Monthly Archives: August 2015

World Class Procurement Organizations Are Beginning to Align with the Business

A recent publication from The Hackett Group for Procurement Executives addresses “How Procurement Organizations Are Reinventing the Stakeholder Experience” that looked at world class procurement organizations, which continue to outperform their peer group by a wide margin (by up to 5M in cost savings for a typical company), and found a surprising result.

We’ve known for quite some time that world class Procurement organizations, also known as The Hackett Group Top 8%, outperform their peers. We’ve known that some of these generate savings up to 41% higher than other (laggard) organizations. But we did not know that almost twice as many world class organizations (83% vs. 44%) have dedicated resources that act as liaisons between Procurement and the rest of the business.

As the authors state, raising stakeholder satisfaction levels builds trust and helps procurement gain the organizational permission to take on higher-value work. This is confirmed by the Hackett Group’s database of thousands of benchmarks across hundreds of performance studies which found that organizations that continue to invest in activities that elevate their role to that of a trusted advisor are taken more seriously, especially when they communicate that activity appropriately to the other departments in the organization. Furthermore, when these Procurement organizations are seen as a valued business partner, they generally report 68% higher savings! (This comes by way of an average cost reduction of 3.5% vs. 2.1% and an average cost avoidance of 1.2% vs 0.7%.)

Simply put, world class Procurement organizations have climbed to the top of the hierarchy of supply (which the doctor and the maverick discussed in their piece on “The CPOs Agenda I: Availability and Delivery”), having mastered supply assurance, cost reduction, and demand management. They listen and engage the internal customer, understand the customer’s needs, manage the relationship, offer them a superior service experience, and get better results. They follow all of the best practices the doctor and the maverick have been, and will be, discussing* over on the spendmatters.com/cpo site, and are seeing the return.

* The Agenda series has been broken up into three series:

  • the Conundrum# serieswhich discusses the outside-in issues putting pressure on, and shaping, Procurement
  • the Agenda serieswhich discusses the most pressing objectives on the CPO’s plate that are required to respond to the outside-in issues
  • the Value Drivers serieswhich discusses the primary actions that a CPO can take to realize the objectives on their journey to master the hierarchy of supply

# the doctor‘s terminology

Procurement Outsourcing is On the Rise

But is it the dawn of a transformational era?

Everest Global just released it’s Annual Report on Procurement Outsourcing, which it called the dawn of a transformational era, where it found that the procurement outsourcing market is growing at a rapid pace (12% year-over-year in 2014) but that it is in a state of flux with record new deal signings intertwined with high end-of-year terminations (26%), indicative of service provider switching (or, sometimes, the pulling of the function back in-house because not all outsourcing decisions outsourced the right functions). (However, 2 providers, Accenture and IBM, still command over half of the Annualized Contract Value and the next two largest providers, Xchanging and GEP, command about 17% of the ACV, which means that two thirds of the market is dominated by four providers.)

This, and other findings discussed below, was based on Everest Group’s database of over 1,100 Procurement Outsourcing contracts (each worth over 1M with managed spend typically in the 50M+ range), its database of operational capabilities of roughly 20 Procurement Outsourcing providers, and ongoing surveys and interactions.

There were seven key messages in this report, including the rapid 12% year-over-year growth, but the three we are going to focus on are:

  • The value proposition is transitioning from a cost-focussed model to a cost+value model, where strategic drivers such as market intelligence, supplier relationship management, and operational excellence are gaining more importance
  • The scope of contracts is expanding to a more end-to-end approach
  • The role of technology is growing, with increased adoption of end-to-end platform-based offerings

Advancement of the Value Proposition

In the beginning, outsourcing was mainly focussed on economics (cost reduction):

  • procure goods and services at the best prices
  • optimize activities to be cost efficient

More recently, outsourcing has been focussed on efficiency (cost avoidance):

  • spend consolidation to drive further impacts (with volume pricing)
  • satisfaction of complex demands
  • quality as well as price (to reduce warranty/return costs and protect the brand)

But now outsourcing is starting to focus on value generation:

  • the outsourcer is trying to become a strategic partner and not just a cost centre
  • the outsourcer is trying to define and drive business outcomes that impact overall growth
  • the outsourcer is trying to predict market trends to help organizations adapt to, and take advantage of, macroeconomic shifts early

How? Outsourcing is becoming more interested in identifying innovative suppliers, tracking and enforcing compliance and risk management, and gathering and harnessing the power of market intelligence.

Increasing Contract Scope

While many outsourcing contracts start out as Source-to-Contract (S2C), where the outsourcer helps the organization identify savings in indirect, non-strategic, or even strategic categories where the organization just does not have the volume, many are transitioning to Source-to-Pay (S2P) contracts where the provider also takes over the back-office invoice management and accounts payable function. Similarly, those contracts that started out as (P2P), because the organization thought its first priority was freeing up resources for strategic sourcing, are transitioning to S2P as well because these organizations realize that a third party can source those categories that it does not have expertise in better than the organization can.

