Monthly Archives: July 2011

Why Should You Include Simulation In New Product Design?

As per this recent article in Industry week that proclaims that “the computer-aided-engineering revolution is here”, proper utilization of simulation in New Product Development:

  • creates products that are more sustainable and energy efficient,
  • enhances performance and ergonomics,
  • improves value and affordability,
  • provides options for differentiation, and
  • considerably reduces NPD timelines as simulations can be created and run much faster than prototypes can be built and tested.

It’s a great article, and simulation is a great counterpart to optimization, which will allow you to optimize costs and supply before the product is finalized.

For A Believable Vision Of Procurement 2020, Head Back To 2008

Long Before Ariba published their 20/30 Vision of the Future of Supply Management and Aberdeen took us back to 1999 with their vision of the next decade of Supply Management, the leading Supply Management minds at Hackett sat down and came up with their vision of Procurement in 2020 which was a heck of a lot better than most of the stuff I’ve seen this year (with a notable exception being Bob’s Next Level Supply Management).

In Hackett’s 2020 Vision For Procurement: A Revolution Through Evolution of Capabilities and Value (which was released as their Procurement Executive Insight on April 15, 2008 and followed by their 2020 Vision: Delivering on the Evolving Value Proposition of Procurement which was detailed in their 2008 Book of Numbers), Hackett identified the emerging trends that will define tomorrow’s world-class performance and help an organization move up the capability path. Realizing that transformation in most organizations is evolutionary, and not revolutionary, Hackett’s leading minds lay out an evolutionary path that takes organizational capability from reactive to strategic in a four-step process that passes through planning and alignment along the way.

The authors note that while an average Supply Management organization starts out with the goal of assuring supply, this is a very reactive strategy. Supply Management has to get to the point where it is harnessing the power of supply markets to maximize the value it is getting from its spend, to enable business strategy, and to optimize its tactical execution. Along the way, Supply Management will progress through TCO and demand management. As it progresses to harnessing the power of supply management, the organization will continually expand its circle of influence, dig deeper into its customers needs, and provide better service as time goes on.

In addition, it will also need to acquire the following strategic capabilities:

Business Process Sourcing
Supply Management will need to become the starting point of BPS activities and skillfully integrate disparate methodologies surrounding core competency analysis, resource management, service delivery models, business process management, and portfolio management into its overall supply management practice so that it is the first business unit consulted, and not the last, in any conversation surrounding business process (out)sourcing.

Supply Performance Management
Supply Management will go beyond simply managing the inbound supply chain to shaping strategies, goals, and objectives for the business as a whole based on its knowledge of global supply markets for materials, talent and technologies. It will need to seamlessly integrate supply planning with financial planning and operational planning so that each decision is best for the business overall.

Knowledge Management
It will need to master content-driven analytics which integrate external data into internal data models for supply prediction, planning, and risk mitigation that will allow it to build robust and agile (virtual) supply models that can be redesigned as needed in response to significant events.

Talent Management
Supply Management will need to adopt a cradle-to-grave talent management framework that includes knowledge management and advanced training models that allow it to advance its personnel to the next level. The framework will need to contain an innovative “brand management” model that will differentiate Supply Management as the career path of choice for new talent.

New Product Development and Introduction (NPD/NPI)
Supply Management will have to include advanced design-for-supply support that incorporates multi-tier cost modelling, scenario
planning and optimization that will allow the organization to understand the critical relationships between requirements, specifications, costs and constraints and make the best design decisions for the business overall.

Supplier Management
Supply Management will have to proactively engage suppliers and extend internal competencies and knowledge into suppliers’ operations
to increase their process capabilities, financial health and goodwill toward the buyer. Supply Management needs to progress to the point where it is able to detect a potential problem before the supplier detects the problem, and then step in to help the supplier resolve it before it materializes.

Next Level Strategic Sourcing
Strategic sourcing has to advance well beyond TCO modelling and the application of the best e-Sourcing tools to the point where it is using deep supply intelligence to identify unseen risks and anticipate supply capabilities that can deliver breakthrough improvements in innovation, environmental sustainability, new market entry, brand enhancement and other key business strategies. It will utilize scenario planning on the extended supply network to provide visibility of opportunities and risks that will guide Supply Management to the right buy for the organization every time.

