Category Archives: RFX

(e-Sourcing, e-Procurement, and e-Supply Chain) RFP Help Here!

Here’s irony for you: as a Purchasing and Procurement professional, some of the most complex products and services you will source are the very tools that you have to acquire in order to be successful. That’s right, I’m talking about e-Sourcing tools and e-Procurement systems.

If you’re a regular reader of Sourcing Innovation, you know that I don’t pull my punches when it comes to reviewing e-Sourcing and e-Procurement tools. I’ve seen it all, and I can assure you that there are very real differences between them — differences that can and will have a profound impact on your success.

I can help you find the tools and solutions that are right for your company and your needs.

Unlike industry analysts, who are paid by the very vendors they “review,” I do not have any skin in the game with regard to a particular approach or a particular vendor. And, unlike armchair “experts” who opine on technology without having any technology background, I am a technologist by training (a PhD computer scientist, in fact) who cannot be fooled by a pretty user interface or a piece of Marketing drivel. When I get a vendor brief, I insist on looking inside the cookie jar. I’m not satisfied just admiring the glaze on the outside. If the vendor won’t open the jar, I assume the worst, and I’m usually right. (And they don’t get a nice blog entry on Sourcing Innovation either!)

There are numerous mistakes that are easy to make in the RFI/RFP process. You should not be embarrassed if you have made some of them, because both vendors and analysts are aggressively pushing strategies that ultimately benefit them, not you. It’s very hard not to fall into the traps they’ve set for you.

For example:

  • Never, ever, use an RFI or RFP “template” from a vendor. At best, this is just a way for the vendor to sell you the exhaustive, but often mostly useless, set of “features” they happen to have. At worse, it is a way for the vendor to sow “poison pills” that other vendors will have difficulty answering, so that the scoring algorithm on the RFx will cause them to appear better than the competition, whether or not this is true.
  • Never use an analyst’s report to generate a list of “features” that the analyst believes a product should have. The analyst doesn’t know anything about you or your business, and typically knows very little about the products, either (other than what he or she has been told by the vendors who are paying him or her or his or her company).
  • Never use vendor marketing materials to decide on the “key features” that you need. Vendors often compete with each other on irrelevant points that have no bearing on the functionality that your business requires, and analysts tend to repeat these irrelevancies until they achieve a life of their own.
  • Never assume that a product is “stable” or “bullet proof” just because it’s been out there for years. I’ve seen mature RFP software utterly fail, when RFP software (after years and years of development!) ought to be a slam dunk. I’ve seen “enterprise” e-procurement systems where the price actually charged by the vendor does not match the catalog price (you’d think they could at least get that right!). By the way, neither of these examples involve small vendors.
  • If a claim seems outrageous, it almost always is. For example, no static report can replace an opportunity assessment from a trained professional. Don’t imagine that you can base a procurement strategy on the output of an automated tool.

Fortunately for you, I’m in a unique position to help. With my dual background in technology and sourcing/procurement, I can work with you to:

  • understand what you need and do a proper Needs Assessment
  • put together an RFP that outlines the functionality you need, not an exhaustive list of useless features. Vendors want you to focus on irrelevancies; you need to focus on core value.
  • review the RFP responses and help you identify the questions you need to ask, like I did generically last year in my X-emplification and X-asperation series
  • review a potential contract in order to identify:
    • unnecessary modules
    • missing functionality
    • missing cost definitions (so you don’t get burned later on)
    • and other potential weaknesses

So if you need help with that needs assessment, RFP, or contract, reach out at any time using the contact information in the FAQ. No job is too big or too small as I know that you don’t put the cart before the horse.

P.S. Yes, as per the categorization, this is an advertisement for the doctor‘s services. I’d hoped I wouldn’t have to state the obvious, especially since I classified it as such, but it appears I have to.

 

The e-Sourcing Handbook (Free e-Book)

The e-book edition of the e-Sourcing Handbook, co-authored and edited by yours truly, and sponsored by Iasta [acquired by Selectica, merged with b-Pack, rebranded Determine, acquired by Corcentric] (an e-Sourcing solution provider), is now available on request (through e-mail).

The e-Sourcing Handbook is your modern guide to Supply and Spend Management Success which utilizes and enhances strategic sourcing technology and best practices. Covering the full spectrum of the e-Sourcing cycle, the handbook helps you understand not only what spend analysis, e-RFx, e-Auction, decision optimization, and contract management are, but where and when to apply these technologies for maximum benefit.