More Prominent Technology

“Cloud”, Big Data, Digitization, and Consumerization is reshaping the Procurement Outsourcing marketplace as organizations demand more from their outsourcing providers and outsourcing providers look for an edge over their peers. With the proliferation of S2P SaaS solution offerings on the marketplace, outsourcing providers can not only offer S2P services but also enterprise S2P platform deployments where the customer organization not only gets platform access, but the ability to use the platform for their sourcing projects as well.

These are promising findings. Given that most Procurement departments are under-staffed and that no Procurement department can be an expert in every category and every technology, it’s good that there are maturing outsource providers that can add value to the organization and not just drain dollars.

And the other findings, which can be found in Everest Global’s just released Annual Report on Procurement Outsourcing, the dawn of a transformational era, are promising as well. It’s worth checking out.

Organizational Damnation 53: Engineering

So far in our series, we’ve addressed Marketing, Legal, Logistics, and Human Resources. However, as you might have guessed, these are just a few of the organizational damnations Sourcing has to deal with on a daily basis.

Today we add Engineering to the list of organizational damnations that Sourcing has to deal with on a daily basis.

Why Engineering? Why is a department staffed by Engineers and Scientists who, unlike Sales and Marketing aren’t inclined to stretch the truth beyond all recognition; unlike Legal, are inclined to speak plain English; and, unlike HR, are not inclined to find new and innovative ways to suck the life force out of you, a source of eternal Procurement damnation?

Engineers are rigid stubborn perfectionists.

Let’s break this down.

Each engineer has a process, a design, a set of approved raw materials, and that is the process, the design, and the set of approved raw materials. Trying to convince them that there is another process, an alternate design, or other raw materials that might be usable is like trying to force molasses to flow up a glacier. Like doctors, who only want a specific operating tool from a specific supplier, they are rigid.

This is because they are also stubborn. In order to accept new processes, new designs, or alternative raw materials, they would have to accept that there are better processes, better designs, and better raw materials, and that they exist today. If they believe that they are at the top of their game, they will believe that better processes, better designs, and better raw materials have not been discovered yet and even if they are discoverable today, it won’t be by Procurement or the supplier Procurement is bringing for joint innovation, at least not without a lot of time and effort on their part — that they don’t have. Don’t read this to imply that they are arrogant, because they don’t mean to be (unlike ivory tower PhDs), it’s just that good engineers and scientists invest the majority of their time keeping up with their field and honestly believe that they have a much better idea than you, and they are usually right in that assumption. Since it’s not often that Procurement will actually stumble across a better way, and, moreover, since the past track record of Procurement and suppliers — before Procurement was seen as a strategic department and top talent brought in to staff the department — was poor, Engineering will naturally assume that Procurement’s zany idea of the day will be another dead end and will be stubbornly resistant to it.

And, finally, they are perfectionist. The cost model might say 98% reliability is good enough because, in practice, only 1% of units will break down before the warranty period expires and the cost of flat out replacement will have little impact on profit margin, but Engineering will say otherwise. They will insist on selecting the supplier with 99% reliability even though that will increase costs 30% and it makes no sense because it is a consumer electronic device which will cause no injury when it fails and which will have little negative impact beyond temporarily inconveniencing the consumer who will have to call in, get a replacement shipped, and send back the defective unit in the box that arrives. An Engineer takes pride in producing the best quality product possible, even if that would bankrupt the organization in the process.

Their insistence on being the best will be one of the worst damnations Procurement has to face. After all, how can you fault someone for wanting the best? And you can’t even dislike them because, unlike some departments, Engineering is not filled with blood-sucking leeches, sociopaths who figured out how to screw people legally, or evil creatures that take pleasure in your pain. But yet they will cause you anguish in every sourcing project you undertake.

As each and every post in this series explains, Procurement is truly corporate damnation.

For those of you new to the profession, welcome to hell. (And enjoy the archive knowing that we’re only halfway through our journey.)

Contract Lifecycle Management VI: Do You Know What The Should-Haves Are?

In Part I of this series, we argued that CLM, short for Contract Lifecycle Management, while seemingly one of the most bromidic acronyms in the Supply Management space, is also one of the most important. This is because, as summarized in Part III of this series, it overlaps S2C, P2P, and, as a result, S2S/S2P as well as intersecting with risk management, performance management, change management, and supplier (relationship) management. In other words, CLM touches almost every aspect of Supply Management and is taking a central place in your Supply Management organization.

However, as noted in previous posts, up until now, CLM has not been well defined and the best definition, which could arguably be that given by Gartner (see Part I), has been, more or less useless, because you already know it’s a good process supported by a great platform. What you need to know is what that platform is as vendors, analysts, peers, and even professional organizations don’t, or won’t tell you. That’s why, in a landmark effort, Sourcing Innovation and Spend Matters, as the two leading independent authorities on Supply Management, led by the doctor, the maverick, and the prophet, have joined forces to define, publicly and openly, the core Supply Management platforms, starting with CLM.

