Monthly Archives: May 2016

One Hundred and Forty Five Years Ago Today …

Saw the opening of the first rack railway in Europe (and the second in the world), the Rigi-Bahnen, which even today is the highest standard gauge railway in Europe. Located between the two arms of Lake Lucerne on the Rigi Mountains, described by Mark Twain as “the charmingest place we have ever lived in for repose and restfulness”, this could be seen as the beginning of mountain tourism in Switzerland. It’s hard getting people up a mountain, and this is an important landmark in human (and cat) logistics history.


Determine – Determined to Conquer b-pack’s Brave New World Part II

Our last post (re-)introduced you to Determine, a name you know even if it’s a name you don’t, as this provider is the successful fusion of the mature solution offerings that have been offered by Selectica since 1996 and Iasta and b-pack since 2000. We ended by noting that the new Determine platform is the platform that many sorcerers always wanted but never knew they were missing. Today we’re going to dive a little deeper into why.

Now, even though there’s not a whole lot new since SI last reviewed b-pack in its series on Taking Root in Their Brave New World (I, II, and III) or since SI last reviewed Iasta pre-acquisition (in Smart-Source Style, I, II, and III), these platforms have been integrated, their core modules have been enhanced and, most importantly, the (core) platform has a new UI that is not only easier to use than the one that b-pack had before, but is better looking to. (It was straight-forward, and there was nothing wrong with it, but parts of it looked like it was built as a Windows application and not a SaaS application.)

That being said, there are some cool new features, including:

  • Virtual Purchasing Contracts

    Good invoice and payment management requires m-way matching every invoice to at least a purchase order or contract and, if possible, a goods receipt as well. For many types of recurring payments — such as rentals, utilities, etc. — Procurement does not cut a contract and there is no Procurement record for AP to refer to when an invoice comes in. This prevents an m-way match and makes it difficult to detect duplicate, erroneous, or fraudulent invoices (and this, of course, contributes to over-payments). However, in the Determine system, you can set up recurring payment contracts and define expected payment dates along with expected amounts or ranges. Then, when an invoice comes in, it can be matched to an associated virtual contract payment, and if there is already an associated invoice, if the invoice is outside of the expected/agreed to range, or if the invoice is from a supplier without a virtual purchasing contract, it can be defined as duplicate, erroneous, or potentially fraudulent.

  • Supplier Network

    Often you know who the suppliers are you want to invite to a sourcing event, and often they are already in your Source to Pay system, but sometimes they aren’t in the system and sometimes you need to invite new suppliers that you don’t know. That’s why Determine is building a supplier network to not only help suppliers centralize their data management across multiple customers, but help buyers search for new suppliers. However, it takes time to build a supplier network so Determine comes …

  • … with TradeShift Integration

    … so that a buyer can find a new supplier “out of the box”. Tradeshift has a large global supplier network that can be used by any customer to jump-start their supplier identification and management for new sourcing events.

  • Full E-mail Approval Support

    Requisitions, purchase orders, invoices, etc. — anything that requires approval can be approved or rejected through e-mail, making it easier for buyers to get quick responses from approvers and executives who never need to log in to the system.

  • DocuSign integration

    Which allows for contracts to be created and signed electronically, eliminating the need for paper contracts (that get lost in filing cabinets), paper couriers (which can lose the contracts or fail to get them to their destination on time), and paper cuts (which are well deserved when paper is wasted).

And the following will be in the next release (end Q2 / beginning Q3):

  • Contingent Labour Management

    The b-pack platform had a very powerful catalog management system, which has recently been upgraded and extended in the Determine platform with full punch-out support to third party catalogs, and seamlessly integrates hosted catalogs and third party catalogs like any modern catalog system. It also supports standard requisition templates that allow a buyer to order merchandising (and simply specify the quantity and colors, etc. of the merchandise), bound documents (and specify the binding, paper, etc.), and other standard make-to-order products. And with the next release, it will also support embedded continent labour / service management capability where a buyer can search for resources with select skills, request a time of service, and send it off to one or more organizational contingent labour suppliers under contract (or create a requisition that will be fired off to the appropriate buyer for a sourcing event).

  • Workflow Driven Dynamic Questionnaires

    At present, the platform has standard workflows for new supplier registration, RFX creation, and so on, but these simply present pre-made questionnaire and forms to the user. As of the next release, the questionnaires will by fully dynamic and buyers and suppliers will only see the questions and information they need to see based upon their answer to current questions and their industry, product, service, etc.

  • Universal Action Plans

    One of the unique offerings of the b-pack platform was action plans, mainly used for corrective action plans in supplier management. In the next release, buyers will be able to create action plans for any process — including sourcing, procurement, and supplier development — manage them, and even tie them to appropriate metrics (built on the relevant platform master data).

And within a year Determine plans to have the Iasta platform native and all of the relevant CLM functionality native on the core b-pack platform, so not only will everything be off of one Master Data Management store, but one seamless user interface as well. And given the rapid pace at which they’ve integrated and extended the core platform so well, you can be sure that as long as Determine is determined, this will happen. In short, if you’re looking for a new S2P platform, this to know provider should definitely be on your short list.

