Category Archives: Services

Want to Save? Get a Handle on Services Spending!

Earlier this year, Industry Week, in their article about how “Services Supply Chain Management [is] an Untapped Opportunity”, picked up on a recent study by CAPS that found that purchased services averaged 39% of total purchasing spending. That’s a significant number – especially when it’s getting harder and harder to save on goods when energy and raw material costs are still spiking across the board. And its a worrying one when you consider that not only do the majority of companies not have a good technology-based solution to help them make the right decision, but they often don’t even know how much they’re spending on services, if they’re being billed consistently – and in line with the local market, or even being billed according to the contracted rates!

In one of my recent posts, I noted how Iasta used their optimization-enabled e-Sourcing solution to save roughly 20M on two different projects, including a 20M savings on a services spend of roughly 80M. They didn’t do this because optimization is a magic technology that always saves you wads of money (it’s not, and what it does is find the lowest cost solution that is feasible within your constraints), they did this because the organization was simply signing national contracts with large multi-purpose consulting shops at what it thought were good rates, instead of signing regional contracts with regional providers who performed the required services at local rates and who could offer discounts for local volume-based awards. They built a sophisticated RFX bid model that allowed providers to bid by resource type by location, and to offer discounts based on total dollar award across resource types and / or regions, and then fed all of the data they collected into an optimization model that had the computational strength to identify that, lo-and-behold, breaking the contract up among multiple regional providers who could give the best price in the region could save you a significant wad of cash.

In another of my recent posts, I noted how expert spend analysis consultancies like Opera Solutions (now ElectrifAI) and Lexington Analytics can often walk into a client and get them a rebate cheque on overpayments, that are common in office supplies, electronics, and there should be no surprises here, services categories. They do this not because they are experts in guilt transference or debt-collection, but because they know how to normalize and structure your data in a way that allows them to compare it against contracted rates, find overpayments, and, also, find duplicate payments that your vendor forgot to tell you about. They then prepare a report that makes it abundantly obvious that your vendor was ripping you off (whether they meant to or not), which essentially forces your vendor to either refund you or give you a credit against future services (as you have everything you need to take legal action, which is something you’d both rather avoid).

These days, services at an average mid-size company could represent a multi-million savings opportunity and savings at a large company could represent a savings opportunity worth tens of millions of dollars. Although these numbers weren’t significant in the early days of e-Sourcing when supply outstripped demand in many categories, raw material costs were low, and e-Auctions were leveling the playing field, now that you’re lucky to contain cost increases on your purchased goods to inflation, these numbers are very important. Therefore, it’s important that you get a good handle on your services spending and exploit it for the savings opportunity that it is.

So how do you do that?

  1. Do a services spend analysis
    The first thing you need to do is get a handle on how much you are spending on each services category, and how many providers you’re using in each category per region, and, more importantly, roughly how much you’re overpaying and whether there are opportunities for refunds, rebates, or credits.
  2. Identify, and order, your biggest savings opportunities.
    Stop when you get to 10 or when you’ve covered 80% of your spend. You’ll attack these first.
  3. Break your savings opportunities into two groups: those you have the expertise to do in house and those that should be done with the assistance of an expert consultant
    The ones that can be done in house will be tasked to senior category experts in your sourcing group and the rest will be tasked to your CPO to find the right external expert to help your organization.
  4. Identify the right, niche, technology solutions to assist you.
    You get good results when you use good tools. For professional services, consider using a provider like Provade with a solution that specializes in work-force sourcing. For printing, consider a provider like Noosh that specializes in print services.
  5. Implement a good end-to-end e-Procurement solution with m-way matching that integrates purchase order creation, electronic invoice management, payables management, and contract management.
    This will insure that

    • when a purchase order is cut, it is cut with the contract rate included,
    • only invoices that bill against purchase orders at the approved contract rate, and for a number of hours/days within approved limits, are accepted,
    • the payment is for the amount, and only the amount, on the approved invoice, and that
    • your negotiated savings are realized!

Are you an Import Genius?

I recently had the chance to check out Import Genius, which made the top ten list of the most innovative and exciting start-ups on KillerStartups.com, and I must say that it is impressive. Billed as a site that provides timely, detailed shipment data for every ocean container that enters the United States, it appears to live up to its promise. In addition, the search interface is fast and the export to CSV allows search results with up to 40,000 rows to be exported to a CSV, which can be downloaded in an automatically generated zip file for faster transmission.

