Monthly Archives: July 2013

Nipendo: Bringing O2P and P2P to the Mainstream

Nipendo, which recently secured $8 Million in funding (Press Release), a provider of order-to-payment automation software, recently released a new version of its order-to-payment (O2P) platform that includes automated rules-based end-to-end invoice reconciliation. Billing itself as the Supplier Cloud* solution, Nipendo has done an excellent job of making seamless supplier connectivity a reality for its customers.

By integrating with a number of platforms, providing a supplier portal, and by offering a print package that suppliers can download and install as a print driver on their PCs to print invoices to the Nipendo solution, Nipendo makes it easy for suppliers to e-invoice buyers without having to do any sort of complex integration with yet another platform. This is a powerful feature.

But what is really great about the Nipendo platform is the fact that they took three years to build a good understanding of customer fears as well as customer needs and built a solution that not only does what it says it does, but also addresses the main customer fear points, as outlined in our last post on points to ponder when people are pushing off procurement platforms.

Reality #5: It does save money.
A proper implementation of the Nipendo platform automates the full O2P/P2P (Procure-to-Pay) lifecycle, including invoice matching, verification, and payment subject to user-defined rules, allowing O2P/P2P to be managed on an exceptions-only basis. Once supplier onboarding is complete, all tedious tactical no-value-add manual processing or review time is required unless there is an exception, which allows 80%+ of the invoices and payments to just flow. This eliminates 80% of valueless tactical manpower effort, which can be redeployed to more strategic work, as well as all of the associated costs of sending, receiving, processing, and filing paper.

Reality #4: It does integrate.
Nipendo integrates with all of the major ERP vendors — including SAP (Business One), Oracle, Microsoft Dynamix, Quickbooks Enterprise, and Sage; integrates with a number of third party supply management platforms — including IBM Cognos, Synertrade, BuyerQuest, Global Factoring, and TIS; has it’s own Print to Cloud solution (which, thank your deity, does not actually print to the cloud but allows a supplier to submit their invoice to the Nipendo platform in a common data format); and has a number of third party technology partners that can build you an integration point if you don’t have one. Nipendo realizes that in order to truly deliver O2P/P2P savings, you had to automate the entire process, which means automating it for ALL parties, which means you have to integrate with all parties and the platforms they use, and they have spent years building a multitude of integration points.

Reality #3: It will work for you – it has a customizable workflow.
You can define the exact O2P/P2P process that you use, and precisely how complex each step is. For example, where purchase orders are concerned, you can define each status and step, the approval(s) level(s) required, whether you want to be notified of viewings/approvals, actions the vendor can take, information required by the vendor for each action (comments, reasons for rejections or requests for corrections or clarifications, etc.), required attachments (such as insurance certificates, certifications, etc.), the validations executed against invoices, the variations allowed, rules for automated approval, etc. The system can be setup to match your current organizational workflow precisely.

Reality #2: Suppliers can use it. They can choose among a number of low effort solutions!
In addition to the ERP integrations, third party platform integrations, the Print to Cloud utility, and options for custom integration from a third party, the supplier also has the option to use a good old-fashioned web portal. The supplier can use the platform.

Reality #1: The solution is designed for efficiency. Not job elimination.

It’s true that if the primary reason for O2P/P2P automation is that you just want to outsource the function (using BPO – business process outsourcing) and make sure that the third party organization is actually capable of delivering cost savings (by way of reduced manpower), then jobs will be eliminated. But if the driver for paperless O2P/P2P automation is that your Procurement and Supply Management personnel are spending too much time on costly tactical activities and not value-add strategic activities, the solution will end up providing a much greater contribution to the organizational bottom line as your Procurement and Supply Management personnel will be able to focus on getting more spend under management (and through the system), which will identify cost reductions in addition to process savings.

With the recent release of their automated end-to-end invoice reconciliation functionality, Nipendo enables true end-to-end O2P/P2P process automation in an exception driven fashion. This is where O2P/P2P needs to be. Manual review of invoices adds no value, and manual payments when everything matches approved purchase orders adds no value either. Value is in the identification of issues; the creation of corrective action plans; the implementation of efficiency, service, and product improvements; and in the identification of areas for cost avoidance. Pushing paper accomplishes nothing.


* Presumably because, even though Nipendo knows it’s not true, too many people still think that the cloud is a fluffy magic box (which it is not).

P2P: Points 2 Ponder when People are Pushing Off Procurement Platforms

As far as SI can tell, not enough companies are using good, modern, fully electronic, Procure 2 Pay technologies when they should be. Even worse, many of these companies have realized the importance of good Supply Management and adopted modern e-Sourcing and Supplier (Performance/Information/Risk) Management software. But that’s not enough. SI has been ranting for years about the fact that it’s Sourcing AND Procurement and that if you don’t implement the full cycle, you’re not only leaving savings on the table but failing to capture all of the value available to you.

