Category Archives: Procurement Innovation

Vinimaya: Taking Their Procurement Marketplace Global, Part II

In Part I we noted that Vinimaya, despite scaling back on their marketing efforts for about two years, has been hard at work extending their core Procurement Marketplace platform to be a fully-featured Procurement Marketplace platform that fills the gap that ERP e-Procurement solutions leave wide open. Specifically, while the average ERP e-Procurement solution does great when it comes to master data management; workflow, approval, and PO management; and financial system integration; it doesn’t do so hot when it comes to content management, search, ordering, and invoice management. (Just ask vendors like Wallmedien that became the number one e-Procurement provider in Germany by filling in the holes in the SAP e-Procurement solution and Nipendo that is growing fast here in North America by offering an e-Invoice management and automation solution that most e-Procurement solutions are missing.)

The proof that Vinimaya fills the gap is, as they say, in the pudding that a large number of large organizations are eating. The Vinimaya solution, which has had great success in the private and public sectors, and which supports 37 different currencies, is utilized by buyers and suppliers in 13 languages across 80 countries on 6 different continents. That’s pretty damn good for a small company with less than 75 employees headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. Vinimaya’s success is due to the uniqueness it brings to the table. A unique federated search capability, a pure focus on the features other platforms lack, and a rapid implementation timeline (as a customer can go live on already supported supplier [platforms] immediately and most suppliers can be added within 24 hours) are just some of the reasons for their success. Other reasons include the platform’s ability to validate pricing in real time, force compliance if required, track pricing discrepancies, and get an organization’s spend under management.

And then there’s Vinimaya’s new vTransport solution that runs on top of their marketplace. One of the big inefficiencies in most Procurement organizations is invoice management and automation. With no standard means of invoice receipt and management, most large organizations require teams of tactical AP personnel who spend the vast majority of their time simply entering invoices into the payment system and validating basic information. In addition, due to limited manpower, only one in ten invoices gets fully validated and the result is a large number of overpayments, duplicate payments, and fraudulent payments. (There’s a reason that the recovery industry is still thriving and vendors like Lavante are building automated recovery solutions.) Like Nipendo, Vinimaya also recognized this issue and also recognized that many of the invoices are for goods and services requisitioned by organization personnel — most of which, if the solution is fully deployed and effectively utilized, should be bought through the Vinimaya platform.

So they acquired a leading PO and invoice management solution, improved it, and integrated it into their solution. With their new vTransport solution, POs can be delivered to the supplier through their mechanism of choice – XML, EDI, e-Document, supplier network, PDF scan attached to an e-mail, or old-fashioned fax, and then the invoice can be returned to the buyer through their mechanism of choice. And everything can be pulled direct from the central ERP data store and pushed back into the ERP workflow when received. In addition, the POs and invoices can pass through the Vinimaya audit engines which can verify prices and totals and limits to make sure no overcharges or fraudulent invoices get through. While the solution isn’t as extensive as you’ll get from a provider like Nipendo (which also has a print-to-cloud solution and [third-party] I-OCR integration), it’s considerably more extensive than the vast majority of e-Procurement solutions (and definitely way more extensive than what ERP offers) and will give most organizations an 80%+ solution. (The only POs and invoices missing will be for goods and servies not put through the platform – but such requisitions and invoices should be few and far between if the platform is fully deployed.) And the fact that it works with all of the big ERP and AP Systems (including Oracle, PeopleSoft, JDE, SAP, Lawson, Ariba, iValua, Microsoft, etc) out of the box is a big plus for organizations that want a good e-Procurement solution that is going to rapidly get their Spend Under Management (SUM).

Also, as indicated in our last post, the core platform has been extended, the UI has been revamped, and the performance has been accelerated greatly. Like many of the other e-Procurement players (like Coupa and b-Pack), Vinimaya has kept a close eye on consumer search and shopping (cart) technology and has incorporated the best features you’ll find on the web into their platform. Not only can you search all of the catalogs, punch-outs, and marketplaces relevant to your procurement needs in one federated search and dynamically validate the pricing and availability in real time, but you can filter on suppliers, price, and other relevant attributes dynamically, compare items in detailed comparison views, filter preferred items (based on simple or complex rankings) to the top, and track the price (and purchase) history of each item in real-time. Plus, the interface can be configured to each buyer and by each buyer to meet their particular needs.