With an ability to search by product, consignee, consignee address, shipper, shipper address, notify name, US port, foreign port, bill of lading, carrier code, and vessel name for any date range, it’s quite powerful for a new offering. Testing it out, I found that Apple Computer Inc. received 42 shipments between June 1, 2008 and August 18, 2008, 30 from Amtran Electronic Co. Ltd. and 12 from Quanta Computer Inc No. 68. The Amtran Electron Co. Ltd shipments were for “LCD Monitor For PC” and the Quanta Computer Inc No. 68 shipments, all on June 1, were for “GENERAL APPLE ACCOUNT PAYABLE BY”. Take a guess as to what those shipments were for. In addition, 37 were from Shanghai and 5 were from Tokyo, 24 went to Long Beach, and the remaining 18 went to LA. The average number of LCD monitors per shipment was 539 CTNS (containers) while the average number of mystery products per shipment was 501 CTN (cartons). The country of origin varied between the Bahamas, Greece, China, Liberia, Singapore, Japan, Liberia, and the Marshall Islands for the monitors while the mystery product was sole sourced from China. Eight different vessels were used: the Hanjin Praha, Concord Bridge, Xin Yan Tai, CSCL Seattle, Dong Hai Bridge, Clifton Bridge, CSCL Hong Kong, and the Long Beach Bridge. Additional information available for export includes the shipper address, consignee address, party to notify, party to notify address, bill of lading, arrival date, weight, container, and other marks and numbers. If I’d been watching carefully, as Import Genius was between mid-March, 2008 and mid-May, 2008, I’d have noticed that Apple Computer Inc. and its logistics partners imported 188 ocean containers of a product type never before declared on its shipping manifests.

As partially highlighted in this Washington Post article, which calls Import Genius The Disruptive Shipping Database, there are numerous uses for Import Genius’ service, which include:

  • Penetrating your competition’s business strategy
    Analyze your competitor’s import activity, identify their suppliers, and discover new endeavors before it hits the news.
  • Keeping your suppliers honest
    Watch the inbound shipments of your suppliers, identify threats and opportunities, and catch cheating factories who are counterfeiting your goods or stealing your IP in the act!
  • Identify new competitors before they emerge
    Find out who else your suppliers are supplying to – if they are supplying similar products to companies you don’t know, there may be new competitors on the horizon.
  • Identify new suppliers
    Find out who your competitors are using before their new products hit the stores!
  • Find out your leverage with your suppliers
    You can figure out what percentage of US business you represent by tracking all shipments against what percentage of shipments are yours.
  • Find new customers.
    Find out who your competitors are shipping to.
  • Identify new customs brokers, importers of records, and similar third party services.
    All of this information is available in the import records.
  • Make your patent infringement suit bullet-proof.
    Upon discovering a patent violation, use Import Genius to trace the goods back to their source overseas.
  • Perform due diligence on privately held companies in emerging markets
    By examining detailed records of a company’s US exports, you can reduce the risk for investors in markets where available data is scarce.
  • Stock Market Predictions
    A detailed snapshot of a company’s imports can serve as a leading indicator for new product releases, revenues, and key performance indicators.

So check out the company that, according to Freakonomics blogger Justin Wolfers, offers Amazing New Trade Data that may enable bright economists to fine tune our understanding of the dynamics of international trade. It’s certainly worth a few minutes of your time, especially when enterprise access (which permits up to 300 searches per day across the entire trade database) is less than $5,000 per year!

Squeeze the Most Out of Your Supply Chain

Supply chain investment is on the rise, but many companies are finding that effectiveness still declines over time after the introduction of a new solution. Why is your average supply chain, powered by best-of-breed technologies, still not operating at peak efficiency? I’d argue that there are a number of reasons, including lack of proper visibility, lack of proper monitoring processes, and lack of proper training, but a recent article in Supply and Demand Chain Executive took a different twist. In “Squeezing the Most Out of Your Supply Chain”, the author, who notes that it is likely that your average supply chain is not operating at peak efficiency, indicates that a supply chain opportunity assessment can help you you determine if, and where, this is happening. This implies that one of the reasons your supply chain is not efficient is that your average company probably doesn’t know where it should be focussing and that the systems it is employing might not be the right systems or the systems the company needs the most.

A supply chain opportunity assessment gives your company a complete look at the overall state of one of its most critical functions and provides your company with a comprehensive list of opportunities for improvement. With this knowledge, your company can define a set of actions to improve its operating efficiency and ensure that its supply chain is properly designed to support growth and flexibility to prevent supply disruption.

A supply chain assessment is a straightforward process, which, as per the article, can be boiled down to a succinct series of steps.

  1. Define the scope.
    Business Unit or Entire Operation? Subset of processes or full spectrum? Although you should assess your entire supply chain, it’s often best to start small, focussed on key areas, to generate some initial improvements and wins that will fund future assessments.
  2. Examine the ongoing challenges in your business model.
    Document how information, materials, and financials flow through the organization and review the metrics that are being used to evaluate effectiveness. This will help to reveal the challenges.
  3. Identify key issues impacting performance and perform a root-cause analysis.
    Also be sure to compare the company’s existing processes to industry best practices. This will help you zero in on the real improvement opportunities.
  4. Identify and prioritize opportunities.
    Determine the potential business impact of each opportunity and the relative ease with which they can be realized. Then select the most valuable ones and start with those.
  5. Develop a solutions roadmap.
    Once you’ve identified the appropriate improvements, develop a roadmap that outlines the project plan, estimated timelines, and expected costs. And follow through!

The Shared Services & Outsourcing Network – A Useful Resource for Sourcing Professionals

Not too long ago, the Shared Services & Outsourcing Network was brought to my attention. Even though I was afraid that it might be another Supply Chain Social Network, I decided to check it out anyway. I’m glad I did. It’s along the lines of the type of Knowledge Network that I’ve been promoting behind the scenes for a while now — and I’m glad to see that they’re starting to appear.

