Category Archives: Vendor Review

The Sourcing Maniacs 2008 Vendor Tour Part X: Iasta

In our last installment of the 2008 Sourcing Maniacs Vendor Road Tour, the maniacs had just finished talking with a somewhat contemplative looking gentleman from GDM somewhere near Denver, Colorado. We rejoin them shortly after their conversation with the somewhat contemplative looking gentleman from GDM.

Today’s post is a little lengthy, so it’s broken up into Interlude and Inquiry, which contains the vendor content.

Interlude

Yakko, Wakko, & Dot We dig dig dig dig dig dig dig
through our data the whole day through
To dig dig dig dig dig dig dig
is what we really like to do
It ain’t no trick to get rich quick
If you dig dig dig with a shovel or a pick
In a large data mine! In a large data mine!
Where a million diamonds shine!
Dot Where Next?
Wakko I think it’s called e-Sourcing Place now.
Dot sneering
Wakko!
Wakko Sorry!
Dot Any more G’s?
Yakko Lots of services companies! Global Procurement Group (Global Supply Training). Global Sourcing Specialists. Greybeard Advisors.
Dot Can you think of any technology companies?
Yakko Besides Google, not today.
Dot So on to the H’s then.
Yakko Hiperos?
Dot SRM. Hmmm … let’s file them under services for now.
Wakko Hyperion?
Dot Oracle, remember?
Yakko I guess we’re skipping the H’s too this time around. Where do we start in the I’s?
Dot I seem to remember this punky little upstart by the name of Iasta from our Ariba days.
Yakko I heard they were just 4-guys in a garage with a simple e-RFX tool.
Dot Well, that’s what we used to say they were. But when was the last time we actually paid any attention to them …
Yakko Uhm … err … I can’t remember.
Dot Neither do I! Should we check them out?
Wakko Well, I seem to recall the doctor mentioning them quite a few times on SI … there must be something to them.
Dot Might as well go for it. And with our e-Sourcing background, maybe we’ll even understand what they do!
Wakko So where are they?
Yakko Indianapolis, I believe!
Wakko Race car city! Cool!
Yakko Super Overdrive!
Wakko Wakko breaks out his best rendition of Super Overdrive by Billy Idol.

 

Inquiry

  The maniacs head off towards Indianapolis, on the scenic route. We catch up with them again a few days later.
Dot This is it. I hope they talk to us!
Yakko Their CEO is a blogger, and they sponsor the e-Sourcing Wiki, which hosts some of the best wiki-papers in supply management that you’ll find anywhere. I’m sure they’ll talk to us.
Wakko Wakko breaks out his mini-mallet.
Let’s find out!
Wakko taps on the door.
A minute later, a smiling man with a moustache steps out.
Wakko Who are you?
Smiling Man I’m the CEO of Iasta.
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot And we’re …
CEO The Sourcing Maniacs.
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot You know of us?
CEO Yes. I’ve read about your exploits, and Eric Strovink from BIQ warned me that you were making the rounds.
Dot Well, hopefully you’ve only heard good things about l’il old us!
CEO Checking that the door behind him, and more importantly, to the server room, is locked (see Where Pinky and the Brain Devise a Plan to Market Their Strategy for a reason why).

What I’ve heard varies. How can I help you?

Wakko What do you do?
CEO e-RFX …
Yakko yawn
CEO e-Auction …
Dot looking very bored
CEO Smart Optimization
Wakko Com-bin-a-tore-e-ul Op-ti-my-za-shun?
CEO Yes Wakko, we do strategic sourcing decision optimization … and we think it’s one of the best solutions out there. And we do Contract Management …
Dot perking up
CEO and we’re in the process of preparing our first Supplier Relationship Management release, better known as SRM.
Yakko Really?
CEO Really. And when you add in our built in project management and our Smart Analytics solution, based on BIQ’s leading spend analysis product, you see that we have one of the most complete end-to-end e-Sourcing suites on the market.
Dot So you go head to head with Ariba and Emptoris?
CEO All the time!
Yakko And win?
CEO More often than you’d be led to believe!
Dot How often?
CEO Let’s just say that we have well over 100 global customers, many in the Fortune 500, and that both our annual North American User Conference and our annual European User Conference are very well attended by happy customers who enjoy learning how they can do even more with the platform they have already bought, and at a very attractive price point I might add.
Wakko How attractive?
CEO We’re a True SaaS provider, so we are very competitive with our basic solution prices.
Dot Under a Million?
CEO We start at under one hundred thousand a year for our entry-level solution.
Dot shocked
Under One Hundred Thousand?
CEO Yes Dot, under one hundred thousand for our basic Smart Source solution. You don’t have to buy everything to start, and even if you do, unless you also buy a considerable amount of services support for your organization, it’s still under the seven figure mark that you liked to charge.
Dot still shocked
How do you make money?
CEO Economies of scale enabled by SaaS, and smart spending. We eat our own dog-food and follow our own advice. We keep our costs reasonable, which allows us to give our customers good service at a great price, and in return we keep them. We believe we have one of the highest customer retention rates in the sourcing space. But I’m sure you’re not here to discuss our success stories. What would you like to know?
Yakko How you’re different.
CEO Well, we think our product is better than our competition, but if you limit yourself to a “check-the-box” comparison, as so many analysts are prone to do, you’d see that our major solution differences when we are compared against your average sourcing vendor are our strategic sourcing decision optimization and supplier relationship management capabilities. These go well beyond your standard bid-negotiate-award-track capabilities found in your average e-RFX, e-Auction, and Contract Management applications and allow you to focus on identifying the best value for your money and then ensuring that the savings you negotiated, and contracted for, are realized.
Wakko But don’t a number of companies claim to have Op-ti-my-za-shun?
CEO Very few have true optimization, Wakko. Most just use heuristic decision support algorithms that they try to pass off as optimization. We use true Mixed Integer Linear Programming and best-of-breed industry solvers, like ILog CPlex, underneath a true strategic sourcing decision optimization model that meets ALL of the requirements outlined by the doctor in the wiki-paper.
Wakko And that’s important because?
CEO Because you need all four types of constraints — capacity, allocation, risk mitigation, and qualitiave — and costs — unit, usage, and freight — to accurately model your average real world sourcing scenario. Otherwise, the scenario you end up with is only approximate, which means the solution is only approximate, and, if you missed key constraints, not realistic. Without all of the constraints, and some “competitors” only provide a subset, you either get a result that’s too good to be true, and is, because you can’t implement it, or the result isn’t as good as you can get, because you couldn’t specify all of the constraints and discounts.
Wakko And it works?
CEO Remarkably. As covered in recent posts by the doctor on Sourcing Innovation and our own e-Sourcing Forum, we’ve had two events where we’ve saved over 20M on two projects of roughly 80 Million and 110 Million, respectively. We also find that we do hit the industry average of 12%+ above and beyond e-Auction savings alone when we apply the technology.
Yakko It must be hard to use. You need a team of PhDs to drive it, right?
CEO Not at all! It’s quite easy … your average intermediate buyer can drive it very successfully after just a few hours of training. You create the constraints using wizards and english sentence fragments. You can import the cost data from Excel or from your e-RFX. You can create a new what-if scenario by copying an existing scenario and changing only what you want. Your power-users will teach themselves to be experts in the tool in a matter of hours. I bet even you could use it Wakko.
Wakko But I don’t know how to do Com-bin-a-tore-e-ul Op-ti-my-za-shun!
CEO You don’t have to. Our tool does all the heavy lifting. If you can fill in a spreadsheet, use drop downs, and enter numbers in web-based text-boxes, you can use it. It’s really that easy.
Wakko Wow!
Yakko And what about SRM. Is that easy too?
CEO As you would say, yassuredly.
Dot So what’s it do?
CEO It’s still in development, and we’re aiming for a late 2008 / early 2009 release, but what it’s going to do is streamline data capture and sourcing processes for the buyer and supplier alike. The first addition to our suite is a new supplier self-registration portal, backed up by a workflow-driven custom survey development tool. This pair of tools, the first for the supplier and the second for the buyer, is going to allow a buyer to define what information they need from every supplier, and then what information they need from suppliers in certain verticals and / or what information they need from suppliers who wish to supply certain types of products or services to the buyers. Then, when a supplier logs in and enters their basic information, as well as specifying the products or services they offer, they only have to fill out the surveys specific to them.