Vinimaya has also added new quick-order and e-Forms functionality to support regular (re-orders) of products and services from suppliers based on standard catalog numbers (which a buyer probably has memorized) and standard organizational needs. The forms can be used for both simple and complex services, and templates can be pre-configured to meet all different types of service and manpower needs, including janitorial, (simple) advertising, and internal full-time and contingent workforce positions. In addition, buyers can also use them to make free-form requests and send them to the appropriate suppliers using the new quick-quote functionality. While not as extensive as what you will find in the Contingent Workforce or Agency Management solutions, it’s more than enough for most goods-based industries.

And extensive improvements have been made to auditing and analytics, but that, as well as other new development, will be the subject of a future post in this series on Vinimaya’s Global Procurement Marketplace.

Vinimaya: Taking Their Procurement Marketplace Global, Part I

When we last covered Vinimaya, the B2B Search Engine, back in 2008, they were the next wave in product catalogue management. Remembering that Networks are ok. Catalogs are Good. Punch-outs are Better. But Agents are King!, we noted that Vinimaya was the first solution that did real-time federated search across all of your supplier databases, catalogues, and punch-outs through a single consumer-like search and shop interface.

And, unlike other procurement enablement solutions of the day, a buyer could be up and running in a day with all suppliers that provided formatted catalogues, standard punch-outs, or industry standard APIs and the majority of remaining suppliers could be brought on with about one day’s worth of effort due to their extensively configurable agent architecture specially designed to integrate with punch-outs, catalogues, EDI, XML, marketplaces, and industry standard database APIs. And even the 25% of suppliers that did not fall into the quick enable category could typically be enabled in 3 to 5 days.

The solution was the first to give the buyer total control over access, view, and pricing with their local pricing and audit engine capabilities. Marketplace pricing could be over-riden with contract pricing if and when required. And the platform worked beautifully. In 2008, their five largest implementations supported over 30K users and allowed hundreds of suppliers to be searched simultaneously through one federated view.

But Vinimaya didn’t stand still. While they may have had a brief hiccup on the marketing side during 2009 – 2011 due to management changes and the relocation of corporate headquarters, product development kept on trucking and since then have built a large number of new and impressive features and capabilities on top of the industry leading procurement marketplace technology that Vinimaya built between 2003 and 2009. (One has to remember that Vinimaya was the first vendor with [patented] federated search back in 2003, the first “simple search” of all content sources, the first forced ranking solution for products and searches across all content sources, and the first to offer real-time audit of pricing across punch-out supplier search results. In addition, it is now the first solution SI has seen that offers universal search results and shopping from within your ERP e-Procurement solution.)

On top of their base platform, that supported content management, federated search, powerful connectivity options, personalization and customization, globalization, and an easy to use shopping cart with authentication and single sign on, user roles and permission, Vinimaya has added (more extensive) auditing capability, workflow-based catalog management, quick-quote (RFX) capability, e-Forms, deep analytics capability, mobile capabilities, and social integration as well as a new transport framework for managing Purchase Orders and Invoices. In the posts that follow, we’ll dive deeper into these new capabilities and the strides Vinimaya has made over the last four years.

Early Payment Discounts vs. Early Payment Rebates

Are we dealing with six of one and half a dozen of the other? After reading “The Art of the Play” (PCubed.com), I have to wonder.

They are different in that you get one right away and you get the other later, and they are different in that one is just a reduction in spend and the other can be treated as an income stream, if the CFO so desires, but in the end they both have the same effect on the bottom line — less spend.

So why would an organization favour one over the other when the big difference is capturing the savings now versus capturing the savings later? If the organization was limited in cash and was trying to maximize savings, then capturing the savings right away would definitely make more sense, but if the organization was flush with cash and the supplier offered tiered rebates that improved with volume, then the organization might want to wait until later. Otherwise, the doctor can’t see much of a difference.

