Category Archives: Procurement Innovation

John Mavriyannakis on the Future of Procurement: Part II

In Part I, we described the 4 major trends affecting Procurement today that were identified by Deloitte in its research and consulting initiatives (and which have been addressed in publications that include “Supply Chain Strategy”, “Winning With Your Supply Chain”, and “Charting the Course: Why Procurement Must Transform Itself by 2020”) that were summarized nicely by John Mavriyannakis, a Senior Manager at Deloitte Canada (and the Practice Leader in Sourcing, Procurement, and Settlement), in his recent presentation on Empowering Modern Procurement that was given as part of the Coupa One Vision Roadshow in Toronto

Specifically, John Mavriyannakis identified the following four trends:

  • Margin Pressure
  • Supply Chain Risk
  • Government Regulations
  • Talent

As a result of these trends, it is clear that today’s supply managers need to:

  • control margin pressure,
  • mitigate supply chain risk,
  • stay ahead of changing regulations, and
  • win the war for talent.

But that’s not going to be enough for a Procurement organization to succeed in the long term in the dynamically changing global marketplace. If they wish to survive, Procurement and Supply Management organizations need to rethink mission and capabilities. Specifically, they need to:

  • get strategic
    and establish a formal organizational presence that ties metrics to company performance,
  • transition
    to re-aligned processes and responsibilities that focus on business outcomes,
  • task talent cross-functionally
    to enhance the procurement capability of the organization as a whole, and
  • tie it all to technology
    that blends service and management tools that are easy to use and that allow for the right level of control.

While keeping in mind that they need to get to the 2020 Procurement and Supply Management organization in just 6 short years (which is no easy feat given that the average transformation time that is required for a Global 3000 organization to become a world class Procurement organization, according to The Hackett Group, is at least 5 years). In 2020, Procurement, according to Deloitte, is going to (need to) be:

  • the keepers of the global supply and demand perspective,
  • the nexus of finance, operations, and supply chain,
  • risk forecasters,
  • the arbiter of risk vs. reward,
  • the value-generation unit that is the treasure trove of ideas, and
  • talent rich.

And SI fully agrees with all but the last of these predictions. In addition, it partially agrees with the last prediction that Procurement is going to need to be talent rich to achieve the goals that are set before it, but given the lack of investment in talent to date in the average Procurement organization, SI isn’t sure that the talent is going to be where it needs to be in 2020. Even though talent has been in the top three Procurement issues for at least the last three years, it’s still in the top three budget items that are cut every year in these tough economic times, even though a small investment in talent can lead to a (very) large return in savings in a Procurement organization. (For example, one of the first companies to certify their entire department with the SPSM designation offered by Next Level Purchasing, a 1 Billion furniture manufacturer, doubled their annual savings only one year after completing the certification on the department level. That’s a double digit ROI multiple in one year! Compare that to the 2X or 3X you might get from automating manual processes.) Basically, the most successful Procurement organizations in 2020 will be talent rich, but the average Procurement organization will be struggling at the current rate of training and talent induction into our space.

John Mavriyannakis on the Future of Procurement: Part I

John Mavriyannakis is a Senior Manager at Deloitte Canada and the Practice Leader in Sourcing, Procurement, and Settlement who recently gave a presentation on Empowering Modern Procurement as part of the Coupa One Vision Roadshow in Toronto. Through its regular CPO Surveys, CFO Surveys, and its Source-to-Procure experience across 1000+ projects for 300+ clients, which made it #1 in the Procurement Consulting provider in the global Procurement Consulting marketplace, Deloitte has built up a considerable understanding of the current state of Procurement [which it has captured in a number of publications, including Supply Chain Strategy (Deloitte), Winning With Your Supply Chain (Deloitte), the CFO Surveys, and Charting the Course: Why Procurement Must Transform Itself by 2020 (Deloitte)].