How Do You Build a High Performance Supply Management Organization?

A recent study by Dr. Andre de Waal of the HPO Center that involved more than 3,500 organizations across 60 countries confirmed what leaders already know:

  • Leadership
    In High Performance Supply Management organizations, leaders lead with exemplary behaviour, make decisions, adopt a results focus, act with integrity, and coach staff. They don’t micromanage and do the work of their staff.
  • Talent
    Leading organizations have top talent that is diverse, complementary, and able to work well together. The talent is also flexible and resilient and committed to making the organization successful.
  • Openness and Action Orientation
    Everyone is involved in important processes through shared dialogue, change (for the better) is encouraged, and actions are taken to improve performance.
  • Continuous Improvement and Innovation
    There is an eternal focus on improvement and innovation.
  • Long Term Focus
    Long term success take precedence over short term profit. Management and employees are in it for the long haul and act that way.

1999


Oops out of time
So tonight I’m gonna party like it’s 1999
Yeah

1999, Prince

Somehow SI gets the feeling this song was playing on the oldie’s station when Aberdeen was penning their recent piece on “The State of Strategic Sourcing: Building a Context for the Next Decade”. In a nutshell, their required actions would have been okay if penned in 1999 as necessary actions for leading supply management organizations for the next decade (although, in reality, they would have only taken an average organization through 2007). But in 2011 for 2020? Let’s just say SI liked Ariba’s predictions that data will predict the future, outsourcing will explode, and sourcing geeks will go the way of the dodo better. (Even though I hope it’s just a ruse.)

Normally SI ignores Aberdeen, as they haven’t, in SI’s opinion, put out anything good in years (as they lost their last senior analysts in the space a few years ago), but after having this particular piece brought to our attention, SI just can’t ignore it and how behind the times it is. Let’s put it this way, if a supply management organization thinks that the required actions are new and next level, it belongs in the bottom of the barrel in the laggard category. Let’s look at these required actions from the executive summary:

Leverage e-Sourcing solutions to drive higher savings and automate manual strategic sourcing processes
Just like every leading supply management organization has been doing for the last 10 years? This is advice for 2020? An average supply management organization has already squeezed every penny they can out of simple automation and standard reverse auctions, which most e-Sourcing suites revolve around. e-Sourcing is still the foundation, but now it is just the beginning of your Supply Management journey, not the destination.

Utilize spend analytics to drive visibility into corporate spending and forecast savings for future planning and budgeting
Wow! Two big problems with this. First of all, after the last two years, every executive and his dog has a “spend analysis”, “spend visibility”, or “spend reporting” tool that tells him just how much the organization is spending. What he needs to know is where the savings opportunities are. Just because the organization is spending 50M on fuel doesn’t mean there are any savings in the category. Maybe supply management saw the sharp prices increases coming and locked in low rates just in time. Maybe the real savings is in temporary labour where only 10M is being spent but where rates are still, despite recent increases in average labor rates, 20% above the norm. Secondly, spend analytics can’t forecast future savings. That depends on demand and input costs. Basic spend analysis just tells you what you spent, not where prices are going or where demand is going. The organization needs a real data analysis tool as well as good demand and price forecasting tools to get that picture.

Align overall sourcing activities/processes with the goals and objectives of the greater organization
Really? And should we also put our underwear under our pants? Supply management leaders have only been saying this for how long? Maybe SI should lighten up a little as it’s the only piece of advice that’s right, as supply management must be aligned with the rest of the business to be successful, but if this is not common sense to any supply management leader (who is also a business leader), there’s a fundamental problem in the organization that no action will fix. Plus, it’s a requisite, not an action!

The only action for success that SI can give you where this report is concerned is to burn it. The same-old, same-old is not going to get your supply management organization through the next decade. That’s why SI is spending so much time discussing next generation supply management and highlighting the efforts being taken by thought leaders such as Greybeard Advisors, The Mpower Group, and The Hackett Group to get the word out there. Supply Management must get to the next level, and it’s not going to do that rehashing technology from a decade ago.