Category Archives: Miscellaneous

Sourcing Innovation: Where Thought Leaders Converge

The following is a complete* list of authors who have submitted a guest post on Sourcing Innovation or who have contributed to one or more of the Sourcing Innovation Series on their blog. There are a large number of truly great posts in this collection — which will increase in size with the next cross-blog series that starts next week on The Seven Grand Challenges for Supply & Spend Management.

A Buyer and Not a Cutter
Canadian Medical Purchasing is Only Just Average

Anonymous Author
GPOs and the Health Care Industry of Tomorrow

Alan Buxton, e-Sourcing Place and Trading Partners
The Future of e-Sourcing – Less is More
Two Sides to the CSR/Sustainability Argument
Auctions and Sustainability
What I Learned From Conference Season

Andy Monin, Vendor Compliance and VendorMate
Why do Hospitals Struggle to Run like a Business?
Leading the Sustainability Charge

Ashton Udall, Product Global and Global Sourcing Specialists
Best Cost Country Sourcing and the Concept of “Riskturn”

Bernard Gunther, Lexington Analytics
How much do you know about your spending?
Do You Have A Plan

Bob Derocher, Per Blomquist, Katie Boord, Archstone Consulting
Expanding Procurement’s Role in a Financial Services Company

Brian Daniels, Spend Radar
Supply risk – Seize the Initiative!

Brian Sommer, Services Safari and Azul Partners
Sourcing: A Sustainability Case Study
Sourcing: Sustainability or Durability?
Traveling During Conference Season
Ready to Drink the Kool-Aid?

Charles Dominick, Purchasing Certification Blog and Next Level Purchasing
Sourcing Innovation for Single-Customer Contracts
Sourcing Innovation for Enterprise-Wide Contracts
The Future of Sourcing: Results-Based Process Specialization
Measurement, Benchmarking, and Skills
Procurement Transformation

Chris Jacob Abraham, @ Supply Chain Management and ILOG
Forward: SCM 2.0
Supply Chain Talent
Closed Loop Supply Chain Management and Supply Chain Collaboration
A Brief Background on Sustainability Issues
Sustainability – Solutions in Search of Problems

Christopher Sciacca, Who Said Supply Chains are Boring? and IBM
Putting reduced packaging into a bigger supply chain perspective

Dave Kuketz, Global Content Works
Sustainability

Dave M, Buyer Analytics
Defining Sustainable Procurement
The Cornerstone of Sustainable Procurement – Ethical Sourcing
A Model of Sustainable Sourcing Transparency

Dave Stephens, Business and Technology Nexus and Coupa
The Future of Sourcing
The Top Three: Cost, Complexity, and Compartmentalization
The Battle Over Efficiency vs. Quality vs. Cost in Hospitals and Clinics

David Bush, e-Sourcing Forum and Iasta
The Future of Sourcing?
Sourcing Innovation Series
The Top Three: Adoption, Adoption, Adoption
Carbon-Neutral Blogging

Dick Locke, Global Procurement Group and author of Global Supply Management
Musings on Talent Management
Are Your International Procurement Skills Up to Snuff?

Don Dougherty, Denali Consulting and SupplyStaff
The “Talent” Game

Doug Hudgeon, Vendor Management
Rogers and Hammerstein: The Future of Sourcing
The Top Three: Dale Earnhardt

Doug Smock, Design News and co-author of Straight to the Bottom Line
The Top Three: Straight to the Bottom Line

Eric Hiller, Cost Cents and Apriori
Design for … What?
Sustainability, Granola Definition

Eric Strovink, BIQ
The Future of Sourcing
Spend Analysis: What Purchasing.com Got Wrong
Aberdeen on Spend Analysis: Lost in the Trees
The Future of Spend Analysis
Integrating Contract Management and Spend Analysis
Screwing up the Screw-Ups in BI
Sustainable Savings
A Quick Start to e-Sourcing
Spend Analysis Meme Busting, Part I
Spend Analysis Meme Busting, Part II
Spend Analysis I: The Value Curve
Spend Analysis II: The Psychology of Analysis
Spend Analysis III: Common Sense Cleansing
Spend Analysis IV: Defining “Analysis”
Spend Analysis V: New Horizons (Part 1)
Spend Analysis VI: New Horizons (Part 2)

Harvey Chan, Ethical Sourcing Blog and Mountain Equipment Co-op
Pollution, Social Ills & The Developing World

Haydn Jones, European Leaders Blog and A.T. Kearney
Sustainability, Sustainability, Sustainability