The survey construction tool, which will look similar to those who have tried our relatively new contract management tool, is based on the same underlying concept that the user should be able to define what fields, and meta-data fields, are of interest and allow the buyer to define what information they want, and how they want it. In addition, our survey construction tool, which builds on our RFX creation abilities, allows a user to define survey pages, and then makes uses of wizards to guide the buyer through survey construction. And, of course, all of this data is indexed, searchable, and easily managed. Furthermore, as with contract management, the buyer can define triggers on certain events (survey completion, changes to key data fields, etc.) and certain values (expiry dates, renewal dates, etc.) which will send off alerts or e-mails when certain events happen or certain actions need to be taken.

Dot Well, that sounds pretty common sense. A few companies have that already. How’s it different?
CEO What’s different is where we’re going with it and, most importantly, the approach we’re taking. We realize that the “R” in SRM stands for “relationship” and that is something that can not be accomplished with software-based tools alone. You can only have a relationship if there is interaction between the buyer and supplier on a regular basis. This means that there are only two ways a tool can help: enable communication or disable the roadblocks that prevent it. The most common roadblocks are the various tactical tasks that keep getting in the way, specifically, the tasks around collecting, organizing, tracking, and reporting on data.

Thus, in our view, a good SRM tool enables communication — and that’s why we’re building a new supplier portal, starting with our registration site — and centralizes all of the tactical data collection, organizing, tracking, and reporting in one location for the buyer — and that’s why we’re building a new supplier administration module, starting with surveys and scorecards, that is integrated with the rest of our suite, including contract management and meta-bid enabled optimization, which will allow the buyer to track agreements, expirations, certifications, insurance, and performance data in one place. Sometime next year, the tool will also allow senior buyers to define workflows around supplier contracts and interactions, which will guide the buying team through the organization’s best-practice supplier interaction processes. And we’re also building in new commodity-based classification hierarchies that will allow buyers to better segment their supply base and define hierarchical scorecards by commodity category and location to help them get a better view of total operational performance and how a supplier is impacting that.

Dot And it’s all going to be integrated in one platform?
CEO Seamlessly. Unlike our competitors, who have been on acquisition binges for the last decade, we built everything from the ground up on one platform, in one core language. That allows us to seamlessly integrate all of our products into one application in a way that most companies would envy. That’s why we think our SRM will succeed where many have failed before. It may not have all of the bells-and-whistles of some of the best-of-breed stand-alone products, but we believe it will have the core functionality that everyone needs, plus provide the advantage that you only have to deploy one platform. It’s the classic 80/20 rule — 80% of the functionality, for 20% of the cost, and effort, for our customers. When the full platform is released next year, we believe that the majority of customers will find that it does more than what they need. And that’s what we feel the market needs.
Yakko That’s a very interesting take.
CEO And a practical one. Most of the mid-market just needs basic functionality in sourcing and procurement to get through the day. There’s only a few Fortune 500 / Global 2000 companies that are advanced enough to productively use every bell and whistle you can imagine. We’d rather serve the 90% of the Fortune 500 / Global 2000, and, more importantly, the mid-market at large, who have been underserved for years due to the big-platform price tags that have traditionally put the traditional e-Sourcing platform solutions out of their reach.
Wakko I think I get it. 20% of the Fortune 500 would give you 100 companies, and it’s hard to get 20% of the Fortune 500. But if you got 10% of the Global 10,000, that’s 1,000 companies, and there are still 9,000 other companies who need a solution, and a lot fewer companies serving them.
CEO That’s right, Wakko. It’s about building a great company with a great tool that brings great value to, and enables, the mass market. That’s what we’re shooting for. And we think we’ll get there. And with that, I must get back to work. Have a good day.

 

The Road Tour will continue on Thursday.

 

The Sourcing Maniacs 2008 Vendor Tour Part IX: Global Data Mining

When we concluded part VIII of the Sourcing Maniacs Vendor Road Tour, the Maniacs were in Chicago visiting FieldGlass (acquired by SAP), a provider of contingent workforce management and services procurement. We join them a few days (or so) later, somewhere in Colorado.

