Daily Archives: April 17, 2007

JVKG … Who?

SpendMatters unveiled its new sponsor today, the JV Kelly Group, a professional services firm headquartered in New York that specializes in developing and implementing innovative spend management solutions and effective, measurable procurement results that Jason Busch has called a best-kept Spend Management secret.

All I can say is that thanks to their innovative investment in the supply and spend management blogsphere, the cat’s out of the bag now. Within a week, I’m sure everyone, or at least everyone who matters , will know who they are – especially with five or so webinars lined up covering best practices in the sourcing and spend management space over the next three months.

If your organization is looking for a way to boost name recognition in the supply and spend management space, and to play a part in the community as well, I’d like to remind you that Sourcing Innovation sponsorships are now available and that there is a slight advantage to being the first to commit (as your logo will be the only logo until subsequent sponsors sign up).

As far as I can tell, this is the only daily blog left in the space that is independent – most of the other independent bloggers got scooped up last year by leading, forward thinking organizations and most of the other daily blogs are now not only vendor sponsored, but vendor operated. This is an opportunity to think different.

The World Economic Forum’s Global Risks 2007 – Part II

Expert opinion suggests that levels of risk are rising in almost all of the 23 risks on which the Global Risk Network has been focussed over the last year – but mechanisms in place to manage and mitigate risk at the level of businesses, governments, and global governance are inadequate.
      Global Risks 2007, World Economic Forum

In addition to identifying 23 core global risks of an economic, environmental, geopolitical, societal, and technological nature that no global organization can afford to ignore in its risk planning and risk mitigation efforts, this report also offered the “5 Pathways” to mitigation.

  • Improving Insight

    Move risks from the unknown to known through research.

  • Enhancing Information Flow

    Allow information to flow effectively between decision-makers and those experiencing the risk first hand to provide early warning, inform the public, and exchange best practice.

  • Refocus Incentives

    Create incentive frameworks that allow decisions to be made to reduce risks.

  • Improve Investment

    Provide the investments necessary to mitigate risks.

  • Implement Through Institutions

    Improve the framework needed to mitigate risks for which an institutional response is required.

The report also pointed out which risks are reduced by each of these mitigations.

Risk Insight Information Incentives Investment Institutions
Oil Price Shock / Energy Supply Interruption       X   X   X
US Account Deficit   X         X
Chinese Economic Hard Landing   X         X
Fiscal Crisis Due To Demographic Shift       X   X  
Excessive Indebtedness   X   X      
Climate Change   X     X     X
Loss of Freshwater Services   X     X     X
Tropical Storms   X   X       X
Earthquakes     X   X     X
Inbound Flooding       X   X   X
Terrorism   X   X       X
Proliferation of WMD       X     X
Interstate and Civil Wars         X   X
Failing States   X       X   X
Transnational Crime   X     X     X
Retrenchment from Globalization   X     X     X
Middle East Instability       X   X   X
Pandemics   X   X       X
Infectious Diseases (Developing World)   X       X   X
Chronic Diseases (Developed World)     X   X    
Liability Regimes   X     X    
Critical Information Infrastructure (CI) Breakdown   X   X      
Nanotechnology Risks   X   X      

They also provide two possible institutional innovations for managing global risks.

  • Country/Chief Risk Officer

    In the public sector, governments would appoint a single Country Risk Officer, prioritize risks on a cross-sectional basis, and explore private sector techniques of risk assessment, management, and transference. In the corporate sector, the Chief Risk Officer would be responsible for all categories of risk, risk reporting, consolidation, and aggregation.

  • “Coalition of the Willing”

    Different groups of countries / corporations would come together in a non-exclusive fashion to create a system of flexible geometry to mutually mitigate risks.

Lastly, although not specifically mentioned in the report, you can address each risk on an individual basis using reason, logic, and common sense to develop appropriate mitigations, which will be the subject of Part III.