Jason Busch, Spend Matters and Azul Partners
Sourcing Innovation: Securitizing Direct Materials
Sourcing Innovation: Next Generation On-Demand
Evaluating Spend Visibility and Analytics Providers
Sourcing Innovation Series: Wither Procurement as Strategist in 2008?
How Will Green / Sustainable Procurement Play in a Recession
Sustainability Wins Because of the Market – Not Regulation
Three Lessons From Conference Season
* all pre-2012 posts were removed in the 2023 site upgrade

Jason Rushin, Nextance
Promoting Sustainability Throughout Your Ecosystem

Jean-Philippe Massin, Strategic Sourcing | Europe and Capgemini
Future Purchasing: The Extended-Enterprise Connector
The Top Three: Live Spend Analysis, Best-in-Class Suppliers, and Change and Culture Management

Jim Lawton, D&B
Winning the Battle on Risk: Information and Technology

John Martin, Building SaaS
The Future of Sourcing … for Services
Services Sustainability

John Miller, Gemba Panta Rei and Gemba Research
The Top Three: Slow is the New Fast, The 90-mile Rule, DIYS
What We Can Learn Form Boeing’s Lean Supply Chain

Jon Hansen, Procurement Insights
Procurement’s Expanding Role and the Executive of the Future
Yes Virginia! There is more to e-procurement than software! (Part 1)
Yes Virginia! There is more to e-procurement than software! (Part 2)
The FOSS(ilization) of the supply chain: The risks of a strategy centered on Free Open Source Software

Kevin Brooks, True Demand
The Future of Sourcing Commentary
The Top Three: Learning to Communicate

Lisa Reisman, Metal Miner and Aptium Global
Quantifying Quality in Lean Sourcing Initiatives
The Top Three: Global Sourcing Savings Maximization, Volatile Commodities Management, and Savings Implementation

Mark Usher, 1 Procurement Place and Treya Partners
A State Gets Smart

Matt Gersper, Global Data Mining
GDM & AQPC Launch Ground Breaking Study of Global Trade Metrics
10+2 Readiness … Beware! It’s strategic, not tactical …

Norman Katz, Katzscan
Some Examples of Supply Chain Fraud

Paul Martyn, Track Management Group
Some Thoughts on Sustainability

Randy Littleson, Kinaxis
The Top Three: Strategy, Strategy, and People
Sustainability and the Impact on Supply Chain Responsiveness

Rick Ankrum, SCM Pulse
CDP Initiative Aims to Establish Carbon Reporting Across the Supply Chain

Rob Parish
Rob Parrish: Sourcing Innovation Blog Swarm

Robert A. Rudzki, Transformation Leadership, Greybeard Advisors, and co-author of Straight to the Bottom Line
Don’t Wait for the Burning Platform

Ron Southard, Safe Sourcing
Twenty Reasons Why All Retailers Should Use e-Procurement Tools Now

Tim Albinson, 2sustain and Aravo
Report from DC: Good News, Bad News

Tim Minahan, Supply Excellence and Ariba
Sourcing Innovation: Predictions for the Future of Strategic Sourcing
Predictions for the Future of Strategic Sourcing: Part II
What’s Next According to Busch: Supply Skills Networks
What’s Next In Purchasing: Ask Your Supply Management System
Open Season (Part One): It’s Time to Negotiate Best Value Events
Open Season (Part Two): Best Practices for Event Management Spend

Vinnie Mirchandani, Deal Architect and New Florence. New Renaissance
Healthcare – Three Way Matching
Green – or Guilt – Selling?
What I Learned From Conference Season

* Hopefully I didn’t miss anyone. If I did, please accept my sincere apologies, send me an e-mail, and I’ll rectify the problem. Please note that I did not include any posts that were contributed to the Sourcing 2007 series as all of the contributors were bloggers who would have likely wrote those posts even in the absence of that particular cross-blog series, because bloggers love to pontificate on the year ahead every time a new year rolls around.

Coming Soon: The 6th International Supply Chain Management Symposium

The 6th Annual PMAC/MeRC International Supply Chain Management Symposium is coming up next month. It starts with the 3rd annual Doctoral Colloquium on Wednesday, October 15 and the welcome reception that night and the main body of the conference is on Thursday, October 16 and Friday October 17.

This year, their keynotes are from Mr. Dean D. Loria from Shell Canada Limited, Dr. Terry L. Esper from the University of Tennessee, and Jason “The Prophet” Busch, the Spend Master of Spend Matters. Jason’s always an energetic speaker, Dr. Esper is rather well reknowned, and although I must confess that I don’t know the dude from Shell, I’ve never attended a bad presentation from a Shell representative. (Not that they’ve all be gems, but compared to some presentations I’ve attended, including an Ariba keynote from last year, they were never bad.)