(But you can skip the mischief and jump straight to the mining* if you wish. [* indicates content])

Mischief

Dot The Rocky Mountains. Awesome!
Wakko I can go rock sliding!
Dot I think we should keep going.
Wakko Where?
Yakko To GDM.
Wakko Who?
Yakko Global Data Mining (acquired by CUSTOMS Info, acquired by Descartes). the doctor recommended we pay them a visit.
Dot What do they do?
Yakko I guess they do data mining, globally.
Dot That’s not very Web 2.0. It sounds… passe.
Yakko Well, we thought “spend analysis” was dull too, then we talked to BIQ and we found out differently.
Dot That better be the case. I love the Rockies … but it’s been an awfully long trek from Chicago … mostly through the middle of nowhere … with no shopping!
Wakko Why have we stopped?
Yakko I’m not sure which way to go.
Wakko We were in Chicago, Illinois, We’re headed toward Denver, Colorado, so we have to go slightly South and to the West.
Yakko temporarily stunned by the fact that Wakko just had an intelligent thought
…. OK!
Dot (singing)Off to the Global Data Mine
Yakko To see what we can find
Wakko When we start to dig
  we join the maniacs a few hours later
Yakko I think we’re here.
Dot Looks kind of small. Is this another one of those micro-operations organized as a virtual organization?
Yakko I believe so.
Wakko I’ll knock!

Wakko breaks out his new mini-mallet, a “friendly” replacement to the traditional mallet he used to use, which had a tendency to leave large dings, and flared tempers. As Wakko raises his mallet, the door opens … a somewhat contemplative looking gentleman, looking somewhat hurried, steps out.

a contemplative looking gentleman, looking somewhat hurried, steps out.

Yakko Is this GDM?
Dot Can we ask you a few questions?
Gentleman You’ll have to make them quick … on my way to the airport …
Editor’s note: presumably in preparation for GDM’s next webinar on its new Web-Based Classification and Data Management System, taking place on November 6, 2008, with online registration.

 

Mining

Wakko No problem. What’s Global Data Mining?
Gentleman Excuse me? Why would you be looking for GDM if you didn’t have some idea what it is?
Yakko Well, we know that data mining is the art of searching your data for patterns and insights, and we know that global means world, which tells us that global data mining should simply be searching your data sets from around the world for patterns, but we don’t get how it’s any different from what you do with traditional business intelligence or spend analysis systems and why a company like yours would even exist.
Dot We were told we needed to check you out, but we don’t know why.
Gentleman By who?
Yakko the doctor
Gentleman And you are?
Dot The ‘Ribas! I’m Dot!
Yakko I’m Yakko.
Wakko And I’m Wakko!
Gentleman Well, here’s the rub. Global Data Mining is exactly what you think it is … mining your data for patterns and insights that you can act on to make good business decisions that will cut costs, increase revenues, and keep you compliant with government regulations. What you need to know about Global Data Mining is that it’s not about the technology … you can use existing off-the-shelf technology to do what we do (though not as quickly or efficiently, but that’s beside the point) … but about the understanding of what data you need, how you look at it, and how you find opportunities that traditional, canned, analyses miss.
Wakko I don’t get it.
Gentleman Ok. Let’s start with something simple. Taxation. Do you know how much you’re paying?
Yakko With a good spend analysis tool, the calculation is a snap.
Gentleman Correct. But do you know how much you should be paying?
Dot What do you mean? It’s just added to the bill.
Gentleman But is it the right rate?
Wakko What do you mean? Isn’t it just a flat rate.
Gentleman Yes it is … usually … but how much do you know about HTS codes and other import tariffs?
Yakko Doesn’t the supplier or 3PL take care of that?
Gentleman Often they do, but you’re the one who should be worrying about it!
Dot Why?
Gentleman Because a misclassification can often cost you a couple of percentage points, which can translate into hundreds of thousands of lost revenue on a large order.
Yakko How does that happen?
Gentleman The consumer goods world moves at a fast pace. For example, how often do you replace your cell phone?
Wakko Well, I replace mine every few days …
Yakko That’s because you do zany things like taking it with you for a swim … whereas I usually get almost a year out of mine.
Gentleman And how often do you think the HTS is updated?
Dot Uhm … well …
Gentleman Major updates only happen once or twice a decade. But it’s often a judgment call by an ill-informed packing clerk that dictates whether a product falls under code X or very similar code Y. If the product is classified as code X, and should be classified as code Y, and code Y is 2% cheaper and no one catches it on a million dollar order … how much do you lose?
Dot 20,000 … or enough for 10 new top-of-the-line Prada bags …
Wakko or a new Prius!
Gentleman Precisely. Given that the HTS is extensive … with well over 20,000 basic classifications, and that your average clerk might not know the difference between an iPod, an iTouch, and an iPhone, you should be able to see that the average company makes numerous errors each year … anywhere from a few dozen for a small importer to thousands for a large global multi-national. Those misclassifications add up fast.
Wakko How fast?
Gentleman Not that long ago, we did a study for a three billion dollar global apparel company and found that they were overpaying $161.5 Million a year in duties and taxes. That’s 5% of their revenue. Wasted.
Dot I could buy my own high-end fashion company for that!
Wakko And I could finally buy a lifetime supply of baloney!
Yakko So, you help people find tax savings.
Gentleman Yes, but that’s just part of what we do. As per our messaging, we help companies with high-value global trade-business build effective trade databases and conduct comprehensive auditing of their global trade processes that they can use to detect savings opportunities above and beyond simply volume-based leverage and reclamation of overpayments.

For example, we’re currently working hard on helping companies prepare for 10+2. Without a game plan, that’s going to cost companies a lot. A recent Supply and Demand Chain Executive titled “10+2 Whats a US Importer To Do?” article estimated that the new 10+2 program, which I discussed in a recent article on Sourcing Innovation, is going to cost importers between 390 million and 690 million dollars. And this is just the start. Did you know that if you fail to comply with the Importer Security Requirements that you have to pay liquidated damages equal to the value of the merchandise in default? So, if you’re importing $250,000 worth of goods, and don’t file properly, that could be an automatic $250,000 fine. And it doesn’t matter whether you made the error or the freight forwarder you employed to handle the shipment for you made it.

Yakko Yikes!
Gentleman Indeed. And we also offer a host of other services, like two-way matching audits where you can identify potential discrepancies between invoices and actual receipts; forensic supply chain analyses to help you determine your global trade options — and whether proposed FTZs, SPPs, and re-routings can help you save money; and compliance reviews … which are described in detail in the numerous publications and articles that are freely downloadable from the resource library on our website.
Wakko You just give that information away? For free?
Gentleman Of course. If you don’t know that you have a problem, you don’t know you need a solution. And if you don’t understand the complexity of the problem, you don’t know why you need our solution, which is more than just consulting. We’ve developed custom tools, based on best practices that we have evolved over our collective decades and decades of experience, that streamline the process and go beyond what standard BI and spend analysis solutions do out of the box. We’ve tailored our solution to global trade needs. That’s what we’re all about. And with that, I must bid you adieu as I have a plane to catch.
The gentleman, now more hurried than before, rushes off to his vehicle.
Dot And I always thought EDI was enough for global trade!
Yakko And that there was no way to find savings in the tax department.
Wakko Maybe global sourcing is as whacked as I am!
Yakko I don’t know about that … but it’s certainly more complex than we thought it was … and I’m starting to realize that just one solution might not be enough to fully address global sourcing!
Wakko I guess my mallet isn’t enough anymore!

