Category Archives: Sustainability

Supply Risk Management Can Not Be Siloed

In our post on Playing With Fire, we indicated that your supply chain was full of hidden risks, ready to materialize unexpectedly at a moment’s notice and bring your supply chain to a crippling halt as your bank account bleeds dry trying to deal with the damage. Risks that, in many cases, could be mitigated and prevent the organization suffering and, in some cases, losing 100 Million to fines alone.

Why? Because the average organization is not spending the time and resources required to properly manage risk, or if they are, they are not managing risk appropriately. There are a number of reasons for this, including:

  • Lack of Resources
    most organizations do not have enough people with the right expertise to effectively manage and monitor supplier sustainability efforts, and sometimes this is because there just isn’t the budget for the resources
  • Lack of Time
    most of the skilled resources in an organization barely have the time to do their jobs properly, and since risk management is hardly ever anyone’s primary job, it typically becomes a side issue
  • Lack of Immediacy
    even though there may have been hundreds of smaller incidents in the supply chain that resulted in small fines, unexpected cost increases, disruptions, and minor brand damage, if no single incident has been severe enough to get the C-Suite’s attention, something else will always be higher priority
  • Lack of Cohesion
    most risk management and sustainability efforts grow organically over time as different functions encounter risks, regulations, or sustainability objectives that need to be addressed — this results in a fragmented approach to risk management that is inefficient and ineffective

But regardless of the reason, fragmented risk management does not work. It’s the biggest reason that many organizations are losing millions, if not billions, of dollars a year due to supply chain incidents (that could have been caught or significantly reduced with effective supplier management). With every department running off in their own direction, no one knows what is, and is not, being done. And that’s a problem. But it’s one that can be addressed. How?

Check out Sourcing Innovation’s latest white-paper on Why Sustainable Supply Risk Management Cannot Be Siloed: Lessons From Leaders Who Beat the Odds, sponsored by Ecovadis, for the answer.

Environmental Sustentation 18: Natural Disasters

Natural Disasters are on the rise. The rapid rise to be exact. As per a 2011 publication from THINK Executive, the number of disasters between the 1970s and 1990s occurring worldwide tripled. But as if this was not bad enough, it is predicted that both natural and man-made disasters will increase five times in the next fifty years. Ouch!

Something bad is going to happen. And it’s going to seriously disrupt your supply chain. Are you ready?

Probably not. But regardless of the natural disaster, these tried-and-true techniques can help you survive the next earthquake, hurricane, tsunami, volcanic eruption, or ice storm.

1. Dual Source from remote regions.

That way if a crop or factory in a region is destroyed, you can switch to the alternate source.

2. Maintain visibility down to raw materials for key products.

This way if something happens that affects a supplier’s supplier, you will have early warning and can make plans to switch sources, or help a supplier find an alternate source of supply.

3. Continually investigate alternate designs that require less of raw materials in limited supply.

The less you are dependent upon that one rare earth supplier in China or petroleum based products, the better you will be.

4. Invest in your own renewable energy source.

Should the main grid be overloaded and go down or be destroyed, having your own renewable energy source that your own engineers can maintain can help.

We know you’ve heard this a hundred times, but there’s a reason for that. These techniques are among the few that can be used to prepare for, and deal with, any natural disaster that considerably disrupts part of your supply chain.

Failure to Monitor a Supply Chain for Risk Can Tarnish Your Brand

In our last post on Playing With Fire: Hidden Risks in Your Supply Chain, we discussed how your supply chain is filled with hidden risks which can bleed your bank account dry and bring your supply chain to a screeching halt if they rise up and rear their ugly head.

But they can do more than bleed the bank account and stop your supply chain in its tracks, they can tarnish your brand and cause permanent damage to your company. A recent study by CIRANO found that while there is an 80% chance of a company losing at least 20% of its value at least once during a five year period as a result of a negative, but well publicized, incident, a major incident that negatively impacts the brand in a significant way can be much worse. Just ask Airbus that had its stock plummet by over 26% in a single day, equivalent to a market capitalization loss of approximately €5.4 Billion, after it announced on the close of trading on June 13, 2006 that issues with the supply and installation of electrical harnesses would lead to a further six-month delay in the delivery of the A380 (and that the impact of the disruption on earnings before interest and tax would be €500M per year for four years).

Or ask BP, which, as a result of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill when the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded on April 20, 2010, saw its stock price fall by 52% in 50 days. Ouch!

But it’s not just supply delays or disasters that cause loss of brand value. It’s reported violations of clean air, water, energy and other environmental acts that get environmentally conscious consumers to boycott your products after environmental activists get up in arms. It’s poor treatment, or even discrimination of, a class of people that can also get a company in trouble. If your supplier is known to regularly subject its employees to unfit working conditions and violate wage acts, that’s a problem. If a CXO regularly goes on record speaking out against minority groups’s rights (include the LGBTQ community or immigrants), that’s a problem. And if there are investigations of corruption, that’s a big problem.

