I’m Not Sure That I Buy That This Increases Sustainability

According to this recent blog post over on Core 77, Walmart (Canada)’s New Supercube Increases Sustainability by Designing Bigger Trucks. Working with an Ontario-based Company called Innovative Trailer Design, they have commissioned the Walmart Supercube that can hold 30% more cargo in the same footprint. By designing a truck with a squashed cab, they can increase the trailer length from 53 feet to 60 feet without increasing the overall vehicle length. Plus, they are lowering the floor of the trailer and installing a built-in scissor lift to help load the cargo into the far reaches. And they’ve even added a dromedory box that holds an additional 10% of cargo behind the cab that can be independently loaded and unloaded.

Now, technically, if there is no significant difference in fuel usage, then the trucks will be a more sustainable way to move cargo since you will now only require 3 trucks to move what used to take 4 trucks, but if the total number of trucks on the roads do not decrease, then there is no significant advantage.

Plus, more cargo = more consumption, and that’s never an argument for sustainability.

It’s a great concept, and a cool design, but I’m not sure I buy that it’s going to improve sustainability.

Some Good Advice from Hackett on Building a Better Procurement Scorecard

Supply Management is about more than cost. Much more. But it’s hard to make the point if all that you’re measured on are (soon to be very elusive) cost savings. So you need to be measured on a scorecard, preferably one that’s balanced. But what should it contain? A recent Supply Chain Brain article indicated it should focus on service. CPO Rising indicates that you should focus on categories. And SourceOne authors Bill & Joe say to focus on the balanced scorecard.

Hackett indicates that the following considerations are important

  • innovation
  • supply assurance / supply risk
  • regulatory compliance
  • working capital
  • P2P process efficiency
  • supplier diversity

and I would agree that they are all relevant to Supply Management, but what I really like is their 10 key considerations to keep in mind when developing your next scorecard that should help ensure a more holistic level of success that starts off:

  1. Align with the Business
    While most organizations have still failed to realize this fact, Supply Management is the business. Now that companies no longer make what they sell, supply management now serves the most critical function – as there is no product without it. So its critical that supply management closely align with the business and provide the business what it needs.
  2. KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid)
    When creating a scorecard, its critical to consolidate to a manageable set of metrics. Otherwise, the complexity becomes overwhelming and the utility of the tool becomes increasingly diminished . While it’s important to include all of the key contributions that supply management makes, the scorecard should only measure the key contributions that provide the organization the most value. Your organization might do 101 things, but probably only needs to report on the top 11 or 21.
  3. Compare Externally
    While not all measures need to be externally benchmarked, the organization does need to understand what the measures mean.

Check out this article on My Purchasing Center (on building a better procurement scorecard) for their other seven key considerations for developing a scorecard that will help your Supply Management organization achieve a holistic level of success.

It’s About Time You Get a Grip on Risk!

Risk management is about more than just the disclosures the auditors make your accountants put in the fine print when you release your financial statements and annual reports. And it’s more than the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of opportunities. For example, from a supply management point of view, risk management is modus operandi for supply assurity when there is an average of 250 supply chain disruptions for public companies every month. (Source) And from a profit point of view, it’s value. Less money dealing with the financial and brand fallout from a disruption is more money spent on innovation to meet customer demand.

And, as per this recent Ernst & Young post over on the Harvard Business Review blogs, it’s money in the bank. Their recent research fund that companies in the top 20% of risk (management) maturity generated three times the level of EBITDA as those in the bottom 20%. Wow!