However, one area where there is a big difference is paying for a platform vs. paying for a service, especially for a big company. For example, the Oxygen Finance model described in the article is to provide you with a service where you pay up to 50% of the discount or rebate captured by transaction. While this is a good deal for a mid-sized company that might not have the up-front cash required to implement the end-to-end e-Procurement solution required to effectively take advantage of discounts and rebates offered by suppliers for quick payments, this can be a very expensive solution for a large enterprise. Consider a company that spends 250 Million a year, the low-end of the market for Oxygen Finance. If the average rebate is 1.5%, and you give one third of that up to the service provider, then the organization is paying 1.25 M a year for the solution, and only achieving a 2X ROI.

A company of this size can acquire a SCF solution for a fraction of this cost and realize a much larger ROI.

When you dive in, you realize that there are only three reasons most companies can’t create or take advantage of most of the early payment discount and rebate opportunities available to them:

  1. Invoices aren’t getting in the system fast enough
    because most of them are coming in as (e-)paper.
  2. Approved invoices aren’t getting to AP fast enough
    because routings for approval take too long.
  3. Procurement doesn’t have the manpower to negotiate rebates on 100% of spend
    because there are too many suppliers.

And while these were valid problems a few years ago, without (m)any real solutions (that an average organization could afford), today:

  1. An organization can acquire a SaaS end-to-end invoice automation framework, such as the one offered by Nipendo, that will convert all incoming invoices into one standard e-format for six figures.
  2. An organization can acquire a number of rules-based e-Procurement and invoice automation solutions (including Nipendo‘s) that will automatically approve and route all error-free invoices that match a PO or contract to the AP system and route those that require manual correction or approval to the right individual for online (e-mail) approval.
  3. An organization can see significant returns addressing only 80% of the spend which is typically with less than 20% of the supply base.

An organization that takes this approach can typically acquire a solution for (much) less than 500K a year, save 1.5% on 200 M of spend, and see a (minimum) 6X return, which is the return you should be looking for from an e-Procurement solution.

Maybe there’s another reason for a large enterprise to go transaction-fee SaaS for discount and rebate management, but if there is, the doctor ain’t seeing it — and he’s been covering SCF for years. As far as he is concerned, the sweet-spot for transaction-fee SaaS for discount and rebate management is the 50M to 250M range, because the implementation cost of the necessary end-to-end e-Procurement, invoice-Automation, and SCF solution isn’t that much cheaper for a mid-sized organization than for a Global 3000, and at less than 200M of addressable spend, the ROI multiplier starts to drop considerably.

Any differing opinions?

The Evolution of Procurement, and Where It Is Headed

Today’s guest post is from Joe Payne, Vice President of Professional Services at Source One Management Services, LLC and co-author of “Managing Indirect Spend: Enhancing Profitability Through Strategic Sourcing”.

While strategic sourcing and procurement groups around the globe continue to make headway into new departments and address categories previously off the table, their popularity with business owners and stakeholders has never been lower. Headlines and titles like “Everybody Hates Procurement: Here’s How To Fix It” and “The End of Procurement, Forever!” and “The Problem with Procurement: Misalignment” seem to pop up every day.

I attribute these headlines to the growing pains strategic sourcing and procurement will naturally experience as the role of this group continues to expand and evolve. And evolve it has! In the 11 or so years I have been at Source One, I have seen Strategic Sourcing transition from rarity, to necessity, to commonplace, to part of a larger spend management strategy. In its current form, and as it heads into the future, it looks to me that modern procurement has developed to be just as much about negotiating with an organization’s leadership as it is negotiating with a supplier base. In fact, I tell most college grads entering this industry to be prepared to challenge those within their organization, learn how to market their group, and sharpen their debate skills. Getting savings is the easy part, getting your organization to act in their own self-interest is the challenge. This is not a job for the weak-willed or thin-skinned! To explain what I mean, here is a quick rundown of the change I have witnessed.

The Reactive Buying Era

When I first started at Source One, most of the purchasing groups in the companies we worked with dealt exclusively with raw materials. If the personnel had “sourcing” in their title, it was rare, and many of our customers did not have any sort of sourcing initiative for their indirect spend items. Stakeholders and the department heads responsible for budgeting conducted the purchasing for their needs.

