A recent article by Alexander Arsath Ro’is of Benefit, an Amsterdam Procurement Consulting Company, provided 7 tips on how to align procurement with the boardroom that are worth a second look. Based on research they conducted with two Dutch universities, which led to the construction of the Benefit Boardroom Alignment Assessment Methodology, they concluded that the following best practices would benefit any company that wants to align procurement with the boardroom and wants to start with an accurate assessment of the current state.
- Tell the Board First
Make sure your Board understands the challenges before you start an assessment of your current state.
- Be Absent from Assessments
This will allow the CEO, CFO, COO, and other CXOs to speak freely about their expectations of Procurement.
- Put Your View Across
Initiate dialogue with the Board to challenge views in a positive way and talk about opportunities that will arise from a proper alignment.
- Remember, It’s a Start
Alignment isn’t a precise measure — it’s a way to get perceptions in tune with reality.
- Ascertain What Others Want
The goal is to be on the same page with what the Board expects and what your internal customers want.
- Create Understanding
Effective alignment will only result when Procurement fits with the rest of the organization.
- Ask: Are You Ready
An assessment won’t help if the organization isn’t ready for an accurate assessment of where things are and isn’t willing to do what’s necessary to get where it needs to be.
Share This on Linked In
Everyone should read this recent article in Strategy + Business on Virtuous Connections that presents a case study on how local “fixes” that don’t take into account dependencies can actually result in global “breakdowns”. The article, which presented a case study from a large chemical manufacturer, described how numerous attempts to “fix” existing supply chain issues resulted in the creation of additional supply chain issues that were even worse and more costly.
For example, the article describes how:
- they focussed on pallet standardization, only to find no performance improvement because being able to load a pallet faster doesn’t help much if the products aren’t ready when you need them;
- they installed a system-wide network that couldn’t handle the volume of incoming orders because management underestimated the range and volume of the company’s channels; and
- they tried outsourcing warehousing, which made matters worse because their software didn’t integrate with the 3rd party’s software.
But when a more holistic view was taken and Supply Chain focussed on:
- segmenting customers by strategic importance, which allowed reps to give customers a more realistic picture;
- eliminating rogue stock-replenishment processes by replacing them with new, standardized processes dictated by a properly selected and calibrated inventory system; and
- including risk constraints in schedule production that took into account order complexity, which greatly increased schedule predictability,
the results were astonishing. Inventory on hand decreased by 20 percent, shipment costs stabilized in a period of rising fuel prices, and stock-outs fell by 50 percent — resulting in exponential gains.
When they failed to look at the big picture, intended “improvements”, including the selection and integration of expensive new systems, had disastrous consequences because their “side effects” were never taken into account. But when they analyzed the system as a whole, even minor changes had major positive impacts. You need to look at your supply chain as a whole, and select systems that allow you to analyze the supply chain as a whole. Otherwise, that “fix” might introduce a fatal flaw!
Share This on Linked In