Category Archives: Vendor Review

Fill Your Gas Tank with Coupa e-Procurement

These days, prices at the pumps are on everyone’s mind – consumer and business owner alike. And whether you’re a 3PL or a call center, your business depends on gas. Just like a 3PL will go under if it can’t afford to keep the fuel tanks in its fleet full, so will your business if your employees can’t afford the gas they need to get to work and you can’t afford to help them offset their transportation costs. But how are you to do that if everything else is going up in cost as well?

These days, the only way many businesses can consistently keep their costs down is to use e-Procurement – which has been found to lower an average organization’s costs by 4.8% (according to a recent Aberdeen study). But if you’re a small business, or even a smaller mid-size business on a limited budget, chances are you just don’t have the cash for the solutions offered by the self-proclaimed market leaders. (Ariba and Ketera, if you’re wondering.) But all is not lost – because there’s Coupa, the first e-Procurement platform for the mass market that any organization can afford. (Not just the Fortune 3000!) A true on-demand SaaS platform that takes advantage of Amazon’s cloud computing to keep prices as low as they can go, prices start as low as $295/month or $3540/year! Chances are that’s less than you’re paying Microsoft annually for it’s bloated, unstable, operating system that you run your business on – and within the reach of even the smallest of operations!

There’s no better time than now to investigate Coupa, who just today rolled out their latest update. On their seventh release (since their initial launch in July 2006), the platform is now well rounded for buyers, suppliers, and administrators alike – and still easier to use than Amazon.com. (Let’s put it this way, if Amazon truly was “one-click”, Coupa would be “no-click”.) Their search functionality now supports lists and gallery views and sorting by supplier, price, and relevance. Their form-based ordering now allows for “requisition copy” for instant re-ordering. You can now receive notification of approvals (which can be done by system administrators through e-mail) in real-time through your Instant Messenger client! And their checkout is still a marvel in simplicity – everything that can be pre-populated (such as shipping, billing, and receiving information) already is, and most of the time all you have to do is click “submit”! And, unlike many other systems out there (including the B2C leaders) if you have to order multiple items that require different billing information, whereas most systems would force you to create multiple orders, with Coupa, you can choose to specify billing at the line item level. And if only a few items require special billing information, you only have to specify the information for those items. Default billing information will be automatically populated for all of the other items.

It’s all based on Coupa‘s philosophy that no piece of data should need to be entered twice – ever – a philosophy that is even extended to suppliers. (A philosophy that the doctor wishes more software companies would wrap their head around and stop wasting time building flashy Cadillac UI’s to mask their problematic Model-T Ford engines.) With Coupa, your supplier can automatically generate an invoice off of your purchase order with a single click, and they only need to enter information (such as shipping, billing codes, etc.) not available on the purchase order. Considering that the vast majority of EIPP systems only allow for electronic submission of a supplier invoice, this is a huge benefit. Millions, if not Billions, of dollars are lost annually due to invoicing errors – which are easily prevented when the supplier does not have to re-key in data, as every keystroke increases the chance of an error. Furthermore, Coupa supports standard catalog formats and “punch out” (and has over 2300 suppliers already enabled in its system), so the chances of a pricing error are greatly reduced as the supplier does not have to create a separate price list for every client for off-contract goods and services (and only has to create one price-list for on-contract goods and services, and never has to re-key pricing on an invoice).

But most importantly, because it’s 100% hosted, Coupa does not require anything besides the browser already sitting on your employee’s desktop. Furthermore, since it supports the creation of buying policies during set up, it’s essentially 100% touch-less buying from an administrative point of view. You don’t need any IT resources. You don’t need your approvers double checking every order to see if every good or service is on contract and at the contracted price (because you can set the system up to only allow on-contract purchases at contract prices without authorizations), and you can eliminate manual review of all purchases that represent normal business conduct (by setting up regular purchases and rules for what purchases require approval and human intervention and what purchases don’t).