In those days, we did a lot of explaining to potential customers just on what Strategic Sourcing was. It wasn’t a commonplace concept even within Procurement, so those outside of it — Finance and IT, for example — had very little knowledge of it. Especially in the mid-market, any group with spend management tactics that were more advanced than three bid purchasing or preferred supplier relationships were the exception, not the rule.

The Sourcing Era

Slowly, Strategic Sourcing became more and more familiar until it ultimately blossomed. Strategic Sourcing practices were first used by a limited number of organizations as they purchased their raw materials. Seeing the successes in that category, organizations then asked these “sourcing” teams to look into areas like packaging and shipping. Strategic Sourcing’s applicability continued to grow as success after success was reported. Subsequently, most departments were soon asked to start implementing strategic sourcing practices, and procurement departments began to be more directly involved in buying decisions.

The Category Management Error

In its latest form, Strategic Sourcing is now tied into category management, meaning companies are hiring or developing sourcing experts for their individual spend categories — telecom, media buys, office equipment — or departments — Capital Projects, Marketing, IT — and restructuring their departments with the goal of achieving near 100% spend under management. With dedicated sourcing experts managing each category and an intense focus on supplier relationships, those sourcing departments effective in category management are not only able to take advantage of market conditions today, but are better able to predict future market conditions and opportunities within the managed categories.

Even utilizing these strategies, a common problem remains. These sourcing teams lack the institutional clout within their organization to be effective in managing spend. SOPs are reluctantly followed, if they are followed at all, by the end users, and the majority of the end users and stakeholders do their best to avoid involving the sourcing team. Additionally, sourcing initiatives are often dead on arrival, killed in the name of deadlines or supplier relationships

The Change Management Era

So, that’s a short history of Strategic Sourcing’s development. So where is the industry going from here?

From what I have seen in the work we perform for the clients of Source One, category managers must now become “change managers”. “Change managers” are those leaders who can navigate their organization’s structures and barriers to be effective, and transition their department’s role from that of a reactive-tactical resource to one that is proactive and strategic.

“Navigate” here means “maneuvering around” objections or otherwise getting things done, and there are a few ways that I have seen different sourcing groups approach this. At the last conference I attended, I heard some sourcing teams discussing their use of a “bell cow” — a single resource within their group that is skilled in working with department heads and generating acceptance from end users for their group’s sourcing activities. In other cases, I have witnessed sourcing departments working through an executive sponsor, often times a CFO, to help push their group’s agenda items. A third, slower method I’ve seen used to promote sourcing initiatives is the granular approach, meaning the sourcing group is using any quick-and-easy method available to build credibility and support, end user by end user and department by department. Not surprisingly, this third method is high resource-low return, and often causes some areas ripe for sourcing to go untouched. Of these, the proper solution is the one that works best within a particular organization.

When sourcing groups improve their internal relationships, the stakeholders are better encouraged to participate and end users are better encouraged to comply with sourcing activities, increasing their chances of success. These project successes give Procurement something tangible to market internally and use as leverage in drumming up support for future initiatives, and also exposes their unique skills to the organization as a whole. Through continued project success and internal relationship-strengthening, Procurement will slowly be seen as an integral and centric resource to the company; its unique skillset prized not only for its ability to identify cost savings for the organization but for its ability to generate value for the organization as a whole.

Summary

As the need for more strategic spend management practices increases, procurement departments are evolving to meet these newfound challenges. But rest assured; the industry’s progress is not slowing or stopping. Adapting to the industry’s modern changes and challenges is only setting the stage for the next evolutionary step, which will be to become a revenue center for the organization. The better equipped a procurement team is now at handling the challenges of the current market, the better prepared it will be to predict and stay ahead of future trends

Thanks, Joe.