The site supports two types of members: Premium Member and Associate Member. Premium memberships cost 149.99 a year and come with exclusive access to Shared Services News magazine, regular e-newsletters, full access to online articles, and upcoming job section access and three free job postings a year. Free associate memberships come with access to some of the articles on the site, the regular monthly newsletter, up to four specialist alerts, and basic access to the upcoming job section.

I signed up for a free associate membership. The Industry News goes back four months, and is indexed on five topics (strategy & governance, process & technology, people & culture, customer satisfaction, and globalization) and four functions (human resources, IT, finance & accounting, and other). The networking is limited to knowledge sharing Q&A forums and Blogs (which include Peter Allen from TPI, Sam Poston of ScottMadden Inc, Dave Griebl of Monster Worldwide, and Ed Martinez of BellSouth Affiliate Services Corporation). The event listings are reasonably well populated, and broken down by Continent and Country and there are numerous resources for on-line learning including interviews, presentations, podcasts, and webinars.

In all, I think it’s a good resource for sourcing professionals who need to manage shared services or outsource business processes. There’s a significant amount of information available for free members, and with over 7,000 global members, a wealth of information available for premium members – which I believe would be a great investment for any organization that’s looking for a shared services or outsourcing partner. Take a few moments and check it out. I think it will be worth your time.

(e-Sourcing, e-Procurement, and e-Supply Chain) RFP Help Here!

Here’s irony for you: as a Purchasing and Procurement professional, some of the most complex products and services you will source are the very tools that you have to acquire in order to be successful. That’s right, I’m talking about e-Sourcing tools and e-Procurement systems.

If you’re a regular reader of Sourcing Innovation, you know that I don’t pull my punches when it comes to reviewing e-Sourcing and e-Procurement tools. I’ve seen it all, and I can assure you that there are very real differences between them — differences that can and will have a profound impact on your success.

I can help you find the tools and solutions that are right for your company and your needs.

Unlike industry analysts, who are paid by the very vendors they “review,” I do not have any skin in the game with regard to a particular approach or a particular vendor. And, unlike armchair “experts” who opine on technology without having any technology background, I am a technologist by training (a PhD computer scientist, in fact) who cannot be fooled by a pretty user interface or a piece of Marketing drivel. When I get a vendor brief, I insist on looking inside the cookie jar. I’m not satisfied just admiring the glaze on the outside. If the vendor won’t open the jar, I assume the worst, and I’m usually right. (And they don’t get a nice blog entry on Sourcing Innovation either!)

There are numerous mistakes that are easy to make in the RFI/RFP process. You should not be embarrassed if you have made some of them, because both vendors and analysts are aggressively pushing strategies that ultimately benefit them, not you. It’s very hard not to fall into the traps they’ve set for you.

For example:

  • Never, ever, use an RFI or RFP “template” from a vendor. At best, this is just a way for the vendor to sell you the exhaustive, but often mostly useless, set of “features” they happen to have. At worse, it is a way for the vendor to sow “poison pills” that other vendors will have difficulty answering, so that the scoring algorithm on the RFx will cause them to appear better than the competition, whether or not this is true.
  • Never use an analyst’s report to generate a list of “features” that the analyst believes a product should have. The analyst doesn’t know anything about you or your business, and typically knows very little about the products, either (other than what he or she has been told by the vendors who are paying him or her or his or her company).
  • Never use vendor marketing materials to decide on the “key features” that you need. Vendors often compete with each other on irrelevant points that have no bearing on the functionality that your business requires, and analysts tend to repeat these irrelevancies until they achieve a life of their own.
  • Never assume that a product is “stable” or “bullet proof” just because it’s been out there for years. I’ve seen mature RFP software utterly fail, when RFP software (after years and years of development!) ought to be a slam dunk. I’ve seen “enterprise” e-procurement systems where the price actually charged by the vendor does not match the catalog price (you’d think they could at least get that right!). By the way, neither of these examples involve small vendors.
  • If a claim seems outrageous, it almost always is. For example, no static report can replace an opportunity assessment from a trained professional. Don’t imagine that you can base a procurement strategy on the output of an automated tool.

Fortunately for you, I’m in a unique position to help. With my dual background in technology and sourcing/procurement, I can work with you to:

  • understand what you need and do a proper Needs Assessment
  • put together an RFP that outlines the functionality you need, not an exhaustive list of useless features. Vendors want you to focus on irrelevancies; you need to focus on core value.
  • review the RFP responses and help you identify the questions you need to ask, like I did generically last year in my X-emplification and X-asperation series
  • review a potential contract in order to identify:
    • unnecessary modules
    • missing functionality
    • missing cost definitions (so you don’t get burned later on)
    • and other potential weaknesses

So if you need help with that needs assessment, RFP, or contract, reach out at any time using the contact information in the FAQ. No job is too big or too small as I know that you don’t put the cart before the horse.

P.S. Yes, as per the categorization, this is an advertisement for the doctor‘s services. I’d hoped I wouldn’t have to state the obvious, especially since I classified it as such, but it appears I have to.