And you can take comfort in the fact that as good as Coupa is today, it’s only going to get better with time! Between July 2006 and May 2008, Coupa had 7 major releases and over 13 updates! That’s at least 3 releases and 6 updates a year! And when you consider that they were

  • the first open-source e-Procurement platform
  • the first e-Procurement platform built for the mass market
  • the first mass-market e-Procurement platform built as SaaS from the ground up
  • the first supply chain platform to use Amazon cloud computing
  • the first e-Procurement platform to offer a free 30-day trial
  • the first, and still only, e-Procurement platform to offer drag-n-drop shopping
  • the first, and still only, e-Procurement platform to include “how to buy” policy support
  • the first e-Procurement platform that allows employees to contribute feedback

and that

  • the rate at which spend through the platform doubles decreases every quarter (it’s now down to 25 days)
  • the supplier count is exploding month over month (over 2300 connected suppliers and climbing fast)
  • the average “go-live” time for a new client is decreasing by the quarter (average is now 17 days to get the system fully configured for “touchless” buying and the suppliers who represent 80% + of your business enabled)
  • the average update has 100’s of improvements … and over a dozen new features
  • it also comes with extensive reporting for finance, logistics support, and even basic inventory management capabilities … with new functions being added every major release

you just can’t go wrong giving it a try if you’re an average small or mid-size business. (Especially since it has a free 30-day trial!)

And chances are, with Coupa, you’ll save enough to keep that gas tank full, even when everyone else is running on empty.

ThomasNet Takes Sourcing to the Masses

ThomasNet recently launched it’s free Purchasing Tools, based on SourceOne’s (acquired by Corcentric) free WhyAbe (sunset) platform. This platform allows buyers who still haven’t adopted an e-Sourcing platform to test the waters with a basic RFx and Auction service.

The platform, which comes with a complete Buyer User Manual as well as a Supplier User Manual, allows buyers to create a private or private RFX, see their listings on a dashboard (where they can also identify reviewers and block blacklisted suppliers from bidding), and also take advantage of ThomasNet’s engineering, web, and community tools. The RFxs are essentially RFQs where you solicit bids for well a basket of well-defined products and services, and the reverse auction formats are limited to supplier rank and lowest bid, but that’s where most companies start on their e-Sourcing journey.

The auction tool allows you to specify whether or not you want duplicate bids, minimum decrements during bidding (as a number or percentage), and automatic extensions to prevent bid sniping. The product also supports multiple currencies, attachments, and product images as well as e-mails to invited suppliers. It’s not on par with any of the paid Software-as-a-Service offerings, but as I’ve said before, it’s cracking the sourcing mold and offering a free solution that companies new to sourcing and sourcing technology can use and experiment to find out what works for them, what doesn’t, and what they need help on. It’s a great way for a company to test the water as it provides a quick start to e-Sourcing with a price that can’t be beat. Then, when an organization has identified it’s needs, and, more importantly, identified what it can do well in house – and what it can not, it can always upgrade to a more extensive e-Sourcing platform and retain a PSP, like Source One, to help it with those categories that it doesn’t have the experience, or the leverage, to get savings on.

So, let’s give ThomasNet some applause for trying to spread the sourcing word and hope that this convinces more organizations still using e-mail and fax for RFQs to join the twenty-first century.

Vinimaya : The B2B Search Engine

Last November, I introduced you to Vinimaya (rebranded Aquiire, acquired by Coupa) in my post on The Next Wave in Product Catalogue Management. With their agent technology, Vinimaya is a leader in supplier enablement for those companies that need an integrated catalog solution for their e-Procurement platform as their Product Catalog Management Solution (PCM) supports whatever mechanism the supplier already has – be it a punch-out, catalog, market-place, or plain-old web-site.

However, Vinimaya, which is a very stable and profitable company (despite some competitor’s claims to the contrary), is not content to just have the best PCM solution. They’ve spent the past six months improving their core technology and working on additional offerings to benefit the supply management space. In addition to their streamlined agent technology-enabled SmartSearch Buyer, which they are able to implement for an average large customer, who needs hundreds of suppliers enabled, in four to five weeks, they now offer a SmartSearch Supplier service for suppliers, B2B transaction services, and they are working on a new Discovery service that is likely to be launched before the end of the year.