Intengo – Mastering the e-Procurement Tango in Turkey

When we last covered Intengo back in 2010, they were doing the e-Sourcing Tango in Turkey. At that time, they provided an on-demand e-Negotiation platform built around (multi-round) e-RFX and e-Auction with a sprinkling of Supplier Information Management (SIM) and early stage catalog management thrown in. A project-oriented system, it was a breeze to set up a new RFX or e-Auction event in the system and get a new sourcing event going. One of the unique features of the platform was the calendar view, which integrated with Microsoft Outlook and hot-linked to all of the relevant screens in the relevant projects, and which allowed a buyer to get a quick summary of where they were and what they needed to do at any given time. Other cool features were item-level currency support, smart unit support, and bulk-updates on (filtered) lots or items.

Since then they have been dancing up a storm and they are now the leading e-Sourcing and e-Procurement provider in Turkey, with over 100 clients, including a few notable international clients with operations throughout Europe and Asia. That’s right, they have migrated from a basic e-Sourcing application to an end-to-end e-Procurement solution in an effort to serve their clients better. Since 2010, they have added requisition and purchase order support, price lists and full catalog support, delivery notification and tracking, and integration with the big ERPs (Oracle and SAP) for master data management, invoice management, and e-Payment / Accounts Payable integration. In addition, they have also integrated budget management into the e-Procurement process.

A user can begin a requisition from a catalog or from a free-form request. The request can be sent straight to a (preferred) supplier if it is within the user’s spending limit (as defined by the budget), turned into a Purchase Order (after being approved, if necessary), or turned into an RFX or e-Auction. If the request is turned into an RFX or e-Auction sourcing event, the RFX or Auction is pre-populated with pricing from the most recent supplier price list (at the volume level) or catalog if pricing is available. If the request is sent straight to the supplier, the supplier can accept the request and provide delivery information, reject the request, or decline due to incorrect or insufficient information. In the last case, the buyer is notified and corrections can be made. In the case of an RFX, after the event has been configured, the request is sent to the selected suppliers who can bid on the whole or part, decline to bid on the whole or part, or decline to bid because of incorrect or incomplete specifications on one or more line items. In the last case, the buyer is notified, and if the buyer agrees, he can suspend the RFX or e-Auction until corrections are made, and all suppliers are immediately notified of the event suspension. A supplier who accepts a purchase order, who is awarded an RFX, or who wins an auction is able to immediately enter delivery information into the system (which can generate e-invoice data for submission to the organization’s ERP) and when the product is received, a buyer can mark the product as received in the mini delivery module.

The catalog functionality is pretty much what you would expect and is comparable to most other e-Procurement platforms out there and the budget capability can be used to define budgets by user, project, and department and track them against requisitions and awards project-to-date and year-to-date. The built-in reporting is good, and Intengo even has canned reports by brands (which are great for retailers). Furthermore, Intengo can create and customize any report on any platform data that you want, but note that the platform is still missing a custom report builder. However, realizing this weakness, Intengo gives you the ability to export any and all data to Excel or to your ERP (so you can build your own reports using reporting tools you already have). So if you do full ERP integration (and use it for your Master Data), and you already have a best-of-breed reporting product sitting on top of that (and chances are you do), you can use that to build custom reports on your sourcing and procurement projects.

They have also made enhancements to their e-Sourcing platform. One of the most significant enhancements is their formulaic auction capability. This weighted auction capability allows a user to define an arbitrary weighting, composed of one or more factors, to every bid, on a lot and line-item level, that is used in determining the rankings. The user can define one-or-more weighting factors based upon quality, warranty, shipping, associated duties, etc. The categories can be (optionally) displayed to the suppliers who can choose the ones relevant to their bids (such as shipping, warranty included, etc.) and the weighting factors can then be applied behind the scene. In addition, during an auction, suppliers can also suggest substitutions for each line-item and lot, which a buyer can accept. (And, if necessary, the buyer can pause the auction, define appropriate formulae, and provide additional information to other suppliers who might also be capable of offering substitutions on different terms.)

Intengo is definitely an up-and-coming contender on the end-to-end Procurement scene in the European mid-market and another European e-Procurement provider to watch, especially since, like other European players, they have been internationalized and multi-language since day one on their integrated, single-solution, SaaS platform that allows them to create new instances virtually on-demand. While SI doesn’t expect them to cross the Atlantic for another couple of years, it does expect that the North America companies competing across the pond are going to be seeing a lot more of them on mainland Europe in the coming years.