According to Deloitte, Procurement today is dealing with 4 major trends, which are going to continue for the foreseeable future:

Margin Pressure
Margins are getting tighter and organizations need to be looking at least ten years ahead to determine future (labour) arbitrage opportunities, which are becoming increasingly more difficult to leverage as emerging economies emerge and produce middle classes with higher wage expectations (and transportation costs increase to make up the difference). In addition, the fact that price volatility has increased 57% in the last 12 months hasn’t helped matters any.

Supply Chain Risk
Due to the increasing interdependence and extensiveness of supply chains, risk is increasing, as illustrated byt he fact that 85% of surveyed organizations experienced at least one large scale disruption in the last 12 months. The increased risk is a big issue given that companies announcing supply chain disruptions had a 30% lower supply chain return compared to the benchmark group.

Government Regulations
Regulatory compliance issues have resulted in high-profile, high-cost shutdowns in recent years and with 2/3rds of CPOs admitting that their companies are only in the early stages of compiling information required to meet the recent SEC reporting changes, this is not a good state of affairs as the SEC reporting requirements are only one of a plethora of reporting requirements an international company that is importing and exporting on a daily basis around the globe needs to be compliant with.

Talent
Given that 76% of CPOs feel that their staffs’ skills need improvement or have a significant gap, talent is on the radar in a big way. And not just any talent — with 91% of the 60% of CPOs planning to change their operational model announcing a shift to center-led or centralized supply chain operations, this means that over half of the talent that is required needs to be effective in these type of Supply Management models.

So what does this mean? We’ll discuss tomorrow in Part II.

Vinimaya: Taking Their Procurement Marketplace Global, Part II

In Part I we noted that Vinimaya, despite scaling back on their marketing efforts for about two years, has been hard at work extending their core Procurement Marketplace platform to be a fully-featured Procurement Marketplace platform that fills the gap that ERP e-Procurement solutions leave wide open. Specifically, while the average ERP e-Procurement solution does great when it comes to master data management; workflow, approval, and PO management; and financial system integration; it doesn’t do so hot when it comes to content management, search, ordering, and invoice management. (Just ask vendors like Wallmedien that became the number one e-Procurement provider in Germany by filling in the holes in the SAP e-Procurement solution and Nipendo that is growing fast here in North America by offering an e-Invoice management and automation solution that most e-Procurement solutions are missing.)

The proof that Vinimaya fills the gap is, as they say, in the pudding that a large number of large organizations are eating. The Vinimaya solution, which has had great success in the private and public sectors, and which supports 37 different currencies, is utilized by buyers and suppliers in 13 languages across 80 countries on 6 different continents. That’s pretty damn good for a small company with less than 75 employees headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. Vinimaya’s success is due to the uniqueness it brings to the table. A unique federated search capability, a pure focus on the features other platforms lack, and a rapid implementation timeline (as a customer can go live on already supported supplier [platforms] immediately and most suppliers can be added within 24 hours) are just some of the reasons for their success. Other reasons include the platform’s ability to validate pricing in real time, force compliance if required, track pricing discrepancies, and get an organization’s spend under management.

And then there’s Vinimaya’s new vTransport solution that runs on top of their marketplace. One of the big inefficiencies in most Procurement organizations is invoice management and automation. With no standard means of invoice receipt and management, most large organizations require teams of tactical AP personnel who spend the vast majority of their time simply entering invoices into the payment system and validating basic information. In addition, due to limited manpower, only one in ten invoices gets fully validated and the result is a large number of overpayments, duplicate payments, and fraudulent payments. (There’s a reason that the recovery industry is still thriving and vendors like Lavante are building automated recovery solutions.) Like Nipendo, Vinimaya also recognized this issue and also recognized that many of the invoices are for goods and services requisitioned by organization personnel — most of which, if the solution is fully deployed and effectively utilized, should be bought through the Vinimaya platform.

