Monthly Archives: March 2012

Best Buy Experience? Not At Best Buy! Part II

Yesterday’s post recounted the recent problems that has had Best Buy in the sights of Storefront BackTalk, which include coverage of how Best Buy is “Making the Same Data Mistakes Again”, while being the latest example of a “Black Friday Fiasco”, and offering free “Wi-Fi Porn” to minors in its store. And the last story was the doozie — not only can it apparently not keep its own in-store networks secure enough to prevent porn from being displayed on HD TVs for half an hour, but when a customer asks for the manager, he’s told “You want to see the manager? You go get him. He’s over there.”.

As far as examples of bad customer service go, that’s a response that always take the cake. So, not only does their IT suck, as highlighted by their now not-so recent website update to BestBuy.ca which prevents those of us still on Mac OS X 10.6 from adding more than one item to our cart for a purchase (which we can only do if we log-in first), but their customer service, in-store and on-line leaves much to be experienced. So, not only can we buy only one product at a time (which is a great inconvenience if we want to buy five items, as this would require five separate session and purchase processes, but a cost-prohibitive inconvenience if the items are small as multiple purchases means multiple shipments which means multiple, unnecessary, shipping charges), but they don’t seem interested in doing a damn thing about it. I reported the issue back in the end of January when I first noticed it, received an e-mail saying someone would contact me within 2 days, but over a month later, still no response. I reported it again last week when I again tried to purchase more than one item (with no luck), got the same e-mail, and again no response.

But it’s their in-store customer service that takes the cake. I’ve been to the new Best Buy in Halifax exactly three times, and each time was a customer service nightmare. I’ll just describe the last visit, last week, as it was just a repeat of the problems I experienced in the first two visits, with a few extra aggravations thrown in.

This time, I went there to return an item I ordered in early February that was defective before my time ran out as I would otherwise have to deal directly with the manufacturer directly (which was not a pleasant thought given that they have been in financial and media trouble lately and were certain to be understaffed in their customer service department). Best Buy allows you to return / exchange items in-store that were ordered online and this sounded preferable than trying to deal with an agent over the phone to explain “it literally shorted out”, try to get a pre-paid shipping box, try to insure that someone actually processed the item when it was returned, etc.

So I go to the store. I explain the situation, show my on-line receipt, and ask to exchange in-store (because I know they had stock) as I only had a couple of days left before their return policy expired on the item. The rep said “sure, but you have to go back to computers and get the replacement — I can’t leave the desk”. Huh? You can’t leave or call back and get someone to get it? O.K., Fine. So I go back and ask an associate to get me the item, behind a glass door, right in front of me. First thing, “I don’t think we have any more of those”. They were right there and I was pointing at a row of three. “Oh, well, I have to go get a key.” Fine. I wait, and wait, and five-or-so minutes later notice him half way across the store talking to someone else, with obviously no interest in trying to track down someone with a key. So, I wait for another associate to become free, ask if he can help me, and note the item I want is in the case. He says sure, follows me to the product, and says “Oh, I don’t have a key for that. I’ll have to get someone behind the desk.” So I wait a few more minutes, and finally someone comes and says “What can I help you with.”. This associate should know, as I explained it to the associate that fetched him, and then again I get “Oh, I need a key. I’ll have to call the manager.” Well, I guess that’s progress as he actually called the manager, but it took three associates and over ten (10) minutes to get a product out of a case that the customer knew he wanted. Had I been trying to buy it for the first time, I would have given up and went to a different store.

But the fun didn’t stop there. The manager hands the item to the associate, who brings it to the desk, and on my return, the associate says “I can’t do this return, as the item was purchased on-line, and I haven’t been shown how to do that, I’ll have to get someone else”. Uhmm? I told the associate it was purchased online before the associate said she could do the return. Fine. Wait for another agent, who goes through most of the return process only to mumble something along the lines of “Oh, it’s above my limit, I need a manager’s authorization.” The price was clear on the receipt. So I wait again. Finally, after a few more minutes, a manager comes buy, punches in a code, and walks away. And after some stumbling (which, based upon prior experience, makes me want to swear that they didn’t train anyone on their own systems), finally completes the exchange.

