Category Archives: Auctions

The Control Provided by e-Sourcing is Only an Illusion – YOU HAVE NO CONTROL!

A recent post on one of the lesser known sourcing blogs indicated that, due to the lack of economic upturn in most of the developed world, maybe now is the time to finally try reverse auctions. The rationale, quotes from a CEO and his team that watched their first reverse auction that indicated that it was simple, powerful, easy to follow, effective, and, most importantly, if you read between the lines, gave them an illusion of control over the process and the results.

This, and some of the messaging coming from a few of the smaller e-Sourcing providers, is scaring me. I fear that adopters may believe that adopting this technology may give them some control. Well, as this recent article over on Chief Executive on why you should “embrace tomorrow’s strategies” clearly points out, you have NO control! You can manage the process, but you have no control over the outcomes. Why? For starters

  • Cartels, cabals, speculators, organized crime, and entire countries are constantly manipulating commodity prices.
    Case in point: China possesses over 90% of many of the rare earth metals used in many technologies (smart phones, batteries, etc.) and when they recently reduced exports, a steep price increase resulted that triggered a costly disruption of delivery of the precious commodities to global business.
  • Disasters are on the rise.
    Industrial, agricultural, and political disasters are increasing in frequency and wiping out production in entire regions. For example, the nuclear meltdown in Japan affected most businesses that rely on a Japanese supplier.
  • Global currency fluctuations, unforeseen credit crises, and economic stagnation are increasingly severe and unpredictably enduring.
    The extreme fluidity in the valuation of imported and exported goods, services, and components is as equally difficult to predict and manage.

No e-RFX or Auction is going to help you regain control over these economic nightmares that you have to deal with on a daily basis. And any provider that’s trying to sell you 1999 e-Sourcing technology to deal with the current economic stagnation doesn’t have a clue. There’s only one way you can even hope to adapt to the constantly changing reality, and that is through the adoption of a supply management platform with advanced data analytics capability. You have to constantly monitor, react, adapt, predict, plan for what-if, monitor, react, and adapt again. This requires extensive data acquisition, mapping, transformation, and analysis that only a real analytics solution, with advanced (spend) analysis, optimization, simulation, and reporting is going to provide. Don’t get fooled. All auction platforms give you in this day in age is a false sense of security. Sometimes an auction is the right way to go, but, most of the time, an auction (on its own), is not the answer.

To Maximize Value, Don’t Overlook Tail Spend

A recent article in the Sourcing Interests Group Newsletter on “understanding tail-spend management” noted that while ROI for tail spend categories will generally be lower than for core categories, those companies that keep their eye on the efficiency/effectiveness equation and approach tail-spend intelligently can still find significant savings that make the effort worth while. So how does an organization properly approach tail spend, which:

  • rarely includes direct materials
  • contains a disproportionately high percentage of spend from the furthest-flung subsidiaries
  • contains suppliers that no one in procurement has heard of
  • contains large percentages of non-compliance and maverick spend

Intelligently. And iteratively. Data must constantly be reviewed in the light of changing business requirements to determine the best course of action using the following process:

  1. Spend Analysis
    Focus in on the tail-spend data and figure out what is being bought, from whom, where, and for how much compared to market value.
  2. Filtering
    Focus on commodities that can be reclassified into a category that will have enough spend to be worthwhile.
  3. Sourcing Strategy
    Once the category with the biggest opportunity has been identified, determine the right sourcing approach. If a sourcing project is the right approach, accelerate it with standardized templates, RFX, and/or auctions.
  4. Spot Buy
    If the right strategy is to spot-buy in a weak market, then aggregate demand across the organization and spot-buy through e-RFX or automated auctions.
  5. P2P
    And, regardless of the right sourcing strategy, drive as much spend onto technology platforms, like P-cards, so that it can be tracked and analyzed.

