Monthly Archives: June 2015

Real World Analytics – It All Depends on the Domain

Another book that was published late last year, and that has been sitting on the doctor‘s stack for review since about then, is Real-World Analytics by Michael Koukounas. the doctor has to admit that he was a bit hesitant to review this (and then lost it in the stack) because, as he just finished explaining to yet another individual before penning this post, Spend Analysis is not the same as Data Analysis, and that’s why so many companies without any understanding of the unique requirements of spend analysis for Sourcing and Procurement (who hire hard-core computer scientists who write trite like Spend Analysis: The Window into Strategic Sourcing (which is about the only book the doctor has ever reviewed that he has completely shredded) that, as it’s title suggests, gives you a cloudy window view that doesn’t give you the full picture (and often causes you to make the wrong assumptions about what is going on in the house).

But the doctor will have to admit that if you take this book as it is — a guide for building the foundation to do analytics (and not a guide for how to do them, which requires a completely different guidebook), it does a decent job. And the author — who is obviously an expert in data analytics in the Finance and Banking industry where a lot of effort goes into loan return models, credit risk prediction, and currency fluctuation models — really knows the core foundations for performing analytics quite well and does a great job discussing them.

As the author describes in various chapters, there can be no successful analytics, data nor spend, without:

  • Good Data Access
    and a Data Management Team
  • Talent
    as analytics cannot be automated
  • Operational Knowledge
    and, in particular, operational knowledge as it relates to the domain
  • Appropriate Trade-Offs Between Efficiency and Creativity
    and fine-tuning to the audience
  • an Analytics Continuity Plan
    in case something happens to top talent
  • the right teams …
    data management, analytics development, and analytics maintenance
  • … and the right team sizes
    since core development will usually only require a small team (because once the up front models are developed / implemented for the organization, new needs won’t be popping up every day), data management will require a team proportional to the number of data sources and their complexity, and maintenance will often require a larger team than you think as new data becomes available, new insights are required, and new reports are requested.

Moreover, at a high-level, the five-step game plan is correct:

  1. Define the Problem (and the end goal)
  2. Identify Touch-Points (where and when the analytics should be run)
  3. Understand the Touch Points (and the restrictions and requirements they place on the analytics)
  4. Select the Right Data (since garbage in means garbage out)
  5. Run the Analytics (and validate the results)

But when you start to descend from the 30,000 foot view, the details are vastly different in the spend analysis domain (and the author even implies this when he says that the analytic needs for engineers are vastly different than the analytic needs for financiers). But Real-World Analytics is a great guide to getting the precursor foundations right.

Is Your SRM in a State of Flux? Maybe You Should Find Out!

Earlier this year we introduced you to State of Flux, a provider of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) software and services, and the initiators of the SRM Research Report which we highlighted in our 3-part series that highlighted why you should focus on essentials, plan against the pillars, and be a customer of choice.

SRM is very important because supply chain success is ultimately dependent on your supply base. Your organization can have the best marketing and packaging in the world, but if the supply base delivers products that are rubbish, your organization’s brand reputation is tainted, and the damage can well exceed even double-digit savings identified during the sourcing phase.

But it’s not easy to effectively manage supplier relationships because SRM is more than just performance monitoring and corrective action management, it’s also nurturing, development, and partnership. Furthermore, effective SRM requires quite a bit of work to get a proper framework in place (as reinforced by Sigi Osagie’s recent Procurement Mojo), which will need to be implemented while keeping the ten essentials in mind that were highlighted in State of Flux’s 2014 SRM Report (and summarized in our post on the essentials).

And it’s even harder to find out how well you are doing until, of course, a major disruption or disaster occurs when a shipment doesn’t arrive or, even worse, arrives with a 10%+ defect rate (because, otherwise, it seems like everything is hunky-dory even when the relationship is spiralling out of control). But there is a way — you can proactively participate in the 2015 State of Flux SRM Research Report and get the full results ahead of the market. You can measure yourself against your peers, find out where the market is, and get the first insights into new best practices.

You have until June 26, 2015 to complete the SRM Survey, which, this year, is focused on helping you get executive sponsorship and support for SRM. Executive sponsorship is critical because SRM needs to be viewed as an organization enabler for the required transition management program to be adopted and enforced.

While this survey will take 45 minutes of your time, the reward is infinitely more valuable than the cost. This year’s publication was one of the most comprehensive compendiums of SRM insight ever produced with 216 pages of data, results, and expert interpretation. Imagine the value that will be yours, for free, as a participant in the seventh annual study.

So, follow the hyperlink and take the 2015 SRM Survey today. Given the depth of the work consistently produced by State of Flux compared to the average analyst report, you won’t regret it!


Gettin’ Sigi With It!

My readers on the other side of the pond are probably well aware that Sigi Osagie’s Procurement Mojo has been available since late last year, but since Amazon UK had it in book form well before COM and CA, my readers on this side of the pond may not have noticed yet.

Procurement Mojo is a bit of an uncharacteristic Procurement book in that it does not attempt to teach you what Procurement is, assuming you already know how to do your job. What it attempts to teach you is explain what Procurement does, which is a critical issue that needs to be addressed since

  1. Procurement is, in many organizations, still the Rodney Dangerfield (and still don’t get no respect)
  2. And most Procurement Pros don’t know how to sell the organization on the unrealized potential that Procurement can bring

Sure this topic has been addressed in such books as Charles Dominick and Soheila Lunney’s Procurement Game Plan, but never has an entire tome been dedicated to this topic and it’s a tome that’s badly needed. (Procurement people really should get sales training because it’s often easier to sell a freezer to an Eskimo than to sell the value of a Procurement Investment to anyone in the organization.)

The reality is that in order to even get noticed, you have to first build a Procurement Brand — and building a brand, especially for something that most people would rather stay invisible, is not easy. You can’t just decide to build a brand and start tomorrow. You need frameworks, process-based enablers, platform support, and good management — and it takes time to get all of this in place. Only then can you build what Sigi calls Procurement Mojo and get your message, and value, taken seriously.

SI will be doing a more detailed review later on, but for now, be it known that if you are looking for a way to build your Procurement brand, start by gettin’ Sigi with it!

Twenty Years Ago Today

The Boeing 777 entered service as the world’s largest twinjet. This particular twinjet had a number of different variants, including the 777 Freighter which was an all-cargo version that had a payload of 103,000 kg (226,000 lbs) and a range of 9,070 km at maximum payload.

While not the capacity of the 747 200F which could handle a MTOW of 378,000 kg, which had a range of about 8,000 kms at full payload, the improved operating economics not only offered new options for long-range, lower-cost air freight.

It was yet another advance in the long line of aircraft advancements leading up to the recent 787 Dreamliner which, despite being a prime example of a supply chain fiasco, is still a technological innovation.