It’s more than just environmental non-compliance risks that you have to watch out for. To find out more, check out Sourcing Innovation’s latest paper on Playing With Fire – 4 Hidden Risks Lurking in Your Supply Chain, sponsored by Ecovadis to find out the major categories of risk you need to watch out for, some major impacts of each type of risk, and just how many zeros they could take off the end of your bank account.

Environmental Sustentation 15: Waste, RoHS, & WEEE

As per our damnation post, waste, dangerous chemicals, and unnecessary disposal is bad and legislation that requires waste to be minimized, dangerous chemicals to be avoided, and perfectly good materials to be reclaimed is good — unless new legislation comes in faster than your supply chain can keep up.

And while the US may not be as advanced as the EU in terms of legislation to this effect, some states, like California, are making a push for a plethora of new legislation and some countries, once expected to be behind the times in such legislation, are now attempting to lead the way (like India and China which are considering much more restrictive environmental legislation akin to European RoHS than one ever thought they would consider).

More legislation is coming, and your product supply chains are going to be hit hard if you are unprepared. Getting a good bill of materials system in place, a better trade document management system, and an online collaborative design solution, as discussed in our damnation post, is a good start, but it’s not enough. In addition to the basics, in order to maintain compliance with the ever increasing amount to environmental legislation in effect, and coming into effect, around the globe, the organization also needs:

1. Drill-down Bill of Materials Capability

A complete bill of materials is a good start, but many items will be components, made of subcomponents, each of which uses a number of sub-subcomponents and raw materials. Complete drill down visibility is needed to ensure 100% compliance with environmental legislation.

2. Regulatory Compliance Monitoring (by product by country)

So that the organization knows at all times the requirements for each product by country as well as any restrictions or bans for each component or raw material by country.

3. CSR Monitoring

This is the best way to get early warning of current issues and future legislation coming down the pipe. You don’t want to know about a new piece of legislation that is going to require a partial (or complete) raw material formulation the day after it is signed into law, which could only give you a few months to get in compliance, but the day it is first drafted and released for public consultation (or, if drafted in private, first brought to a legislative body for review). To stay ahead of the game, you have to get ahead of the pack.

4. Design for Sustainability

All new designs should not only use as few hazardous or restricted substances as possible, but should also use as many renewable, or at least abundant, resources as possible. Sustainability is the name of the game, as environmental sustainability is becoming a key component of business sustainability.

5. Design for Reclamation and Reuse

Metals and rare earth minerals are becoming in increasingly short supply, but, when a product is appropriately designed, becoming increasingly easier to reclaim. Plus, in many complex systems, not all parts wear out at the same rates, and if the system is designed for component-based upgrades, it can be used, and re-used, for a much longer lifespan. (The same way that servers designed for memory, storage, and processor upgrades can be used twice as long as integrated laptops.) Or, components with a significant life-span left, can be easily extracted and re-used in refurbished systems.

This is not necessarily everything that can be done, but it’s a great start, and when you get there, you will be considerably in the lead.

Playing With Fire: Hidden Risks Lurking in Your Supply Chain

Modern supply chains are fraught with risk that can result in volatility and increased operational costs, large and sometimes devastating losses, and long term damage to the corporate reputation. These risks can be organized into four major categories, but non-compliance risks alone, the first category, should be more than enough to scare you.

Of the four major categories of risk, the costs of non-compliance risk is often the easiest to quantify, and the corresponding price tag of regulatory violations alone can be enough to halt a supply chain in its tracks as the bank account is bled dry.

Corresponding costs can range from the $3.0M, $3.19M, and $4.95M fines from the recent settlements by Washakie Renewable Energy, ExxonMobil, and Noble Energy for violations of the energy policy, clean water, and clean air acts, respectively through the 13.2M settlement by Lumber Liquidators for violating the Lacey Act to the $81.6M in fines that Wal-Mart had to pay in 2013 for the mishandling of products that became damaged or were returned and became hazardous waste, of which $60M was a result of violations to the Clean Water Act and $14M was a result of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide (FIFRA) violations.

But environmental acts aren’t the only acts that can result in large fines. There are also worker’s rights acts, where even simple filing errors can cost over 1M, as Abercrombie & Fitch found out when they were fined $1,047,110 for numerous technology-related deficiencies in the company’s electronic I-9 system.

And while most violations of worker’s rights law or filing requirements are rather small, the violations could increase now that anti human-trafficking and modern slavery laws are popping up that can hold your organization responsible for any violation of these laws anywhere in your supply chain, even if the infraction is caused by the supplier to the supplier of your supplier.

But these fines will still likely dwarf the fines being levied by the US Department of Justice for violations of the FCPA – Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In 2014, the average fine for a violation was $156.6 Million, and this included a $772 Million penalty to Alstom, the second largest penalty in history.

But this is just one set of risks with an associated cost that can bleed the bank account dry and effectively cripple a global supply chain. If you would like to know what the others are, watch for Sourcing Innovation’s latest paper on Playing With Fire — 4 Hidden Risks Lurking in Your Supply Chain (coming soon), sponsored by Ecovadis.