Category Archives: Vendor Review

Trade Extensions Trades Up Its UI and e-Negotiation Management Capabilities

About a year ago, I introduced you to Trade Extensions (TE) on the eleventh day of X-Mas. A provider of an extensive on-demand e-Negotiation platform, Trade Extensions is an emerging player in the global e-Sourcing marketplace — one that offers negotiation management, extensive RFX, and (reverse) auctions with embedded real-time decision optimization.

Since my initial coverage, Trade Extensions has made the following significant updates to their platform:

  • a brand new UI across their end-to-end system
    The new UI is crisp, clean, and click-minimal. It’s quick and easy to use and very self evident. Plus, their online help pages are very extensive and updated regularly by the entire TE development and consulting teams.
  • integrated data cleansing & classification capabilities
    Have to fix a lot of data? Just create a rule and map it, just like you’d do in a spend cleansing and classification system.
  • OLAP Reporting for Scenarios
    Users now have access to full OLAP capabilities when viewing scenario results and reports.

In addition, the following features, which I have not covered before, have been improved:

  • extensive modifications to their bid supplement functionality
    Data — pricing, discount(s), rebate(s), etc. — can be captured at any level (supplier, business unit, plant location, etc.) and used for mark-ups, discounts, qualitative scores, or as the basis for any formula(s) the user wishes to define.
  • flexible bid forms
    Not only does TE support full Excel integration, but bid forms can be designed by the user to fit their business needs. There’s no need to force your information into a single system format. A user can create additional worksheets, add columns and rows to existing worksheets as required and add macros and formulas without interfering with the platform’s ability to read completed bid forms.
  • outlier analysis and statistical reporting
    The platform can automatically detect bids that might be too high or too low and flag them for your review (after you define your outlier rules, such as specific bid field values x% away from average / historic / custom calculation). The platform also includes a number of statistics reports, including a parameter statistics report that contains a detailed analysis at the lot and bid level.
  • composed filters
    Filters, which allow you to define constraints on any set of suppliers, ship from locations, ship to locations, products, etc., can now be defined on other filters to allow for very easy, and very powerful, constraint creation.
  • selection sheets
    Excel spreadsheets can be used to define allocation constraints, discounts, penalties, and multipliers … greatly simplifying discount and constraint creation in many cases.
  • project management functionality
    100% integrated into the cohesive e-Negotiation platform, the project management functionality allows for the creation of phases and tasks, the allocation of resources to phases and tasks, and the creation of scopes (by supplier, geography, etc.) as appropriate.

They’ve also continued to increase its power. Consider a recent project run by a financial services firm that tendered all of the components of a direct mail project that would result in the mailing of 1.8 Billion documents. The project, which consisted of 65,000 items, 60,000 transport destinations, and 400,000 bids from over 100 suppliers was valued at $1 Billion with a “B”.

The project was to ultimately deliver documents to the firm’s customers, but to get to that stage each part of the supply chain needed to be tendered. This included design, paper supply, printing, assembly, and transport. The project was completed as a single tender with offers collected on-line and all components tendered concurrently. In addition, suppliers could make conditional offers that reflected their own efficiencies that could present the firm with further savings. This was a project that could not even be attempted by hand as it would take someone close to two weeks just to scan each bid. There’s no way someone could even fathom attempting to optimize this scenario if all they had was a spreadsheet solution that couldn’t handle more than 65,536 rows.

Finally, TE is one of the few players in the market to make their pricing scheme public.

Share This on Linked In

Become a Financial Superstar with The Receivables Exchange

Share This on Linked In

The Receivables Exchange, which bill themselves as the world’s first electronic marketplace for trading accounts receivable, simply put, allows businesses to sell their receivables to a global network of institutional investors through an auction (with an eBay-like “buy it now” option) and access working capital in as little as one (1) day. The model, which has been covered by a large number of leading publications (including BusinessWeek, Forbes, and Inc.) is very successful with 99% of all auctions completing and more than 90% closing through the buy-out option, sometimes in as little as thirty seconds!

So why should you care as a Procurement Professional?

