Category Archives: SaaS

Sievo is Still Constantly Sieving Your Data For New Opportunities

While the doctor has never covered Sievo on Sourcing Innovation, he did cover them in depth at Spend Matters, and, if you have appropriate Content Hub access, you can find the last 3-Part in-depth Vendor analysis here in Part I, Part II, and Part III.

A Quick Recap

Sievo was founded twenty years ago in 2003 in Helsinki, Finland and is probably the oldest remaining standalone spend analytics player, as a significant portion of all of the M&A that occurred in the 2010s was on leading spend analytics players. (The next oldest standalone vendor is likely Rosslyn Analytics founded in 2007.) While it started as a standard service-based spend analytics offering, by the time of the doctor‘s in-depth update on Spend Matters in 2020, Sievo had moved well beyond basic spend analysis and centered much of its value proposition on driving savings and improvement (as Sievo is not just limited to spend data and can also process compliance, risk, and ESG/GHG/Carbon data, for example) program identification (through automated insights), measurement and management across the full spectrum of spend, where they do the data management services, the foundations for savings and improvement program management, and even the meta-data management to power advanced organizational initiatives.

With regards to data management, it handles all of the system integrations; refreshes on your schedule; does all the classification (working with your team to build the classification you want); cleanses, normalizes, and enriches your data; and rolls out (customized) market and category intelligence to your organization.

With regards to classification, they use a mix of (black-box) AI and human (re-)classification and review, guaranteeing 94% accuracy, and usually achieving 98% to 99% accuracy. They use multiple techniques including customized in-house LLMs, DeBERTa Large v3, BERT, evolutionary algorithms, and NER models, with and without feedback. (And while the doctor knows most of you won’t understand any part of that sentence, it means their AI/ML team actually knows what they are doing and they are not just a bunch of college drop outs randomly feeding open models with random data and assuming anything that appears to give them 90% accuracy is good. Which happens quite a bit in “data science” consulting shops. See the doctor‘s post about how to do Analytics and AI Right.) Mappings, especially for low confidence, high spend, and new categories/customers are also manually reviewed on a regular basis, corrected, and the models retrained. In addition, a user can request a reclassification at any time, and once a customer admin approves, the data is reclassified (in an override) and the model retrained.

With regards to integration/refresh, they’ve integrated with over 100 ERP/AP/data systems and dozens upon dozens of market, risk, and ESG feeds that they can use to enhance your data and typically refreshes massive data sets daily (but can do faster or slower depending on the desires of the organization).

With regards to traditional analytics, the platform has the standard set of modern drill down dashboards, support for user-defined calculated/derived dimensions, and incredibly powerful filters that support functions that can be used on any dimension (base or derived) which collectively allow a user to break out, and drill into, any subset of data of interest.

With regards to out-of-the-box reporting and analytics, Sievo has over two-dozen out-of-the-box dashboards that provide deep insight into spend by category, PO, invoice, supplier, emission, cycle time, tail, geography, etc. There’s also pre-built insight dashboards for savings opportunities on price (variance), payment terms, currency exchange, and efficiency/cycle-time improvement.

With regards to savings tracking and management, Sievo includes a realized savings dashboard that can automatically compute the spend difference period-over-period, currency fluctuations, and changes due to changes in market indices (where a contract price is tied to a market index). It provides insight into spend that results from non-performance and allows Procurement to pinpoint the exact reason for deviation from a plan. Note that savings tracking is very extensive in the platform and users can define budgets, demands, expected trends, milestones, approvals, etc. and track each initiative as a separate project in the platform.

It also supports forecasting/budgeting, contract metadata management, and price benchmarking based on over $1 Trillion of customer spend (and their customers now represent 1% of global GDP) mapped to a common internal schema and with their deep knowledge of direct material pricing (from indexes, etc.), they can help customers benchmark down to the material level in a BoM.

So What’s New? (Since 2020.)

Since 2020, Sievo has made a number of platform improvements and included a number of new offerings in the spend analysis platform. The most notable of which are the following:

Integrated Actions

In addition to supporting (savings) action plan, some associated actions can now be initiated within the system (with more being added with every release). Email contacts relative to supplier performance / sustainability can be initiated with the system, automated negotiations through Pactum can be kicked off within the system, and Ecovadis requests (detailed below) can be kicked off within the system. A user can also access the Sievo Academy, Sievo Support, reclassification requests, associated contracts (not just metadata), and roadmap suggestions/product feedback directly through the platform.

Integrated Sustainability and Third Party Dashboards

When we last covered Sievo, it had an Ecovadis integration and could pull in select data for enrichment dimensions or measures, but, if you have the subscription, they now maintain all Ecovadis data natively in their platform and have a new Sustainability dashboard where a user can dive into the different Ecovadis scores (Global, Labor, Ethics, Environment, and Sustainable Procurement) by category, material, supplier, etc. and see the global score, assessed suppliers (as not all suppliers will be assessed by Ecovadis), assessed suppliers, score by top 100, score by category, score by organization, global score heatmap, etc. A user can drill down to an individual supplier (by category and material) and see all of the Ecovadis details natively in Sievo. If a supplier has not been evaluated and the organization would like it evaluated, they can even initiate a request directly in the Sievo platform. (Alternatively, if you have other sustainability/risk data feed licences, including [but not limited to] SupplierIO, RiskMethods, D&B, etc.] all of that data can now be brought in and maintained natively as well.)