And the fun didn’t stop there as I also wanted to pick up a game for my son. I should have tried the games store across the street first, but I happened to have checked the on-line system before I left and knew there were over 10 in stock when I checked the quantity reported on the website earlier that day. I go to the section where the games are, and where I believe it should be, only to find it’s not there. I ask an associate in the section as to where it is, only to hear him say “I don’t work in games. I think it should be here”. This was annoying, but not as annoying as him taking me to a section for games for a completely different console by a manufacturer. So I take him back to the section and say “It should be here, as this is where the other games are for this console, but it’s not. Where else could it be?” I’m told “if it’s not here, we don’t have any” and he walks away.

Since I couldn’t believe they’d sell 10 in a day as it was not a brand new release, and there was no sale on, I go to the back of the store, find a tablet with working Wi-Fi (which, I’m happy to report, appeared to be porn free), go to their mobile site, pull up that there are still nine (9) in the store, go back, find the associate, and tell him this. He stumbles around, fails to find it, so decides to ask the customer service desk if there are any in stock (and ignore the fact that I just checked their online system less than five minutes ago). They say yes, and when he asks where, they say they don’t know. He says I’ll have to ask someone who works in games, but that he doesn’t know if anyone’s working in games tonight. Great. So I decide to check ends of rows, displays, etc. and basically wander around until I eventually find one. Then I go to the cash, where the cashier, of all people, tells me (when she is struggling to get the security device off of a $40 game) that it would have been faster if I had just came to the cash and asked for one to be pulled out of the locked game cabinet next to the customer service desk. That’s right, the customer service agents apparently didn’t know about the game cabinet right beside them! (And this wasn’t even the most ridiculous customer service experience. On my first visit, where they didn’t know how to process an American Express card, which, as you know, has the security code on the front, and not the back, the associate also didn’t know how to listen to a customer who repeatedly tells him: “No, the security code for AMEX is on the front – you can type the numbers on the back as many times as you like, it’s not going to work”.)

So what is the lesson to be learned — it doesn’t matter how good your supply management organization does if the retail / merchandising side can’t get its act together. Because, at some point, customers will get fed up with the bad customer service and go elsewhere (as I have with most of the electronics I order on-line — I like the selection, price, and/or speed of delivery less, but it’s still less aggravating dealing with these sites). That’s why Supply Management has to make itself the go-to organization that other organizations in the company come to for advice. This is the only way that it will be able to insure that best practices are applied down the chain as well as up, as, otherwise, all of its effort to source quality product won’t mean squat when customers won’t be able to put up with the shoddy experience of trying to acquire the product and just give up entirely.

Best Buy Experience? Not At Best Buy! Part I

It would appear that Best Buy is in trouble. And not just because Storefront Backtalk has been covering one problem after another on their web site about how Best Buy is “Making the Same Data Mistakes Again”, while being the latest example of a “Black Friday Fiasco”, and offering free “Wi-Fi Porn” to minors in its store. It is in trouble because they obviously cannot get a handle on their IT, despite trying to be a major provider of computers and electronics across North America.

But first, let’s recount the problems Storefront Backtalk has already told us about.

1. They’re still living in the “Wild West” and making the same data mistakes again.

How could an organization end up with “50 or so applications running on the cloud with absolutely no governance whatsoever”? That just boggles my mind. Maybe it’s the CTO in me, but I couldn’t even imagine 5 applications running untethered on the cloud. And not just because I’m not all that fond of clouds, which do have their uses when correctly applied, but because it doesn’t matter where your applications are — they still need to be managed, backed-up, and secured. It is, or I thought it was, just good old-fashioned common sense.