In these troubled times, it’s your job to do everything you can to save the business money … and helping finance, who are probably just going to the local bank and accepting the (higher) rates offered on operating credit lines, save money on working capital counts. If you need 2,000,0000 of working capital for the next 30 days while waiting for payments to come in and you take a loan at 2.5% when you could sell your receivables (as an asset-based sale) at 1.5%, that’s 20,000 in financing payments you don’t need to be making. If you have to do it every month, that’s 240,000 of instant savings. And we all know that the financing terms can be much more onerous than just 2.5% for many small and mid-sized companies today, meaning that this can be a million dollar plus savings opportunity for many mid-sized businesses.

Not only can you point out this solution to your finance team, which is probably spending 2.7% of working capital unnecessarily on an annual basis, but you can use your procurement and customer expertise to let them know which receivables would be the most attractive to third party financiers and which receivables would command the best rates. This would go a long way to helping traditional finance managers, that probably see you as the “L” in “P&L” (as astutely noted by Mr. Guth on the VMO blog), understand the cost-savings potential of your department when your expertise is applied throughout the organization.

Furthermore, it’s also your job to keep tabs on the financial health of your suppliers and help your strategic suppliers out so that they are there to help you in the future. If you know that they are in need of more working capital, and you’re not in a position to pay them early (at a fair discount), you can point them to The Receivables Exchange and even help them with the on-boarding and due-diligence process.

So how does The Receivables Exchange work?

Unlike traditional factoring, which generally costs more and places much more onerous restrictions on your financing, The Receivables Exchange is completely anonymous, your customers are not notified that your receivables have been sold (unless you want them to be notified — which means there is no impact to a customer’s AP department) with a 100% transparent fee structure, that is free from restrictive covenants. You bundle one or more invoices for auction, define the minimum advance you require and the maximum transaction fee you’ll pay (for a 30 day advance), your optimal “buy it now” financing requirements, the auction start time (usually “now”), and the auction length (3+ days). Then 30+ buying organizations, which represent 15 Billion in A/R buying power, bid on your receivables and, if the requirements are reasonable, a few days later (1-10 depending on how long the auction takes to close and transfer time requirements), you have cash in your bank account. Then, when your customer pays your invoice(s), the advance, along with the lending fee, is paid to the buyer, a small transaction fee (that is typically between 30 and 60 basis points and determined by your z-score) is retained by The Receivables Exchange, and the remaining funds go into your bank account.

And it’s a sellers market right now. The exchange currently has buying power that is four times it’s current throughput with a number of Receivables Buyers still waiting in the wings to take advantage of the great supply chain financing opportunities that are being passed up by banks and other traditional lenders. The only downside is that the platform is currently limited to US-Headquartered sellers. You can list international receivables on the exchange, including receivables due to international units, but you currently have to be operating, and headquartered, in the US to take advantage of the exchange. When you consider that you can significantly decrease DSO at a very low cost of capital, compress CCC, and increase ROE in a matter of minutes once you are registered (as the auction environment has been optimized for the sale of receivables and the process of uploading your invoice and due diligence documents, bundling for auction, and defining your minimum and optimal terms has been streamlined to only take a few minutes, on average) and download their Adobe Air client, it presents a great opportunity for any company that needs to improve their working capital situation.

For additional information, you can contact Paul Hoeper (phoeper@receivablesxchange.com) directly.

Roll Out to Your Community with RollStream

Share This on Linked In

RollStream (acquired by GXS) is a new entrant to the emerging SIM-centric (Supplier Information Management – centric) subspace of Supply Chain Management that has taken a Web 2.0 inspired approach to its solution. At the core of its “Enterprise Community Management” solution is the belief that collaboration is the missing critical component in many of today’s supplier management solutions.

As a result, when it comes to ease of use and supplier on-boarding, it has developed one of the best, as well as one of the easiest to use, solutions for Supplier Information Management as many people today are familiar and comfortable with the Web 2.0 and social network like interfaces it has developed for supplier, partner, and contact profile management as well as for survey creation and information gathering. It’s scalability and ease of use has allowed one of its largest customers to on-board their roughly 13,000 suppliers and manage roughly 150,000 points of contact. The solution has assisted this customer in credentials capture, compliance, training and enablement, and new technology rollout.

But, as you know, SIM is only the first component of Enterprise Management, whether you call it Supplier Central (CVM Solutions), Extended Enterprise Management (Hiperos), or Enterprise Community Management. There’s also, depending upon your outlook, risk, performance, compliance, sustainability, diversity, dispute resolution, initiative management, and collaboration for innovation.