And, most importantly,

  • use procurement technology
  • simplify processes and increase controls
  • establish resources and manage performance

Trade Extensions: No Rest for the Wicked-ly Powerful – Part I

It’s been less than five months since we last checked in with Trade Extensions, who had traded up to a Fact Sheet User Interface and added a slew of new features, including improved RFI support, multi-dimensional rankings in e-Negotiation, Google Earth integration, new incumbent rules, and an OLAP foundation to reporting, including the implementation of a new n-way comparison report. Since, then, it would appear that Trade Extensions have been working around the clock to add a host of new features in auctions, reporting, award management, scenario creation and analysis, and feedback mechanisms. They are advancing the platform so fast that only a few companies in the space are currently keeping up with their rate of development. And while nothing added in the last few months is earth shattering, Trade Extensions has again taken usability to a whole new level, which is the key to adoption, use, and, ultimately, cost avoidance and reduction in your sourcing organization.

Auctions

Probably the biggest improvement is the new wizard-based interface that defines different types of RFX and Auctions, including Quick Quote and Simple Auction, that simplify event creation. In the new wizards, the user only needs to define the critical information necessary to create the event and can, if the user so chooses, define everything necessary to set up straight-forward RFXs and Auctions, including lots, on a single screen. While the workflow-driven wizards provided in many of today’s platforms are good, if you just need a quick quote or are auctioning office supplies, you just need to set it and forget it. The platform’s newfound ability to handle simple events with ease while simultaneously allowing for the creation of the most complex events one can think of is quite powerful for an organization that wants a single tool to handle the whole gamut of sourcing events. Now a user can define how much information is required to define an event and enter just that, whether it be a few pieces of information or a few hundred pieces of information. In addition, the new bidder UI is slick, clean, and quite easy to use.

Reporting

Trade Extensions, which supports the Fortune 1000, has added new multi-project reporting which allows for the creation of (roll-up / drill-down) reports across projects. The user can select any set of projects and any set of scenarios in those projects and create a roll-up or comparison report across those projects on any set of dimensions and facts that they choose, which can be organized in a user-defined row-column format. One of the things that Trade Extensions noticed was that a number of users, even when their new OLAP reporting was rolled out product-wide in January, were still downloading reports to Excel for the sole purpose of reformatting them into a preferred or dictated format. So they built this capability, including pivot table functionality, into the tool. Combined with the ability for a user to create fields defined on just about any formula (macro) the user can imagine, there is now no need for a user to have to export to Excel for analysis or report formatting. It’s a very impressive leap forward in reporting and goes well beyond the reporting capabilities of most of the on-line sourcing and procurement platforms that SI has seen.

Award Management

Trade Extensions has created a new set of rules that allows a user to define a scenario that uses allocations from an existing scenario for any subset of the award that they want to fix. No longer does a user have to copy the scenario and define fixed award rules, which can quickly lead to unsolveable scenarios if the user has 20 rules and messes up one or two to create a conflict that results in an unsolveable scenario. Just point at an existing scenario where part of the award is acceptable, indicate that the award for items X and Y at locations A through M are acceptable, and the tool will fix those allocations and build a smaller model that will solve faster (instead of a bigger model with more constraints that solves slower).

Come back tomorrow for Part II which will address the rest of the cool new features in Trade Extensions’ new release.

Cost Reduction Success Requires More Than a Reverse Auction

As more and more companies have found out over the past few years, it takes more than a well-structured reverse auction to cut costs, especially during a recession. If your organization is not yet a next level supply management organization, here are a few tips to get you on your way.

Understand the Need
The current market environment is to do more, and grow more, but spend less. It’s an economic paradox, but it’s the reality for the time being. As a result, any company that fails to achieve continual cost reductions might find themselves the next victim of the jobless recovery.

Accept the Reality
Despite what South Park might suggest, it is not possible for an entire company to bury its head in the sand to get through some trying times. Nor is it possible to ignore the need for continual cost reductions even if there are no obvious “low hanging fruit” opportunities left to pick.