For a deeper dive into the new Determine platform, watch for the two-part Pro coverage by the doctor and the prophet, coming soon on Spend Matters Pro (membership required).

Determine – Determined to Conquer b-pack’s Brave New World Part I

Determine is one of those companies that is a name you know even if it’s a name you don’t know (and a name you should know as it’s a 50/50 company with the doctor‘s seal of approval). It’s a name you don’t know because it didn’t exist until 4th Quarter last year. But it’s a name you should know as it is essentially the merger of the Selectica (founded 1996), Iasta (founded 2000), and b-pack (founded 2000) solutions into one cohesive whole (and not just a Frankenstein solution patched together when one company acquires two others).

Understanding that a true CLM-enhanced Source-to-Pay solution is only valuable if it is one solution that empowers one process based on one workflow, the first thing that the new company did was standardize on one platform — namely, the b-pack platform — and the next thing it did was figure out how to integrate the other two solutions on that platform. Since the b-pack platform is, at it’s core, a business process oriented workflow platform with native Master Data Management capabilities, and not a PO or invoice-driven e-Procurement platform with workflow kludged in as an afterthought, Determine was able to quickly accomplish two things:

  • Convert the Iasta Sourcing platform into an “app” on the b-pack platform
  • Rebuild and integrate all of the core CLM IP from Selectica they were missing native on the b-pack platform

which means that

  • even though you have to load the Iasta app to do your full-featured sourcing events that go beyond simple RFX and include powerful auctions, SRM, and strategic sourcing decision optimization (Iasta is one of the six sourcing samurai), all of the data is stored in the central MDM repository in the Determine core, which means it is 100% available when you start the contracting and/or ordering process (and, similarly, all historical data is instantly available in the Iasta app)
  • even though some more advanced (nice-to-have) features from CLM are still missing, there is sufficient functionality (or workarounds) to meet over 80% of CLM needs (for example, native editing and redlining is not yet integrated, but Word versioning is 100% integrated, which is the solution the Legal team wants anyway)

And the core business process workflows have been extended to cover the end to end sourcing lifecycle as well as the end to end purchasing cycle from both a line item and business object perspective (you can trace a line item all the way from initial sourcing and forward to final return and disposal and you can trace the entire history of each contract, purchase order, invoice etc.).

Plus, all of the unique, non-standard, features of the b-pack platform have been maintained and as soon as an organizational asset has been purchased, an asset record to track the lifecycle of that piece of equipment, software license, or IP can be created (and custom managed by asset type); as soon as inventory appears, appropriate inventory records are created (and pushed to the ERP and/or [W]IMS solution as necessary); as soon as a vehicle is acquired or leased, an appropriate entry in the native (or integrated) FMS (Fleet Management System) is created, and so on. The platform not only enables a true source-to-sink source-to-pay process, but also recognizes that acquisitions and artifacts of the source-to-pay process are the starting points of other business processes and supports those as well. It’s the platform that many sourcerors always wanted but never knew they were missing.

And we’ll tell you more about it in Part II.

Procurement Is Dead! Long Live Procurement! Part IV

Mr. Smith is right. Procurement is dead. It was doomed, entombed, marooned on a desert island, and passed away peacefully in the night long after everyone had forgotten about it. It’s dead and buried. And you should thankful that the Romans closed the door on the Egyptian Empire’s burial chamber or you would have been buried with it.

And, as we explained in painful detail in Part II, there is no more need for a purchaser. Like video killed the radio star, the internet killed the purchaser. And good riddance too. The innovations that led to the purchaser’s demise are far superior than even the John Henry of purchasing could ever be.

Procurement is Dead!

But with the death of every monarch, a new monarch is appointed.

Long Live Procurement!

A new age is coming, and Procurement will lead this new age. But it won’t be the Purchasing of old where catalog buyers sat in dark rooms ordering widgets and sprockets, processing mountains of paper, sending requests by fax, and comparing results in lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheets on MS DOS.

It will be the Procurement of new where senior analysts equipped with actionable intelligence make decisions that not only reduce costs, but increase quality and reliability across product and service lines and, moreover, increase the value with each decision made.

These senior analysts will amalgamate market intelligence from raw material and commodity markets (food stuffs, metals, petroleum, etc.), credit and risk providers (Dunn & Bradstreet, Bureau van Dijk, CreditSafe), CSR providers (Ecovadis and Sedex Global), third party auditors, and so on; integrate this data into extensive cost and risk models; and then compare them across suppliers to determine the real cost of each product and supplier from an organizational perspective now, 12 months ago, and with reasonable certainty, what it will likely be in 12 months. They will be able to make decisions that balance cost, risk, and quality, and also take supplier innovation into account.

But this is just one thing that these senior analysts will do. Because they will also have deep insight into best practices and processes across the supply chain, they will also have deep insight into best practices and processes that can help each organizational unit. Not only will they have insight into buying office supplies, and sending out RFPs for custom manufactured products, but they will have deep insight into best practices for

  • Marketing Spend Management
    their insight into production can be levied into managing both print runs and media production
  • Human Resources
    as their insight into services management can be extended into managing temporary labour
  • Legal
    discovery services, standard contracts, and market intelligence are similar to specialized HR services, other market intelligence services, and standard publication acquisition
  • Warehousing
    as their total cost modelling capability will be just as applicable to modeling the operating cost breakdown of a warehouse as it is to modelling the production cost breakdown of a super widget
  • etc.

