Category Archives: Risk Management

Trade Partnership Programs: Are You Ready for Global Compliance?

Chances are that, if you are a US based organization, you are up to date on you C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) and if you are a multi-national, your AEO (Authorised Economic Operators) initiatives to achieve a safer supply chain while streamlining trade through self-compliance security initatives (designed to withstand comprehensive audits). And while this may have been enough in the beginning, today the C-TPAT and AEO are just two of many global trade partnership initiatives that you should be aware of. If your organization is to be a major player in the global marketplace, you should be aware of at least the following seven initiatives:

  • AEO (EU)
    Authorized Economic Operator: AEO status is granted to reliable operators that are compliant with respect to security and safety standards and who can therefore be considered “secure” traders. Benefts include fast-tracked consignment, streamlined declarations, and mutual recognition with countries with a similar program.
  • C-TPAT (US)
    Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism: A voluntary supply chain security program focussed on securing supply chains against terrorism. Benefits include reduced customs inspection, reduced border delays, and eligibility for account-based operations.
  • Customs Co-operation and Mutual Administrative Assistance in Customs Matters
    An European Union program that provides the necessary tools for customs cooperation between EU member countries and other importers and exporters, including Korea, Canada, Hong Kong, the US, India, China and Japan.
  • FAST
    Free and Secure Trade: A voluntary joint initiative between the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection that enhances border and trade chain security while making cross-border commercial shipments simpler and subject to fewer delays.
  • ISA
    Importers Self Assessment Program: a voluntary approach to trade compliance that provides the opportunity for importers who have made a commitment of resources to assume responsibility for monitoring their own compliance in exchange for benefits.
  • SAFE Framework
    SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade: a WCO Framework that includes requirements for Customs and Authorized Economic Operators that is designed to facilitate the implementation of secure trade programs in member nations
  • SEP
    Secure Export Partnership: A US-New Zealand Customs security arrangement (which is representative of emerging US security arrangements with other countries).

The Growing Importance of Water Conservation

Chances are, somewhere along the line, your supply chain requires freshwater — and lots of it. If it’s not already costing your organization a lot of money, it will soon. Why? Consider these facts, as collected in “Greenhouse Gas and Energy Co-Benefits of Water Conservation” by Carol Maas and Water for Energy by the World Energy Council.

  • 70% of the planet may be covered in water, but only 3.0% of that is freshwater, and five sixths of that is frozen in glaciers
  • 60% of freshwater is found in nine countries: Brazil, Russia, China, Canada, Indonesia, United States, India, Columbia, and the Democratic Republic of Congo
  • one third of the Earth’s population does not have the necessary quantity of 100 to 200 litres/day of water available to them
  • the US estimates that by 2050, half of the world’s population will live in nations short of water
  • over the last 70 years, water withdrawals have increased at more than twice the rate of population expansion
  • on average, 70% of available freshwater is used for agriculture and 22% is used by industry
  • water is required to produce energy
  • municipalities in Ontario consume more electricity than any industrial sector outside Pulp and Paper
  • water and wastewater services in Ontario municipalities represent a third to a half of electricity consumption – double that of street lighting
  • global water requirements for energy production are expected to increase from approximately 1.8 Billion cubic meters in 2005 to almost 2 Billion cubic meters in 2020 to about 2.1 Billion cubic meters in 2035
  • the increased need for energy production combined with increased agricultural needs and industrial process needs (to produce goods for an increasing population) is going to add considerable strain to an already strained water supply

The cost of water is going to increase as freshwater becomes more scarce, just as the cost of energy has increased with the cost of oil, which is still a primary fuel for electricity generation. As a result, water conservation is quickly becoming just as important to your supply chain as energy conservation, and any measures taken today will pay off in spades tomorrow.