Building on the resounding success of the e-Sourcing Wiki [WayBackMachine] and the e-Sourcing Forum [WayBackMachine] and Sourcing Innovation blogs, the handbook takes the concept of open access to knowledge and best practices one step further by compiling the best information on e-Sourcing to appear on all three public information sources into one definitive source. Furthermore, by mixing content from factual and informative wiki articles with blog postings that are both controversial and opinionated in an innovative manner, the juxtaposition of the two in the handbook allows the reader to see where the boundary lies between information and advocacy. It is the goal of the authors that, through this ground-breaking effort, the reader will gain a better understanding of e-Sourcing and how to take their supply and spend management efforts to the next level.

And, most importantly, unlike some of the recent e-books to pop-up, this is a real book – not a glorified marketing white paper doubled (or tripled) in size with a fancy (spaced-out) layout that contains dozens of colorful, yet useless, images. An exact mirror of the forthcoming print-book, it’s 220 pages of solid content backed up by a 4 page resource section, 8 page glossary, and 22 page bibliography for those who thirst for knowledge. The full table of contents and index are also included to help the reader quickly find what she is looking for.

But perhaps the foreward by co-author Eric Strovink of BIQ (acquired by Opera Solutions, rebranded ElectrifAI) says it best.

The e-Sourcing space has undergone a major transformation since 2000. Vendors who were once dominant or cutting-edge have failed. Many have undergone asset fire sales, become part of the walking-dead, or been absorbed into larger companies; and still others have been forced by their investors into mergers that make little sense to the outside observer.

 

These consolidations have brought about a dangerous commoditization of ideas, along with a slowdown of innovation. Even worse has been the obscuring – by over-enthusiastic and under-educated vendor marketing departments – of deeply important issues that sourcing practitioners must consider and understand in order to be successful.

In response to this, my co-author, Dr. Michael Lamoureux, launched the Sourcing Innovation blog with the specific purpose of educating practitioners and cutting through the marketing babble that had begun to dominate the discussion. Another co-author, David Bush, started the e-Sourcing Wiki (from which the bulk of this Handbook is taken) in a similar attempt to put fundamental e-Sourcing ideas and concepts into a publicly accessible forum. Over the years, David has also built Iasta’s e-Sourcing Forum blog into a credible and useful resource.

These efforts are laudable, but blogs and wikis are sometimes hard to navigate, and effort is often required to extract related information in a useful way. This Handbook is an effort to draw together the knowledge base of the Wiki, along with relevant blog postings, into a coherent and readable framework. Of course, one might argue that none of the authors are readable or coherent – and that may be a fair criticism – but we’ve made a best effort.

Because Michael is a strong and independent voice in the space, it’s appropriate that he is the editor of this Handbook. He has taken an interesting and unorthodox approach, choosing to mix factual and informative wiki articles with blog postings that are both controversial and opinionated. The juxtaposition of the two allows the reader to see where the boundary lies between information and advocacy. This is perhaps the first effort of its kind where two very different resources are interlinked in a constructive, and hopefully interesting, way.

 

I trust that this edition of the Handbook will be the first of many similar efforts, and that together we can collectively energize our space with accurate information and useful insights. Remember, the e-Sourcing Wiki is a public resource – anyone can contribute – so everyone should consider “sharing the wealth” and do so.

SourceOne scores a Grand Slam with WhyAbe

Gartner recently named Source One’s (acquired by Corcentric) free WhyAbe.com (sunset) platform as a Cool Vendor in Procurement and Finance for 2008. This is a big score for the sourcing and contract management toolset, when you consider that not many sourcing providers get this recognition from Gartner and that previous winners have included FreeFlow, Vinimaya (rebranded Aquiire, acquired by Coupa), and BIQ (acquired by Opera Solutions, rebranded ElectrifAI) – the latter of which are really cool vendors.

Source One, a Procurement Service Provider (PSP), is a fairly major player in the strategic sourcing & cost reduction consulting marketplace, having been incorporated back in 1993 – well before companies like FreeMarkets (now part of Ariba) made strategic sourcing vogue, and many of their consultants have over 20 years of experience in the field. They take the traditional approach to sourcing projects with a two part project team (consisting of Source One personnel who do the project and Client personnel who sponsor and manage the project on the client site), as compared to the resource augmentation approach some of the newer consultancies take. The approach may seem heavy to a smaller organization, but the results speak for themselves. With an average savings of 18% across 60+ categories (whose average savings range from 5% to 25%, while some outliers, like cash management, are as high as 90%), when they say their aggregated purchasing power allows them to secure exceptionally competitive pricing, they mean it. And from what I hear, they’re doing so well that it’s a daily struggle to keep up with a constantly increasing demand for their services. (P.S. They’ll be making a big announcement at ISM next month. You might want to watch for it.)