 


Editor’s note: Wakko’s right. The days of the mallet and the carrot are over.

At this point, we’re going to break again.  When we continue, we’ll discuss the maniac’s excursion to Indianapolis and what they learned from Iasta.

The Sourcing Maniacs 2008 Vendor Tour Part VIII: FieldGlass

In yesterday’s installment, we jumped ahead in our story and recounted the Maniacs’ failed attempt to infiltrate Empower and find out what Emptoris is really up to, whether or not they’re going to go public soon, and what their plans are in their quest to become the largest sourcing provider in the space. In today’s installment, we recount the maniacs’ visit to FieldGlass (acquired by SAP).

Today’s post is a long post, as it recounts the “rationale” the maniancs used in selecting Fieldglass, a lenghty definition of what contingent workforce manaagement is, as the maniacs apparently had no clue, and then a detailed description of Fieldglass’ capabilites. I’ve broken it into Preamble, Lead-In, CWM Definition*Technology*, and Epilogue so that you can jump to the part you’re most interested in, where * indicates content,  if you’re short on time (and come back later for the rest).

Preamble

Yakko, Wakko, & Dot Oompa Loompa Doom-pa-dee-do
Yakko I have a great product for you
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot Oompa Loompa Doom-pa-dee-dee
Dot If you are wise you’ll take a look-see
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot Oracle‘s fine when you have lots of cash
It stores all your data and caches it fast
But when you’re cash-strapped, you’re hung out to dry
To watch the vultures circ’ling high
Wakko Up in the dark’ning skies
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot Oompa Loompa doom-pa-dee-dar
But now there’s Coupa, you can go far
You will buy in happiness too
Like the Oompa-Loompa doom-pa-dee-do
 
Dot the doctor sure knows how to write a catchy tune!
Wakko I could sing it all day long. ‘Cause I wanna go to the Coupa Store!
Dot So where are we going next?
Yakko I guess we’re on the D’s.
Wakko Who do we know who starts with D?
Yakko Demica.
Dot Supply Chain Finance, right?
Yakko Yep.
Dot Well, the innovation there is in the application thereof, and not necessarily in the technology, as the doctor explains nicely in the wiki-paper, so I’ll pass this time around, since we’re more focused on technology right now.
Yakko No prob. We can always do a services company tour later if we don’t find any jobs before this tech tour is over. How about Descartes?
Wakko The “delivery management” company. That’s just combining 3PL with VMI and network op-ti-my-za-shun, right?
Yakko I think so, but I’m not 100% sure.
Wakko I’ll pass for now. Too complex for me! I still have problems with 5 by 5 … I run out of fingers and toes …
Yakko Hmmm … Denali?
Dot Consulting, market intelligence, and professional placement. Again, services.
Yakko Well, dat does It. I’m out of D’s. On to the E’s!
Dot I have a sour taste in my mouth for the E’s right now.
Yakko And there’s a chance we can sneak into Empower in the fall and find out what Emptoris is up to. Ok. On to the F’s. Frictionless?
Wakko Aren’t they just a bunch of saps?
Yakko Excuse me?
Wakko Didn’t SAP buy them?
Yakko Oh, you mean S-A-Ps. Yes, you’re right! Fogbreak?
Dot Again, back in California. Too soon to go back.
Yakko FieldGlass?
Wakko What do they do?
Yakko Contingent Workforce Management.
Dot And where are they?
Yakko Chicago.
Dot That’s not too far.
Wakko Wind! I like wind! Let’s go!
Dot And since we have a mighty hike ahead of us …
the maniacs are still in Pittsburgh, PA, where they were visiting Co-exprise before doing their on-line Coupa research
let’s sing!
Wakko It was just yesterday, I ran out of feed
Dot A wascally wabbit, it ate all my seed
Yakko Hens were getting restless, I couldn’t drink my mead
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot I logged into Coupa, and it met my need
  Editor’s note: the maniacs proceed to sing all of the Coupa songs, repeatedly … and even though I think they’re pretty damn good (after all, I wrote them), they get a little tiring after you’ve heard them for the tenth time … in a row … so I’ll save you a few pages and simply point you to Davie and the Coupa Factory, It’s Coupa Time, The Coupa Hoedown, The Coupa Drinking Song, and The Coupa Store if you’re curious.

 

Lead-In

Wakko Feel that wind! We must be getting close.
Yakko Pretty darn close, actually!
Dot So why are we here? After all, isn’t contingent workforce management simply contractor management? And when you need a contractor, don’t you just call up your placement agency and get one? What’s so hard about that? And why would you need a software solution?
Wakko Quoting?
Dot e-RFX.
Wakko Billing?
Dot e-Invoicing.
Wakko Payment?
Dot e-Payment.
Yakko Firing?
Wakko Donald Trump!
Yakko Were we too hasty in selecting FieldGlass as our next target? Were we swayed by the possibility of an excuse to visit the windy city
Wakko so I could fly my kite
Yakko and not by whether or not the technology might have something to offer, making the company viable, and, thus, increasing the chances that there might be a job for us?
Dot Maybe. I’m starting to wonder about this decision.
Yakko Well, we’re here … so we might as well give them a shot!
Wakko On it!
Out comes Wakko’s mini mallet. Tap. Tap. Tap.
See, no dings!
  A man in a blue suit and dark jacket opens the door.
Dark Jacket Can I help you?
Wakko I’m Wakko!
Yakko I’m Yakko!
Dot And I’m Dot!
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot And we want to know why we’re here!
Dark Jacket Now that’s a very difficult question, and one I leave to the philosophers. I’m a technology guy myself.
Yakko What we mean is, why is FieldGlass here?