Why are otherwise smart, moderately progressive, companies doing this? Because they have deep concerns that the platform won’t do what they need it to do and fears that the only reason these platforms exist is to eliminate their jobs the same way machines and automation have led to our manufacturing woes. And while they have good points, since some of the early solutions didn’t do everything they needed to do in order for the company to obtain the promised benefits, and since automation typically leads to elimination of workforce in the function, when you look at some of the current solutions and look at the goal of Procurement in the right light, their points are no longer valid.

Nevertheless, if the points of trepidation are not addressed, the solutions won’t be considered, the function will not advance, and, vendors, you won’t survive. So, because SI encourages the proper use of technology platforms to increase efficiency, eliminate non-value-add tactical tasks, and augment the capability of your workforce (which is different from replacing it), SI is going to give the vendors building these solutions a helping hand by identifying the common trepidations, the solution requirements needed, and, as a result, the message you have to get across to calm the prospective buyer’s nerves (provided, of course, that you do have the solution requirements).

Trepidation # 5: It Won’t Save Money. There will always be exceptions to manage, suppliers who can’t use it, and administrative requirements and the costs will just be shifted.
Many early systems claimed big savings, typically in the 80% range, but never really delivered. The reality is that if the organization still has to support offline paper processes, still has to review all the invoices for errors, has to have an IT person administer the system, etc., the costs just shift. A modern P2P system has to support, and be usable by, all suppliers (and not just the top X that constitute 80% of spend), has to automatically detect errors and unmatched invoices, and has to be low, or no, cost to administer for the 80% savings to materialize. Otherwise, the buying organization won’t be able to achieve the 5X ROI the system is supposed to deliver and will not want it.

Trepidation # 4: We use X for purchase orders and / or Y for payables tracking. We can’t replace these systems.
A lot early systems expected that they would be the system of record for whatever the system did, and that all the system had to do was export the payments to a flat file for importing into the finance system. This is not the case. The platform has to integrate, in a straightforward manner, with the systems the buying organization uses for Purchase Orders and Inventory Management and the systems the buying organization uses for Accounts Payable.

Trepidation # 3: It Won’t Work For Us. Our Processes are Unique.
A lot of early systems followed the Henry Ford philosophy in that “you can have any colour as long as it’s black”. This doesn’t work for organizations that have distinct invoice approval workflows, distinct payment procedures, and different master-data storage policies. While the basic workflow is the same at a high level, it is different in the implementation across companies and the platform needs to support workflows that can be customized.

Trepidation # 2: Our Suppliers Can’t Use It / It’s Too Much Work for Our Suppliers
A lot of early systems took the view that “we have a portal that accepts EDI format and that’s good enough”. The problem is that supply organizations, like buying organizations, have different systems and different processes and, typically, don’t have the manpower to support a different invoicing mechanism for each customer and, frankly, won’t. The system has to support the common processes and technologies used by suppliers in the buyer’s market. A few (small) suppliers can be given a single “portal” solution, but this has to be a minority.

Trepidation # 1: They Took Their Jobs and Now They Will Take Our Jobs!
A good P2P system, which is exception-driven and requires a buyer to only manually review invoices that don’t match POs and / or exceed a certain dollar value, and which provides mechanisms all suppliers can use to submit electronically, should reduce the tactical invoice processing effort by 80% or more. This means that if the people doing the invoice processing had no other skills, then 4 out of 5 would lose their jobs. But if these are true procurement people, their job function would just be shifted to a more strategic role as redeploying these resources to spend more time on strategic supplier management, category management, and risk management would provide the organization with a value that (far) exceeded their cost. You don’t get rid of smart people just because you got a new system. You just ask them to deliver more, which they can do thanks to the new system.

Procurement KPIs and Business Acumen – A Review, Part III

Next Level Purchasing (NLP) recently released a new four-part express course on Procurement KPIs and Business Acumen that is available to all premium Next Level Purchasing Association (NLPA) members for free (and to all free NLPA members at a one-time price of 54.99*). In SI’s opinion, this course meets it goals of delivering one of the key lessons a Procurement department needs to master to be seen as strategically contributing to the organization given the current view of Procurement’s role, does a great job of defining business acumen and relating it to a function Procurement should understand well (Sales), and does a deft job of indicating how properly defined synergistic KPIs can generate compound effects and deliver greater results than non-synergistic KPIs. But more importantly, as indicated in Part I, it develops and presents a basic, generic, framework that ties together the key synergistic KPIs for any Procurement organization that can be used by an Procurement Professional. This framework, which is beautiful in its simplicity, is the most innovative encapsulation of a core idea that I’ve seen from a purchasing organization, analyst firm, or consulting organization in years!