So why is this? I think it’s due to the fact that less than 40% of companies are actively managing (supply) risk to the level they should be. In 2008, a Marsh survey found that only 35% of organizations self-reported that supply chain risk management was moderately effective at their companies. In other words, 65% of companies did not have a risk management program that was at least moderately effective. In 2011, researchers at Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Ghent University did a supply chain risk management study and found that 64% of the companies have no one responsible for managing supply chain risks! That’s essentially 0 improvement in the last three years! And while the initial introduction of a risk management program will require a significant investment of talent, it’s not that difficult, relatively speaking. As the post says, the critical factors are communication, openness, leadership, framework identification, formal methods, coordinated planning, standardized monitoring, and occasional (stress) testing of the different facets. With the right leadership and training, everyone will be able to do their part. And in the end, just like the Global 50 consumer products company highlighted, in the post, the organization will have

developed a governance structure that allows it think about risk proactively, and has aligned its risk profile and exposures more closely with its strategy. Its governance leadership group and supporting management clarified the company’s risk appetite, defined its risk universe, determined how to measure risk, and identified which technologies could best help the company manage its risks. Aligning risk to strategy, by identifying strategic risks and embedding risk management principles into business unit planning cycles, enabled the company to identify and document 80% of the risks that have an impact on performance. This alignment of risk awareness and management practices, from strategy to business operations, enabled the company to monitor risk developments more effectively. Managers could keep the organization within acceptable tolerance ranges, driving performance to plan.

So just do it. You’ll double your EBITDA in the process!

Demo Tips

the doctor has been asked a few times now by vendor reps on how to give a good demo. He’s been hesitant to address the subject beyond what is already on the FAQ regarding product reviews because this is one subject where good is in the eye of the beholder, but since he doesn’t like his time wasted when getting demos, here are his tips for giving a good demo to SI.

(01) PowerPoint is for Pansies.
Did I mention I was going to be brutally honest? You don’t demo a product with PowerPoint. EVER! Powerpoint is only for

  1. Summarizing key facts about your company.
  2. Summarizing key points about the problem domain.
  3. Summarizing key contributions of your solution.

then you get into the demo ASAP (As Soon As Possible).

(02) Off-the-Cuff is only for experts. Have planned, tested, to-the-point walkthroughs that cover the key features you want to promote.
If you just released a new version of your product that adds new auction formats, constraints or cost modelling capabilities to optimization, real-time market feed integration, etc. and that is what you want to show off – make sure you’ve tested minimal walkthroughs that display those capabilities as accurately as possible. Don’t divert from these unless asked as you don’t want to run out of time and not show off your best capabilities. And definitely don’t dilly-dally.

(03) Focus on features that are unique. Not cookie-cutter features found in a dozen competitor products.
Even if it’s new to you, it isn’t going to do anything to impress someone who’s seen it a dozen times before, no matter how flashy your UI is. And speaking of UI, this is enterprise, not consumer, so flash doesn’t get you bonus points. In fact, if the flash slows down or detracts from the process, it gets you strikes. Enterprise is about ease of use and efficiency. Unless you’ve found a way to simplify the process, avoid anything that’s considered a standard feature of the product you’re promoting.

(04) Don’t jump around the screen.
You might have fast internet, but that doesn’t mean that the person on the other end has fast internet or that the web sharing software you’re using can keep up as you jitter around the screen like a Hummingbird. Move smoothly, and slow enough for the software to keep up. If you have a habit of jittering, setup a client machine next to you so you can see what your audience sees.

(05) Have a flushed-out data-set.
Once you get through the scripted part of the demo designed to show off your product’s key feature, or significant enhancements since the last demo, the doctor is going to want to confirm that it is market ready and real. This means he’s going to want to see some random functionality, on the path of his choosing. And he’s not the only blogger who works this way. Be prepared to cater to your audience’s demand. After all, if you want a good write up, you’re going to have to keep their interest long enough for them to get enough material to write it.

(06) Have a domain expert on the call.
Preferably this person and the person giving the demo are one in the same, but if not, be sure you have someone who can answer intelligent, thoughtful, expert questions, which you are going to get if you do a good job and keep the doctor‘s attention because he is, after all, a domain expert.

(07) And, whatever you do, don’t paint an old Fiat 500 black and call it a luxury limo.
Remember that even though you can put lipstick on a pig, in the end, you still have a pig, so do not simply slap a new UI on an old product and try to pass it off as new and improved. If you haven’t improved the process or capability, or it still doesn’t really do what it needs to do to be effectively deployed, you’re not going to be able to hide this from anyone who has one eye open and half a functioning brain when it comes to technology. Trust me on this one.