2. They sold product they did not have in their latest “Black Friday Fiasco”.

Not only did Best Buy take way more orders than it could fulfill for certain items on Black Friday, but it waited until a few days before Christmas to cancel those orders. Talk about a crushing blow to a customer, who has already been charged, and who thinks that special Christmas gift they bought a special someone is on its way. And talk about an insult when, instead of refunding the purchase, you send the distraught customer a Best Buy gift card. This is definitely a violation of trust. But even worse, one might be able to argue that this is a violation of the Uniform Commercial Code as the acceptance of payment can be argued to constitute a contract, which would mean the seller (Best Buy) would be obligated to transfer and deliver under Sec. 2301 or terminate with reasonable notification under Sec. 2309. The question is whether or not terminating almost a month later after accepting payment is “reasonable”. I’ll leave that to the lawyers, but note that as if this wasn’t bad enough, even in January, they cannot say what happened. This leaves one to surmise that they have some major IT problems, and won’t own up to them, which is not a good thing in the doctor‘s book.

3. It’s inability to implement simple Wi-Fi security resulted in a South Carolina store showing pornographic images on its large-screen TVs three (3) times in twenty-four (24) hours in it’s latest “Wi-Fi Headache”.

And one time, on February 12, the images were displayed at the Greenville location to children in the store for a full 30 minutes! And Best Buy has not offered a definitive explanation as to what happened. The story was changed from “two individuals accessed our store’s wireless signal to broadcast inappropriate content on a smart television display” which would require a wi-fi hack (unless they didn’t secure it in the first place) to “accessed a product display wireless signal” which would mean that just the “smart” TV’s were hacked to receive signals directly from a mobile phone. Further details indicated that “one of the signals in our store wireless system, specifically the one for product displays, was accessed”. But was that the case when Best Buy was “inviting people to come in and select whatever they wanted on their device and show it on the big screen”. Regardless of what happened, it looks like “store management didn’t have an immediate way of halting the porn displays” and that’s a serious problem. Especially when it has still not addressed how it will prevent this problem from happening again. But the worst part of this story is when a customer subjected to the images asked to speak to a store manager, the associate told him “You want to see the manager? You go get him. He’s over there.”. When it comes to customer service, how much worse can it get?

And that’s the real problem with Best Buy, as will be elaborated tomorrow in Part II.

If The Only Budget Airline in China Can Profit In This Global Economy …

… why are North American airlines up sh*t creek with only one paddle?

Every year, another North American airline is in financial trouble, and while a bail out may not be required, usually a bankruptcy and restructuring is, or at the very least a merger (or acquisition) to increase revenue and “balance the books”. I’m a little dumbfounded. Yes, the cost of fuel is rising, as is the cost of labour, but the amount of money flowing into air travel is still near an all time high and with the increasing globalization of our society, that’s not going to change. As a result, the doctor finds it hard to believe that every major airline isn’t as profitable as a well-run bank (and given that banks, more-or-less, “mint” money, it’s pretty hard to lose money as a bank — unless you’re run by people who are the reason us IT folks invented ID 10 T errors). In 2010, only 7 of the top 10 North American Airlines were profitable, and only 3 of these made a profit margin that was respectable. While the average profit for profitable airlines was 3.46%, the average profit for the bottom 4 profitable airlines was a mere 2.06%. To put this in perspective, that was the average net profit of Grocery Stores (NAICS 4451) in Canada in 2008. Or, in other words, you’d see the same return in the lowest margin retail business on the planet as you saw in these airlines. (See the summary in the following table.)

 

Airline Passengers Revenue (2010) Net Income (2010) Profit Margin
Delta 163 M 31.78 B 593 M 1.87%
United 141 M 16.34 B -651 M -3.98%
Southwest 135 M 15.7 B 178 M 1.1%
American 106 M 22.17 B -471 M -2.12%
US Airways 60 M 11.9 B 502 M 4.22%
Air Canada 32 M 10.79 B 361 M 3.35%
Republic 31 M 2.65B -14 M -0.5%
JetBlue 26 M 4.5 B 86 M 1.91%
Alaska 25 M 3.8 B 251 M 6.6%
WestJet 20 M 2.6 B 137 M 5.2%

 

That’s why every CEO and COO of every major airline should definitely read this recent piece over on the Knowledge @ Wharton China site which provides a transcript with “Wang Zhenghua of Spring Airlines: Making a Low-Cost Strategy Fly High”. While the best North American Airline made 6.6% profit, Spring Airlines made 14.7% profit! And he made this profit in a local market dominated by state-owned heavyweights while being the only airline in China that doesn’t use the TravelSky booking service, the state-owned monopoly, to sell tickets. In the article, Wang gives away some great wisdom in the article, which is relevant not just for airlines, but transportation providers in general.