Their SmartSearch Supplier service allows suppliers that require specialized punchouts or catalog formats to support their buyers to offer these formats without having to build these punchouts or specialized (XML, CIF, etc.) formats on their own. The SmartSearch Supplier offering, which uses the same underlying agent technology as SmartSearch Buyer, translates the supplier’s current catalog format (web-site, database, XML, etc.) into whatever format the buyer requires (because they use Ariba Supplier Network, SciQuest, Ketera, etc.) on the fly. In addition, it supports the same price override capability as SmartSearch Buyer, so the supplier can customize its prices to each buyer using a set of pricing rules.

Their B2B transaction services supports internet EDI with seven standard document formats, p-card payments, XML-EDI punchouts, and interchange and is delivered by their partners, including VITG USA and ESIS. In other words, Vinimaya is all about the internet as the network and providing you with the ability to connect with anyone, anywhere, anytime.

However, it is the SmartSearch Discovery offering that they are currently working on now that really got my attention when I caught up with them last week. Right now, they allow you to search multiple sites seamlessly through their SmartSearch Buyer, which is more than any other catalog solution allows you to do. However, in the near future, it sounds like they will also allow you to search third-party marketplaces at the same time, in the same view, and seamlessly integrate the best of B2C with the best of B2B. Right now, you can search by product, category, part, and supplier location – everything you can do with your standard catalog. But with this new service, you’ll also be able to search by component, manufacturer, third party rating, and any other piece of information that is out there on third party marketplaces. And there’ll be better integration into your current e-Procurement and e-Sourcing platforms. What will it look like? That’s a topic for a later post. So stay tuned!

CVM: Not Just About Supplier Diversity Anymore!

CVM Solutions (acquired by supplier.io), one of Spend Matters’ Nine Vendors to Watch in 2008, appears to be on a quest these days to conquer the sourcing space, with their intent to offer supplier data enrichment, supplier relationship management (SRM), spend analysis, and a soon-to-be-launched procure-to-pay process management solution. According to Jason, CVM is a “best-kept secret” because of their extensive data enrichment services, supplier portal, and their new uber-workflow and process management engine that creates a level of control and visibility that he’s not seen elsewhere.

Now, I don’t know if they’re the “best-kept” secret, but when it comes to their data management capabilities and their new process management engine, they’re certainly a well-kept secret. Their extensive data management solution allows you to track extensible & customizable information on each supplier of a generic, location-based, contact-based, business registration, financial, capability, diversity, contract, sourcing, SRM, administration, and documentary nature – including scanned attachments which can be easily uploaded by specifying meta-data, printing off a cover-page with a system-generated bar-code, and faxing the document (with a cover-page) to a CVM provided fax number. (Reducing the number of steps in the traditional scan, convert, upload, tag, index.) In other words, their data management capabilities are in the same class as Aravo, a vendor I’ve written about before. However, due to their extensive supplier information databases (as the largest provider of diversity information in the US with enrichment data being culled from over 330 external databases and over half of the Fortune 500 as customers), they can also quickly and easily enrich your data, eliminating the need to integrate a third party’s data stream into your supplier data management / supplier information management solution (SIM), which might reduce the Total Cost of Ownership for a company that needs extensive amounts of third party data (as long as their pricing for enrichment services remains competitive with Austin Tetra and D&B.