In our previous posts we elucidated the need for a core CM (Contract Management) platform because existing Supply Management systems weren’t enough, and then, in our last post (Part V), we outlined the must-have core capabilities of a CM platform, as discussed at great length in “Core Contract Management” over on Spend Matters Pro [membership required], Part V of the doctor, the maverick, and the prophet‘s landmark ten-part series fully defining CLM.

Today we are going to outline all of the important should-have capabilities of a contract management platform, discuss a couple of them, and then refer you to “The Standard Contract Management Platform”, part six of the landmark ten-part series co-authored by the doctor, the maverick, and the prophet over on Spend Matters Pro [membership required], for an in-depth discussion of each should-have capability.

To make sure there is no confusion, a should-have capability is a capability that, while not absolutely required, significantly impacts usability and performance by the absence of these features and most industry leading contract management solutions will support the majority of these capabilities to some extent.

The following capabilities are should-have:

  • Clause Library
  • Full Text Search & (Legacy Contract) Discovery
  • Collaborative Creation
  • (Fine-Grained) Roles Based Security
  • Contract Workflows
  • Rules Management
  • Contract Authoring via Rules-Based Contract Builder
  • Schedule & Rate Card Support
  • e-Signatures
  • Task Management / Tracking
  • Event Monitoring & Issue Escalation
  • Corrective Action Management
  • Dashboards and Contract Analytics
  • Native Integration to MDM Platforms

As with the set of core capabilities, most of these you probably expect, and for some of these you probably have a fairly good idea why (even if you are not sure exactly what functionality is required for a proper implementation), but a few of these are probably unexpected, including Corrective Action Management and Native Integration to MDM Platforms. We’ll discuss these two capabilities, but refer you to our in-depth piece on “The Standard Contract Management Platform” over on Spend Matters Pro [membership required] for coverage of the rest. (But the must-have, should-have, and nice-to-have function lists will be made, and remain, public as they are the common measuring stick that both Spend Matters and Sourcing Innovation will be reviewing and measuring vendors against going forward.)

Corrective Action Management is critical because issues will always arise during contract execution and they will not always resolve themselves or be resolved by the supplier. And while the organization may have a process for dealing with issues, and even a platform for doing so, those actions have to relate to, and be mapped back, to a contract to not only insure that both parties meet their obligations and performance hits necessary levels, but that resolutions are tracked and performance, pre-and-post issue resolution, is tracked and measured appropriately. After all, not all value in a contract is in the price list — sometimes it’s in the value-add, sometimes it’s in the staff augmentation, and sometimes it’s in the innovation.

Native Integration to Master Data Management (MDM) platforms is important because contracts are with approved suppliers on approved items and services under a well-defined categorization for agreed upon prices and delivery dates. All of this data is defined in existing systems, and much of it (with the exception of agreed upon prices and delivery dates) can come from the Master Data Management [MDM] system (which is generally the ERP, but could be a Sourcing or SRM platform with MDM capabilities). If the integration is not there, then a lot of information has to be manually rekeyed, which introduces considerable opportunity for error that can result in agreements for higher-than-negotiated pricing, slack delivery arrangements, or data miscategorizations that will result in erroneous spend analysis down the road. (Approximately one in one hundred keystrokes is erroneous, and this is one of the reasons that 88% of Your Spreadsheets are Garbage.)

However, every other should-have capability listed above is just as critical to usability and performance, and to understand why, and what the platform has to support with respect to those should-have capabilities, check out “The Standard Contract Management Platform” over on Spend Matters Pro [membership required], part six of the doctor, the maverick, and the prophet‘s landmark ten-part series fully defining CLM.

One Hundred and Forty Five Years Ago Today

The world’s first underground tube railway opens in London, England. IN 1869, a 1,340 foot circular tunnel was dug under the River Thames, running from Tower Hill on the north side to Vine Lane (off Tooley Street) on the south. Then a 2 ft 6 in narrow gauge railway was laid in the tunnel and one hundred and forty five years ago today on August 2, 1870, Tower Subway was opened and a cable-hauled wooden carriage conveyed passengers from one end to the other.

And even though the company that was operating the underground carriage went bankrupt the following year (as it was uneconomical), which opened up the tunnel to pedestrian traffic, and even though the tunnel was closed to pedestrian traffic in 1898 (when it was bought by the London Hydraulic Power Company which used it for water mains), as the Tower Bridge (which was built in 1894) negated the need for traffic, it was still the first underground tube railway and laid the foundations for the City and South London Railway , which were built using the same method of construction.

And one hundred and forty five years later the fog still rolls off the River Thames, obscuring the fascinating history beneath.