But let’s talk about WhyAbe.com. From a technology perspective, RFX, Reverse Auction, and basic Contract Management is nothing new … basic solutions for the former has been available for over ten years and a basic solution for the latter for at least seven years. There’s nothing new about cookie-cutter on-line stores or stripped down supplier networks either. What is new is the fact that it’s totally free.  WhyAbe.com is cracking the sourcing mold and offering a free solution that companies new to sourcing and sourcing technology can use and experiment to find out what works for them, what doesn’t, and what they need help on. It’s a great way for a company to test the water as it provides a quick start to e-Sourcing with a price that can’t be beat. Then, when an organization has identified it’s needs, and, more importantly, identified what it can do well in house – and what it can not, it can always upgrade to a more extensive e-Sourcing platform and retain a PSP, like Source One, to help it with those categories that it doesn’t have the experience, or the leverage, to get savings on. Furthermore, should it retain Source One, it can still use the tool as a way to work with the PSP. In other words, even though there’s nothing new from a technology perspective, the model is very cool and I think they deserve the Cool Vendor award for it. If nothing else, it will force some of the stagnant providers in the e-Sourcing space that haven’t done much with their solution for 2, 3, 5, and in some cases, 7 years to update their offering to provide real value for the $$s they’re charging, or fall by the wayside to make room for the new innovators. And that’s a win for the space you can’t argue with!

The 6 Days of X-asperation: Day 2 – Questions to ask your e-RFX and e-Auction Vendor!

Just like we did in the X-emplification series, we’re going to start with e-RFX and e-Auction as we tackle the generic questions that you should be asking every vendor, and the types of answers you should be expecting.

1. What do I have to do to get a good handle on how to make effective use of this technology, and for an organization of my size, how long is it going to take?

Before you even consider selecting an e-RFX and e-Auctions platform, you should have reviewed your categories, divided them into projects, and achieved a good grip on what categories are appropriate for sealed bid RFX and what categories are appropriate for reverse auctions. Then, you should review these categories with the vendor and see if their recommendations match yours. If the vendor’s recommendations are different, they should be able to back them up with data and experience and an ability to transfer that knowledge to you if you go with their solution.

Furthermore, neither e-RFX nor e-Auction is new, and both offerings should be very straight forward. Therefore, it shouldn’t take long to install and deploy these solutions on your first project, once it is identified and the requirements determined. (A SaaS vendor should literally be able to set you up on the platform and help you get your first e-RFX and e-Auction up and running in a few days.)

2a. How much functionality is my organization realistically going to be using in 12 months?

e-RFX and e-Auction functionality is pretty basic compared to other e-Sourcing and e-Procurement offerings, and there’s no reason that you shouldn’t be using most of it within a year.

2b. How much functionality do I really need?

All of the basics. And all of the functionality that was outlined in the original X-emplification post, although you probably won’t be ready to use complex formulas, splits, and cross-lot rankings right away.

This means that you don’t need a 1001 template library or automatic project creation from a bundled spend analysis or reporting tool to be productive and, more importantly, get savings. If you have the flexibility to build any RFX you might need, you can always download a free template from a resource center and build it yourself. Sure a built-in one might save you a few hours, but how much is that few hours costing the organization relative to how much the total buy is costing and, more importantly, what if the bundled template isn’t quite right? In other words, be sure you’re not sacrificing core capabilities just to get a few frills.

Note that even though RFX is a mature technology, there are inflexibilities baked into many of the tools that analyst firms blindly label “best in class.” There have even been outright failures of RFX software, despite this maturity level (one might almost say, “because of it” — some companies have stopped innovating entirely in RFX as of several years ago). So when you evaluate RFX, make sure to pick a tough category with complex pricing grids and make sure the RFX solution you choose supports them. You might be unpleasantly surprised if you do not.

2c. And how does this functionality solve my #1 pain today, which is X?

Chances are, if you’re looking at e-RFX, you’re number one pain is sourcing cycle time. Make sure the tool automates as much as possible. If you’re looking at e-Auction, chances are your number one pain is cost. Make sure the tool supports a reasonable number of different auction formats, because empirical evidence seems to indicate that certain auction types get better results in some categories, while others get better results in other categories. (See Alan Buxton’s Where Next blog, for example.)

3. How much training is my team going to require to effectively use the software? How long is it going to take them to absorb this training?

e-RFX and e-Auction is very straight forward, but you still shouldn’t overlook some basic training. This training should include the set-up of a sealed-bid e-RFX project, the set up of a basic reverse auction, a review of what the supplier sees (so that the buyer can competently answer questions), an overview of the communication and collaboration capabilities, and troubleshooting techniques. This should only take a couple of days, but it’s an important couple of days.