The following are some of the key points Wang makes about Spring Airlines.

Quote Wisdom
Spring Airlines has aimed to offer low fares by operating efficiently and making flying more affordable for the average Chinese traveler. Specifically Spring Airlines has a a cost that is, on average, 30% less than its peer group. Spring Airlines has recognized that the biggest market is in the middle — not the upper class or premium business traveller, as both of these are in decline, or the poor, who can’t afford to fly — and that’s where a smart, budget, enterprise focusses, especially when no one else is doing it well. (It focusses on leisure travellers and price-conscious business travellers, which are the growing markets.)
Low-cost travel is a global trend. A smart company aligns itself to mega-trends, and, when possible, adjusts for current mini-trends (which, in Spring Airlines’ case, is no extras or frills, like meals, that only add to the total cost).
[Low-cost flying] comprises 70% of the short-haul market. That’s why only 4 of Spring Airlines’ 54 flights are (long-haul) international. Don’t invest where the business is not.
Cost-conscious business travellers [are our target customers]. It’s 70% of their business and the logical focus. That’s why they launched a business economy service focussed on this customer segment that offers them food, a special shuttle for boarding, and a seat at the front of the aircraft, which they want and will pay a slightly higher price for.
The nature of this industry is that the relationship between supply and demand is changing constantly and quickly. Demand fluctuates between high and low seasons, weekdays and weekends, and even morning and evening travel. So unlike with other goods and services, consumers’ demand for air tickets fluctuates greatly. Thus, the airline industry needs a more flexible, open market approach to operate.
Some companies actually consider delaying payments — having a so-called “no interest loan” — to be an operating strength. But we never do that because we believe our credibility is our life. Credibility is all you have when times get tough, and can be the difference between life and death.
Be cautious in boom times; face the challenges in the bear times. … It’s just focus and down-to-earth, hard-core efforts that have made us what we are today. Growth doesn’t last for ever, and those that don’t realize this fact are doomed to crash with the market.
Rather than spending heavily on ads, we focus on internal management, and carrying out strict evaluations of our suppliers and running internal training programs. A focus on Talent and Transition, and not Buzz and PR. And just when I thought all trace of good business fundamentals had disappeared! Wang Zhenghua is brilliant. I wonder, could he be China’s Peter Drucker?

Supply Chain Disaster Management

Earlier this year, EBN Online ran a good article on “Managing the Variables in a Supply Chain Disaster” that outlined the basic steps a global company can use to get started on planning for a disaster.

It’s obvious, with all of the recent natural disasters, political disasters, and economic disasters, that a supply chain natural disaster is coming your way. It’s just a question of what, when, and how it is going to impact your supply chain. That’s why you need to plan. So where do you start?

According to the author, start by getting all of the departments together — IT, operations, sales, warehousing, administration, and management — to help map out the entire upstream and downstream supply network and determine where the different risk points are and what risks are most likely to materialize. And, as Jim Lawton points out in this Industry Week article on “Country Risk — What You’re Overlooking”, you have to not only focus on your suppliers and the countries they are located in (whch contribute to the political, economic, and commercial risks that are faced by your organization), but your suppliers’ suppliers and the countries they are located in.