Negotiation is Not Enough
The days of yelling, table banging, and threatening to take the business elsewhere are long gone. Margins are tight across the board and no supplier is going to risk survival for a customer who may, or may not, be around next year. A moden organization needs a number of tools at their disposal, including good spend analysis and e-Negotiation solutions.

Make The Business Case (to be a Technolgy Ace)
Given the do more but spend less mantra, the C-Suite will probably want Procurement to get by with whatever tools they have now, even if those tools aren’t more powerful than a pencil, paper, and abacus. Fortunately, numerous studies exist documenting the ROI of Spend Analysis and Decision Optimization solutions that prove that these two solutions, on average, each deliver a year-over-year return of over 10% (and are the only e-Sourcing solutions that fall in that category). Thus, if Procurement focusses on Spend Analysis (to identify its most profitable opportunities in the short-term and the long-term) and an e-Negotiation suite that contains Decision Optimization (in addition to modern RFx and e-Auction technology), it has a lot of ammunition.

Focus on Erosion of Savings
Generally, 40% (or more) of negotiated savings in an average organization are never realized due to maverick spending and non-compliance on the part of the supplier. Implement e-Procurement policies and solutions that can ( a) prevent the approval of POs to non-contracted suppliers without appropriate executive sign-off and ( b) automatically m-way match each invoice to goods receipts and purchase orders (verified to be at contracted rates) and prevent payments until all items have been delivered and billed at contracted rates. While not perfect, as there will always be emergencies that require off-contract spend, such a solution will get an average organization from 60% to 90% compliance, and if the negotiated savings was 10%, increase implemented savings by 50%, which is a substantial amount on a multi-million category.

Work as an Interdisciplinary Team
It’s important to work with the joint S&OP team to insure negotiations, and buys, are based on good forecasts and with engineering to not only make sure the raw materials and component parts but to help them, during NPD, select alternate sources of supply that can reduce costs from step one.

Communicate, Communicate, Communicate
Procurement requirements change everyday, and if the organization is buying last year’s materials on last year’s forecasts, one can be sure that opportunities for savings are lost.

For Successful e-Sourcing, Put the Supplier First

An article in a recent SIG Newsletter on “eSourcing from the Supplier’s Perspective: Improving Bid Submissions and Event Outcomes”, that was contributed by Denali (who deliver) made a couple of very good points if you want a successful eSourcing event. These points can be succinctly summarized as “design the event from the suppliers’ perspective”. If it doesn’t work for the supplier, it isn’t going to work for you.

As the article states, while many benefits are usually touted to the supplier to get their participation in an eSourcing event, at best, the supplier typically only realizes two benefits: fair(er) competition and an easy(ier) quote process. As a result, the supplier gets discouraged by the whole process and, if the supplier does not win a (significant) award, the supplier is unlikely to participate in future events.

Basically, you have to avoid “the reality chain” that is repeated over and over again as more and more companies hop on the eSourcing bandwagon unprepared for the journey ahead. In “the reality chain”

  1. Supplier begins with little or no knowledge
  2. Supplier reaches out, but receives no guidance on requirements or evaluation criteria
  3. Supplier submits a bid that does not meet the buyer’s need
  4. Supplier receives no feedback as to why
  5. Supplier is discouraged

As a result, not only is the buyer’s event only moderately successful at best, but the buyer’s potential supply base for future eSourcing events has shrunk. However, if the buyer had considered what suppliers want and supplied:

  • detailed RFX requirements
  • post-bid feedback
  • well thought-out RFX
  • more stakeholder communication
  • opportunity to provide alternative solutions
  • evaluation criteria

Even if the supplier lost, the supplier would be encouraged by the process (since the supplier would know why the lost and what they need to improve next time) and the buyer would not only have a successful event, but lay the foundation for successful events for years to come. In other words, if the buyer designs the event from the suppliers’ perspective, success is much more likely.

For more details on how to achieve the level of success required, check out “eSourcing from the Supplier’s Perspective: Improving Bid Submissions and Event Outcomes”.