Monthly Archives: June 2009

One More To Go and Technology and My Hobby Attains Seniority

Over on New Florence, New Renaissance, Vinnie Mirchandani’s Technology and My Hobby series recently received its 64th submission, putting it one post away from seniority status. For those of you looking for something different, but yet interesting, to read … if you haven’t already, you should check this series out. To help you find the guest posts related to your hobbies, I’ve indexed them in alphabetical order by category.

Category Author Company
Archaeology (Armchair)
More Essays
Michael Lamoureux (of Sourcing Innovation)
Baseball (Little League) Mike O’Brien (of Appirio)
Basketball Coaching Dan Dal Degan (of Salesforce)
BBQ Floyd Teter (of Jet Propulsion Labs)
Beagles Peanuts
Blood Donation Tom Foydel (of SightLines)
Brewmastering (Home) Dennis Howlett (of ZDNet)
Bridge David Dobrin (of B2B Analysts)
Cars (Tinkering) Brian Sommer (of TechVentive)
Cartoons (Tech Toons) Alvaro “Blag” Tejada Galindo (of SAP)
Cats Rusty Weston (of Third Set Media)
Chess Rita Mirchandani
Community Service (Long Distance) Will Scott (of Waer Systems)
Cycling Paul Wiest (of Siemens Enterprise Communications)
Disney World Jim Holincheck (of Gartner)
Fishing Mike Prosceno (of SAP)
Friends Naomi Bloom (of Bloom & Wallace)
Flying Ameed Taylor (of Applation)
Gardening Erik Keller (of Wapiti LLC)
Gastronomy William Mougayar (of Eqentia)
Golf Jim Rafferty (of Market Shapers)
Grandparenting Frank Scavo (of Computer Economics)
Green Living Timothy Chou (of Cloudbook.Net)
Harmonica Leonardo Kenji Shikida (of Vetta Labs LTDA)
Home Design Josh Snowhorn (of Terremark)
Home Improvement (Global) Helmuth Guembel (of Strategy Partners)
Home Movies Tom Wailgum (of CIO Magazine)
Jazz Radio DJ Jim Berkowitz (of CRM Mastery)
Horses (Low-Tech) Mark Galloway (of oppSource)
Martial Arts Harald Reiter (of SSIP)
Model Planes Anil Wats (of DP World)
Music (as a Second Career) Richard Hunter (of Gartner)
Musical Discoveries Mike Laven (of Traiana)
Jazz (Big Band) Joe Thornton (of Lawson Software)
Opera Guenther Tolkmit (of Lawson Software)
Organ Playing Gerlinde Gniewosz (of Zuztertu.com)
Photography Michael Krigsman (of Asuret)
Reading Francine McKenna (an Author)
Restoring Antiquarian Books Jason Busch (of Spend Matters)
Rifles (Target) Tom Ryan (of Gartner)
Rock (Guitar) Devan Sabaratnam (of Business on Software fame)
RVs Tom Chimera (of Overpayment Recovery Services)
Running Eric Dirst (of DeVry)
Sailing Curtis Beebe (of PwC)
Side-Tripping Kimberly McDonald Baker (of Project Partners)
Photography Michael Krigsman (of Asuret)
Singing (Soprano) Gretchen Lindquist (of SAP Security)
Skiing Sig Rinde (of Thigamy fame)
Snorkeling Louis Columbus (of Cincom)
Soccer Coaching Christian Schuh (of Siemens Enterprise Communications)
Squash Nick Dembla (of Capsilon)
Super Momming Joy Wald (of ADT)
Technology Impact Bob Warfield (of SmoothSpan)
Technology Luddism Josh Greenbaum (of Enterprise Application Consulting)
Tennis Karen Beaman (of Jeitosa)
Theatre Marilyn Pratt (of SAP Labs)
Travel (International) Harish Malani
Vinyl DJs Ray Wang (of Forrester)
Wine John Dean (of ex-Steelcase fame)
Woodworking Jeff Nolan (of Venture Chronicles (.com))
Working Out Larry Dignan (of ZDNet)
Writing Charlotte Otter (of Charlotte’s Web)
Writing (Adventure) Rein Krevald (an Author)
Youth Science Mentoring Charlie Bess (of EDS)