These analysts will do more than just send out simple RFQs and make simple purchasing decisions. They will define category, supplier, and even supply chain strategies and execute them strategically — starting with spend and value-based analysis, continuing with the collection of the right supplier and product information, followed by the right bidding and award strategy for the situation at hand (be it multi-Round RFX, e-Auction, re-negotiation with incumbent, etc.), which could even include a supply chain redesign, and concluding with a contract-based award to one or more suppliers that will be managed through the lifecycle of the contract. No more set it and forget it. Milestones for certificates, certifications, and reviews will be set and completed. Purchase orders will be regularly reviewed for completeness, correctness, and appropriate responses. Performance will be monitored and, if necessary, corrective action plans put in place and executed. Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) with strategic suppliers will take a front seat. Tactical processes and data collection will be automated as much as possible so that only exceptions will be addressed as needed and more time will be available for education, best practice improvements, supplier, and Procurement development and improvement.

Procurement will listen to the needs of the key stakeholders, synthesize them into a cohesive whole, and insure they align with the goals of the business to make sure that the right purchase — not the lowest cost or most readily available — is made every time. They will be strategic leaders that lead the way vs. tactical soldiers that just execute last year’s market plan. And they will generate more value than was ever generated simply by taking 5% (or 10%) off the top.

And we will continue to describe the tools, technologies, methodologies, and innovations that Procurement will use to form a new Procurement to replace the purchasing that has finally been entombed like the pharaohs of old.

Procurement is dead! Long Live Procurement!

Procurement Is Dead! Long Live Procurement! Part III

In Part II we left of noting that not only is Mr. Smith right and Procurement really dead, having passed away peacefully in the night long after everyone had forgotten about it, it’s dead and buried with the radio star (because Video Killed the Radio Star) 6 feet under. The internet has killed the purchaser just like the industrial revolution laid waste to the armorer, blacksmith, glassblower, and dozens of other occupations.

But I’m sure you’re all shocked that in yesterday’s argument we left out the most important fact of all about the purchaser:

He could process a mountain of paperwork that instills fear and loathing in even the most die-hard career AP clerk.

Paper? Who cares! The only paper (not counting the unnecessary printing of e-mails by managers who can’t read on the screen) any organization with a modern platform needs is the signed contract in jurisdictions that still need ink on the page to recognize a contract. Modern platforms take requisitions from anyone in the organization, allow a buyer to flip them into a purchase order to the under-contract or awarded supplier, allow the suppliers to flip them into invoices when the goods have been issued, queue the invoices for processing upon goods receipt from the warehouse, auto-match the invoice to the goods receipt and the PO, and if everything matches (or is within pre-defined parameters), send it to AP for (pre) approved payment (who make an ACH to your bank account). No paper required.

And while we recognize that, historically, up to 15% of invoices will come in with errors and the exceptions need to be processed even in e-form, the reality is that modern rules-based workflow driven cloud-based m-way match system will auto-detect (and sometimes auto-correct) the discrepancies, flip them back to the supplier for correction (or acceptance), and then, when they are correct (or at least within pre-defined tolerances), send them to AP for (pre-approved) (automated) payment. Since most suppliers will correct an (honest) error, and since most omissions (PO Number, address, routing number, etc.) can be filled in with corresponding documents, at the end of the day, less than 2% of invoices will need to be manually processed.

When you look at all of the innovations the internet has given us, not only is there no need for a purchaser, there’s no desire for his resurrection either. After all, it’s so much better to be able to find any product you could ever need with a single search at any time and have it within one business day then it was to have to wait. In the old days, if you discovered at 6 pm on a Friday you needed a part Monday, and the purchaser had already left for the weekend, what could you do? Typically nothing. Today, you do an internet search, place an order, request expedited same-day shipping, it ships out first thing Monday morning, and you have it late Monday afternoon. Maybe you are a day late in delivery, but if you had to wait for the purchaser to return, get his attention, maybe he gets the order in Tuesday and maybe you have the part Wednesday. And today, if you really have to have it now, you can order it Friday night, request special courier shipping on Saturday, finish the product on Sunday, and still make the Monday morning deadline. (It will cost more, but it can be done.)

And who would give up the automated m-way matching? It used to be that a large organization needed a roomful of AP clerks to process the 20K to 40K invoices it got a month, and even then it could only verify 10% of them 100%, leading to an average overspend (on overpayments, duplicate payments, and fraudulent payments) of 1.5% to 3%. Today, all invoices are processed 100% in real time, missing data is automatically appended, and erroneous invoices are flipped back to the supplier (with explanations of errors and acceptable corrections) … leaving less than 2% to be manually processed by a junior clerk who can get through all of them.

The purchaser is no longer needed.

Procurement is Dead!

But with Procurement’s death, we have a new beginning.

Long Live Procurement!

To Be Continued.