In addition, they again have a number of tracks on timely supply chain issues that include green supply chains, health care supply chains, energy sector best practices, and remanufacturing supply chains as well as the old standby topics that include global logistics, procurement management, and negotiation. In addition, this year’s panels are on green supply chains, non-profit supply chains, and supply chain education.

As I noted in last year’s announcement, there aren’t a lot of good Supply Chain / Sourcing / Procurement conferences north of the border, and this is one of the few. So, if you’re in Canada or the northern states and do business in, or with, Canada, I strongly encourage you to consider checking it out. Plus, you get to check out Cowtown this year, which might be a nice change after five years of Hogtown.

For those of you who haven’t been to Canada’s wild wild west, you can check out the the city web site, the Tourism Calgary site, the Calgary Community Events Guide, and even the WorldWeb.com travel guide and vacation planner. And even though the event is not being held during the annual Folk Festival, Blues Festival or during the world famous Stampede, you can always check out the Calgary Zoo and Heritage Park and see how your average Canadian still lives outside of the big nine Canadian cities (which, from east to west are: Halifax, Quebec City, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Winnipeg, Edmonton, Calgary, and Vancouver). In addition, you can also check out the Calgary Herald, the Calgary Sun, and The Gauntlet from the University of Calgary for the down-low on what’s happening. (And you music lovers can check out Calgary Music Lives here, Music Calgary, and the Calgary Music Special Interest Group.) And, for us bloggers, there is the Wild Rose Brewery and the Brew Brothers Brewery … so we’ll be just fine.

Maximum Value From Your Consultants

There was a great article recently in Supply Chain Brain that described a litany of failure. In measuring the value of supply chain consultants, the authors review five horror stories that resulted from consulting engagements. This article was very enlightening as it did a great job of what can go wrong when you fail to work with your consultants and heed their advice. Even though consultants are cheap, and often the best resource you have to identify savings, this is only true if you work with them. Otherwise, they become just as expensive as all the other boneheaded initiatives an average organization will introduce on a daily basis.

Fortunately for us, the article also does a great job of describing the proper approach to maximizing the benefits your consultants can offer you through the advice it offers in each of its tales of horror. The proper attitude, approach, and attention is paramount to your success, and makes the difference between a project that is classified as a dismal failure and a project that generates 10X ROI. As the article notes, in many cases, the best a consultant can do is to give you a good roadmap. When all is said and done, you still have to drive the car to the destination.

So what do you need to do? At a high level, you need to:

  • Listen to the consultant, even if it’s not what you want to hear.
    A good consultant is one who comes in, tells you what’s wrong, and what you need to do to fix it. There’s no value in a consultant that pays you lip-service for a big paycheck.
  • Be prepared for “scope creep”.
    A good consultant will likely uncover problems that neither of you were aware of at the outset. Although you will be able to push off some of these problems to a future project, others will need to be addressed. For example, if the goal of the project is to design or identify a software-based solution to automatically generate import and export documentation for customs and the consultant identifies that your organization is not capturing certain types of critical, required, data, then you will need to extend the project scope to the creation of a process and implementation of a system to capture the necessary raw data.
  • Be ready to take action and implement at least some of the recommendations.
    There’s no benefit in paying a consultant thousands upon thousands upon thousands of dollars simply to identify problems and respective solutions. The benefit comes in implementing the solutions identified by the consultant.
  • Put your own ego in check.
    Maybe you built your company from nothing to a 25-person 5-Million a year operation on nothing but sweat, resolve, and pennies you found on the street while your heavily-funded venture-backed competitors went-belly up faster than lemmings can get to their favorite cliff. That’s great, and you definitely deserve a pat on the back, but that doesn’t mean you know what it takes to grow your company from a small 5-Million nickel-ante player to a mid-size 50-Million market force to be reckoned with.
    Or maybe you were the one who last sourced that 100-M category three years ago and saved 10-M. That doesn’t mean you’re the right person to source that category again today when the balance of power has shifted to suppliers, when raw material costs according to the market indexes have risen 50%, and when your key suppliers are already maxed. You did well, but you likely don’t have the expertise and experience of the consultant being brought in who has sourced this category half a dozen times in the last year in similar market conditions and who knows what you need to do to get results.
    The consultant’s goal is to bring you value, which you will only get if you’re willing to admit that “Ok, I’m good, and I certainly know more about this consultant than X, but right now, I really need to do a good job with Y, and this is the right person for that job.” And you have to remember what happens at the end of a successful engagement — the consultant moves on to the next project and you’re the only one left to get the pat-on-the-back, and the big bonus, from the boss-man.
  • Recognize that sometimes technology is the answer.
    A smart person recognizes that technology, by nature, is not intelligent and that she should not blindly follow any “advice” it has to offer, but she also recognizes that, on the right equipment, it can do more computations per minute than she can do in a lifetime and mine through more data in a few minutes than she’ll ever be able to. If you’re lacking good visibility or data upon which to base decisions, you need technology that can get you that visibility and data.
  • Work with the consultant (and leave the politics to the politicians).
    Regardless of the rumors you might hear, the consultant is not there to take your job. Trust me when I say she doesn’t want it.
  • Get the consultant the data she needs promptly …
    Every day a consultant waits for data is another day the project is delayed and another day you will have to wait to get the advice you need to improve your operations and cash-flow.
  • … and make sure that data is good data.
    A consultant’s recommendations are only as good as the information you provide.
  • Don’t limit the consultant to focussing on just process or just technology.
    The two go hand in hand. There’s no value in automating an inefficient, incorrect, or just plain poor process and there’s no value in adapting your processes to fit the wrong technology. Give the consultant the freedom to address the full scope of your problem.
  • Be serious about problem solving and process improvement.
    If you’re doing a project merely to “check a box” on standardized RFXs, then you’re just wasting everyone’s time. For example, if you undertake a SAS-70 initiative just because your competitor did it without a solid goal of improving your service offerings and production processes, the effort will simply result in a large collection of “manuals on the shelf” gathering dust that cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars.
  • Be prepared to go back to school.
    Sometimes the consultant will find that you’re significantly behind the curve and the only way to catch you up is through radical updates to your processes or technology, which are well beyond where you are today. If you’re not prepared to learn and innovate, you will not be able to act on the recommendations, which might literally mean the difference between staying viable and going bankrupt.