Spreadsheets are not a Global Trade Management Solution

Share This on Linked In

Hiring expert compliance professionals and sending them to training seminars and conferences to keep them on their edge is laudable, but it’s not a solution if they return to a workplace that relies on the totally inadequate compliance tool known as the spreadsheet. Spreadsheets, designed for simple accounting calculations, might be reasonable for forecasting and budgeting, but they were never designed for applications that required advanced data management activities, including trade compliance demands, especially when the mere act of sorting can corrupt all the data in the spreadsheet.

That’s why I was very pleased to see these facts echoed in a recent Industry Week article on Global Trade Management (GTM) technology that was “a call to action to importers and exporters”. Good GTM, which delivers tangible ROI, enhanced revenue, and more efficient internal processes, overcomes the failings of spreadsheets and greatly reduces the risks of non-compliance (which can include massive fines and penalties).

Furthermore, GTM can allow importers to maintain more control over the process. They can verify classifications, insure filings are made on time, and track VAT that your company may be eligible to reclaim. GTM also gives importers and exporters:

  • advanced cost-estimation capabilities,
  • a complete archive of electronic filings at their fingertips,
  • automated transaction processing, and
  • true global visibility, where real-time visibility and exception monitoring allows problems to be solved before they become catastrophic.

For more information on the importance of global visibility, see the Illumination on why you need trade visibility and the white paper on why you need to close the loop with entry visibility.

7 Reasons Why Organizations Need a Global Classification Platform

Today’s guest post is from Clay Perry, SVP of Global Markets, of Integration Point, Inc.

It’s more than just an item master. It’s definitely more than just a spreadsheet. A Global Classification platform includes various and multiple forms of classification data, stores required documents, provides up-to-date trade content, and provides a centralized, web-based solution that all trading partners can access. Having trouble selling the need for a Global Classification platform internally? Below are 7 great reasons why any organization needs, and can benefit from, a Global Classification platform.

  1. Centralize product databases
    By consolidating all product classification databases into a central, shared repository, you eliminate the all too common practice of using spreadsheets to manage a company’s multi-national parts list. As a result, the centrally controlled classification database reduces errors, increases internal and external communication, strengthens compliance, and improves the timeliness of the information shared with external trading partners.
    (Remember, up to 90% of spreadsheets contain non-trivial errors.)
  2. Increase visibility
    Managing all classification data in one location provides visibility into when additions, changes, or deletions to the classification data repository are made.
  3. Improve compliance across the supply chain
    Providing on-demand availability to the classification database via the web ensures that every trading partner has access to, and uses, the same classification data at every stage in the supply chain.
  4. Minimize risks and/or delays in the supply chain
    Having the correct classification data in an easily accessible platform reduces the chance of shipments being delayed in Customs resulting in demurrage and other late fees.
  5. Share classification data to maximum compliance in other trade areas
    Involving members from various areas within the organization — from the shop floor to shipping department to accounting — provides better classification data. By collecting input, facilitated by an online tool, you ensure that all product data used for classification determinations is thorough and timely.
  6. Demonstrate reasonable care
    Complying with government regulations, such as the Modernization Act for US importers, is required by all importers and exporters. This means organizations must show they demonstrated reasonable care when deploying a solution focused on managing and maintaining accurate classification data.
  7. Manage trade preference programs applicability
    Utilizing a Global Classification platform, organizations eliminate the possibility of missing duty savings opportunities caused by not flagging the products in the classification database and sharing that information with Customs Brokers that these products are eligible for Free Trade Agreements.

Thanks, Clay.