CO2 Analytics

There’s also a new set of CO2 Scope 3 Emission management dashboards that can, at a category, material, and/or supplier level, summarize total CO2(-equivalent) emissions, related spend, intensity, carbon price amount, with breakdowns by category, GHG protocol category, organization, region, supplier country, share of emissions per higher level category/supplier, etc. A user can dive in and see the Unit of Measure (UoM) conversion rates, inflation rates, mapping quality, and types of estimates used at the meta-leval and the mapping source, emissions factor, validity dates, and associated backup (attachments, etc.) at the mapping level.

One unique feature of the Sievo platform is that the CO2 can be used as a second currency alongside spend and allow users to see the spend/carbon trade off of different decisions. (For example, switching to supplier S for Product P can save D Dollars but cost X emissions.)

Curated Data, including Science-Based Target Initiative (SBTI), Support

Sievo has not only started tracking supplier ESG and net-zero status data, but also correlates an organization’s spend against SBTI records and summarizes percentage of spend with SBTI suppliers (who have set a target), percentage of spend with SBTI suppliers with near-term targets, total spend with net-zero targets, and percentage of de-listed suppliers as well as spend by top 100 suppliers and net-zero status, spend by category and net-zero status, and spend by organization and net-zero status. It’s a great way to see SBTI spend coverage at a glance.

At a finer grained level, for each supplier, it summarizes the supplier’s general status, number of commitments, number of targets, net zero status & target year if committed, near term target status (targets set or not), long term target status, company temperature alignment, spend, sector, org type, region, location(s), etc. and all data can be accessed by a drill in to the supplier level.

AI-Extended Supplier Profiles with Feedback and Human Validation Available

In addition to spend benchmarks powered by community intelligence on well over One Trillion Dollars of spend mapped to a common, centralized, taxonomy, they have also been building a common supplier database which currently consists of over 6 M suppliers (with the goal of 10M by EoY 2024) with enhanced supplier profile data around geography, categories and materials, CO2/GHG and sustainability, SBTI, and other relevant data from a spend analysis perspective. In addition, they have been augmenting it using customized AI/NLP/LLM that uses web-based data (from the supplier’s web site, Wikipedia, supplier intelligence platforms, etc.) to provide a more complete picture in order to provide clients with deep embedded supplier insights, which will eventually support deep discovery in a future release.

Sievo manually validates a subset of high-spend suppliers for every client and every user can provide feedback on supplier data they feel is incorrect and request validation on a supplier if desired. Suppliers whose profiles have been manually validated are marked as verified (and data is not changed without human verification if such data comes from a data feed where the provider, such as Ecovadis, has manually verified the data).

Extended Supplier 360 Dashboard and CraftBoards

The dashboard summarizes total spend (for the given time range), it’s spend rank, PO coverage, avg invoice, spend share by category, by organization, by ERP supplier (instance/subsidiary), by payment terms, invoice-to-due days, due-to-pay days, [local] price [consolidation] opportunities, price opportunities vs. best price from a different supplier, top insights (from the new insights dashboard, discussed below), and, if desired, key metrics from the new SBTI dashboard (summarized above).

Since our last update, Sievo has also added CraftBoards, which allows users to build their own dashboards on any data subsets they like. Sievo can process and display any type of data, and the user can build cubes and dashboards on any data source they like.

Adaptive Insight Recommendation Engine

Sievo has doubled down on identifying all types of savings opportunities across price (variance), payment terms, process optimization, risk and compliance, and the (supplier) tail. Sievo has also doubled down on a new insights overview dashboard that currently summarizes system-identified opportunities across almost twenty (20) types of analysis across those five categories (with more coming in future releases). With regards to price optimization, it will summarize price (variance) opportunity and high price impact. With regards to payment terms, the outlier opportunity, the early payment impact, and overall consolidation opportunity as well as (interest/penalty) losses due to critically late spend. With regards to process, it summarizes order consolidation spend, hidden tail spend, non-PO outlier spend, and after-the-fact spend that is likely ripe with opportunity. With regards to risk and compliance, FX exposed spend, outlier sustainability spend, single sourced material spend, and hidden locally sourced high risk spend. Finally, with respect to the tail, they break it down by category, material, new supplier, new supplier non-PO, and supplier count increase which is super rife with opportunity. It’s super easy to drill into each dashboard metric, see the breakdown by supplier, category, or location, and quickly identify the top opportunities for savings. And, of course, dive into the suppliers with the highest opportunities as the Sievo platform was designed to automatically bubble up insights from the data in a manner that is relevant and actionable.

For each area, there’s also an insight dashboard that summarizes the total number of insights identified, and the breakdown by open, assigned, completed, and removed. One major difference in their platform is that a human user can identify when an insight is immaterial or non-actionable and the system will not only hide it, but learn from the feedback, and not show the insight again. For example, a payment term rationalization across a supplier’s location will not be possible if the average payment term is longer than legally allowed in France or the UK (as a result of recent laws designed to ensure [small] suppliers are paid timely). Note that insights can be assigned for action to a user and, once assigned, generates an action plan in the Sievo system.

The individual opportunity dashboards are incredibly detailed, and you can see prior coverage or a Sievo demo for details. For example, the payment terms consolidation dashboard, which allows you to dive into a category (as most contracts are category based), allows you to pick a supplier, see the supplier spend and summary, spend by payment terms, spend development opportunities by payment terms, totals by ERP supplier instance, best payment terms, overall working capital opportunity by ERP supplier, etc. etc. etc.