That framework, as we mentioned in our last post, is the Procurement Funnel. This funnel, which can be used by any organization to accurately determine it’s contributions that go straight to the bottom line, takes in the universe of total organizational spend and squeezes out the realized savings that Procurement is measured on, just like the Sales funnel takes the universe of potential leads and squeezes out organizational customers. The only difference is while a basic sales funnel can have as few as three tiers, the Procurement funnel requires five tiers.

  • Total (External) Spend
    The total expense incurred by a company over the course of a year. The base definition of total spend would also include things like salaries, etc. that Procurement does not, and will never have, control over (which is why SI believes this top tier should be external spend ).
  • Spend Under Management
    The percentage of spend under the control of the Procurement organization. Should be a significant amount of total (external) spend, but may not be.
  • Addressed Spend Under Management
    How much of this spend the Procurement organization has actively sourced (or has under contract from a previous year).
  • Negotiated Savings
    The year-over-year savings the Procurement organization was able to negotiate on the addressed spend under management.
  • Realized Savings
    How much of this savings was actively captured (and did not get lost in maverick spend).
The Procurement Funnel

This funnel is accurate regardless of the industry your Procurement or Supply Management organization is in, and the four implied synergistic KPIs — % Spend Under Management (SUM), % SUM Addressed, % Savings on Addressed Spend, and % of Realized Savings — are universal. Organizations in different verticals may have different KPIs around New Product Development (Influence), Supplier (Performance) Management, etc., but these spend related KPIs are universal and a great starting point. And improving two or more of these KPIs has a significant compound effect on the bottom line performance of the Procurement / Supply Management organization.

For more details on how to accurately compute each category, compute the KPIs, improve the KPIs, and address the organizational issues that could inhibit your ability to improve the KPIs, take the short course on Procurement KPIs and Business Acumen , which will also help develop your Procurement Acumen, your ability to distinguish KRIs from KPIs, do the math that will help you figure out how to make the greatest impact, and give you some techniques to achieve a higher percentage of cost savings on sourced categories. There’s only so much justice a 3-post review can do to a four-part, fifty-page short course.


* Note that premium NLPA membership is only 99.99 annually and grants you access to all nine express course series (of one or more courses) as well as the full NLPA library. SI would recommend that you consider premium membership if you are interested in multiple resources as it is much cheaper than paying by the drink.

** Internal spend is compensation and controlled by a compensation committee, while external spend, regardless of it’s nature, should be influenced by Procurement.

Procurement KPIs and Business Acumen – A Review, Part II

Next Level Purchasing (NLP) recently released a new four-part express course on Procurement KPIs and Business Acumen that is available to all premium Next Level Purchasing Association (NLPA) members for free (and to all free NLPA members at a one-time price of 54.99*). In SI’s opinion, this course meets it goals of delivering one of the key lessons a Procurement department needs to master to be seen as strategically contributing to the organization given the current view of Procurement’s role, does a great job of defining business acumen and relating it to a function Procurement should understand well (Sales), and does a deft job of indicating how properly defined synergistic KPIs can generate compound effects and deliver greater results than non-synergistic KPIs. But more importantly, as indicated in Part I, it develops and presents a basic, generic, framework that ties together the key synergistic KPIs for any Procurement organization that can be used by any Procurement Professional. This framework, which is beautiful in its simplicity, is the most innovative encapsulation of a core idea that I’ve seen from a purchasing organization, analyst firm, or consulting organization in years!

So what is the framework? We’ll get to that. First we have to describe the Sales funnel. In order to measure their progress, and success, most Sales organizations use a sales funnel that represents the various stages that a potential customer goes through before becoming an actual customer. The basic funnel has three tiers: leads, prospects, and customers. A business or individual that might be interested in the organization’s products or services is a “lead”. Once the organization has taken the time to investigate the needs and desires of the business or individual and determined that they have a reasonable probability of becoming a customer, the “lead” is converted to a “prospect”. Once the “prospect” commits to the purchase of a product or service, they are a “customer”. Not all leads become prospects, and not all prospects become customers. And this is to be expected. A successful organization is one that converts a large number of leads to prospects and a large number of prospects to customers.