For more information on closing the loop with entry visibility, see the white-paper. For more information on why you need trade visibility,
download the Sourcing Innovation Illumination on Why You Need Trade Visibility.

Panjiva Was Right — It is Doom and Gloom!

Share This on Linked In

If you’re been following Panjiva, namely their blog, their press releases (sign up at your own risk), or their twitter feed, you know that they’ve been preaching doom and gloom for months where global trade and supplier viability is concerned. Well, this has been backed up by a recent CPO Agenda survey, summarized in their recent article on “balancing the cost-risk equation”, that found that nearly half of the respondents have already experienced the bankruptcy of at least one key supplier since the year started and that over three quarters are (very) concerned about the prospect of other key suppliers going out of business before the year is over.

In plain English, if you haven’t lost a key supplier yet, it’s just a matter of time before you do. The only question is, will you know which one before the shipment fails to arrive and the line goes dead?

The Best Vendor Selection Checklist the doctor Has Ever Seen

Share This on Linked In

Integrated Solutions recently ran a fantastic article that had a very simple 3-point “Vendor Selection Checklist” that is undoubtedly the best I’ve ever seen for determining whether or not a vendor should make your short list. Although you should go through a long and detailed solution review before initiating a long term relationship with any vendor where enterprise software and services are concerned (due to the amount of money involved and the fact that your business could literally be riding on the success or failure of the systems and services you’re contracting for), you don’t want to go through that process unless there is a very good chance that the vendor is stable, in it for the long-haul, known for good solutions and service, and willing to work with you.

Although I would not have believed it before recently, I have to admit that this very simple 3-point checklist is sufficient to weed out many of the vendors who would not make your final cut if you went through a longer process. So without further stalling, here it is.

  • Do They Advertise?
    The author of the article asks would you purchase a new car or HDTV from a company you never heard of? (No.) So why should you buy software for your business from a company you never heard of? (You shouldn’t.) Well, even more relevant is the fact that in tough markets, there is a strong correlation between those companies who are constantly advertising (especially on new media) and those companies who are doing well, and an even stronger correlation between those companies who have not been advertising for the past year or two and who are now in a difficult financial situation. A significant number of the smaller companies in this space (including some of the more innovative companies that have been profiled on this blog) are not in the best financial shape right now. A number have not only had to cut NPD budgets, but had to layoff staff (and, in a few cases, between 30% and 50%.) Most of these companies have not been advertising (either because they thought their money was better spent on NPD, because they thought they couldn’t afford it, or, in some cases, because they thought they didn’t need to) over the past two years. Right now, where this space is concerned, if they’re not advertising (in the trade pubs, through professional organizations, on the blogs, etc.), I’d say there’s a 4/5 chance that either they’re not that strong financially, or at risk of becoming not that strong financially with even a small shift in the market breeze. Out of sight, out of mind is never more true than it is in a down market (where everyone is overworked or operating in panic mode and without the time to search out for solutions they haven’t heard of).
  • What do your peers say?
    Find out who their customers are, narrow the list to those in related verticals who have been customers for at least a year or two (so the “blush” has left the rose), and talk to them. If the general consensus is not reasonable satisfaction, chances are, in this economic climate, some of those customers won’t be renewing, and in these times, that will probably put the vendor in a tough financial situation, which will make it difficult for the vendor to support you.
  • What do the experts say?
    Advertising tells you that they’re likely stable (but be sure to ask focussed questions during your detailed review), and your peers tell you that you’re likely to receive good customer support (as long as you insure they have the expertise you need), but you still need to insure that the solution is solid before you spend a lot of effort investigating it. Look at what your favorite bloggers and analysts have to say before investing too much time on a detailed analysis. If it’s a good solution, it should have at least a few rave reviews from trusted experts in the space.

Like I said … it’s a great list that can save you a lot of time as you can use it to weed out vendors who aren’t worth a detailed analysis.