New Widget-Based Insights-Oriented Home Page

The main dashboard can summarize the top insights (as per the insights discussed above) across each area analyzed by the platform and provide quick links into each insight area and bubble up insight while also giving users quick access to:

  • their current/open initiatives
  • their bookmarked dashboards
  • their current/open reclassification requests
  • recent bulletins
  • quick links to relevant courses in the Sievo Academy
  • top CO2 emitters
  • other widgets the user wants on their home page

Extended Do-it-Yourself Self Service Report Creation

Not really new, but as they have added dimensions and measures, they have all be included in the self-service dashboard (and organized by measure type such as spend, payment term, supplier, invoice, PO, material, category, etc. for quick location). Similarly, as new chart types have become available, they have been included as well. (And you are not restricted to traditional bar, line, pie, and table charts — full featured pivot charts, scatter plots, and mekko charts are also available in self-service).

Near-Term Roadmap

Community Data

Sievo users will be able to benchmark their data against anonymized data from other Sievo companies’. For example, a company will be able to gain insight into its payment term competitiveness with respect to market average. A variety of pilots are ongoing to determine the most useful data, but these insights will extend the value Sievo can bring to its users.

Index-based Price Forecasting

In the materials forecasting module, more functionalities are being integrated to ensure a deep understanding of future budgeting and spending and simplify usability. Soon (in Q2 2024), forecasting based on indexes will become available, making the process even smoother and accurate for Sievo users.

Supplier Portal

ESG emissions in the supply chain are largely related to those from suppliers, and thus collaboration with suppliers is a must for emission reduction. A new supplier questionnaire and supplier portal enables users to ask suppliers for information related to their emissions, sustainability initiatives, and more.

In conclusion, if you are looking for a Best-of-Breed spend analysis solution, Sievo continues to be among the best in the space and should be on your RFP short-list.

Take the Tedious out of the Tactical Tail and Autonomously Avoid Overspend with mysupply

The taming of the tail is tedious and that’s why it’s overlooked in many organizations beyond whatever a catalog can address. There are only so many strategic sourcing professionals, there are only so many projects they can handle, and only so much spend they can get under strategic management. After that, beyond what’s in the catalog, IF there is a catalog, it’s typically the wild wild west for Procurement — especially if it fits on a credit card or P-card. There just isn’t enough bandwidth to manage more than a measly modicum of the tactical tail in an average organization.

Many organizations believe it’s okay to ignore tail spend because it’s only 20% to 30%, and because they believe that overspend probably can’t be that high on small purchases. They’re wrong on both points. In most organizations, even when the strategic categories are defined to include 80% of spend, because products and services change all the time, organizational buyers and / or overworked sourcerers won’t always catch when new products or services should be included in a strategically managed category; and because p-card/T&E is never included in the initial estimate, tactical/tail spend that’s unmanaged is usually 30% to 40%. If it’s 40% that ends up being unmanaged when the expectation is 20%, that’s a lot. Secondly, spend analysts and tail spend analysts have regularly found that the average overspend in the tail is in excess of 10%, with some categories of spend routinely being in the 15% to 30% window because no one ever looks at it. And if your organization is losing out on 10% of 40%, that’s 4% that could go straight to the bottom line with a good tactical tail spend solution.

To put into perspective just how good 4% straight to the bottom line is, consider the fact that, in direct organizations, strategic events on carefully managed direct categories that are regularly sourced typically only net 2% as the categories have already been squeezed. It’s only the mid-tier categories where you will see higher savings rates, which will typically average in the 5% to 7% range at best as these categories at least go to auction or multi-round RFP regularly. So if you save 2% on the top 30% and 5% on the next 30%, that’s only a savings of 2.1% that hits the bottom line. In other words, if your organization has been actively strategically sourcing top spend for five or six years, your organization has twice the cost avoidance / savings opportunity in the tail. It may seem counter-intuitive, but it’s the truth. Let that sink in for a moment before you read on.

mysupply is the newest start-up that aims to tackle the Tactical Tail Spend space, which has been historically underserved since the first specialists popped up (and then disappeared) to tackle it in the early 2010s. Even today you can count the true tactical tail spend specialist solutions on one hand without a thumb, compared to the seventy-five plus sourcing providers, but the new generation of providers, and mysupply in particular, understands that no one wants their spend in multiple systems (as you can’t do integrated spend, PO, and invoice management otherwise, key for Procurement success) and are developing their system as an extension to current sourcing systems, not a replacement for.

mysupply, which is even available on the SAP app store for those that use SAP (Ariba) and want a quick-start into tactical tail spend management, was designed to integrate with, and feed into your existing sourcing / procurement platforms — and in the case of Ariba, will fully use the Ariba Catalog and Ariba PO system to manage all spend. mysupply allows for:

  • quick event definition for sourcerors short on time (though the App or ProcurementBot)
  • roll-out to organizational users who can do their own quick-hit RFPs/Auctions/Catalog buys (also through the app, if needed, or ProcurementBot)
  • integration with your intake platform of choice for event push to the sourcing team

While it’s not designed as a full intake (or intake-powered) platform, as it was built for tactical tail spend and not all organizational spend, it was built from the ground up with integration in mind (as their goal is not to replace any platform you might already be using, as they are going after the enterprise market) and has a lot of orchestration capability built in and could even serve as an intake platform if desired (and route requests that should be strategically managed spend to an existing strategic sourcing application or to mysupply, which can also be used for strategic sourcing if desired).