Then run a variety of “what if” scenarios to see how the company could recover if supply is interrupted, a warehouse goes up in smoke, a supplier becomes unavailable, freight rates or tarrifs rise substantially, preferred raw materials or components get banned for regulatory reasons, or something else possible, but not predictable, happens. If there is no way to recover, something has to be done now before it’s too late for your supply chain, and maybe your entire organization. For example, if all of the company’s supply for a certain component is from South Korea, and supply from South Korea gets cut off, there would be no recovery. The company either has to find a secondary source of supply from another country, or a way to use a slightly different component to accomplish the same task.

If a moderate increase in freight rates or tarrifs would prevent the company from being able to source a raw material at a price that would allow the company to turn a profit on the finished product, then the company has to identify alternate, cheaper, transportation methods, a way to further save on raw material costs, or a way to increase the value, and thus the selling price, on the finished product. If a raw material gets banned from usage in the product the organization plans on importing into Europe, then the organization has to have a way to produce the component using a different raw material, which could require a different design or manufacturing method, which could add cost as well.

The short of the story is that disaster planning is more than just identifying the upstream supply network and more than just identifying what could go wrong, but also identifying how a recovery could be initiated if necessary.

Storytelling in Data

Today’s guest post is from Doug Hudgeon, Director of PitchMap, and a long-time Procurement blogger. Back in the day, he authored a vendor relations blog on WordPress (at hudgeon.wordpres.com) and more recently he authored the Operating Efficiency blog (at OperatingEffieciency.org), which has now been ported to the PitchMap Blog. It originally appeared on the PitchMap blog yesterday (Storytelling in Data), and is being reprinted with kind permission.

Now that we’ve introduced Pitchmap, I’m returning to topics on business operation efficiency. Today’s topic is Telling stories in data: Using data to support your arguments

Yesterday, I attended the first Australian IACCM meeting of the year. The two presenters spoke on very different topics, “Clean energy laws and carbon trading” and “Utilities Benchmarking” but both presenters were equally adept at using data to underpin their arguments. Today, data is everywhere and an effective business person must be an expert in presenting their arguments using data. In my view, there’s nothing like a story to make your audience feel that change can happen and a vision can be achieved.

Storytelling in Data

Let’s look at some Pitchmap data to show how data can be used to tell a story. This data compares the procurement processes of three companies (Salamander Logistics, Melbourne Transport and Queensland Trucking) with each other and with an optimised process. The columns in the chart show the cost per transaction: the higher the column the greater the cost per transaction. The type of transaction is shown by the label above the columns.

< image no longer available as source no longer exists >

The first story in the above data is indicated by the red arrow. It shows that Melbourne Transport is spending about the right amount on Vendor Creation processes whereas the other two companies, Salamander and Queensland, appear to be under-investing. This does not say that Melbourne Transport is doing it right, just that they are spending about the right amount on it.

The second story is indicated by the yellow arrow. The story within the data is that Melbourne is better than its peers but higher priced than optimal. Interestingly, the purple section of the column (transaction costs relating to invoice processing) is the same as the optimised process but the green section of the column (transaction costs relating to placing orders) is significantly more expensive. This indicates that Melbourne Transport should be focusing its process improvement initiatives on order placement rather than invoice processing.

The last story is highlighted by the blue arrow. Melbourne Transport and its peers are significantly more expensive than the optimised process. This should serve as a red flag in any attempt to re-engineer this process given that no one is doing it particularly well. It may well be that there is some aspect of expense processing such as regulatory requirements in this industry or geography that adds to the cost of the process and further investigation should be undertaken to ascertain whether this is so.

The keys to successful storytelling

The keys to being able to tell stories with data are four-fold:

  1. The data must be clearly displayed – preferably on one page,
  2. The data must show where you are now and where you could be (either by reference to an optimal state or comparison against your peers or benchmarks or all three),
  3. The data must be sufficiently detailed to make the story interesting, and
  4. You need to be able to dive into the details underlying the data when your assumptions are questioned.

Doing so will enable you to present a compelling picture (as in the chart above) of what needs to be changed, how it needs to be changed, and what further inquiries need to be undertaken to resolve outstanding questions.

In my next post, I’ll discuss how to collect and present variable data in a compelling manner.

Thanks, Doug!