the doctor’s Sustainability Solution: The 10% Blogger Challenge

the doctor is a big believer in sustainability. He’s one of the few bloggers in the space who’s been blogging about green since before it became a hot topic. That’s why, even though he is not in the position that you are as a buyer to enforce the production of sustainable goods and services (because your money speaks louder than words to a supplier), he wanted to do something anyway.

So what’s the doctor‘s solution? Donate 10%* of all current and future sponsorship and advertising revenue on the Sourcing Innovation Blog, web-site, and future on-line properties to charitable causes that are pursuing sustainability options. Every quarter, after the sponsorship and advertising cheques come in, the doctor is going to take 10% of the gross revenue and immediately donate it to one or more charitable causes – and then tell you which causes, and how much, he donated.

This quarter, the doctor chose to make two $525 donations. One to the David Suzuki Foundation, which works to find ways for society to live in balance with the natural world that sustains us, and one to Doctors Without Borders, known as Medicins Sans Frontieres en Canada, which endeavors to find ways to respond rapidly and effectively to public health emergencies, with complete independence from political, economic, and religious influences. I’m a big fan of both of these organizations. David Suzuki is a tireless crusader on behalf of our planet Earth, and Doctors Without Borders recently started trying to mass produce Plumpy’nut, a very simple food that does wonders in keeping young children in third world nations healthy. (There are lots of videos on YouTube that describe its success.) I look forward to being able to make additional donations to both of these charities on behalf of Sourcing Innovation in the future.

Unfortunately, the doctor is not as dim as he looks (or, at least according to some trusted colleagues) and realizes that, on his own, he’s not going to make much of a difference. Even if this site was fully sponsored, at what the doctor perceives it’s market value to be, he’d only be donating thousands a year. A nice number for an individual donation, but peanuts in the grand scheme of things. But the doctor has a solution!

The Solution: The 10% Blogger Challenge!

the doctor is hereby challenging all bloggers who generate advertising or sponsorship income off of their sites to donate 10% off the top (off the gross for you financial types) to sustainable charities of their choosing from all advertising and sponsorship income they receive, and to do so at least yearly, with quarterly donations being preferred. Furthermore, each blogger should advertise the charities they are donating too, and why, and try to convince their readers to persuade their companies to also donate 10% of at least one revenue line, off the top, to sustainable causes.

Just think of the difference it would make if every organization in the developed world took 10% of their revenue and applied it to sustainable causes (charities, community programs, green energy investments, etc.). And since you can supposedly take 10% off the top of everything when buying, there’s no good reason you can’t spare 10% yourself. (Maybe your company would have to do away with the private box at the track, or cut back on it’s over-priced private art collection, but does it really need those?) So join me, and let’s show them that us bloggers are the future, on-line and off.