Event creation in mysupply can be super easy. Options include:

  • in-house LLM-assisted Event Creation and Management via API-powered ProcurementBot, that can be integrated through existing enterprise collaboration platforms (Microsoft Teams is in Production, further integrations are planned)
  • Existing event templates that define all of the items being sourced, data required for bids, and (pre) approved vendors (which can easily be augmented or removed) (any event can be saved as a template to kick off future events)
  • events from scratch, where the platform is very adaptive and you only need to specify as much information as is necessary to source the product/service, which, if already defined in the system, can simply be an RFP request and a due date

and, most importantly, all of these strategies can include

  • demand bundling, even if different products or services should be sourced using different strategies, which can be across buyers for a given timeframe (i.e. collect all requests for a week or a month and then source)
  • pre-selected, custom, or hybrid supplier lists
  • customized lots, as the platform allows sourcing by item (price) or lot (price)
  • multiple tender/go-to-market approaches (i.e. each lot can be designated for a different [type] of RFX or auction), where the approach doesn’t need to be selected until suppliers have confirmed interest AND initial bids are in (which is very relevant for tactical spend where you don’t know the market dynamics because you haven’t researched the market and/or don’t source the product or service regularly; it’s not like strategic spend where you know there are seven suppliers, and five will show up to a reverse auction)
  • automated negotiation via (lot-based) QuickBot or multi-line item QuickBot
  • multiple scenarios for negotiation award analysis (where the items can be broken up for further negotiation/award after an initial bid event based on total spend, number responses, etc.)

For the requester, integrated LLMs through ProcurementBot help the requester:

  • identify the product or service being requested
  • capture demand and critical requirements
  • select the category
  • be presented with the appropriate sourcing approach: catalog, self-service, or central sourcing (team)
    • for catalog, immediately make the buy by presenting the user with the available catalog options and allowing them to select one and complete the purchase (and then the bot completes the process in the source system)
    • for self service, flesh out tender specifics and select (pre-approved) suppliers and then ProcurementBot sends out the tenders and, when they are all returned, or a certain time has passed (as configured by the category manager in the mysupply platform) returns the quotes to the buyer through the initial chat channel (where they can select one)
    • for central sourcing, it collects the request and, if appropriate, bundles it with others that are then rolled up into a managed tender that is then put into a central buyer’s queue for management, which may happen before or after initial quote requests are sent to suppliers (if an event template has already been pre-configured)

Let’s dive into some key sections / capabilities for the sourcing professional.

Demand Management / Bundling

As above, the system can be pre-configured to bundle demand over a period of time for all requests for the same product or products in a pre-defined lot, but for the rest of the requests that come in, there is the demand management/bundling section. In this section, the buyer can see all of the requests, have mysupply suggest a bundling, and either pick a suggested bundle or create her own bundle. She can quickly search and filter to create custom sourcing project bundles and then immediately kick off a workflow to define a new sourcing project bundle.

When a new sourcing project is kicked off, the user is taken to a screen where they can select starting pre-defined supplier groupings that are relevant for each item requested in the demand bundle (and, of course, the system will not include duplicate invites if the supplier is in multiple supplier groups, so the sourcing organization doesn’t have to create intersection groups, just groups for each commonly requested item).

Standard Sourcing Process

Once the buyer defines a basic event through one of the workflows (kicked off from a single request or request bundle), the platform takes the user to the event summary. From there they can:

  • define the automation and starting strategy — the event can be setup to automatically select all approved suppliers, send the request out at a certain time, remind suppliers, automatically advance to evaluation when all starting bids are in or the deadline is reached, kick off automated negotiation rounds (where suppliers are given a chance to update bids based on rank information and built-in game theory negotiation strategies), and basically free the buyer until it’s time to evaluate the first round of bids and either award, or kick off another round — at this point, the buyer can change the negotiation strategy, and even split the event up into multiple parts; this is different from most platforms where the entire event structure, and strategy (single round, multi round, Dutch action, etc.) has to be defined up-front and cannot be changed — something which makes no sense in tactical tail spend sourcing where you don’t know the supplier interest or current market dynamics; note that the starting strategy can be multi-pronged based on event value (if the award can be done under 10,000, then just award the lot to the current lowest bidder; if under 25,000 use autonomous QuickBot negotiation and award to the lowest bidder on an item basis; if over 25,000, do a 2nd round RFP with the three best suppliers and more negotiation/bundling to motivate better pricing; etc.)
  • flesh out the request — quote breakdown (while it is tactical tail spend, you may still want shipping, handling, taxes, service fees, etc. broken out), basic information required, documents required, delivery and payment details that must be accepted, compliance requirements, etc.
  • invitation of the selected suppliers (where you can add or remove suppliers that were pre-populated from supplier groups appropriate to the items in the request)
  • the evaluation of the bids that come back – manually, autonomously, or a combination thereof;
    the platform supports best price strategies, threshold strategies (which allow the strategy to be dependent on the amount of the bid, i.e user-driven negotiation above a range, best price negotiation within a range, and best-price auto-award below a range), QuickBot single lot auto-negotiation, Multi-Item QuickBot, English auction, Dutch auction, ranking (based on weighted responses and costs), buyer awards (no auction/negotiation); it supports lot strategies (best distribution by single-item award or all split); it also supports multiple rounds if desired with pre-scheduled negotiation windows (for RFQs and auctions); and, finally, it supports automated awarding if strategies that permit automated awarding are selected (subject to conditions that can restrict auto-award based on LDO — Least Desirable Outcome — or MDO — Most Desirable Outcome — scenarios; however, note that this is just the starting strategy;
  • select one or more bids for negotiation and make an award (unassigned/unawarded items are summarized and the user can see, through color coding, the lowest cost among all offers, select one, and send it to the e-Procurement system; the user can even dynamically kick-off new rounds of the RFP/auction, which may have a smaller supplier set or introduce new suppliers if the responses weren’t acceptable )
  • manage Q&A with the suppliers