So they acquired a leading PO and invoice management solution, improved it, and integrated it into their solution. With their new vTransport solution, POs can be delivered to the supplier through their mechanism of choice – XML, EDI, e-Document, supplier network, PDF scan attached to an e-mail, or old-fashioned fax, and then the invoice can be returned to the buyer through their mechanism of choice. And everything can be pulled direct from the central ERP data store and pushed back into the ERP workflow when received. In addition, the POs and invoices can pass through the Vinimaya audit engines which can verify prices and totals and limits to make sure no overcharges or fraudulent invoices get through. While the solution isn’t as extensive as you’ll get from a provider like Nipendo (which also has a print-to-cloud solution and [third-party] I-OCR integration), it’s considerably more extensive than the vast majority of e-Procurement solutions (and definitely way more extensive than what ERP offers) and will give most organizations an 80%+ solution. (The only POs and invoices missing will be for goods and servies not put through the platform – but such requisitions and invoices should be few and far between if the platform is fully deployed.) And the fact that it works with all of the big ERP and AP Systems (including Oracle, PeopleSoft, JDE, SAP, Lawson, Ariba, iValua, Microsoft, etc) out of the box is a big plus for organizations that want a good e-Procurement solution that is going to rapidly get their Spend Under Management (SUM).

Also, as indicated in our last post, the core platform has been extended, the UI has been revamped, and the performance has been accelerated greatly. Like many of the other e-Procurement players (like Coupa and b-Pack), Vinimaya has kept a close eye on consumer search and shopping (cart) technology and has incorporated the best features you’ll find on the web into their platform. Not only can you search all of the catalogs, punch-outs, and marketplaces relevant to your procurement needs in one federated search and dynamically validate the pricing and availability in real time, but you can filter on suppliers, price, and other relevant attributes dynamically, compare items in detailed comparison views, filter preferred items (based on simple or complex rankings) to the top, and track the price (and purchase) history of each item in real-time. Plus, the interface can be configured to each buyer and by each buyer to meet their particular needs.

Vinimaya has also added new quick-order and e-Forms functionality to support regular (re-orders) of products and services from suppliers based on standard catalog numbers (which a buyer probably has memorized) and standard organizational needs. The forms can be used for both simple and complex services, and templates can be pre-configured to meet all different types of service and manpower needs, including janitorial, (simple) advertising, and internal full-time and contingent workforce positions. In addition, buyers can also use them to make free-form requests and send them to the appropriate suppliers using the new quick-quote functionality. While not as extensive as what you will find in the Contingent Workforce or Agency Management solutions, it’s more than enough for most goods-based industries.

And extensive improvements have been made to auditing and analytics, but that, as well as other new development, will be the subject of a future post in this series on Vinimaya’s Global Procurement Marketplace.

Vinimaya: Taking Their Procurement Marketplace Global, Part I

When we last covered Vinimaya, the B2B Search Engine, back in 2008, they were the next wave in product catalogue management. Remembering that Networks are ok. Catalogs are Good. Punch-outs are Better. But Agents are King!, we noted that Vinimaya was the first solution that did real-time federated search across all of your supplier databases, catalogues, and punch-outs through a single consumer-like search and shop interface.

And, unlike other procurement enablement solutions of the day, a buyer could be up and running in a day with all suppliers that provided formatted catalogues, standard punch-outs, or industry standard APIs and the majority of remaining suppliers could be brought on with about one day’s worth of effort due to their extensively configurable agent architecture specially designed to integrate with punch-outs, catalogues, EDI, XML, marketplaces, and industry standard database APIs. And even the 25% of suppliers that did not fall into the quick enable category could typically be enabled in 3 to 5 days.

The solution was the first to give the buyer total control over access, view, and pricing with their local pricing and audit engine capabilities. Marketplace pricing could be over-riden with contract pricing if and when required. And the platform worked beautifully. In 2008, their five largest implementations supported over 30K users and allowed hundreds of suppliers to be searched simultaneously through one federated view.

But Vinimaya didn’t stand still. While they may have had a brief hiccup on the marketing side during 2009 – 2011 due to management changes and the relocation of corporate headquarters, product development kept on trucking and since then have built a large number of new and impressive features and capabilities on top of the industry leading procurement marketplace technology that Vinimaya built between 2003 and 2009. (One has to remember that Vinimaya was the first vendor with [patented] federated search back in 2003, the first “simple search” of all content sources, the first forced ranking solution for products and searches across all content sources, and the first to offer real-time audit of pricing across punch-out supplier search results. In addition, it is now the first solution SI has seen that offers universal search results and shopping from within your ERP e-Procurement solution.)