Using this framework, Sales can successfully define synergistic KPIs that allow it to measure how well it is doing. Unlike a Key Resource Indicator (KRI), which is a number that represents the result of a business activity, or a group of business activities, such as revenue or number of support calls, that is often mistaken for a Key Performance Indicator (KPI), a KPI is a number that represents how well a person or group performs the activities that contribute the most to a key result. In this framework, the KRIs are number of prospects, number of leads, and, most importantly, number of customers. The KPIs are the conversion rates, i.e., the number of prospects that convert to leads and the number of leads that convert to customers. The higher these conversion rates are, the better the business does. And better yet, in the sales funnel, the KPIs are synergistic, in other words, they work together and improvements in one improve the other. Let’s say the organization starts with 1000 leads, identifies 600 prospects, and gets 200 customers. In this case, it has a 60% conversion rate from leads to prospects, a 33.3% conversion rate from prospects to customers, and a 33.3% * 60% = 20% conversion rate from leads to customers. The KPIs are synergistic because a 10% improvement in the conversion rate from leads to prospect (to 66%) and a 10% improvement in the conversion rate from prospects to customers (to 36.66%) results in a 21% improvement in the conversion rate from leads to customers (to 24.2%). The effects are multiplicative, not additive.

Viewed from a high level, this funnel is a framework to get from the universe of organizations of businesses and individuals to the universe of customers — which is what matters most to Sales. What matters most to Procurement is realized savings (because that, and not value generation**, is what they are typically measured on). And this savings is relative to the universe of total spend of the organization. From the 30,000 foot view, there is no reason why one cannot create a “Procurement funnel” that takes the total spend of the organization down to the the realized savings of Procurement. And that is precisely what NLP does in this course. It defines a Procurement funnel that can be used by any organization to accurately determine it’s contributions that go straight to the bottom line while defining a framework for the definition of a base set of synergistic KPIs that can be used as a starting point for any Procurement and Supply Management organization, independent of vertical or geography.

So what is the Procurement Funnel? Come back tomorrow for Part III!


* Note that premium NLPA membership is only 99.99 annually and grants you access to all nine express course series (of one or more courses) as well as the full NLPA library. SI would recommend that you consider premium membership if you are interested in multiple resources as it is much cheaper than paying by the drink.

** Shame on the backwards thinking C-suite that still has this mentality!

Procurement KPIs and Business Acumen – A Review, Part I

Next Level Purchasing (NLP) recently released a new four-part express course on Procurement KPIs and Business Acumen that is available to all premium Next Level Purchasing Association (NLPA) members for free (and to all free NLPA members at a one-time price of 54.99*). The express course series is designed to cover the essential lessons required for a procurement department to strategically contribute to an organization, including what business acumen is and why it is essential for procurement success and how synergistic Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) can be used to create a compound effect on business result. In SI’s opinion, it delivers one of the key lessons a Procurement department needs to master to be seen as strategically contributing to the organization given the current view of Procurement’s role, does a great job of defining business acumen and relating it to a function Procurement should understand well (Sales), and does a deft job of indicating how properly defined synergistic KPIs can generate compound effects and deliver greater results than non-synergistic KPIs.

However, what SI really liked about the course is that it introduces a new concept poorly missing from the Procurement world that should be adopted by EVERY organization on the planet. And for this reason alone I would recommend you become a premium NLPA member. It is the most innovative encapsulation of a core idea that I’ve seen from a purchasing organization, analyst firm, or consulting organization in years! And we’ll get to it before the review is over.

The course starts off by noting that it is big news when a CPO rises to the top and becomes the CEO of an organization. Why? Because it is a rare event. Why is this the case? SI believes there are a number of factors but agrees with NLP that one of the reasons is a lack of business acumen (beyond the procurement and supply management function). What is business acumen? The Financial times defines business acumen as a keenness and speed in understanding and deciding on a business situation. People with business acumen are able to obtain essential information about a situation, focus on the key objectives, recognize the relevant options available for a solution, select an appropriate course of action and set in motion an implementation plan to get the job done. And if they discover that changes are required to adapt to unforeseen circumstances, they make the adjustments as necessary and keep the activity moving forward. And, most importantly, they are more often right than wrong (at least when it really matters).

The definition also goes on to state that people with strong business acumen use an explicit or implicit business framework to ensure completeness and integration as they assess a business situation. This is a key point that cannot be overlooked. Because, as they also state, business acumen is learned and a key part of that learning is the tools, processes, and frameworks you need to make good decisions. In the Procurement KPIs and Business Acumen, NLP develops a basic, generic, framework that ties together the key synergistic KPIs for any Procurement organization that can be used by an Procurement Professional. What is this framework? We’ll address that in Part II.


* Note that premium NLPA membership is only 99.99 annually and grants you access to all nine express course series (of one or more courses) as well as the full NLPA library. SI would recommend that you consider premium membership if you are interested in multiple resources as it is much cheaper than paying by the drink.