A great feature of mysupply is it is not built to replace your current strategic sourcing platform (which most organizations have), your existing catalogs and catalog management applications (they integrate with them through their extensive API support), or your ERP/MRP/AP system which manages your purchase orders (as they integrate with those too). It’s meant to fill the tactical / tail spend sourcing hole in most organizations and, in particular, help organizations with tactical sourcing teams and help desks become considerably more efficient so overall savings can be increased though effective category management practices that capture and encode organizational knowledge so the end users can make the right buys on their own as often as possible, ensuring that the tactical team can focus on higher spend tail spend categories and new categories (and develop the right strategies to manage those going forward).

If your organization does a lot of tactical / tail spend sourcing, mysupply is definitely a platform you might want to check out, especially since its ProcurementBot allows it to do intake through third party platforms organizational users are already familiar with (such as Microsoft Teams).

Close the Supplier Loop with LUPR

Suppliers are key to sourcing and procurement success because you depend on your suppliers for the products you sell, the services you provide, and the materials you need for your daily operations. Thus, Supplier Management is key to sourcing and procurement success, but most companies don’t even have up to date information on their suppliers.

In order to achieve the value you expect from your suppliers, you need to

  • properly onboard and vet them
  • manage their information
  • monitor their performance
  • record related issues
  • manage the relationship
  • store contracts
  • track the savings goals
  • track the realized savings
  • and so on

And, more importantly, your supplier account managers need to work with the supplier representatives in each of these tasks, which need to be streamlined for both parties.

The founders of LUPR, each with two decades (plus) of Procurement project experience, realized this and created a supplier management platform that could tackle these issues, and it did so on top of Salesforce, which makes it an easy buy for any organization already using Salesforce as the platform has already been vetted by IT, Risk, Sales, and Finance. It also makes it easy for staff to learn the platform, as they are already used to the basics of Salesforce, and they have staff who can help out.

Before we get into the specifics (modules) of the solution, one thing to note is that because it’s built on Salesforce, it has:

  • high levels of configurability
  • security down to the field level in an object (record)
  • automation
  • familiar reporting and analytics capability
  • easy integration with other Salesforce AppExchange apps

The platform has the following primary modules:

  • supplier registration portal (for self-serve onboarding)
  • supplier information management module
  • risk assessment module
  • issue reporting and performance tracking
  • supplier corrective action resolution (SCAR) control
  • savings tracking and pipeline management
  • reporting and analytics

Supplier Registration Portal
The supplier portal is a very user-friendly web-based portal where a supplier can go and register itself as wanting to do business with the buying organization as well as provide all of the information requested by the buying organization. When it comes to onboarding, it should be noted that the only available out-of-the-box integrations (subscriptions required) for supplier validation are Experian, CreditSafe, Equifax and RapidRatings for business identifiers, financial information, and/or credit scores. Additional, custom, integrations are possible, but if you have other validation data being pulled into your ERP (such as SAP and Oracle which they integrate with), you can pull the validated data in from your ERP rather than collecting it from a supplier (and having to validate it manually).

Supplier Information Management
Upon login, the user is taken to their dashboard, which can be custom configured, and usually overviews their approved supplier list (by product and service), their top supplier spend (by supplier), outstanding tasks (including approvals for onboarding, information updates, etc.), suppliers by relationship tiers (as it supports multiple tiers, which can be custom configured, but are defaulted to critical, strategic, transactional, and leverage, which matches many consulting 2*2 breakdowns), today’s events, NCRs by type, NCR and KPI trends, etc.

Supplier profiles are typical of what you would expect and you can define and track all standard corporate data (including registration numbers), contacts, banking information, risk scores (through an API or collected from surveys), ESG data (from AppExchange partners, including Ecovadis and CSRHub, or pulled in from surveys), and spend (with an ERP or P2P integration). You can also store certificates and track associated metadata, see the supplier’s Z-score, its KPI scores (and drill into scorecards), see any associated nonconformance occurrences, open activities, surveys, and create supplier level initiatives (around overall savings targets, organizational alignment, performance measurements, etc.).

Products and Services
One unique capability of the LUPR platform is that they support extensive product and service definitions, which are associated with the corresponding suppliers, as well as the corresponding organizational standard product or service, and you can drill into each individual supplier product/service from both the supplier profile and the standard product/service, which can be organized by category (or category hierarchy with additional system hierarchy). It’s also easy to search for products and services by keywords (and then filter into particular categories or suppliers if desired).

The built-in out-of-the-box support is very extensive, and allows buyers to analyze total spend, define organizational needs, analyze markets, engage stakeholders, create strategies, and manage performance by product as well as manage performance by suppliers (discussed below). The assessments can be quite deep and look at the business aspect, supply market flexibility, savings estimation, and ease & speed of implementation. Furthermore, any relevant stakeholders can be engaged in the analysis as needed.