For an initial release, I was also quite impressed by their new procure-to-pay process management engine. Although it’s not competitive with either your best-of-breed e-Procurement suites or your best-of-breed e-Sourcing suites when it comes to procurement and sourcing capabilities, with proper use, its flexible design allows you to accurately track all of your ongoing projects, and their current status, with respect to each supplier and each category and manage the process which, for most companies, probably involves at least three or four different systems (spend analysis, e-Negotiation, contract management, e-Procurement, e-Payment, order management, etc.). For example, their default assessment / supplier selection / contract draft / contract approval / transition workflow allows a category manager to document where each sourcing project is, and, when a supplier is selected, track where the project is with respect to contract drafting, approvals, and issuance. This information is then integrated with the data repository, where you can define alerts to notify you when certain quotas are reached / not reached in a time period and when a contract is about to expire. Steps can be added to, or removed from, the workflow, as required by your organization, and it allows you to continue using a collection of best-of-breed products from multiple vendors but still track your project status in one-location (which I believe is critical because there isn’t a single suite vendor with more than 3 solutions that is Best of Breed in everything – and when a best-of-breed solution can squeak out even 2% to 3% more on 100M+ spends, in today’s economy, I don’t think you can justify not going with a BoB solution).

I was also impressed by the usability of the application from a buyer’s perspective and a supplier’s perspective – which is important when you want to capture tier 2 diversity information from your suppliers in addition to asking them to use the tool to enter and maintain their basic information. The only thing I didn’t like was the response time – many screens took an average of 3 to 4 seconds to load in the demo (and I’m not willing to blame the internet as I have high speed cable on a 15MB rated network and can sustain 1MB/sec download times on my machine with ease). If you’re going to be maintaining large databases, you’ll need to ask about their SLAs and insure that you have enough processing power and bandwidth dedicated to the application. (Fortunately, with today’s hardware prices, you can do that at very affordable prices!)

I was, as regular readers might guess, not impressed with their “spend analysis”, or, more appropriately, with their classification of their spend reporting program as “spend analysis”. It’s a good reporting package with over 30 pre-configured reports that has all of the day to day reports that managers and accounting and tactical purchasers are going to need … but when it comes to the true analysis capability required by your power buyers, it’s just not there. In other words, like many of the spend analysis applications on the market, it will satisfy all of the requirements of management and your tactical purchasing team, but none of the requirements of your power buyers. However, it is seamlessly integrated with their platform, so if you were willing to augment it with a stand-alone power tool for your power buyers (like BIQ [acquired by Opera Solutions, rebranded ElectrifAI]), it would allow them to focus on true analysis and not have to worry about meeting the reporting requirements of management or the tactical buyers AND allow those individuals to quickly and easily access spending reports augmented with supplier information, diversity data, and standard classification systems such as NAICS and SIC. Plus, if you maintain complete contract pricing information (which is quite easy to do in their solution for commodities), it can automatically generate “offender” reports for accounts payable when you’re over-billed or accounts receivable when you reach the discount volume. So, if you can get a good deal on it, the “spend reporting” solution could be worth the price when you calculate the opportunity cost of a power user of a companion BoB application generating standard reports for management and accounting vs. digging for new opportunities. Plus, and this could be a key selling point for them, they have an add-on Federal Reporting Module that can be configured to automate Federal and State Agency reporting down to the contract level – and anyone who has had to prepare these reports knows how time-consuming they can be.

Finally, they’re also getting into Risk Assessment Reporting, which, after some of the recent supply chain disasters we’ve seen in recent years, is likely soon to be a must for larger corporations. When it comes to talking-the-talk, they’re certainly ahead of much of their competition in understanding “risk” and the importance of measuring it, planning for it, and proactively dealing with it. When it comes to walking-the-walk, their reports appear to be more-or-less comparable to their competition, especially since they can pull in D&B risk scores and supporting data. However, these days, I don’t think a financially based risk-assessment tells the whole story. I think they need to integrate more sources of information, especially for small businesses (like Austin Tetra is doing), to arrive at a more complete risk picture. It’s good for a first offering, but I’d like to see how it improves over the next year before locking in any long-term agreements. This is an emerging market in the sourcing services sector, and I’m not sure if anyone really has a good lock on what the right solution is.