The RollStream solution addresses, in its own words, basic Supplier Information Management in the form of on-boarding and profile management, Dispute Resolution by way of on-line collaboration, Compliance and Risk Management by way of task-managed projects and web surveys, and Performance and Feedback Management by way of a workflow-based community dashboard and collaborative scorecarding process.

The Supplier Information Management component, which is what they started with, is mature, and as I said above, one of the best and easiest to use solutions that you’re going to find for SIM on the market today, used by a number of global Fortune 3000’s to manage supplier bases of over 10,000 suppliers and 100,000 contacts in a number of verticals. The collaboration components, with complete conversation and audit trails, simplify the online dispute resolution process and make it much friendlier than the alternatives.

The Performance and Feedback Management is good for simple surveys and on-line discussions, but don’t expect to be able to build any complex scorecards within the system at this point in time. If you have a solution that generates your scorecards as spreadsheets or PDFs, you can automate the retrieval and attachment of the scorecards within the platform and then create tasks around the discussion of the scorecards with the relevant individuals at each of your suppliers, which could be quite helpful, but you can’t yet build complex scorecards within the system or attach comments to individual sections. This should not be an issue for most companies in most verticals, but if you are very metric-focussed or use collaborative scorecarding and need to retrieve inputs as well as send them and integrate all of the scorecards into a common collaboration tool, you’ll need to evaluate the solution carefully.

This brings us to the last component — Compliance, Risk, and Sustainability Initiative Management. Their solution, which allows you to build as many virtual sub-communities as you want within the application, and then create as many task-managed projects around those communities as you want, is quite powerful in its simplicity when it comes to the management of these projects, but most projects will require data collection and the degree of data collection will determine its fit within your organization. If you primarily do indirect sourcing or simple commodity sourcing, the solution should be more than enough for your needs as most of the regulatory requirements can be captured in simple yes-no questions. But if you do direct manufacturing, where you have to deal with RoHS, REACH, and or WEEE, the simple survey-monkey style web-form survey capability isn’t going to cut it when you have to capture not only whether or not thousands of chemicals are present in your products, but to what extent they are present. Similarly, if you have adopted, or foresee the need to adopt, complex carbon measurement calculations which depend not only on if-then logic (which the forms support) but also complex built-in calculations, then you’ll find their solution is not ready for prime time.

So what’s the verdict? I think many companies will find that the solution meets their SIM-Centric Enterprise Community Management needs, especially when you consider that even the best solution will take at least a year to roll-out to thousands of suppliers and get them proficient on the solution. In that timeframe, you’ll see more capability added to the Performance Management and Compliance, Risk, and Sustainability Management components as RollStream continues to implement their solution roadmap.

Is it Time to Get Hip with Hiperos?

Share This on Linked In

Hiperos is a relatively new entrant in the space focussed on what they call “Extended Enterprise Management”, which is their term for what you get when you amalgamate (what I call) Enterprise Contract Management, Compliance, Performance, and Sustainability into a single 360° solution platform.

The goals of the platform are to provide you with:

  • Supplier Information Central
    • collect all supplier information in one application
    • allow it to be entered and reviewed by suppliers, third parties, and internal staff, according to roles and permissions
    • allow for the creation of quick and easy monitoring reports that can be displayed in a dashboard
  • Cross-Enterprise Supply Chain Risk Assessment
    • allow risk to be evaluated against any supplier or service provider
    • allow risk to be evaluated by category / product line
    • allow risk management programs to be created based on whatever supplier / risk segmentation criteria you select
  • Supplier Performance Management
    • allow for the easy definition of surveys and scorecards
    • allow suppliers to be evaluated based on the type of product being delivered or service being performed
    • allow for internal and external feedback, subject to approvals
  • Regulatory Compliance Management
    • support any and all compliance regulations your organization is subject to (RoHS, HIPAA, ITAR, etc.)
    • allow requirements to be easily communicated to suppliers
    • monitor responses and flag non-compliance for exception based monitoring and resolution
  • Sustainability Initiative Support
    • allow sustainability guidelines to be captured
    • allow them to be communicated across the supply chain
    • monitor adherence to implemented programs

For those of you in a rush, I’ll tell you right now that the application (which is now on R3) does precisely what Hiperos says it can do, that it’s relatively easy to configure and use (and a couple of clients have self configured it without any help at all), and that it can be configured to report on precisely what you want it to report on, and display this information in real time on every login. Furthermore, if you use it’s capabilities to augment data collected internally with data in your other entprise systems and external data sources and integrate 3rd party risk and financial data, such as what you would get from Equifax, Lexis Nexis, or D&B (using their new “D&B Inside” offering), you can truly get a 360° view. Furthermore, if you define your risk assessment and monitoring metrics accordingly (and / or select the right templates for your vertical and organizational risk management needs), my assessment is that you can be just as confident in the risk assessments as you would be if you outsourced it to a specialist consulting firm (especially if you bring one of them in to help you define your risk assessment program and insure you set up the feeds, applications, and reports appropriately).