Issue Reporting and Performance Tracking / KPI Scorecards
Performance tracking in the platform revolves around KPI scorecards which can be very extensive, depending on how much data the organization tracks and integrates into the platform. The platform comes with a number of scorecard templates (and a large number of pre-defined measures in the KPI library), but LUPR can build custom scorecards to evaluate a supplier on any dimensions that are relevant to your business. (Also, all of the templates can be updated as you see fit, measures added and removed and weights updated to suit organizational preferences.) (They’ve done quite a few over the years and can implement extensive, custom scorecards relatively quickly.) Contract compliance, (On Time) Delivery, Quality, ESG, realized savings, etc. can all be tracked (by default) at the supplier level if the data is available, and you can get KPI scorecards by supplier, category, supplier-category, or a subset of the supply base (restricted to a region).

Nonconformance / Supplier Corrective Action Resolution
The system comes with built in templates to capture nonconformances (related to contracts, delivery, quality, invoices, etc.) that can be filled out by any system user and then turned into a supplier corrective action workflow by a supplier (account) manager that will accept and complete the information, share the nonconformance report with the supplier through the supplier community, get additional information back, propose a corrective action, capture supplier acceptance (or rejection, and then restart the process), track progress, and when the issue is resolved, close it out. LUPR has a detailed dashboard to help the Procurement team track nonconformances for fast resolution.

Savings Tracking and Initiative/Pipeline Management
The entry point is the initiative dashboard which is a Kanban type project management dashboard that summarizes projects in each stage (idea, evaluation, validation, execution, finalization, and realization) as well as the total dollar value of all projects in each stage. If the user prefers, she can flip to a tabular view that can be filtered by stage, owner, spend category, SOP category, and other relevant dimensions. Upon drilling into an active initiative, the user can see all of the associated data as well as what has been realized to date in the realization phase.

A new initiative can be created by simply defining a small amount of project data (name, owner, bracketing dates, business unit, etc.), the spend category, and one or more actions that will need to be performed. Actions just need a name, type, associated category, and one or more suppliers or products you are tracking the action against, each of which is associated with a start date, end date, tracking frequency (one time, monthly, quarterly, etc.), and accounting categorization (capex, opex, etc.).

Reporting and Analytics
Most reporting in the system is summarized in dashboards (from which you can drill into the individual reports behind the widget).

Provided the system is integrated with your ERP or spend analysis system, or someone enters the monthly spend or (data necessary to calculate the) savings realized against each initiative, one of the key reports is the savings dashboard that summarizes the initiatives, total anticipated savings, savings targets for the year, target run rate savings by month, targets by owner, targets by status, targets vs actioned, and so on to allow a supplier and/or category manager to get a firm grip on how initiatives are going, where they may not be going as well as projected, and where supplier management may be needed.

Another key report is the category dashboard which tracks on-time delivery, NCRs not resolved within 30 days (or the number of days defined by the organization), average NCR resolution time (by supplier) invoicing errors, spend, identified savings by quarter, and other key metrics filterable by category.

LUPR comes with out-of-the-box reports and dashboards which can be further configured for you upon implementation, or you can build your own.

The system also maintains complete, unalterable, audit trails on every data element in the system which can be queried and reported upon at any time in the reporting module.

Global Search & Chatter
It’s worth pointing out that the platform also supports global search, and will show all results by type (supplier, product/service, projects, reports, dashboards, events, etc.).

It also has built in slack-like communication where the user can communicate with other users, supplier users, or custom groups of users.

Administration
As the platform is built on Salesforce, everything can be customized, and, most importantly, users can be given access rights down to an individual data element if needed. Most of the administration takes place in the object-manager, which allows the user to select any LUPR system object for customization, as appropriate. Within an object, the user can edit the data elements, the allowed value ranges, the display criteria and layout, the access rights, etc.

So if you’re on the market for a Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) solution, and especially if you are a mid-size organization looking for an SRM solution, that’s quick to buy, quicker still to implement (if you already have Salesforce), and a great complement to a modern Sourcing and Procurement solution (as their API can be used to build integrations that pull data in from your ERP/AP [and they already have integrations with SAP and Oracle] and push up-to-date supplier data to your sourcing platform), LUPR is a platform you should check out. As with the new generation of solutions aimed primarily at SME organizations, it starts at a very affordable price point and as it was designed by Procurement consultants with over two decades of experience, you know they will help you configure it to support the supplier management projects and reporting your organization needs.

Darkbeam: Shining a Light on your Supply Base Cyber Risk

In part 9 of our Source-to-Pay+ series, we talked about the need for cyber risk monitoring and prevention because, in today’s hyper-connected SaaS world, nearly half of an organization’s data breaches originate in the cloud. These risks don’t just come from cyber criminals. Some come from less-than-scrupulous employees and others come from suppliers, even well meaning ones. After all, who cares if the front door is locked when the back door is wide open.

Why do you care about your supplier’s back door? What do cyber-criminals want?

  • money
  • valuable intellectual property
  • exploitable personal data

Where can they get this?

  • account hacking, which is hard, or payment redirection, which is a lot easier
  • your ultra-secure server which is locked down tighter than Fort Knox with everything on it encrypted in 256-bit AES encryption, or the relatively unprotected Google Drive your supplier stores it on (as the file will be open to anyone who can compromise the account)
  • your double encrypted HR database stored in a secure AWS instance or the plain-text Microsoft word documents stored on the supplier’s sales rep laptop with its unencrypted hard drive and an utter lack of virus protection and internet security software

In other words, if your supplier has:

  • a lot of your money coming its way
  • your intellectual property
  • your executives’ personal data

and their cybersecurity is not as good as yours, you can be sure the cybercriminals are going to be going to, and through, them to get to you.