 

CWM Definition

Dark Jacket To provide a unified, best-of-breed, contingent workforce solution.
Dot But why? Isn’t contingent workforce management simply contractor management? And when you need a contractor, don’t you just call up your placement agency and get one? What’s so hard about that? And why would you need a software solution?
Dark Jacket No, and no. Why are you here?
Yakko We’re seeking enlightenment. We’re trying to find out what various solution providers offer the sourcing world.
Dark Jacket To what end?
Wakko Well, we’re trying to map the new sourcing world to find our place in it
Dot and help the doctor in his quest to educate the masses.
Dark Jacket The Doctor? I’m sorry, but you’ve lost me.
Yakko the doctor of Sourcing Innovation informed us that the best way to find our place in the sourcing world was to understand it, and the best way to understand it was to go and talk to the innovative vendors and find out what they were doing. And if we did that, we could help him in his mission to educate the sourcing world, which he says is a win-win for everybody.
Dark Jacket Sourcing Innovation … I think I’ve heard of it. It’s one of those upstart blogs, isn’t it?
Wakko It’s not just any blog … it’s the best blog if you want to learn about innovation in your supply chain.
Dot And it publishes our stories! How can you beat that!
Dark Jacket So you want me to explain what FieldGlass does?
Yakko And why anyone would need a contingent workforce management solution. Especially in supply chain. It really sounds like a simple HR tool to me.
Dark Jacket Well, it sounds to me like you don’t understand the problem. Would you like to?
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot Yes, please!
Dark Jacket OK … give me a few minutes.
  Dark Jacket disappears back inside and re-emerges a few minutes later.
Dark Jacket Since you say you’re familiar with Sourcing Innovation, we’ll start there. I did a bit of research, and found a number of informative articles on the site that frame the problem quite well, and which should allow me to convey the purpose of the FieldGlass solution to you in a manner that will be easy for you to understand.

We’re at the beginning of a talent crunch that will surpass anything the world has ever seen. Over one quarter of America’s population, and well over one third of America’s workforce, is eligible, or will soon be eligible, for retirement. The vast majority do necessary jobs. Where are their replacements going to come from?

Yakko New Graduates?
Dot Other countries?
Wakko Robots?
Dark Jacket Nope. Nope. And Nope. There aren’t near enough graduates to fill all those empty positions as American’s youth is declining. Remember, it’s the boomer generation that is retiring and birth rates have decreased since then. There are strict limits on how many people can enter the US each year to work. If we are lucky, and the incoming administration doesn’t lock down the borders even more, over the next five years, the government might permit 1% of those jobs to be filled with foreign workers. And that might be an optimistic scenario, especially since most countries around the globe are suffering talent crunches as well, and some are worse off than we are! Finally, although Disney’s Imagineering leads us to believe that it won’t be long before Robo can do all of our jobs for us, the AI that would be needed is likely still decades off so robots won’t save us either.
Yakko So we’re doomed?
Dark Jacket Only if we continue with the traditional mentality that all workers must be full time employees. The fact of the matter is that, at least to a limited extent, the vast majority of the American population, almost 80% in fact, is able to contribute to the economy in some way, shape, or form. Furthermore, if we add up all the available capacity that is going unused in the traditional employment model, we find that, at the very least, we can make a major dent in the talent crunch … and maybe even halt it altogether (at least for the time being).
Dot So how should we be thinking?
Dark Jacket Part-time. Flux-time. As needed. As available. Pre-graduate. Retiree. Disabled. Telecommute.

Many people retire because they are forced into it (because of organizational policies, especially in the public sector), because they don’t want to work full time anymore, or because they are unable to do the job they were doing, be it due to failing health or lack of education and training, and not because they want to sit on their porch and stare into space. Many of these people want to keep being productive, they just want to do it less, and maybe do it from home. And they’re great resources. Their valuable experience can be used to mentor junior employees, which helps them become better, more productive employees, faster; to improve processes, which will help the organization do more with less; and to guide management around pitfalls and traps that they know are there in the market, which can prevent the current generation from repeating the mistakes of its predecessors.

And with the high and steadily rising costs of education these days, as well as the desire to be part of the consumer economy, more and more high-school and college students are seeking part time work. Not only are they a great resource to help you with the escalating amounts of tactical work many business face in today’s economy, but utilizing them in positions that correspond to their course of study helps prepare them for full time work when they graduate.

Yakko And that’s why we need contingent workforce management?
Dark Jacket It’s one of the reasons. As I have just described, organizations can not rely on full time labor alone. In addition, the need for temporary contract labor in the services industry is going to increase as lack of talent and market forces dictate less full time employees and more contract labor. And from a business perspective, without a contingent workforce management solution, you can’t have an effective talent management program, and this costs your business money. Lots of money.
Dot How much?
Dark Jacket It depends on the company. But if you look at our Verizon Case Study, readily available on our website, you’ll see that Verizon achieved a four-month payback, 9M in savings in the first year, and a 2 year ROI of 77% after implementation of our InSite solution.
Yakko That’s a lot of cash!
Wakko So how come my wireless bill is so bloody expensive?
Dark Jacket You’ll have to take that up with Verizon, I can only tell you how contingent workforce management saves you money.
Dot So how does it do that?
Dark Jacket Simply put, it streamlines the contingent labor requisition process, simplifies the identification of resources, automates the distribution of requests, standardizes resource rates, automates the collection of quotes, tracks awards, and insures that companies always bill at the approved rate and only for approved hours on approved projects. This reduces recruitment costs, reduces processing and payment costs, and, most importantly, prevents overcharges and overpayments, which often total 20% or more at companies without contingent workforce management solutions.

 

Technology

Yakko And how does your InSite solution enable Contingent Workforce Management?
Dark Jacket Simply put, we enable the end-to-end contingent worker life-cycle, from acquisition, through onboarding, through management and payment, to offboarding, with complete historical data storage to allow you to repeat the process in the future for the same employee, same position, or same department as needed.

We do this with an application that has fully customizable workflows that support the hiring manager, approvers, HR coordinators, suppliers, and workers in each step of the procure-engage-pay-offboard cycle, to whatever level of support and detail they need.

Our application simplifies the definition and setup of a requisition, which, when driven off of a pre-configured template, will automatically populate the job title, description, department, job site, travel requirements, full position description, desired skills, approved rates, default suppliers to issues the requisition to, job status, and any other detail that is relevant to the job posting. All a hiring manager has to do is define the desired start-and-end dates and, if she desires, modify default settings and requirements if the position requires some customization. Once the requisition is completed, pre-configured rules route it to the appropriate approvers, and once it is approved, it is delivered to the appropriate suppliers using multi-tiered supply based rules that can give preferred suppliers or minority suppliers of contingent labor the ability to bid first.

Once the supplier submit candidates, the hiring manager can then use the tool to shortlist candidates (or block them from consideration), select candidates for interviews, record the interview results, select a candidate for hire, send a work-order to a supplier, and then, when the supplier accepts the work-order, “hire” the candidate.

Dot Well, that’s kind of what we’d expect a workforce management tool to do. But what’s so special about it? How does it help procurement? Why can’t we just use Word, Excel, e-Mail, and a File Server.
Dark Jacket That’s a mouthful!