4. How much is this software REALLY going to cost me in the first year and each subsequent year?

e-RFX and e-Auction software are a commodity now. Decent solutions are available in the low five-figure range. Furthermore, since the solutions are mature, updates, whether they are minor bug fixes or minor updates, should be few and far between, so maintenance should be low – in the 10% (or less) range per year. Installation should be free if delivered as true multi-tenant on-demand software, and if it’s behind the fire-wall or hosted ASP installation, no more than a couple of days of reasonably priced consulting time. Furthermore, there should be no need for technology services – the basic training should include everything you need to know to get started. (Although you might want to consider using them for category expertise consulting, if they have it.)

5. You say you care about your customers and that you are going to provide great service. Prove it!

Ask for references. Talk to them. If they have an upcoming user meeting or conference, ask to go to it. But most importantly, ask for examples of results their customers have achieved on the platforms recently, and how they can help you achieve the same.

6. Can I take it for a test drive or a short term lease?

Considering that all of this software is web-based, even if the provider isn’t delivering it using true multi-tenant on-demand SaaS, they should still have a test-drive platform up-and-running and they should be willing to let you do a test-drive at a very low, nominal, cost.

7. Can I buy it or implement it in pieces?

This is one of the few technologies, given that it is simplistic when compared to other e-Sourcing solutions and a commodity, that you may want to consider buying the technology up front rather than buying it on a per-event basis. You don’t have to use more than the basic reserve price reverse auction until you’re ready for more advanced features.

Having said that, though, nothing prevents you from using the technology for one or two events just to make sure that it works well, before signing a long term commitment.

the doctor’s Not Going To Stop Until He Exposes All Of The Elephants!

Late last fall in the doctor wonders why the elephants in the room are often so hard to see and the doctor exposes the elephants in the room I exposed the elephants in the room that were hiding behind the blinds, couch, lamp, and projection screen. But this is a very big room – and it is jam-packed with elephants. So today, in addition to the optimization, compliance, analysis, enablement, contract management, and hidden cost elephants, I’m going to expose the elephants hiding behind the coat rack, the bar, and the water cooler.

We’ll start with an RFX elephant, who’d have you believe that the number of pre-configured templates in the template libraries are an important selling point of an e-RFX tool. It’s not. After all, every business is different and, in reality, you’ll probably have to customize every single standard template that’s provided to meet your business needs before you can use it. That tells you it’s the flexibility of the tool when it comes to RFX creation that’s important – especially since, no matter how many templates are offered, there’ll always be templates that are missing that you need to create yourself.

Now we’ll move on to the e-Payment elephant who will tell you it’s the platform that matters – and, believe-it-or-not, who provides it. Although it’s important that the company that provides the platform be financially stable, it doesn’t have to be owned by a bank or the biggest player in the space to be useful, because, when it comes to e-Payment, it’s not the payment platform that matters – but whether or not it enables your organization. Does it support the types of payments you regularly make? (If you do a lot of p-card and ACH, and it only supports wires and ACH, then there’s a problem.) Does it automate the capture and transmission of all of the payment details that are required by your e-Procurement / EIPP systems as well as your accounting systems? Does it simplify the transactional processing, freeing up manpower for exception handling and more strategic purchasing responsibilities? Because these are the things that matter!

We won’t forget about the technology RFP elephant though – because this big-daddy of elephants, who is often willing to provide us with RFP templates for any technology we might want to put out to bid, will have us believe that you should be evaluating a solution based on the number of (pseudo-) standard features it has, and not whether it has the functionality you need. This is absurd – especially when you aren’t familiar with the technology! After all, why do you care whether or not it has 300 features you probably don’t need? And how do you evaluate solution A with 350 features vs solution B with 315 features vs solution C with 385 features when the common feature overlap between all three solutions is only 60% based upon your unduly long, inept, and inappropriate RFP that this technology elephant gave you. You need a solution that has the functionality that supports the business processes that you need. To do this, especially when you are unfamiliar with the solutions you’ll be evaluating, you need to send out a rather open-ended RFI that describes the processes you need and the problems that you are having and that asks the vendors to describe how their tool solves these problems. Then, you take the top 3 – 5 RFIs, figure out what your minimal baseline is with regards to key capabilities, and send back a more detailed RFP that outlines the core functionality you need (and any industry standard features you’re aware of that are also required), additional functionality you’d like, and the timeframe you’d like to deploy it in and note that formal submissions will not be considered until you get a full demo (if you haven’t had one already). But still, it should be short. Closer to 60 questions than the 600 or so “feature questions” that I’ve been hearing about from some vendors lately if you’re really focussing on what you need and not the market mumbo-jumbo that the elephants are feeding you.

So take heed, elephants hiding in the closet, behind the door, and under the boardroom table – because you’re next!