*The fine print. 10%-off-the-gross of all sponsorship and advertising revenue from the Sourcing Innovation Blog and the Sourcing Innovation Website in 2008 will be donated to registered charitable causes on a quarterly basis, after the revenue is received. This excludes any revenue that is due to a partner through a joint effort or due to an individual or enterprise that sells sponsorship or advertising on behalf of Sourcing Innovation. So, if a quarterly Sourcing Innovation sponsorship is sold for $10,000 by itself, $1,000 will be donated to a registered charity within 3 months of receipt of the funds; and if a partner, with a 30% gain-share agreement, sells an advertising slot for $1,000, then $70, or 10% of the $700 net, will be donated to a registered charity within 3 months of receipt. Furthermore, the doctor is open to having his books audited by any sponsor or advertiser who makes a minimum $1,000 donation to a registered charity of the doctor‘s choosing, as long as they agree to a rigid non-disclosure agreement and make the donation up-front.

Should Value-Cells Be A Part Of Your Center-Led Model?

A recent article in the McKinsey Quarterly on “Organizing for Value” noted that although the traditional practice of organizing large corporations along a few divisional lines has been an effective way to groom managers for top jobs and limit the number of direct reports to the CEO, the approach creates bulky divisions that obscure the performance of small units where value is often created in these lean economic times. This can lead to organizational blind sports when it comes to investments and decisions between long-term growth opportunities and short-term demands, which can, as you will surmise, lead to unfortunate results — as managers end up optimizing earnings goals at the expense of long-term growth and value creation.

In order to compensate for the blunt tools of traditional planning, that will often implement a uniform freeze across business units in tough times (including those units delivering 50% earnings growth that should be invested in heavily as only sagging units should get the axe), a business should take a finer-grained perspective on individual initiatives within large divisions. If you can identify and define small units around activities that create value by serving related customer needs, then you can better asses and manage performance by focusing on growth and value creation. These units, which the authors call “value cells”, provide you with a more detailed, more tangible, way of gauging business value and economic activity — and allow you to spend more time focussed on specific in-depth strategy discussions, instead of generic tactical plans that are never productive when blindly applied across large business units.

These value cells are often oriented around geographic or vertical markets and integrate their backbone functions, like production, operations, and distribution — and unlike the traditional org-unit structure of classic companies, they have stand-alone economics and are typically “homogenous” in regard to their target marketplace. They are governed off of P&L statements that are created as if the value cell were its own business. This allows a business to determine a market-price for the value cell, and judge the value it is creating relative to the funding it is receiving from the business. Then, it can invest in those value cells likely to create the most value in tough times, which will help the business ride out the storm.

Analyzing the definition of value-cell, one thing springs to my mind, and hopefully yours as well — supply management! What other part of a business is a business within itself? And what other part of a business can easily and naturally be broken down into units that are structured around geographic or vertical markets or product families? And what other part of the business might already be more-or-less broken down in this way? Only supply management really fits, and, specifically, center-led supply management. If you have a well-designed center-led operation, you have a supply management function that is broken down into a number of global business units. Moving to a “value cell” mindset is pretty simple, as the only major difference is that each “unit” is now treated as its own business, which would take advantage of the services of the COE value cell (which would, in turn, be jointly funded by each of the value cells, and be credited with a portion of the savings it helps each value cell generate).

These individual value cells will be able to offer improved reporting, with increased levels of detail in the data, to the center of excellence which will be able to use this data to make better decisions (and take advantage of new opportunities) for the long-term benefit of the company as a whole. The COE will be able to better identify where economies of scale truly exist, and where they do not, and better differentiate which purchases should be against global supply contracts, which purchases should be against regional supply contracts, and which purchases should be completely left up to the local value-cells to manage as they see fit.

Furthermore, as the article points out, even though one might initially think it would be more work to manage a larger number of value cells than a smaller number of positions, the ability to focus on a single value cell at a time, which is a highly targeted business in its own right, reduces operational complexity considerably. Managers can focus on the two or three metrics specific to the value cell that truly driver performance, as opposed to the twenty or thirty that would be required to define a whole division. You can quickly see what needs to be done, do it, and move on to the next value cell. It’s easier than trying to define a strategy that will more-or-less work well on the whole for a large division — much easier.

I think that this approach is probably right for many large companies — but do agree with the authors when they state that the approach will only work if a company has the courage to follow up on the right decision and the willingness to (occasionally) sacrifice short-term profits for long-term growth. Furthermore, the process must give managers of the value cells more freedom and more resources to bring innovative projects with a large commercialization potential to fruition. But I think that, done right, it would be worth it. Any other opinions?