Let’s start with the last question. Theoretically, you could create your template job descriptions in Word and your rate-cards in Excel, store them on a Central File Server, and then, every time you need to fill a new job, create a copy, send it out through e-mail, and store the specific instance somewhere else on a file server. And maybe if you’re a small company who only hires a few contingent workers a year, and you were very methodical, you could make that work for you. But what if you hire 100 contingent workers a year in 20 different positions. How easy do you think it would be to keep track of all the different paperwork? Let me ask it this way, you used to do Contract Management right?

Yakko Right.
Dark Jacket And for your average company with more than 500 active contracts without a contract management solution, what was the average level of contract management maturity.
Dot The average company couldn’t even find its contracts!
Dark Jacket So how well do you think the average company who has to hire hundreds, or thousands, of contingent workers a year, where each worker has her own contract, fares?
Dot Not very well.
Dark Jacket And that’s fundamentally why you need a contingent workforce management solution if you have to hire a lot of contingent workers each year.

Now, the reason it helps procurement is that it stores all of the information, including rate information, billed hours, and budgetary information in one place. This allows procurement to get up to date information at any time as to how many contingent workers in each category are hired each year, on average, and how much is being paid, on average, for each position. Procurement can use this information to initiate fact-based negotiations with contingent labor-suppliers to get better rates. Then, procurement can turn around and compare invoices versus approved rates, hours, and expenses and make sure that each worker is being paid at agreed upon rates, and no more, and that unapproved expenses are never paid. Furthermore, they can configure rules that will prevent managers from approving payments that are outside of approved rate or expense bands or that would cause a budget to be exceeded. It gives them the insight into contingent workfoce spend that they’ve never had before without this type of tool.

Dot I get it now. So what’s so special about your tool. We know other companies offer workforce solutions, and we’re wondering what sets yours apart.
Dark Jacket As you can see, it’s very easy to use and guides a user through the process.
Wakko Even I can use it, so I’ll give you that. But most tools are getting easier to use every year. Why should I use yours?
Dark Jacket I could tell you about the hundreds of little usability features we’ve crammed into this tool that make it as easy to use as Google for our average user, but instead I’ll tell you about how we think we’re really different.

Our tool, which supports over 80 Fortune 2000 Global Multi-nationals, was built to be a global tool. That means that we’ve localized it for over 30 countries …

Dot But isn’t that just changing the unit of currency and supporting different languages? If you use Java, that’s easy to code these days.
Dark Jacket It’s much more than that. When I say we’ve localized it, I mean that we’ve configure it to take into account all of the standard business practices, taxation requirements, and legal requirements of each country in which our customers have deployed it. For example, workforce management in Europe is considerably different than in the US. When you bid a rate, you have to break it down into base pay, benefits, travel, per-diem, etc. in Europe. Furthermore, you have different taxation requirements to track and different legal issues to watch out for when onboarding and offboarding. Our tool customizes its workflow and data capture to each country it is used in. And to make sure we do it right, we retain over 20 international law-firms around the globe to keep us up to date on changing requirements and ensure we go above and beyond the requirements when we enter a new country on behalf of a customer.
Wakko So I could hire a vinyard worker in France to hand pick grapes for me and be certain I was following all the rules?
Dark Jacket If you wanted to …
Wakko Awesome!
Dark Jacket That’s what we think of our tool, which can be delivered pure SaaS, and which we improve upon every day. In fact, we now not only do contingent workforce management, but we also do direct hires and service management against projects. And we also have a new InSite Visualizer tool that can be used to generate business intelligence on all of the data the tool collects and present the user with trends and patterns that emerge over time. This way they can accurately predict resource costs over the next contract cycle before entering into a negotiation or compare their data against industry average benchmarks to see how well they’re doing. This is on top of the dozens of standard reports, as well as the ad-hoc report generator, that is built into the tool and the workflow.
Yakko Contingent workforce management is sure a lot more involved then we ever thought it was!
Dark Jacket It truly is … and that’s why your standard direct goods procurment solution you get off-the-shelf won’t work and why you need a customized solution.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a workforce management platform to improve. Good day.

 

Epilogue

Dot That was a learning experience!
Yakko I guess it is a lot more involved than just telling HR to “get me this resource by Monday”.
Wakko I’ll say. So where are we going next?
Dot We’re on the G’s.
Wakko Didn’t the doctor recommend someone else?
Yakko I think so. Just a second.
Yakko takes out his notebook. GDM … Global Data Mining.
Dot What do they do?
Yakko BI, maybe? I don’t know. So let’s go!
Wakko OK. So where are they?
Yakko Just outside of Denver, Colorado I believe.
Wakko All right! We get to see the Rockies! Let’s go!

 

The Sourcing Maniacs 2008 Vendor Tour Part VI: Coupa

When we left the Sourcing Maniacs, they had just finished learning about Co-exprise and Sourcing Lifecycle Management. We join them wandering the streets somewhere in Pittsburgh, PA.