In summary, I think they are a well-kept secret when it comes to supplier data management and, now, sourcing and procurement workflow management, I definitely think they have a lot of potential on the SRM/SPM side and the risk side as well, and even though they don’t have true “spend analysis” (just like the vast majority of vendors who make the claim), I think that their “spend reporting”, and their federal reporting module in particular, is quite good from a usability perspective, especially for non-technical management, accounting, and tactical buyers. They’re definitely a company to look at and keep an eye on, but like other extensive suite providers, they’re not best-of-breed in everything (no matter how good the “eye-candy” UI looks).

MCA Solutions – A Strategic Service Parts Management Platform

MCA Solutions (acquired by Marlin Equity Partners, merged with Servigistics, acquired by PTC) a Philadelphia, PA company, is not only one of the few companies I know of that has an advanced strategic service parts management solution, but one of the very few that only does service parts management. Recognizing that many large manufacturing, semiconductor, high-tech, aerospace and defense companies often have tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions, of dollars tied up in inventory, and that an inventory planning and optimization solution that is off even by a few percentage points can cost these companies millions, if not tens of millions, of dollars annually, the founder of MCA Solutions, Dr. Morris Cohen, who has worked with IBM, Cisco, Applied Materials, Intel, GM, Saturn, Teradyne, and the U.S. Navy, decided to focus the company on this problem alone.

Why? Because the problem is a lot harder than you think. Just like a product has a life-cycle, so does a service part. Not only do you have to accurately forecast how many replacement parts you’re going to need in your network (as well as where they need to be), you have to manage the return, repair, and re-introduction of the repaired part into your inventory. (Remember, many parts are sub-assemblies because it can be too time consuming to replace an individual part — so it needs to be repaired once it is replaced; just like your IT department doesn’t throw out the desktop they just replaced when only the hard-drive needs to be replaced.)

To accurately solve the problem, MCA Solutions allows you to model your entire multi-echelon parts demand network. What does this mean? You can model all of your primary (warehouse) locations, forward locations, forward-forward locations, etc. to as many levels as you need; you can define all of the production lines, aircraft, or other equipment at each location; define the required replacement parts and desired availability and / or target stock levels for each part; define any and all (performance-based) contractual commitments if you are in the business of servicing lines, aircraft, or other commitments for your customer; define historical demand, service requirements, or maintenance plans; and specify the best type of statistical model for the part in question (poisson, normal, or negative binomial – as low volume, high-volume, and sporadic demand parts need to be modeled differently), as well as any location or usage-specific criteria that influences demand.

Furthermore, MCA Solutions’ platform not only allows you to strategically plan cost-optimal inventory levels for target stock and availability levels, but also takes into account current network stock levels and will give you an executable tactical implementation plan which will tell you what needs to be shifted between locations, what needs to be ordered – and when, and which parts should be repaired (and when) and which parts should be retired. In other words, not only does their solution understand product life-cycles, but it also allows understands the entire part life-cycle.

How well does it work? For their target industries, very well. It was chosen by the Navy, who spent almost a year exhaustively evaluating COTS (Commercial Off The Shelf) solutions against their own in-house solution, it’s used by KLA-Tencor and Cisco — who have some of the most extensive parts supply chains in the IT world, and their solution has been chosen by SAP as their preferred parts planning solution. Furthermore, it’s very well designed. You can work at the aggregate network, network (as it allows you to define different part networks if you have to meet different geographies, different environmental regulations, or just want to separate your internal service networks from those of your customers), forward location, location, equipment / contract, or part level, depending on your need; you can compare the current plan to various “what-if” plans that let you see how your altered stock levels / availability levels affect cost or how shifting forward locations (central warehouses) changes stock levels and affected costs; and you can do extensive reporting, graphing, and, if required, data export to Excel (and Power Point). Plus, you can export orders to your external procurement / ERP / MRP systems and import supplier response data. If the lead-times in the responses differ from what the plan expects, the system will automatically update and re-balance the plan.

If you’re in one of their target industries, it’s certainly worth an investigation. Not only is it designed well, but it appears to be very efficient. The average response time for an update even in a fairly sophisticated what-if network model (with hundreds of locations and thousands of parts) is under two seconds. That’s impressive where optimization is involved given the complexity of a multi-echelon network model.