So you need to know which of your suppliers are at risk, so you can reach out to them and work with them to close the holes and eliminate the risks to them, and you. And for suppliers that you do significant business with (and regularly send million dollar payments), who hold your patented IP (for custom manufactured electronics, etc.), or store your employees and/or customers HR data, you need to not only assess their vulnerabilities but continuously monitor for threats.

You need a supplier vulnerability assessment and monitoring solution that can identify vulnerabilities, help you communicate those to your supplier, detect improvements, and, most importantly, identify new threats as they emerge that could cost you, or your supplier, significantly.

Darkbeam is one of these solutions. The Darkbeam solution offers both of these capabilities, continuous vulnerability monitoring across your entire supply base (at a very affordable price point that starts at a mere £25,000 a year, which is low-end for any cybersecurity solution) and continuous threat monitoring, and assessment, of critical suppliers in your supply base (which you can add for an incremental cost that can be as low as £10,000 a year for your ten most critical suppliers).

The vulnerability assessment solution monitors:

  • Connections: SSL certificates and associated validations (hosts, IP, TLS, etc.)
  • Privacy: e-mail and cloud servers and configurations and breaches (esp. email addresses)
  • HTTPS: web site configuration, cookies, and port security
  • DNS: DNS record completeness, security, and recent changes
  • Blacklist: domain and email blacklist monitoring
  • Exposure: shared host identification, domain permutation monitoring, favicon, exposed subdomain monitoring, etc.

Cyber-weakness in each of these areas is highly relevant because it could allow hackers and cyber-criminals to exploit your supplier, and you, in ways that include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • an expired SSL certificate could allow a cybercriminal to register a fake certificate that validates a fraudulent facsimile of the actual site
  • exposed email accounts could allow a cybercriminal to masquerade as a supplier representative and change banking details for payment
  • an insecure site configuration could provide a backdoor into your entire network
  • incomplete DNS records could be completed by a cybercriminal and redirect traffic to a fraudulent site
  • if a domain shows up on a blacklist it could prevent email/traffic to/from the domain; and if emails show up on a blacklist, it could indicate compromised emails and/or emails not being received by their intended recipients
  • if a supplier’s website is on a shared host that is used by a lot of other sites (that are insecure), a number of (one-character-off) permutations of the supplier’s domain have been registered, favicons are being replicated, etc. then that is a strong sign the supplier is being targeted by cyber criminals (that could be coming for you, or your customers, through them)

Based on their assessment, they will compute a cyber-risk score (out of 999), the lower the better, and the higher the more concerned you should be (and the sooner you should reach out to your [potential] supplier to have a conversation about what they are doing to increase their cybersecurity, especially if they have, or will have, your IP or personnel data).

The threat monitoring and assessment solution is a service-based solution where the Darkbeam cyber-intelligence team continuously monitors the web and dark web for potential threats, investigates those threats when they are detected, and if the threats are relevant, they send you a report on which you can take immediate action which can include, but not be limited to, involving the proper authorities, that they have experience working with in multiple countries.

They literally monitor dozens of legit security and threat-intelligence sites (where general cyber security firms release warnings of cloud or software insecurity along with known breaches) as well as dozens of dark-web sites where shady characters like to sell, or at least indicate the presence of, IT, Trade and Finance secrets they should not have. On many occasions, they have detected breaches and data theft even before the supplier’s IT team knew about it (and definitely well before you did, if you were ever told).

If an incident or threat is detected, the threat report you receive will outline the issue (e.g. data exposure / breach), the root cause (e.g. system breach, ransomware, etc.), when it was detected, how it was confirmed, and what is currently being done / monitored. It will then outline the perceived severity (e.g. medium due to potential IP leakage, high due to personal data likely being stolen) as well as any potential follow on risks (i.e. personal logins that can compromise other systems). It will summarize the currently known information uncovered by the analysts and the current status (which could be ongoing). And it will provide current recommendations, such as reaching out to the supplier, changing logins and/or locking down your systems, reaching out to various agencies, etc.

All in all, Darkbeam is a great Supply Chain Cybersecurity solution and should be on your consideration list if you don’t have such a solution already. Cyber attacks are coming, and it’s best to be ahead of the issue, then behind it.

Does Your Procurement Process Take Too Long, Maybe You Need to Zip Through It!

Zip is an interesting player. Started in 2020 to innovate the (lack of) intake in the Procurement world, they managed, through sheer ease of use and organizational friendliness, to embed themselves in a number of large organizations, get major investor attention, and, in less than four years, catapult themselves to a unicorn valuation.

However, as a result of those investments, they’ve been hiring good engineers as fast as they can find them, beefing up the orchestration, extending the product footprint (with baseline source-to-contract as well as some procure-to-pay capability), and launching a new integration platform, which is essential for source-to-pay-plus orchestration. They are making quite rapid progress in a space where many (but not all) larger companies have considerably slowed in their introduction of new innovation.

Marketing itself as procurement orchestration, Zip was founded to address the facts that:

  • purchasing is now distributed across numerous departments, and individuals, in today’s organizations,
  • (significantly) more cross functional approvals are required to control cost and risk, and
  • the ERP is not enough, and the plethora of apps and systems a modern organization needs are disconnected.

Now that they have powerful workflow creation capability, integration capability, and overall orchestration capability that can enable whatever you have (including Workday, Ariba, and Coupa), they now address the core problems they were formed to solve.