Yakko Enterprise Cost Management and Predictive Analytics.
Wakko True Spend Analysis.
Dot Sourcing Lifecycle Managment.
Yakko The Sourcing World is sure a whole lot bigger than we ever thought it was!
Wakko Maybe it was good we got canned.
Dot We’d never have learned all of this if we were still locked in the corporate boardroom.
Wakko So where next?
Yakko Good question! Do we stay with the C’s or move onto the D’s?
Dot I’m curious what that little upstart by the name of Coupa is up to.
Yakko So am I. When they first appeared, I remember we laughed about the idea of an on-demand SaaS e-Procurement application … but after everything we’ve learned so far on this journey, I’m thinking that maybe we wrong and they were right … that maybe new technology is the future of e-Procurement, not legacy behind-the-firewall ERP add-on technology.
Dot After all, new best-of-breed sourcing technology appears to be revolutionizing sourcing, so maybe procurement can be revolutionized as well!
Wakko So where are they?
Yakko I think they’re back in California!
Dot I don’t want to go back to California just yet.
Wakko So what do we do?
Yakko They’re SaaS … and I hear they’re covered regularly by new media – so that should mean that everything we need to know is online. Let’s use the web! I think that’s a cyber-cafe up the street.
  The maniacs enter the cyber-cafe.
Dot So where do we start?
Yakko Coupa.com, of course!
  The maniacs go to Coupa.com and start surfing.
Yakko Wow … what a diverse customer base. Government organizations, science institutes, universities, mid-size companies, even a hockey team.
Dot Multiple major releases a year … I remember that sometimes we couldn’t even get one major release out in an 18-month period!
Wakko And look at that Pricing! It’s even more insane than I am! How can they possibly start at only $295/month and make money? We’d be losing money hand over fist at $2995/month if we were still at our old job!
Yakko Must be something to do with SaaS. Let’s read more about that.
Yakko surfs.
Here’s a great article by the doctor on the e-Sourcing Wiki. According to the article, SaaS allows for great economies of scale, a single multi-tenant instance, and a total cost of ownership that is much, much lower than the traditional on-premise model that we used to promote. Plus, as per this article I found on Sourcing Innovation, they deploy on the Amazon cloud that allows them to keep their infrastructure overhead ridiculously low and only pay for the computing resources they use.
Dot Is on-Premise really that much more expensive? I thought we had a great TCO in the old days.
Yakko I just found this great on-premise vs SaaS TCO calculator on the Coupa site that allows you to factor in license, support, upgrade costs, database costs, application server costs, implementation costs, and annual internal support costs for an equivalent procurement system and it’s surprising. If you managed to score a great deal and get an installed e-Procurement license for only 50K, with an annual industry average support fee of about 20K, and get it installed for 25K, and your tream trained for 25K, your first year cost would be $158,000 and your five year cost would be over $350,000! On the other hand, an enterprise level coupa license for a mid-size business with 1000 users, that costs about 17K with equivalent training costs, if my math is right, would only cost $42,000 the first year, and have a five year cost of only $110,000 … which is less than 1/3 of the five year cost for an on-premise application.
Wakko Wow! That’s less than my annual baloney bill!
Dot And what I spent on Gucci when we had a full time job!
Yakko I guess SaaS really stands for Sumptuary Allowances Actuate Savings!
Dot You’ve been reading the dictionary again, haven’t you?
Yakko It’s almost as interesting as the Universe.
Wakko But I thought you already knew all of the words in the English language!
Yakko I did … but they keep adding more! Did you know that almost 20,000 words are added per year?
Dot Plus all the ones you invent!
Yakko Yassuredly.
  At this point the sourcing maniacs really get off topic and start arguing how many parts of the brain it takes to source, so we’ll skip ahead until they get back to their Coupa discussion.
Dot So what we we doing before Wakko demonstrated how to eat sphaghetti with chopsticks?
Yakko Investigating Coupa I believe.
Wakko And their wacko pricing that’s less than my annual baloney bill!
Yakko And SaaS … which appears to totally rock …
Wakko … almost as much as I rock America!
Dot So, I guess the big question is … at that price, does it do what it needs to do?
Yakko Well, according to the doctor, who wrote an introductory e-Procurement Wiki Article, e-Procurement has up to 9 steps, with the first seven being key: requisition, authorization, purchase order, receipt of goods, invoice, reconciliation, and payment.

Now, according to the Coupa site, it supports requisitioning, multi-level rules-based and workflow-based authorizations, purchase order management, goods receipts and inventory management, invoicing, and integration with existing platforms which allow you to do reconciliation and e-payment.

Dot Shouldn’t it do reconciliation and e-payment?
Yakko Considering that the data you need for reconcilation is probably in your ERP or CM system anyway, built in reconcilation probably isn’t that important, and considering that not only do many companies use AP systems to pay, but that most e-Procurement platforms don’t include a built-in e-Payment mechanism, and simply interface with external e-payment systems, it looks like it’s pretty competitive.
Wakko Okay … there’s got to be something missing at that price! We would have charged $500K a year for this back in the day!
Dot Heck, we would have tried for a million! Gucci and Prada ain’t cheap, you know.
Yakko I guess we’ll just have to try it out!
(Coupa has a 30 day free trial!)
  Silence ensues for about 15 minutes while they try it … all of it … out.
Yakko That was …
Wakko, Yakko, & Dot Awesome!

Editor’s Note: For more information about Coupa, see this list of indexed posts.

Also, since I’m a little tired of typing, we’re going to break for a week or so … and pick up where we left off early next month.

The Sourcing Maniacs 2008 Vendor Tour Part V: Co-exprise

When we left the Sourcing Maniacs, they had just finished learning about BIQ (acquired by Opera Solutions, rebranded ElectrifAI) and the true meaning of spend analysis. We join them wandering the streets of Southborough, MA.

