Category Archives: Logistics

Six Secrets of Successful Freight Tenders

A recent article over on Canadian Transportation and Logistics on “the five secrets of successful freight tenders” had some really great tips for getting the best bang for your buck that makes the article a must read. However, it missed one very important tip, which is probably why it claims that Freight RFPs are analytically challenging. (This used to be true, but it’s not anymore. If it’s still true in your organization, then your organization is stuck in the middle ages and it’s time to at least step up to the industrial age.)

Before we get to the tip it missed, let’s start with the tips it provided because at least one of these is overlooked on many a project.

  • Sell your freight.
    Provide as much information as possible about your freight requirements. For each product, include transport, storage, volume, and frequency requirements. The more accurate and complete the RFx, the better quote the carrier can give you. Without detailed information, carriers will build in a “risk premium” so they don’t end up with “bad freight” and both parties lose.
  • Provide enough time.
    Without enough time to analyze your requirements and consider the fit, you’ll get a rough bid that won’t be the carrier’s best proposal. Remember that, depending on the time of year, it will likely sit on someone’s desk for a week, then in pricing for another week, before someone gets to it in the third week. If detailed analysis is required by the “number cruncher”, it could take a month to get the best bid.
  • Standardize the accessorial program.
    Variety and complexity of programs can make the analysis of bid responses unnecessarily complex, as you will be trying to compare apples to oranges to potatoes. And while maybe you can force fit compare the first two, the third poses quite a challenge. Create one program with one uniform set of charges that applies to all carriers.
  • Fully analyze rate proposals across the board.
    Typically carriers will give you aggressive discounts on major lanes to lure your business, but keep discounts to minor lanes minimal, or non-existent. As a result, you may pay more for freight overall if you end up shipping more on secondary lanes.
  • Benchmark results
    Freight patterns can change, and the net result is that a new freight schedule expected to save you money costs you more in the end. “Shadow rate” your current shipments using at least your last rates (if not your last two rates) to get a feel for what freight profiles give you the best deal overall.

But most importantly:

  • Use a sourcing package that can handle freight optimization and multi-level freight bids.
    A good strategic sourcing decision optimization platform (as provided by Algorhythm, BravoSolution, CombineNet, Emptoris, Iasta, or Trade Extensions) will not only allow for full analysis of the entire freight bid, but allow for the easy import of multi-level freight bids from excel spreadsheets. More specifically, these modern packages allow a carrier to define (inter)national rates by weight, volume, or distance, and then override these by region, and then by lane. This will allow a carrier to quickly define standard bids for low-volume lanes or lanes that they are not interested in and focus in on the lanes that fit their network and that they want to aggressively bid on. A carrier can bid on a 10,000 lane global sourcing project in a couple of hours. This decreases response time and increases bid quality.

Does Your 3PL Have the CCSF Designation?

If you want quick transport by air, maybe it should.

As per this article on “tsa finalizes airfreight screening ruling” in Air Cargo World, the US Transportation Security Administration has executed its interim final rule (IFR) on airfreight security and enabled entities other than airlines to screen cargo transported on passenger planes.

Before the TSAs certified cargo screening program (CSSP) that was introduced in September 2009, only the TSA or airlines were authorized to screen belly-hold cargo. But now that the IFR has been implemented, airfreight entities can now apply to become certified cargo screening facilities, provided they adhere to a stringent chain-of-custody requirement and implement a multi-layered security program that includes appointing security coordinators, strict access controls and vetting of key personnel.

Given that the TSA is aiming to achieve 100-percent cargo screening on all U.S.-bound flights by the end of the year, there’s a good chance that any shipper relying on the TSA or the airline to screen their cargo could experience a backlog delay during the holiday rush season. However, those who use a 3PL with CCSF status will see their cargo clear immediately.

Public Procurement in 2020 — Are You On Track? Part V

At the beginning of the week, we began our discussion of Hansen’s predictions for public procurement in 2020, which were offered as a 5-part series last month in response to the 5 predictions of Bob Lohfeld (of Lohfeld Consulting) that were published in Washington Technology in early July. We started with a discussion of the Government Market and then moved onto discussions of Workforce, Process, and Technology. Today, we tackle the final predictions on Transportation.

In his piece, Lohfeld prognosticated that:

  1. While computing will be ubiquitous, we will still be plagued with transportation problems.
  2. Traffic will become so congested around major cities that employers will always offer alternative work schedules and telework options.
  3. The Washington Beltway will regularly come to a standstill and no longer be considered a reliable transportation corridor. The Tysons Corner area will be in its eighth year of modernizing, and Maryland will be in its 40th year of studying the environmental impact of building an outer beltway. The Silver Line will finally reach Dulles Airport.

Well, duhhhh! He might as well have said that the sky is blue, grass is green, and roses are often red. His prognostications are so obvious that I can’t believe he would label them as predictions, nine years out!

What did Hansen have to say? This time, having the same complaints with transportation, he overlooked the obviousness of Lohfeld’s prognostications and simply noted that transportation, especially within the context of an increasingly global supply network is a linchpin component of an overall logistics and supply chain strategy. It is in essence the glue that holds the interconnecting elements of the end-to-end process from raw material extraction to manufacturing and through to distribution and, as a result, cannot be overlooked in any piece that looks into the future of Supply Management.

All I have to say is that logistics are always going to be an issue. First of all, not only is there not enough logistics infrastructure in many parts of the world, but the rate of new construction is not keeping up with demand — which is expected to increase substantially in line with global population increases and rising automotive sales in emerging marketplaces. Secondly, there are projections of significant talent shortages in logistics in the coming years as the baby boomers retire. Thirdly, global trade is going to continue to increase. Everything points to logistics challenges for at least the coming decade, if not longer. And we’ve all witnessed the increasingly slow pace of infrastructure development in North America in recent years. Prepare for the unending challenge.

Three Great Tips for Optimizing the Distribution Network

A recent article in Logistics Management on Warehouse and DC Management: 6 Tips for Optimizing the Distribution Network provided a number of great tips for optimizing the distribution network and reducing logistics costs which are expected to quickly surpass the 2008 high (on the US Freight Index) as oil prices increase and availability of qualified truck drivers decrease. The following three tips are particularly pertinent.

  • Ask the Right Questions
    What are the perceived service level requirements? What impacts will changes in delivery lead-time have on revenues in a given market? What are the baseline operating expenses, inventory assets, and capital investments? How do these compare to alternative scenarios? Should the company home-source, near-source, or global-source? Remember, Supply Management must deliver value and balance costs and lead times against revenues and demand times in its redesign.
  • Use an Effective Network Modeling Tool
    Effectively modeling a network in home-grown spreadsheets and databases is impossible for an average enterprise with more than half a dozen locations and global sourcing requirements. Not only does an organization have to effectively model a network and proposed alternatives to identify the best network designs, but it needs to monitor what’s happening with the network, which is not possible if all the organization has is a simple spreadsheet or database tool.
  • Perform an Inventory Optimization Study
    While adding more Distribution Centers (DCs) may reduce transportation costs, it will also increase inventory costs, on average, as more inventory will generally be necessary to meet default stock levels. However, if not all distribution centers service locations with the same service level commitments, then inventory can often be varied to minimize carrying and holding costs. However, a careful analysis, supported by an appropriate toolset, will be required.