With the Zip platform, you can:

  • connect all individuals who need to purchase with all departments that need to be involved and vice-versa,
  • integrate all of the departments that need to review and approve purchasing (related) decisions, and
  • get visibility into each stage of the process across ALL of the organization’s systems (and even complete some tasks in the Zip platform where it has the corresponding Source-to-Pay capability).

On top of this you can:

  • integrate third party data feeds as well as applications to get insights and power analytics you need at any step of the process,
  • run cross-platform reports across performance and timelines as well as all spend, risk, and related data in the system,
  • manage your vendors and their data (which could be spread across a dozen systems) from one central viewpoint, and
  • manage your organizations (and subsidiaries) by department, category, etc.

The two-fold reason that you can do all this is because the Zip platform is really good at:

  • workflow management and
  • platform, and most importantly, data integration.

We’ll start with workflow management.

In the Zip platform, workflows are incredibly customizable. Workflows can:

  • have as many steps as required
  • which can be defined as sequential or parallel … and the workflow will not advance until all parallel steps are completed
  • have as many states as is needed (though most will only need a few states: locked, ready, in progress, approved, rejected (and sent back), rejected [and process terminated], etc.)
  • have as many sub-tasks and/or associated approvers as needed (so if the Legal Review needs two sign offs due to different policies that have to be met or the Finance Review needs two sign offs to ensure transparency, no problem)
  • have as many conditions as necessary for workflow selection / triggering (so you can have different procurement workflows by sub-category by geography if need be)
  • have as many triggers and dynamic data pulls defined as needed to instantiate a step once unlocked (e.g. bring up all vendors associated with a product, all approvers associated with a role, etc.)
  • link to as many external systems as required, with each (sub)task associated with the app/system in which the integrated party may perform his or her task
  • have as many details and associated documents as necessary
  • for Procurement, link to associated products, vendors, and / or contracts
  • etc.

And this is why the Zip Platform is so easy to use by, and attractive to, the average purchaser / requisitioner in an organization.

When an average user wants to buy, all they have to do is

  1. log into Zip via SSO (which can be configured to orchestrate organizational workflows beyond Procurement),
  2. indicate they want to purchase something
  3. select what they want to purchase
  4. make a few category/specification sub-selections to help the platform narrow in to the appropriate workflow (e.g. Facility Services, Janitorial; Computing and Electronics, Laptop;)
  5. if there are pre-approved vendors and/or products, the vendors/products; if not, they can select their own vendors/products
  6. answer a few [sub]-category dependent associated questions on the contract type, corporate or personal data that will be shared, etc.
  7. indicate the budget (amount) they wish to use (if appropriate)
  8. and submit the request …

The process is kicked off, the requisite data / document / survey collection is begun, those involved in the process are notified (and have visibility into the tasks they (potentially) have (coming), and the requester has full visibility into where the process is at all times (as the system will synch with external systems on predefined intervals between 15 minutes and 24 hours, usually depending on how often the external systems are used and what restrictions there are on access [e.g. some systems don’t have an API and do daily exports, and for systems with real-time APIs, the user can force synch anytime they want). But, most importantly, events that used to take hours to create and weeks to coordinate, can be created in minutes and the coordination effort is non-existent — the system handles everything for you.

When a user logs in, they can go to their (task) dashboard and see all the projects they are involved in, all the tasks they are assigned in those projects, and drill into all of the open tasks they need to work on now. They can also see how long the task has been open, when it is/was due, the average time taken on a task of that type, and the average time the user takes to do the task (if they drill into the appropriate report).

Moreover, if vendors are involved, vendors are invited and taken to their own portal where they see the event and only see what additional information is required (as anything requested upon onboarding is already available.

It’s also very easy to setup and administer, which is also critical for a modern platform. At any time, a user with appropriate authority can:

  • define, modify, and even inactivate workflows, as appropriate using a very easy to use no-code workflow builder where the users visually define the steps; select the actions; define the rules, actions, and triggers, etc.
  • define or modify (approval) statuses
  • define or modify the organization’s category hierarchy
  • define or modify new or existing survey templates which allow the user to add sections, questions, selection lists, etc.
  • create new system fields and documents and associate them with the appropriate system objects
  • create or modify the lookup types
  • add or modify user access rights, down to geographies, departments, workflows, function access rights
  • define or modify the organizational hierarchy (subsidiaries, departments, queues, locations, GL entities)
  • define roles, users, and permissions
  • define bank accounts and vendor (virtual) cards
  • add (out-of-the-box) or modify integrations, or launch the new low-code Zip Integration Platform that allows customers to build their own connector to any system with an Open (REST) API
  • define the default reports (vendor, spend, performance, etc.)

While we’re not covering them in this post, we should note that Zip has a P2P module (that 42% of its customers use) and a new Sourcing Module, and that Zip is actively working on new capabilities and module(s).

The new capabilities we can discuss now, on the Q1/Q2 roadmap, are:

  • NLP-based intake for even easier usability and up-front integration of Slack, Teams, and other collaboration platforms to allow workflows to be kicked off in those platforms
  • predictive analytics — the analytics module is being upgraded and it will include recommendations for spend management and process improvement using trend analysis, machine learning, and other techniques that can be used to provide the user with additional insight

In other words, Zip, which has well over 300 enterprise customers, is zipping along and intends to keep doing so. The great thing is that you don’t need to replace any of your enterprise systems, including any best of breed systems you have for sourcing or procurement, but instead connect them together to maximize the value you get out of them. Zip is an(other) I20 — intake to orchestrate — system that is certainly worth being aware of and checking out if system, process, or stakeholder orchestration and collaboration is a challenge in your enterprise.