On top of their base platform, that supported content management, federated search, powerful connectivity options, personalization and customization, globalization, and an easy to use shopping cart with authentication and single sign on, user roles and permission, Vinimaya has added (more extensive) auditing capability, workflow-based catalog management, quick-quote (RFX) capability, e-Forms, deep analytics capability, mobile capabilities, and social integration as well as a new transport framework for managing Purchase Orders and Invoices. In the posts that follow, we’ll dive deeper into these new capabilities and the strides Vinimaya has made over the last four years.

Early Payment Discounts vs. Early Payment Rebates

Are we dealing with six of one and half a dozen of the other? After reading “The Art of the Play” (PCubed.com), I have to wonder.

They are different in that you get one right away and you get the other later, and they are different in that one is just a reduction in spend and the other can be treated as an income stream, if the CFO so desires, but in the end they both have the same effect on the bottom line — less spend.

So why would an organization favour one over the other when the big difference is capturing the savings now versus capturing the savings later? If the organization was limited in cash and was trying to maximize savings, then capturing the savings right away would definitely make more sense, but if the organization was flush with cash and the supplier offered tiered rebates that improved with volume, then the organization might want to wait until later. Otherwise, the doctor can’t see much of a difference.

However, one area where there is a big difference is paying for a platform vs. paying for a service, especially for a big company. For example, the Oxygen Finance model described in the article is to provide you with a service where you pay up to 50% of the discount or rebate captured by transaction. While this is a good deal for a mid-sized company that might not have the up-front cash required to implement the end-to-end e-Procurement solution required to effectively take advantage of discounts and rebates offered by suppliers for quick payments, this can be a very expensive solution for a large enterprise. Consider a company that spends 250 Million a year, the low-end of the market for Oxygen Finance. If the average rebate is 1.5%, and you give one third of that up to the service provider, then the organization is paying 1.25 M a year for the solution, and only achieving a 2X ROI.

A company of this size can acquire a SCF solution for a fraction of this cost and realize a much larger ROI.

When you dive in, you realize that there are only three reasons most companies can’t create or take advantage of most of the early payment discount and rebate opportunities available to them:

  1. Invoices aren’t getting in the system fast enough
    because most of them are coming in as (e-)paper.
  2. Approved invoices aren’t getting to AP fast enough
    because routings for approval take too long.
  3. Procurement doesn’t have the manpower to negotiate rebates on 100% of spend
    because there are too many suppliers.

And while these were valid problems a few years ago, without (m)any real solutions (that an average organization could afford), today:

  1. An organization can acquire a SaaS end-to-end invoice automation framework, such as the one offered by Nipendo, that will convert all incoming invoices into one standard e-format for six figures.
  2. An organization can acquire a number of rules-based e-Procurement and invoice automation solutions (including Nipendo‘s) that will automatically approve and route all error-free invoices that match a PO or contract to the AP system and route those that require manual correction or approval to the right individual for online (e-mail) approval.
  3. An organization can see significant returns addressing only 80% of the spend which is typically with less than 20% of the supply base.

An organization that takes this approach can typically acquire a solution for (much) less than 500K a year, save 1.5% on 200 M of spend, and see a (minimum) 6X return, which is the return you should be looking for from an e-Procurement solution.

Maybe there’s another reason for a large enterprise to go transaction-fee SaaS for discount and rebate management, but if there is, the doctor ain’t seeing it — and he’s been covering SCF for years. As far as he is concerned, the sweet-spot for transaction-fee SaaS for discount and rebate management is the 50M to 250M range, because the implementation cost of the necessary end-to-end e-Procurement, invoice-Automation, and SCF solution isn’t that much cheaper for a mid-sized organization than for a Global 3000, and at less than 200M of addressable spend, the ROI multiplier starts to drop considerably.

Any differing opinions?