Yakko, Wakko, & Dot We’re the sourcing-maniacs
We’re zany to the max
We lost our pay-to-play contracts
Without a job we can’t relax
We’re sourcing-maniacs!
Wakko & Yakko Come join the ‘Riba Brothers
Dot And the ‘Riba Sister, Dot
Wakko, Yakko, & Dot Just for fun we ran around the corp’rate parking lot
They locked us in the boardroom whenever we got caught
But let us loose from the caboose
And now you know the plot!
Wakko So where are we going next, Yakko?
Yakko I don’t know, but I think we should move onto the C’s.
Dot Any cool C companies nearby?
Yakko None that I know of. I think they’re all in Pennsylvania, Illinois, or California.
Dot Well, we’re from California.
Wakko And I always thought Illinois was a railroad!
Yakko So Pennsylvania it is!
Wakko Pennsylvania is a railroad, too!
Dot So who’s in Pennsylvania?
Yakko If I recall correctly, CombineNet and Co-exprise.
Wakko CombineNet? I don’t think we’re smart enough to work for them. I still have problems with double-digit multiplication, I couldn’t do com-bin-a-tore-e-ul op-ti-my-za-shun!
Dot I guess it’s Co-exprise. What do they do?
Yakko Something called SLM.
Wakko Sea Level Measurement? In Pennsylvania? Cool! Do they have any yellow submarines?
Yakko I think it stands for Sourcing Lifecycle Management.
Wakko Oh. Well, maybe they have some baloney sandwiches. I’m hungry!
Dot You just ate two servings of Boston Baked Beans, drank enough tea for a party, and finished it off with an entire Boston Cream Pie!
Wakko I know … but I’m always hungry for baloney sandwiches.
Dot So which way to Pennsylvania?
Yakko Yakko licks his finger, sticks it in the air, and pauses.
This way!
Dot Let’s go!
  As per their nature, they start to sing.
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot We’re off to see Co-exprise
We’re gonna get our exercise
As it’s 600 miles away
But we’ll learn about SLM
And if it has a hidden gem
And how it can help you save
  The song goes on for a few hundred more versus which somehow manage to include references to roman aqueducts, visitors from Beetlegeuse Seven, South-going Zax, and something called PffT, which I always thought was the sound my cat made when she was cross. Including it herein would be almost as bad as subjecting you to Vogon poetry, so we’ll skip ahead to when the Sourcing Maniacs land in Wexford, PA.
Yakko, Wakko, & Dot We’re the sourcing-maniacs
Wakko Brooktree Road! I think we’re almost there!
Dot I see lots of office buildings!
Yakko This must be the place!
Dot Do you think they’ll talk to us?
Yakko Why wouldn’t they?
Dot They’ve been in stealth mode, hardly talking to anyone in the media besides the doctor and …
Wakko And?
Dot It looks like this place is access-controlled.
Yakko Well, rumor has it that a number of big companies that have DoD contracts are considering using Co-exprise’s solution. Companies that do military projects have to insure their suppliers have a basic level of data security in place, at least SAS 70!
Wakko Do you think anyone from the military could be in there now?
Yakko Relax, Wakko. I’m sure the military has forgotton all about that little incident where you mistakenly procured a real Tomahawk missile instead of the model rocket you were coveting.
Wakko But I almost blew up the valley!
Yakko But you can’t aim. It harmlessly exploded in the ocean. No harm done.
Wakko But the General said …
Yakko Look, someone’s coming out. Maybe we can talk to them out here. Would that be okay with you?
Wakko Ok …
Yakko Hi, I’m Yakko. Do you work for Co-exprise?
Man-in-Black Yes, I do. Yakko … Yakko … why do I know that name?
Dot I’m Dot.
Man-in-Black Dot. Hmmm. Wait a minute, you’re the Sourcing Maniacs!
Yakko & Dot That’s us!
Man-in-Black I heard you were let go from Ariba a while back. Sorry to hear.
Yakko & Dot Well, can you at least tell us about SLM and what you do?
Man-in-Black Man-in-Black pauses and thinks for a bit.
Well, we have been slowly spreading the SLM message, which we believe is the first major revolution to hit the direct sourcing space since one of our founders co-invented the reverse auction at GE, and we do want to get the Co-exprise message out when the time is right, so I’ll make you a deal. You promise to keep things under your hats for a couple of months, and I’ll tell you about the future of direct sourcing. Deal?
Yakko & Dot Deal.
Man-in-Black Wakko?
Wakko Wakko, who has somehow developed a fear of all men dressed in black, looks out from behind Yakko.
Yes, sir?
Man-in-Black Is it a deal?
Wakko Yes, sir!
Man-in-Black OK, follow me.
Dot Where are we going?
Man-in-Black The coffee shop on the corner. The most discreet place is a public place.
Man-in-Black So, do you know what Sourcing Lifecycle Management is all about?
Dot Managing the e-RFX and e-Auction process?
Man-in-Black Well, that’s what many people think, but it’s much more than that.

Many providers, particularly those that only service the indirect sourcing space, believe that sourcing starts with an e-RFX or auction for a commodity, results in a contract, and ends with order delivery. But things aren’t so simple in the direct space.

In the direct space, the lifecycle starts way back at new product design as you are sourcing not a pre-defined commodity part, but a custom-made part. You have to insure that the design is appropriate with respect to the capabilities of your potential supply base; you have to insure that the raw materials are available, in the requisite quantities, at the appropriate times, in the manufacturing regions; and you have to make sure that the projected cost does not exceed the maximum cost that would make the end product viable for sale in your target market. You also need to collaborate with your supply base in the design, as needed, to optimize the design for production.

Once you have the design, you need to go through a negotiation and collaboration intensive sourcing process to select one, maybe two, suppliers who will manufacture the part for you. This involves the sharing of confidential information, which needs to be done in a secure manner, as well as collaboration on forecasts and target delivery dates.

Once you have an award, you have to manage the procurement, which usually has to coincide with the procurement of other custom parts, which have to hit a single location at the same time for integration into the final end-product, which then has to be packaged and shipped to the end customer. This involves coordination between manufacturers, 3PLs, assemblers, and end retailers. Plus, you still have to insure prices are contract prices, charges are valid charges, and that the i’s are dotted and the t’s crossed, as you would in indirect procurement.

As you can see, whereas indirect sourcing can often be accomplished with just e-RFX, e-Auction, and Contract Management — with Spend Analysis and Decision Optimization for higher-value projects — direct sourcing requires extensive integrated project management capabilities, product lifecycle management, collaboration capabilities, Bill-of-Material management, and the ability to easily integrate with third party platforms.

Yakko, Wakko, & Dot We … we … never knew.
Dot We always thought it was just e-RFX, e-Auction, and good data management.
Yakko & Dot So how do you do all that?
Man-in-Black With a great code-base, of course! Although I have to be really careful with what I say now, especially until our next release hits beta later this year and hits full release late this year or early next year, I can tell you a few things that are already more-or-less public knowledge.

First of all, our platform is entirely new, built from the ground up to handle the direct sourcing process, which our senior management and developers are intimately familiar with. This allows us to do things that retrofitted indirect sourcing platforms can’t do.

Second, we have our own universal data model that underlies our application and it can integrate with data in over 1500 different formats.

Third, we have PLM built in at the core, and this allows us to enable direct sourcing professionals to track a project from beginning to end and always access the most recent data, regardless of which module they are in.

Fourth, we have fine-grained security that allows us to assign access permissions down at the data element level that indicates who can see the data, where (by IP), when, and how they can access it (read-only, view-only, etc.).

Fifth, we’ve integrated a compliance tracking module that allows companies to track regulatory requirements such as REACH, ITAR, etc. from product inception to product end-of-life, and insure that such requirements are met at every stage of the sourcing process.

Sixth, we’ve re-invented “spend analysis” for direct sourcing. Although I can’t say anything yet … we’re still finalizing the initial product offering and working on getting our first beta projects under way, I can say that our founders and developers have been involved with spend analysis since the days of FreeMarkets, and know why traditional “spend analysis”, developed in the indirect world, just doesn’t cut it in the direct world.

Dot Can we see it?
Man-in-Black Definitely not.
Yakko & Dot Can you tell us more about it?
Man-in-Black Not yet. But you’ll be able to read all about it soon enough.
Dot When?
Man-in-Black When the story hits the blogs. We’ll show the right people at the right time. Right now we’re totally focussed on getting the next release of the product out and pleasing our current customers, who include some of the bigger names in manufacturing, and getting beta projects underway at some of the biggest names in manufacturing.
Yakko & Dot Until then?
Man-in-Black You go on your merry way. Have a nice day.
The man in black gets up and walks away, leaving the Sourcing Maniacs speechless, again, as their view of the Sourcing World broadens with each vendor they talk to.