Daily Archives: October 1, 2010

Why SI is Multimedia Free

It seems that the current craze in the blogsphere is to do podcasts and multimedia videos (posted on YouTube). Just about everyone’s doing it, so why isn’t SI?

Well, first of all, as my regular readers know, I’m not a lemming. I didn’t follow the spacers when they went la-la over MySpace. I didn’t follow the facers when they want stupid over Facebook. And I didn’t follow the twits when they went tweeters over Twitter. I’m not a mindless pitch-fork wielding zombie farmer who simply follows the loudest guy with the biggest burning stick. I’m capable of free thought and free expression and willing to make up my own damn mind.

But the real reason SI is multi-media free is this: I like being literate, and I assume that because you keep coming back, you do too. It’s bad enough that Twitter will make a twit out of you, demonstrated by the fact that it’s causing 30% of students to fail English competency, but if we move entirely to multimedia, it won’t be long before the majority of the population is unable to read at a high school level and becomes functionally illiterate. And that’s a fate I don’t want to share in. So I’ll stick to the written word. We’ll all be smarter for it.

Share This on Linked In

Headline From the Land of D’OH: Bypassing Proven Supply Sources Invites Unacceptable Risk

Really? I did not know that! Tell me more!

Don’t we all know this by now? Needless to say I was a little disappointed when I saw this headline in Industry Week, one of my favourite publications in recent times as they usually avoid the obvious diatribe I expect from the WSJ (and used to expect from the now deceased Purchasing) and focus on the core issue, such as how to maintain quality and proven sources of supply in tough times.

There wasn’t a single sentence in the article that I don’t think we all know by now. We know cheap often translates into poor quality, lack of service, and all too often as of late, recalls. We know that production line downtime costs tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. We know that moor Procurement needs to meet regularly with Engineering and they have to work together to maintain the necessary budget.

What we need is advice on how Procurement can stave off the incentive to “go for the lowest cost no matter what” when the top line design and production managers know that the associated costs of such a decision far outweigh the savings. We need some advice on how Purchasing can qualify the total cost and risk associated with a decision and show that “the 10% cheaper solution will in fact cost the company 10% more”. We need a discussion of cost modelling, optimization, and simulation that can be used to demonstrate the true total costs.

And when health and safety is on the line, we need the reminder that even the simplest of parts can spell disaster. Remember, it was a single O-ring that resulted in the Challenger disaster. That’s right, a single vulcanized rubber part brought down a Billion dollar piece of equipment. We can’t overlook quality, but until the cost of poor quality is quantified, uneducated business leaders will continue to do so. So let’s teach our buyers about cost modelling and optimization every chance we get. It’s the only way we’re truly going to end this view of relentless cost cutting as business as usual.