A.T. Kearney’s Four Dimensions of Strategic Value

In a recent article over in IndustryWeek on why it is “time to tell your CPO to collaborate with suppliers”, A.T. Kearney outlined their four dimensions of strategic value that they claim will allow an organization to unlock the next level of value. The four dimensions of value they outlined are:

  • growth
    through improving the value proposition for existing customers or generating sales to new customers
  • risk management
    to deal with a world of increasingly unpredictable and devastating risks
  • value-chain optimization
    by tweaking the value chain to benefit all players by allowing them to focus on their strengths
  • structural capabilities
    that improve agility, responsiveness, scalability and even corporate social responsibility

And, according to the article, they depend on collaborative relationships with the supply base. However, in order to succeed in these relationships, the parties must reach mutual value. So how do the parties reach win-win situations? They start by using a value-screening process that takes the following steps:

  1. Develop a Relationship Baseline
    does the existing relationship provide a competitive position, strategic direction, and/or joint commercial flow in an aligned culture?
  2. Identify Initial Value Hypotheses
    is there a potential opportunities that brings a level of value to both parties?
  3. Align with Internal Partners
    which opportunities bring the most value to the organizations?

Then, according to A.T. Kearney, the next step is to turn supplier collaboration into a core competency. This is not an easy process, but it is a manageable one. It revolves around:

  • the formation of value creation teams,
  • the establishment of foundational processes, and
  • management of the transformation.

These core actions become part of a two-to-three year transformational roadmap which, when completed, will address all key suppliers and, hopefully, provide value well above and beyond typical cost reduction strategies. And if they are done right, they should enable the four dimensions of value outlined above.

Are they worth it? Any organization that grows, controls risk, and improve its structural capabilities and value chain should be able to create and sustain value even in weak economic environments, so they are worth it. Are they enough to get you to the next level? On their own, probably not as they don’t require innovation (as renovation is often enough for companies who are not leaders), but they are good value dimensions.

Is Polygamy Good for the Supply Chain?

A recent article over on CFO by Shawn Casemore, President of Casemore & Co, on why you should “mend your spend” in order to grow, offered up Casemore and Co’s four crucial steps to building a big-business attitude. Step two, which stated that the procurement department is not the place for monogamy, caught my attention because sometimes “monogamy” is needed for successful procurement.

According to Shawn:

Human nature has demonstrated that the longer we remain in a stable relationship, the less effort we place into maintaining or improving the relationship. In a supplier-to-customer relationship, this tendency is often substantiated through escalating prices and diminishing customer service over time.

As an example, he gives the anecdote of when he worked with an organization that used a sole transportation source for all of its inbound and outbound freight needs — remnants of its early days when it was a small business. The prices offered by the carrier had been steadily climbing, and freight damage was quite prevalent. Despite those problems, the company president was hesitant to change. But when they moved the business away from the incumbent and divided it between two alternative carriers, service levels improved and the firm reduced overall transportation costs by nearly 10% per year.

And this is a common story among consultant firms that specialize in transportation / logistics / 3PL cost reduction. Competition is good for the corporate coffers. And in this situation, a secondary source of supply can mitigate risks and increase competition.

But this isn’t always the case. If you need a specialized widget, or microprocessor, and you split the award, you drive up costs as setup costs, which often involve new equipment purchases, for production of a new, customized, product are high — and you’re paying them twice and information protection and losses due to IP theft — as there are two routes IP thieves can take to steal your IP and produce black-market copy-cat products — are higher.

In other words, competition is great when you have a tactical category where there are lots of low-risk, high quality suppliers to compete for your business, but if you have a strategic category where there are few high-quality suppliers and set-up costs are high, sole-source (with production distributed at geographically dispersed plants) might be the way to go.

Your thoughts?

Product Safety Challenges in European Business

A recent article over on Industry Week on “What [You Need] To Know About Product Safety Challenges in European Business” pointed out something very important that U.S. business that want to expand into Europe need to know — U.S. product safety regulations are not enough if you want to sell your wares over in Europe. As per the article, if you want to sell in the 27 member states of the EU, you need to meet the “made in Brussels” European legal regulations (that set an identical standard throughout the entire EU). Before a product can be sold in the EU, it must have a CE mark that verifies that the manufacturer has ensured that the product conforms with the essential requirements of the EC directives. It must also have a declaration of conformity that includes the manufacturer details (name, address, etc.), requisite EC standards and performance data, relevant id number of any notified body, characteristics of compliance, and a legally binding signature. And if the more stringent requirements are not met, your product cannot be sold.