The application allows you to define what fields you want to track, what metrics you want to use, the calculations that define those metrics, and the reports the metrics appear in. It also allows you to define as many roles as you need (buyer, manager, approver, CPO, third party auditor, supplier, etc.) and define access permissions and capabilities based on those roles. In addition to the standard supplier, contact, contract, and (enterprise) program entities, it also allows you to define “relationships” and define the data you want to capture, track, and measure against those relationships. For example, a relationship will be with a supplier, managed by a local account manager and supplier account manager, against a program type and have it’s own status and risk measurements. Collectively, these measurements and statii can be rolled up to give an overall status and risk picture, which, of course, can be drilled into at any time. You can also define as many levels of details as you need in your surveys and scorecards, which, of course, frees you from the limited capabilities of a 3-dimensional spreadsheet workbook. And it comes with template libraries for standard compliance (HIPAA, RoHS, REACH), risk management, and sustainability (carbon tracking) initiatives that can be used to jumpstart configuration for your enterprise.

The one weakness is that while the application has been configured to be extensible and accept an unlimited number of external data sources, at this point in time, only RSS Feeds and a couple of 3rd party financial feeds are configured out-of-the-box. This means that you will have to do some integration with appropriate 3rd party data sources to get a 360° view, which is vital because, if you don’t have someone on the ground, or a good relationship with a 3rd party auditor you can trust, you can’t trust self-submitted supplier surveys alone. (And, these days, some of the best leading indicators are those you get from financial risk data consolidators like D&B — who acquired Open Ratings — and Equifax — who acquired Austin Tetra — and from import/export visibility companies like Zepol, Import Genius, and Panjiva.)

The application is one that is definitely worth looking at, because the only other providers offering integrated solutions of the same breadth are Aravo, CVM Solutions, and, if you’re in the health-care industry, Vendormate.

A FieldGlass Update

Those of you who followed the travels of the Sourcing Maniacs on their 2008 Vendor Tour may recall that one of their stops was FieldGlass (in Chicago), a provider of an on-demand contingent workforce management solution.

A well-designed contingent workforce management solution will streamline the contingent labor requisition process, simplify the identification of qualified resources, automate the distribution of requests, standardize resource rates, automate the collection of quotes, track contracts, and insure that staffing companies and contractors always bill at the approved rate, and only for approved hours on approved projects. The solution will reduce recruitment costs, processing costs, and payment costs as well as prevent overcharges and overpayments, which can often total 20% or more at companies with a large contingent workforce and no solution to manage the process.

FieldGlass has taken the SaaS approach to application development, and instead of one big release every year or two, they’ve moved to a quarterly release cycle where they package smaller, but useful updates every quarter. Their latest release adds or improves on four areas functionality:

  • fine-grained service control
    More granular cost allocation, rate card flexibility and tracking down to GL accounts.
  • time-sheet review process
    The ability to have suppliers and local program managers review time-sheets as part of the approval process so that errors are caught, and corrected, earlier (or, in the worst case, supply managers cannot claim lack of knowledge of deceptive billing as they have to sign off).
  • improved ad-hoc approval support
    Sometimes there’s an emergency where you need someone right away and can’t follow the usual process.
  • decision wizard
    That can be used to guide you through the the process.

It was the last capability that caught my attention. With so many options to choose from in a large company: current approved staffing vendor, new recruiter, direct hire … statement of work, position advertisement, RFX … hourly rate, salary, fixed price contract … it can be hard for someone outside of HR and new to their position to make the right decision. The ability to create company specific decision trees for staffing and hiring allows a manager to walk through a series of Y/N or multiple-choice questions and quickly figure out the route they should be taking, the partner (if any) they should be using, the type of position they should be filling, and how they should be classifying it. This, in turn, allows a manager to focus on finding the right resource, instead of wasting time fiddling with processes, which is what workforce management should be all about.