of people involved in those meetings.
  5. Communicate, communicate, communicate.

This is also great advice for CPOs.

  1. A good CPO clarifies what procurement does for the business and how it meets the strategic objectives.
  2. A good CPO empowers her people to do their jobs and focuses on the big picture.
  3. A good CPO doesn’t waste her days in meetings … she spends them charting paths to procurement success.
  4. A good CPO only includes people who need to be there in meetings … and empowers those who are there to disseminate the information as required.
  5. Not only does a good CPO communicate, communicate, communicate, she also collaborates, collaborates, collaborates.